1. LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

2. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Subsystem Overview
Concept of Operations
Daedalus Performance
Daedalus Vision
Questions

3. Team LunaTech Nick Case, Project Manager
Morris Morell, Systems Engineer
Travis Morris, GN&C
Greg Barnett, Thermal Systems
Adam Garnick, Power Systems
Katherine Tyler, Power Systems
Tommy Stewart, Structures and Mechanisms
Julius Richardson, Conops
John Grose, Payload and Communications
Adam Fanning, Communications
Eric Brown, Technical Editor

4. Partners Mobility Concepts Sample Return Vehicle Design
Southern University
Robert Danso
McArthur Whitmore
Sample Return Vehicle Design
ESTACA
Julie Monszajin
Sebastien Bouvet

5. Daedalus Lander

6. Daedalus Lander

7. Concept of Operations

8. Daedalus LPES

9. Daedalus Thermal

10. Daedalus Power

11. Daedalus GN&C

12. Daedalus Communications

13. Daedalus Performance Figures of Merit Goal Daedalus
Number of surface objectives accomplished
15 Samples in permanent dark and 5 samples in lighted terrain
16 Samples in permanent dark and 6 samples in lighted terrain
Percentage of mass allocated to payload
Higher is better
40% of Dry Mass
Ratio of objectives (SMD to ESMD) validation
2 to 1
Efficiency of getting data in stakeholders hands vs. capability of mission
Redundant Communication
Percentage of mass allocated to power system
Lower is better
17% of Dry Mass
Ratio of off-the-shelf hardware to new development hardware

14. Proposed LPRP Timeline Using Daedalus
Daedalus Vision
Proposed LPRP Timeline Using Daedalus
LRO
(2008)
LCROSS
(2008)
LCS
(2010)
Daedalus I
(2012)
Daedalus II
(2014)

15. Daedalus Vision
Starting with a basic, yet powerful and adaptable lander; building on the good design practices and valuable data will allow the Daedalus concept to evolve with each lunar mission and provide a low-cost solution for the Lunar Precursor Robotic Program. This is the Vision of Daedalus, and the mission of Team LunaTech.

16. Questions