Options for School Grades, AYP, and MAP/STAR FCAT Advisory Committee Meeting June 13, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF) Clark County School District.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
1 Transition to FCAT 2.0, End-of-Course Assessments, and School Accountability and Beyond Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
District Accountability Update May February 2007.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
A Primer on Growth Percentiles Elementary/Middle School Progress Reports January 29, 2010.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Two Accountability Systems This Year NCLB AZ Learns Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Yes / No Excelling, Highly- Performing, Performing, Underperforming.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
1 Putting It All Together Training August 18, 2009 School Name (and motto or theme) ODMS PD SIP.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
The Use of Trajectory-Modeled Growth as Part of Adequate Yearly Progress: One State's Results Christopher I Cobitz, Ph.D. Reporting Section Chief North.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Appoquinimink School District A Bright Horizon for MHS Corrective Action Plan 3 Year Plan December, 2007.
Annual Student Performance Report September
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
1 School Grades and AYP for New Accountability Coordinators.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Elmer is not C2 Ready… R U?. R U C2 Ready? 2012 FCAT/School Grade Data The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake.
Growth Model: A Way to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) The Effective Use of Data to Make AYP AERA CCSSO April 13, 2007.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Student Growth Model Salt Lake City School District Christine Marriott Assessment and Evaluation Department Salt Lake City School District State.
Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
FSA DATA ANALYSIS
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
Two Accountability Systems This Year
2016 Accountability Reporting
Anderson Elementary School
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Revising High School Grading Requirements
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Accountability Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Options for School Grades, AYP, and MAP/STAR FCAT Advisory Committee Meeting June 13, 2007

2 Issue rd grade FCAT Reading results are anomalous  Without an immediate solution to this situation at this time, questions arise regarding how to proceed with: School Grades Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Value Tables for use in the Merit Award Program (MAP) or Special Teachers are Rewarded (STAR) program

3 Impact of rd Grade Scores – School Grades 2 of the 8 components that constitute a school grade are impacted:  Percent of students making learning gains in Reading  Percent of the lowest performing students (Low 25%) making learning gains in Reading Adequate Progress of Lowest Students requirement of School Grades also impacted.

4 Impact of rd Grade Scores – Likely Effect on School Grades Higher than expected 2006 scores likely to depress percentage making learning gains in Learning Gain? No Yes

5 Options for School Grades Proceed with the calculation as outlined in Rule and Statute, including the 2006 third grade FCAT Reading scores. Proceed with the calculation, excluding the 2006 third grade FCAT Reading scores – with safeguards in place holding schools harmless to this decision

6 School Grades Option: Exclude rd Grade Reading Scores Safeguards to ensure that schools are held harmless  Include rd grade FCAT Reading scores for those schools that actually demonstrated learning gains, despite the inflated baseline.  All cell size determinations for calculation would be determined including the rd grade FCAT Reading scores.

7 School Grades Option: Suspend Adequate Progress Requirement in 2007 Department is reviewing this policy and committed to revisiting the issue. For 2008 and beyond, Department will explore other options (e.g., incentives) to ensure focus remains on the lowest performing students. Even with the suspension of this requirement, the performance of the bottom quartile of students remains an important of the school grades calculation

8 Impact of rd Grade Scores – Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) rd grade Reading scores impact two elements of the AYP calculation:  Safe Harbor  Growth Model (pending USDE approval) All decisions on how to proceed with AYP in 2007 require USDE approval

9 Options for AYP 1. Calculate AYP including rd grade FCAT Reading scores 2. Calculate AYP excluding rd grade FCAT Reading scores 3. Calculate AYP using 2005 (instead of 2006) as the baseline for the Safe Harbor calculation 4. Calculate AYP using an average of 2005 and 2006 as the baseline for the Safe Harbor calculation

10 Impact of rd Grade Scores – Value Tables for MAP/STAR rd grade Reading scores impact the development of FCAT-based value tables to calculate improved student performance for teachers for use in the MAP/STAR performance pay plans. Value tables compare the magnitude of learning gains from the prior year to the current year, providing greater weight to gains of greater magnitude.

11 Option for Value Tables In lieu of an Elementary level FCAT Value Table, the Department will provide a fourth grade NRT Value Table in Reading and Math and a fifth grade FCAT Reading and Math Value Table.  Provides flexibility for districts  Provides an example of a non-FCAT based Value Table