Targeted Accelerated Growth at Nerge School TAG Amie Edmunds Liz Maltz Chris Martelli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Have you been using AR to its full capacity?
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Response to Intervention (RtI)
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Intervention at Anne Fox Elementary School Melissa Howard, ELL Resource Teacher Julie Tarasiuk, Literacy Professional Cyndie Gordon, Principal.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention.
Implementing a Diagnostic Reading Assessment Grades 4-8
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
What is RTI? Purpose  How a school responds to students who are not progressing.  Organized into three Tiers in order to provide intervention at various.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Early Grade Reading: Egypt Case Dr. Reda Abouserie First Deputy to Minister of Education Egypt All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action.
Using Data to Inform Instruction Second Year Teacher Induction March 25, 2010.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Differentiating Instruction: Planning with the 2/3 Team.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Designing Intervention Systems That Get Results Dr. Paul Goldberg, Principal Ms. Caron Demos, Teacher Ms. Tricia Leong, Teacher Robert Frost Junior High.
Ten Foundations of Literacy Success Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
PLC Implementation at Link School A closer look at Intervention and Reteaching/Enrichment Angela Schlosser, 1 st Grade Meagan Patterson, 5 th Grade Ann.
PTO Presentation on Harcourt Reading Series Erin Monn Literacy Coach.
Olweus Bullying Prevention  We will not bully others.  We will try to help students who are bullied.  We will try to include students who are left out.
PROCESS TO PROGRESS Reading First at MCS. 8 Critical Reading First Elements 1. Systematic and explicit instruction using an approved Scientifically Based.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
English Language Arts Program Update Lisa M. White, ELA Coordinator School Committee Meeting March 5, 2012.
AN INTEGRATED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR HIGHLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL YEAR MIKE COULAHAN SARAH LINDWALL COURTNEY JONES PETE REILLEY 11/12/07.
Reading Intervention Debbie Wood Elementary Literacy Facilitator.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Waverly Middle School.  What to do and how to do it?  Who do we do it to?  How do we know if we’re doing it right?  What challenges must be overcome?
K-3 Move on When Reading January 29, 2014 Becky Ridge Carmen Fernandez.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
“Keeping Our Promise” “We believe that supporting policies that enhance the teacher as the key provider and decision maker in reaching all students with.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
South Elementary School Des Plaines, Illinois Mary Ellen Bleeden, Principal Beatriz Cruz-Bradley, 1st Gr. Bilingual Teacher Keys To Success: Assessment,
Project MORE Project MORE and RtI  What is RtI?  Why is RtI important?  How does Project MORE fit into RtI?
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Academic Excellence For All Brian D. Bannen Principal.
1 What will the work look like per quarter to help reach the goal? School wide goal: In order to increase student achievement Brown School will use a balanced.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Istation Overview Principals’ Meeting November 7, 2012 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Finding the Friction Point Where Explicit Instruction and Whole Language Meet.
Using Data Process Work Session April 30-May 1, 2010 Route 66 Casino, Albuquerque, NM Presented by: Dr. Maxine Roanhorse-Dineyazhe.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Istation Overview January 7, 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Waverly Middle School.  What to do and how to do it?  Who do we do it to?  How do we know if we’re doing it right?  What challenges must be overcome?
InterventionIntervention What Intervention Looks Like.
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Is Your Math Instruction Built on Empirically Validated Progression?
Literacy Development Plan
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Parent Information Night
Presentation transcript:

Targeted Accelerated Growth at Nerge School TAG Amie Edmunds Liz Maltz Chris Martelli

Getting to know Nerge… Student population –70% White –20% Asian –5% Hispanic –3% Multiracial –2% Black 3% Low Income Very little mobility Five consecutive years of declining ISAT scores in the area of Reading (00/01-04/05) – reaching a low of 68.8% meet/exceed

Nerge ISAT Reading Over Time

Nerge MAP Data Students below 40%

Providing extra TIME & SUPPORT Built into the structure of the school Systematic in identifying students by name and need. Guaranteed to all students demonstrating difficulty mastering grade level appropriate skills and concepts. Delivered as an “extra dose” on top of initial instruction – not as a replacement for initial instruction.

Logistics of TAG Schedule –Primary TAG: 11:15-11:45 daily –Intermediate TAG: 12:30-1:00 daily Personnel –Each grade level uses their classroom teachers, 3 or 4 depending on the grade level –Each grade level has one SST –Some grade levels have additional support from SLP, Reading Teachers, administration, etc., depending on the number of students that are identified for TAG

Logistics of TAG (cont.) Groups should be a small as possible – around 4 students per teacher Most certified staff should be working with our neediest students Teamwork is essential for the success of TAG!

The Details of Intervention 1. How do we identify students? –We use MAP as an initial screening tool –We utilize other assessment materials (ISEL, common assessments, fluency, etc.) –As a team we complete the TAG planning sheetTAG planning sheet 2. What materials do we use? –Research based materials (LLI, Rewards, SOAR, etc.) –A foundation in guided reading strategies – additional opportunities to expose and engage students in text

The Details of Intervention (cont.) 3.How do we monitor student progress? –As a team each grade level develops ways to monitor progress based on the needs of the student groups they are working with 4.What happens when intervention does not work? –Review TAG planning sheet monthly –Discuss our results and as a team develop other options for interventions

What’s happening during TAG Additional dose of Balanced Literacy: Guided, Shared and Independent Reading and Writing and vocabulary/word study activities Research-based programs are utilized as a resource across grade levels Research-based practices are used to address phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension Lessons PARALLEL initial Tier I literacy instruction Students that are meeting grade level expectations are doing purposeful work, independent of the teacher

Summary of Data Over the past five years we have seen a gradual increase in student achievement on ISAT – 2010 being our highest scores (93.1% meet/exceed) Over the past four years (since implementing TAG), we have seen a gradual decrease in the number of students below the 40% on spring MAP testing We have decreased the number of students being identified with an IEP each year This does not happen over night – it’s always a work in progress!