LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Public.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thermal Control Subsystem Passive Techniques Paints – White and Black Multi-layered Insulation 15 layers Betacloth, aluminized Kapton Dacron Netting, Kapton.
Advertisements

Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
1 Pacific International Science Center for Exploration Systems (PISCES) Conference – Nov 12, 2008 Commercial Lunar Business Perspectives John Kohut Chief.
Mars Rovers. Rover Details A rover is a machine that scientists use to explore the planets in our Solar System. They also use rovers to collect minerals.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
A Polar Volatiles Laboratory A. Smith, R. A. Gowen, I. A. Crawford Shackleton Crater ESA Smart-1.
MAE 491/492 Integrated Product Team Design Examples Bringing the Real World into the classroom.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel 3/26/09 Structures and Thermal Lunar Descent Phase Lander Integration Lander Thermal Control (Day) Kelly Leffel Structures.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Australian Centre for Space Photonics Andrew McGrath Anglo-Australian Observatory.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Mysteries of Earth and Mars Mars Facts and Exploration.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
Challenging Environment
MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 1 Welcome MER Parachute DeceleratorSystem Preliminary Design Review.
Alternatives Concepts White Paper IPT 02E. Project Management The University of Alabama Huntsville Team LeaderEddie Kiessling StructuresNathan Coffee.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
November 30, 2006 Space Telescope Science Institute Conference Scott “Doc” Horowitz Associate Administrator NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.
Engineering Means having to deal with failure Missions to Mars as an example of try, try, try again…
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Public.
1 Nori Laslo Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory A NASA Discovery Mission.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel 3/0509 Structures and Thermal Lunar Descent Phase Lander Integration Lander Thermal Control Kelly Leffel Structures and.
ASTRONOMY 340 FALL October 2007 Class #9. Salient Martian Features  R Mars = 3396 km (R Earth = 6378 km)  Higher surface area to mass ratio 
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
5 th IPPW, Bordeaux, June 25-99, 2007 Kinetic Micro-Penetrators For Exploration Of Solar System Bodies. R. Gowen & A. Smith, MSSL/UCL.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Mars Exploration Rover MER Surface Lifetime Presented at Landing Site Selection Workshop #3 March 26-28, 2002 J. Matijevic 3/28/02.
1 Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) Baseline Design Presentation 1/31/08.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
Alternatives Concepts White Paper IPT 02E. Project Management The University of Alabama Huntsville Team LeaderEddie Kiessling StructuresNathan Coffee.
Titan Saturn System Mission Workshop - Paris, Mar 17-19, 2008 MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for Enceladus Titan Saturn System Mission Workshop - Paris, Mar 17-19,
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
Final Report on LOW Design Maximizing Science While Minimizing Single Point Failure.
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Questions.
Mars - The Red Planet Image Courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Laplace Meeting - Frascati, April 2008 MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for Europa MSSL/UCL UK Professor Andrew Coates on behalf of UK Penetrator Consortium.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) Customer Briefing LETS go to the Moon!
EGU Conference,Vienna, April15, 2008 An Update to MoonLITE Lunar Mission Rob Gowen, MSSL/UCL On behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium + international.
Thermal Control Subsystem
Apollo 50 Lunar Mission Concept Goal: Initiate a series of lunar campaign missions, inspired by Apollo 11, to explore the potential of the Moon for science.
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Questions.
0 Space Exploration and International Cooperation Gilbert R. Kirkham Office of External Relations June 2004.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Night and Lander Power System Adham Fakhry February 26th, 2009 Power Group Lunar Descent Phase Passive Thermal Control for Lunar.
LETS Phase 2 Review 3/6/08. Agenda Team Introduction Overview of Design Process Initial Mass and Power Budgets Trade Tree and Trade Study Concept Overviews.
Solar Orbiter EUS: Thermal Design Progress Bryan Shaughnessy, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Solar Orbiter EUV Spectrometer Thermal Design Progress Bryan.
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) Team Frankenstein Phase 2 Presentation 3/6/08.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Mars eccentricity = Mass = 0.11 MEarth
Technical Resource Allocations
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS)
Daedalous Payload Basic Requirements for Single Site Science Box:
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS)
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08.
Thermal Control Subsystem
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS)
Final Report on LOW Design
Communications Rover Penetrators Parabolic Dish Reflector
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Public Outreach Questions

Team LunaTech Nick Case, Project Manager Morris Morell, Systems Engineer Travis Morris, GN&C Greg Barnett, Thermal Systems Adam Garnick, Power Systems Katherine Tyler, Power Systems Tommy Stewart, Structures and Mechanisms Julius Richardson, Conops John Grose, Payload and Communications Adam Fanning, Communications Eric Brown, Technical Editor

Partners Mobility Concepts –Southern University Robert Danso McArthur Whitmore Sample Return Vehicle Design –ESTACA Julie Monszajin Sebastien Bouvet

CDD Requirements Landed Mass kg 1 st mission landing site is polar region Design must be capable of landing at other lunar locations Minimize cost across design Launch Date NLT September 30 th 2012 Mobility is required to meet objectives Survivability ≥ 1 year Lander/Rover must survive conops. The mission shall be capable of meeting both SMD and ESMD objectives. The lander must land to a precision of ± 100m 3 sigma of the predicted location. The lander must be capable of landing at a slope of 12 degrees (slope between highest elevated leg of landing gear and lowest elevated leg) The lander shall be designed for g-loads during lunar landing not to exceed the worst case design loads for any other phase of the mission (launch to terminal descent).

