SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class II Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of Project 168.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prime & Bond® 2.1 & SureFil® Class II
Advertisements

Xeno® IV & Esthet-X® Class V—Site A
Sealants, Preventive Resins and Posterior Composites
Radiographic Interpretation.
Class V amalgam cavity preparation
DENTAL CARIES (Classification And Theories)
Newer concepts in classification of carious lesions
Restorative Materials in Pediatric Dentistry S.Lal, DDS Course Director.
Composite Resin Material
Dr.HINA ADNAN.  It is a tooth colored restorative material that is composed of organic resin matrix and inorganic filler particles dispersed in it.
Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentisty November 15 th, 2008 Christopher Yue DMD, MS.
The School of Dentistry College of Medical & Dental Sciences 'Evaluation of Single-unit Light-cured Composite Temporary Crowns in General Practice' R.J.CRISP.
Fissure sealants DCP1 S2 Lecture 8 - part 1 By Dr A. Eldarrat & A. Uni
Provisional Restorations
Provisional Restorations
Calibra ® & Xeno ® IV Indirect; Crown/Onlay Material: Calibra with XENO IV and Self-Cure Activator Title: A Clinical Evaluation of an Adhesive for Bonding.
TPH ® Spectrum ® Class V Material: TPH Spectrum restored with Prime and Bond 2.1 Title: Clinical evaluation of the Prime and Bond 2.1 adhesive system.
Summary of Abutment Modifications  After RPD Designed  Guideplanes  Lower heights of contour to eliminate interferences & improve esthetics  Create.
Dent 5805 Operative Dentistry III Course Director Dr. Ignatius Lee Office: 8-376b Moos Telephone:
Porcelain Inlay and Onlay
DENT 5102, Fall 2007 Unit 2. Restorative Materials Unit 3. Dental Caries.
Provisional Coverage Chapter 51
Composi-Tight® Sectional Matrix System User Training
Existing Restoration - Clinical Status Secondary Caries Marginal Integrity marginal defect overhang open margin Contour proximal contact axial contour.
Prime and Bond ® NT ™ & TPH ® 3, Class I, II, IV, Facial Veneers, & Diastema Closures Material: Prime and Bond NT with TPH3 Title: A Clinical Evaluation.
DECAYED missing filled index (DMF)
Protemp™ Crown Temporization Material Scientific Presentation
Caries managements Is Restoration required??. Traditional caries management has consisted of detection of caries lesion followed by immediate restoration.
Dental Sealants Chelsea Huntington, RDH, BS University of Bridgeport, MSDH Student Intern.
 Introduction Dental injuries are very common, and up to 30% of children injure their primary teeth. These injuries become common again in the mid- elementary.
Core build up and Amalgam bonding 12 th October. Learning outcomes To know the definition of a core build up. To understand the advantages and disadvantages.
Ternopil State Medical University
PEDIATRIC OPERATIVE DENTISTRY (cont.)
March 11, 2009 STI. Go for the Gold!  Characteristics Parallelism ○ No undercut areas like in direct restorations Lost wax technique Higher strength.
Secondary Caries or Not? And Does it Matter? David C. Sarrett, D.M.D., M.S. April 3, 2009.
Filtek™ LS Low Shrink Posterior Restorative System.
Restoring Primary PosteriorTeeth With A Compomer Using L.D. Caulk’s “Dyract”
General Dentistry/ Matrix Systems
Cavity preparation according G.V.Black
Composite Resin Material
INTRODUCTION Leakage around composite fillings is a very common phenomenon. Excellence in General Dental Practice series by Dr. Veerendra Darakh.
Restorative Dentistry. RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY Caries.
Class I and II Composite Restorations Principles & Techniques
Features preparation carious cavities different classes in temporary and permanent teeth in children. Cavity Preparations.
“Dental caries in children. Etiology and pathogenesis of dental caries. Classification. The clinic, diagnosis and treatment of caries of temporary and.
Tetric EvoCeram ® Bulk Fill Nano-Optimized Composite Restorative.
Instructions for Clinic
Class III, IV & V Composite Cavity Preparations
Restorative treatment of discolored anterior teeth III
CROWN AND BRIDGE.
Provisional restoration of crown & bridge Ass
Introduction to the case
Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/ CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel.
Class IV Cavity Preparation
Gate toward Operative Dentistry
The Restorative Process M.D.A. Ch. 48; Ch. 28
Class III Cavity Preparation
Lecturer: Servatovych Anhelina Therapeutic Dentistry Department SHEI “ I.Ya. HORBACHEVSKY TERNOPIL STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE MINISTRY OF UKRAINE”
Delivery and insertion
Treatment Selection Acceptability Review
DENT204, UNC School of Dentistry
Treatment Selection Acceptability Review
Provisional Coverage Chapter 51 1
Restorative Auxiliary Clinical Examination
Direct Tooth colored restorative materials
5. Application of Resin Composite a. Bulk-Packing
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Presentation transcript:

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class II Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of Project 168 (SureFil) Composite with Fluoride for Restoration of Class II Carious Lesions of Permanent Molars. Principle Investigators: Drs. G. Kugel & Ronald D. Perry Type of Restorations: Class II 2-year Results: 16 Patients; 22 Restorations; (% alpha—highest rating): Retention (100%), Sensitivity (100%), Color Stability (100%), Marginal Integrity (91%), Marginal Leakage (100%), Surface Staining (73%), Secondary Caries (100%), Abrasion resistance (100%), Surface texture (100%), Proximal Contact (100%). Wear Analysis Values: 3-mo. (≤24µm, n=22; 25 to 49µm, n=2); 6-mo. (≤24µm, n=22; 25 to 49µm, n=2); 1-yr (≤24µm, n=20; 25 to 49µm, n=2); 2- yr (≤24µm, n=16; 25 to 49µm, n=6). Summary: Wear results observed for SureFil High Density Posterior Restorative were minimal, and well within the acceptable range of 50 microns per year. SureFil restorations showed satisfactory values in all categories using Cvar and Ryge criteria.

