ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mt. Diablo Unified School District

Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :

ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) Reading and Mathematics 2012 Carolyn Wood, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and.

North Mason School District September 2, ◦ District 4 th and 5 th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. ◦ District 4 th grade Writing.

Watertown Public Schools Assessment Report 2009 Ann Koufman-Frederick & WPS Administrative Council School Committee Meeting December 7, 2009 Part I MCAS,

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.

Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.

New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Recommendations for Change June 1, 2011.

A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.

Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting

Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?

ANNUAL 2013 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.

Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments

Fresno Systemic Program National Science Foundation USP Mid-point Review and Accomplishments February 10, 2003 Fresno Schools – Making A+ Difference For.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.

MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.

Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Florida’s K-12 Education: The Next Generation Presented by: Dr. Frances Haithcock.

1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.

Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.

Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.

MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.

1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.

SPECIAL EDUCATION LITERACY (SPEL) Ronda Hilbert, Special Education Literacy Coach.

2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.

Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.

Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.

Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.

Swampscott Elementary Schools MCAS Results Grade 3 ELA Performance Level Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,

Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.

Accountability Goals September 2014 Bristol Public Schools.

1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016

Nova Classical Academy

Marshall Public Schools Assessment Update

Smarter Balanced Assessment Results

Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Danvers Public Schools: Our Story

Starting Community Conversations

Glen Ridge District Testing Report

November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather

Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation

Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation

Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation

Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation

Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation

Denville Township Parent Academy for Student Success (PASS) NJ Student Learning Assessment (NJSLA) Informational Webinar March 18, 2019 Presented by.

History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

District Assessment Report

Presentation transcript:

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT

What is Evident? 2 Work is Needed – Overall Scores are Below DFG and State Scores Some Positive Signs There are Achievement Gaps Among Subgroups and Schools There are Subgroups with High Non-Proficiency Rates and Specific Schools are Impacted More Than the Others That do not Have Enough Students in Those Subgroups to Count Toward Testing Data Some Schools are Significantly Above the DFG and State Averages

Where Can This Information be Viewed? 3 District Website Curriculum Tab District Testing Information Link to the Annual Report of Student Assessment Data The Report Shows Percentage Proficient by Test Given, Subject, School, Grade, Subgroup Scores are Compared to DFG and State

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS PERCENT OF TOTAL STUDENTS AT PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT IN MOST RECENT ASSESSMENT YEAR GRADES

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 3 5

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 4 6

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 7

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 6 8

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 7 9

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 8 10

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT PERCENT OF TOTAL STUDENTS AT PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT IN MOST RECENT ASSESSMENT YEAR GRADES

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 3 12

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 4 13

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 14

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 6 15

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 7 16

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 8 17

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS PERCENT OF TOTAL STUDENTS AT PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT IN MOST RECENT ASSESSMENT YEAR Grades 4 and 8 18

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS GRADE 4 19

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS GRADE 8 20

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL HSPA LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSEMENTS ASSESSMENTS AFTER THE FIRST TEST ADMINISTRATION 21

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL HSPA MATHEMATICS ASSESSEMENTS ASSESSMENTS AFTER THE FIRST TEST ADMINISTRATION 22

% Passing 2010 % Passing 2011 % Passing 2012 Mathematics – Total Population Hamilton Township76.9%77.8%74.7% Language Arts/Literacy – Total Population Hamilton Township87.8%89.9%91.3% HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS 2012 ANNUAL REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA Percentage Passing after Third Attempt on High School Proficiency Assessment 23

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SAT REASONING TEST CRITICAL READING MATHEMATICSWRITING HAMILTON TOWNSHIP STATE NATION

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP AMERICAN COLLEGE TESTING (ACT) 25 ENGLISHMATHEMATICSREADINGSCIENCECOMPOSITE HAMILTON TOWNSHIP STATE NATION

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ADVANCED PLACEMENT TESTS Hamilton Township # 392 % # 417 % # 430 % A score of 3 to 5 is Considered Passing and May be Considered for College Credit 26

What Now? 27 Con tinue with the Recommended Improvement Plans (DINI, Task Force, CAP from CAPA Review, & the HTSD AIM Initiative) Understand NJDOE Accountability and Growth Models Align with CCC Standards, Update Curriculum Materials, Monitor the Instruction, and Ensure Constructivist Teaching is Occurring Implement New Evaluation Systems (BOE & RTTT3 Funding) Continue Infusing Targeted Assistance Foundations Program (BOE & RTTT3 Funding) Developmental K, Transitional First Grade, & New Title I Teachers (Title I Funding) Monitor Effectiveness of Data Coaches and Basic Skills Instruction Applied for RTTTD Federal Grant for Expanded Programming