Daedalus Lander 1.The Need 2.The Mission 3.The Solution

Daedalus Lander Simple, Adaptable, Autonomous Lander Solar Cell and Li-Ion Battery Power Semi-passive Thermal System Ka-Band and UHF Communications System Lunar Penetrator Exploration System (LPES) “Fire and Forget”

Daedalus Heritage Structure based on Viking Lander Communication based on MER Power System based on Mars Phoenix & Venus Express DSMAC Technology for GN&C based on Cruise Missile

Daedalus Mass Statement

Concept of Operations

LPES Payload Micro-Seismometers Impact Accelerometer and Tilt Sensors Heat Flow Probe Geochemistry Package Water/Volatiles Detector Design Requirements Year Lifetime Impact Velocity: ~350 m/s Impact Force: ~4500 G’s Impact Depth: 1~2 m Scatter Distance: 500 m Penetration Web ESTIMATED PENETRATOR SIZE Length: 480mm to 600mm Diameter: 60mm Estimated Mass: 14kg LPES 22 Penetrators 16 Launched into Shackleton Crater 6 Launched into Lighted Region Spring-Loaded Ejection System

Daedalus Science Basic Requirements for Single Site Science Box: Determine Lighting conditions every 2 hours over the course of one year Study Micrometeorite flux Observe Electrostatic dust levitation and its correlation with lighting conditions

Daedalus Power Lithium Ion Batteries –Total of 9 Sony 1860HC –Total mass of kg –Total Volume of ft^3 Solar Cells –Total of 3 Gallium Arsenide Panels –Total mass of 46 kg –Total Surface area of ft^3 –Total Power of 937 Watts Power Regulation and Control –6 Auxiliary Power Regulators. 2 per Solar Cell –1 Battery Charge/Discharge Regulator per battery –ON Semiconductor LM350 Positive Voltage Regulators –STM Microelectronix ST0269 Digital Signal/Microprocessor –Crydom CMX60D10 Solid State Relays

Daedalus Thermal Passive Systems Paints- White and Black MLI Blankets –15 Layers, Betacloth, Aluminized Kapton Thermal Switches –Diaphragm Thin Plate Switch High Conductance Cold Plate Active Systems Solid-State Controlled Heaters Variable Radioisotope Heater Units –50 Units Provide about 50 W of Heat Variable Conductance Heat Pipes –Aluminum with Ammonia Working Fluid

GN&C Provides Completely Autonomous Landing sequence Very Precise landing location Landing location determined before launch Hazard Avoidance Objective: To deliver Daedalus from 5km altitude safely and accurately to the lunar surface

Daedalus Communications Earth Receiver and Transmitter Lunar Penetrators LRO Penetrators to LRO using UHF Data Rate: 2 Kbps LRO to Earth using Ka-band Data Rate: 100 Mbps Daedalus to LRO using Ka-Band Data Rate: 100 Mbps View Time: 1 Hour per Day (approx) Daedalus

Daedalus Structures To simulate loads experienced at landing a 8200 Newton load was applied to the foot of the leg assembly. These loads were then transferred to the chassis Results indicate the minimum Factor of Safety is 1.15

Daedalus Structures To simulate loads experienced at takeoff a Newton load was applied to the payload adapter ring Results indicate the minimum Factor of Safety is 1.3

Daedalus Performance Figures of MeritGoalDaedalus Number of surface objectives accomplished 15 Samples in permanent dark and 5 samples in lighted terrain 16 Samples in permanent dark and 7 samples in lighted terrain Percentage of mass allocated to payload Higher is better40% of Dry Mass Ratio of objectives (SMD to ESMD) validation 2 to to 1 Efficiency of getting data in stakeholders hands vs. capability of mission Higher is better83.5 % Percentage of mass allocated to power system Lower is better14% of Dry Mass Ratio of off-the-shelf hardware to new development hardware Higher is better1.67 to 1

Daedalus Vision Mariner 7 & 9 Viking 1 & 2 Mars Global Surveyor Mars Pathfinder 2001 Mars Odyssey Mars Express Orbiter Mars Exploration Rovers Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Mars Phoenix Lander Mars Science Laboratory Present Mars Exploration Roadmap

Daedalus Vision Proposed LPRP Timeline Using Daedalus LCS (2011) LCROSS (2008) LRO (2008) Daedalus I (2012) Daedalus II (2014)

Daedalus Vision Daedalus I Mission to Shackleton Crater Lunar South Pole Reconnaissance achieved by LPES Single Site Science Conducted Daedalus II Return Mission to Shackleton Crater Further Investigation based on LPES findings Robotic Rover and Sample Return Vehicle Capability

Daedalus Vision Provide a basic, yet powerful and adaptable Lunar Exploration Transportation System Build upon the design practices and valuable data collected Evolve the Daedalus to accomplish each mission Provide a Low-Cost Solution for LPRP This is the Vision for Daedalus…. and the Mission of LunaTech

Public Outreach Union Hill School May 8, th Grade Presentation about the Moon, LPRP and Daedalus Launch a Model Rocket

Questions

Thermal Backup 1

Thermal Backup 2

Thermal Backup 3

Thermal Backup 4

Thermal Backup 5

Thermal Backup 6