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class I & II Class II restorations, wear results Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of Project 168 (SureFil) Composite with Fluoride for Restoration of Class II Carious Lesions of Permanent Molars. Principle Investigators: Drs. G. Kugel & Ronald D. Perry Type of Restorations: Class II 2-year Results: 16 Patients; 22 Restorations: Wear Analysis Values: 3-mo. (≤24µm, n=22; 25 to 49µm, n=2); 6-mo. (≤24µm, n=22; 25 to 49µm, n=2); 1-yr (≤24µm, n=20; 25 to 49µm, n=2); 2-yr (≤24µm, n=16; 25 to 49µm, n=6). Summary: Wear results observed for SureFil High Density Posterior Restorative were minimal, and well within the acceptable range of 50 microns per year. SureFil restorations showed satisfactory values in all categories using Cvar and Ryge criteria.

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class II Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of a Condensable Light Cured Posterior Composite Resin. Principle Investigators: Drs. Daniel Fortin & André Prévost Type of Restorations: Class II 3-year Results: 20 Patients; 39 Restorations; (% alpha— highest rating): Retention (100%), Sensitivity (95%), Anatomical Form (97%), Color Stability (100%), Marginal Adaptation (84%), Marginal Discoloration (89%), Secondary Caries (100%), Surface Roughness (87%), Proximal Contact (100%). Summary: At 3 years, we can state that SureFil is an efficient and safe material for use in Class II restorations on permanent premolars and molars.

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class I & II Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of a new Condensable Posterior Composite (SureFil). Principle Investigators: Drs. A. D. Wilder, S. C. Bayne, J. Perdigao Type of Restorations: Class I and II 5-year Results: 21 Patients; 37 Restorations; (% alpha— highest rating): Retention (100%), Sensitivity (97%), Color Match (95%), Marginal Adaptation (86%), Marginal Discoloration (73%),Secondary Caries (92%), Occlusal Wear (89%), Surface texture (89%), Proximal Contact (97%), Functional Occlusion (97%), Axial contour (97%) Fracture Resistance (98%). Summary: SureFil restorative was esthetic and user-friendly. The restorations demonstrated very good clinical performance at 5 years and continued to pass both the 1989 and 2001 ADA guidelines for composite use as an “unconditional” amalgam-replacement material.

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class I & II Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of a new Condensable Posterior Composite (SureFil). Principle Investigators: Drs. A. D. Wilder, S. C. Bayne, J. Perdigao Type of Restorations: Class I and II 5-year Results: 21 Patients; 37 Restorations; (% alpha— highest rating): Retention (100%), Sensitivity (97%), Color Match (95%), Marginal Adaptation (86%), Marginal Discoloration (73%),Secondary Caries (92%), Occlusal Wear (89%), Surface texture (89%), Proximal Contact (97%), Functional Occlusion (97%), Axial contour (97%) Fracture Resistance (98%). Summary: SureFil restorative was esthetic and user-friendly. The restorations demonstrated very good clinical performance at 5 years and continued to pass both the 1989 and 2001 ADA guidelines for composite use as an “unconditional” amalgam-replacement material.

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class I & II 58 Class I & II restorations, 5-year results Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of a Condensable Light Cured Composite Resin (SureFil). Principle Investigators: Dr. Makoto Suzuki Type of Restorations: Class I and II 5-year Results: 23 Patients; 58 Restorations; (% alpha— highest rating): Retention (98%), Sensitivity (100%), Color Match (100%), Marginal Discoloration (75%), Secondary Caries (100%), Surface texture (98%), Proximal Contact (87%). Average Wear Values: 1-yr. (0µm, n=68), 2- yr (<25µm, n=58), 3-yr (25 to 50µm, n=58), 4-yr (50µm, n=55), and 5-yr (61.4µm, n=58) Summary: Condensable light cured composite (SureFil) continued to demonstrate excellent clinical performance after 5 years.

SureFil ® High Density Posterior Composite: Class I & II Class I & II restorations, wear results Material: Prime & Bond 2.1 with SureFil Packable Composite Title: Clinical Evaluation of a Condensable Light Cured Composite Resin (SureFil). Principle Investigators: Dr. Makoto Suzuki Type of Restorations: Class I and II 5-year Results: 23 Patients; 58 Restorations; (% alpha— highest rating): Retention (98%), Sensitivity (100%), Color Match (100%), Marginal Discoloration (75%), Secondary Caries (100%), Surface texture (98%), Proximal Contact (87%). Average Wear Values: 1-yr. (0µm, n=68), 2-yr (<25µm, n=58), 3-yr (25 to 50µm, n=58), 4-yr (50µm, n=55), and 5-yr (61.4µm, n=58) Summary: Condensable light cured composite (SureFil) continued to demonstrate excellent clinical performance after 5 years.

Wear, µm SureFil ® --Wear Over 5 Years

SureFil ® --Retention

SureFil ® --Proximal Contact

SureFil ® --Marginal Adaptation

SureFil ® --Secondary Caries

SureFil ® --Surface Roughness