A Fast Introduction to Environmental Ethics Andrea Woody Department of Philosophy October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Dr. Glass Environmental Ethics.
Advertisements

Environmental Ethics. Definitions Moral Agents Those who have the freedom and rational capacity to be responsible for choices Those capable of moral reflection.
Class 5 Environmental Ethics: Other species and the community of life.
Chapter Twelve: The Fact-Value Problem Chapter Twelve: The Fact-Value Problem Metaethics ► Philosophizing about the very terms of ethics ► Considering.
HUMANS AND NON-HUMANS A Spectrum “ Western ” paradigm emphasizes gulf between humans and animals ■ Religious traditions: humans as “the crown of creation”,
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
Environmental Ethics. Three theories Deep ecology intrinsic value of all the natural world, both plant and animal. Eco-holism world is like one interconnected.
Ethics of Whaling In search of the right thing to do.
Strengthening Resilience through Social ‑ Ecological Justice Andreas Rechkemmer VT GFURR October 12 th, 2014.
PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE) Notes on Dale Jamieson, Ethics and the Environment, chapter 6.
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
1 Topic 1(d): Intro to Environmental Economics Environmental economics: what are we doing here? –We are interested in analyzing the interactions between.
Ethics and ethical systems 12 January
Making public environmental decisions. Introduction to cost-effectiveness and cost benefit analysis.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /7/2002.
Standards of Conduct DoD’s Standards of Conduct
Normative Ethical Theory Jim Okapal Asst. Professor of Philosophy Missouri Western State University.
Environmental Ethics. Definitions Moral Agents –Those who have the freedom and rational capacity to be responsible for choices –Those capable of moral.
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Business Ethics/Corporate Social Responsibility Overview.
Worldviews can be narrow or broad
ANIMAL WELFARE and/or ANIMAL RIGHTS. TOM REGAN > Philosopher, Activist.
Ethical Decision-making Craig Dunn, Ph.D. MEET U.S. program.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Chapter Eleven: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics
CSE3PE: Professional Environment Introduction to Ethical Theory.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Conservation values and Ethics (保育的價值與倫理)
"Ecological Footprint" Sustainability Net Primary Productivity 20 – 31% 60% of freshwater runoff Anthropocene era.
Introduction to Ethics and Environmental Ethics. Some Classic Characteristics of Ethics 1. Central concern is the well-being of people. 2. Consider not.
Environmental Ethics. Ethics Ethics: the study of good and bad, right and wrong – The set of moral principles or values held by a person or society that.
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
Biodiversity. What is Biodiversity? Biological Diversity or Biodiversity “The variety of life in all its forms, levels and combinations. Includes ecosystem.
The Moral Status of the Non-Human World Baxter and Taylor
Maybe there is enough land for landfills for generations to come. Maybe global warming is a simple weather pattern that will reverse in five years. Perhaps.
Utilitarianism or Consequentialism Good actions are those that result in good consequences. The moral value of an action is extrinsic to the action itself.
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 2. Part one Mapping ethics.
1 Applied Ethics Section 3 Animal Ethics. 2 History Animal ethics was pioneered in the ancient world & resurfaced in the humanitarian movement of the.
“A land ethic, then, reflects the existence of an ecological conscience, and this in turn reflects a conviction of individual responsibility for the health.
Philosophy 224 Ethical Theory: A Primer. Some Important Questions Ethical Theories attempt to provide systematic answers to general moral questions like.
Normative Ethical Theory: Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology
PEP 570, DeGeorge, Chp. 3 10/28/20151 Chapter Three: Dr. DeGeorge Utilitarianism: Justice and Love.
Philosophy 220 The Moral Status of the More Than Human World: The Environment.
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
Marjukka Laakso Environmental ethics Environment = everything around humans which is not strictly man-made (wild nature, fields, cities, ditches)
Conservation Biology: The scientific study of biodiversity and its management for sustainable human welfare.
Philosophy 360: Business Ethics Chapter 3. Consequentialism: Is part of a theory about what makes certain actions right or wrong. In a nutshell: Actions.
Cunningham - Cunningham - Saigo: Environmental Science 7 th Ed. Environmental Ethics and Philosophy Chapter 2.
Consequentialism (utilitarism). General description 'Consequentialist theories regard the moral value of actions, rules of conduct, and so on, as dependent.
Chapter Eleven: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
“A land ethic, then, reflects the existence of an ecological conscience, and this in turn reflects a conviction of individual responsibility for the health.
WHO DESERVES RIGHTS/FMS? 2002, Germany is the first EU country to recognize animals as having ‘rights’ in its law Many countries grant basic rights to.
Unit Eight Seminar Animal Rights. Old Business!  Welcome Back! Only one seminar remaining!  Unit 7 Papers.
Chapter 14: The Environment, Consumption, and Global Warming William F. Baxter, “People or Penguins: The Case for Optimal Pollution” – Baxter defends an.
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
A Fast Introduction to Environmental Ethics Andrea Woody Department of Philosophy February 2012.
Environmental Science The Earth as seen from space.
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 2 Topic Outlines.
The Ethics of Care According to this method, we have an obligation to exercise special care toward the people with whom we have valuable, close relationships.
Philosophical approaches to animal ethics
Introduction to Philosophy
Lecture 02: A Brief Summary
Environmental Ethics.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Lecture 02: A Brief Summary
Lecture 04: A Brief Summary
“A land ethic, then, reflects the existence of an ecological conscience, and this in turn reflects a conviction of individual responsibility for the health.
Intro to Philosophy Ethical Systems.
Ethical concepts and ethical theories Topic 3
Presentation transcript:

A Fast Introduction to Environmental Ethics Andrea Woody Department of Philosophy October 2008

Today’s reading had… 1.A page that was too blurry to read 2.A missing page 3.A page of advertising in the middle

Singer criticizes economists specifically for… 1.Discounting the future 2.Ignoring aesthetic values 3.Anthropocentrism (human-centered- ness)

The Landscape

Ethical Reasoning Ethical reasoning is the means by which moral agents determine morally acceptable actions giving due consideration to all those deserving of moral concern. We ask: (1)What should we do? (2)Why should it be done? (justification) (3)How should it be done? (policy)

Salmon Species of the Pacific Northwest 1.What? Salmon extinction should be prevented. 2.Why? Because extinction of any species is undesirable. 3.How? Pull down dams along the Columbia and Snake Rivers.

Salmon Species of the Pacific Northwest 1.What? Salmon extinction should be prevented. 2.Why? Because extinction of any species is undesirable. Why? Because…? 3.How? Pull down dams along the Columbia and Snake Rivers.

Salmon Species of the Pacific Northwest 1.What? Salmon extinction should be prevented. 2.Why? Because extinction of any species is undesirable. Why? Because…? 3.How? Pull down dams along the Columbia and Snake Rivers. But pulling down dams is undesirable too!

Salmon Species of the Pacific Northwest Revised reasoning 1.What? Salmon extinction should be prevented. 2.Why? Extinction is undesirable and should not be allowed unless prevention will cause other more significant harms. 3.How? Develop technology for “fish ladders” to mitigate the effects of the dams.

Different sorts of claims Empirical claims –describe states of affairs in the world –can be true or false –To know whether a given claim is true or false, we need to know certain things about the world. Normative claims –describe what ought or ought not to be the case or what ought or ought not to be done –concern values

Values Intrinsic The intrinsic value of something is the value it has solely in virtue of its intrinsic nature. Instrumental Something has instrumental value if and only if it is a means to something that is intrinsically valuable.

Values Intrinsic The intrinsic value of something is the value it has solely in virtue of its intrinsic nature. Instrumental Something has instrumental value if and only if it is a means to something that is intrinsically valuable. substitutes

Sustainability Obligation: Equivalence of some sort “An obligation to conduct ourselves so that we leave to the future the option or capacity to be as well off as we are” (Robert Solow). Worry: Resource depletion BUT Instrumental values always allow substitutes Instrumental optimism “There is no necessity either in logic or in historical trends to suggest that the supply of any given resource is ‘finite’” (Julian Simon).

Ethical Frameworks

Rights Theories Individuals possess certain prerogatives to act, choose, or be in particular states and it is the duty of moral agents to accord, or not interfere, with these prerogatives. Moral Principle: Act in accordance with the rights of others. the primary concept is the "right" stress is on what is permissible; duties are entailed to insure "permissibility"

Utilitarian Theories Utility: a measure of whatever one takes to be intrinsically good (e.g. pleasure, happiness, or well-being) Total Net Utility: for a given act, the sum of all individual utilities for the collective under consideration Moral Principle: Act so as to maximize Total Net Utility. [In other words, do that which brings the greatest good for the greatest number of individuals.]

Moral Considerability Who counts? Why? Traditional ethical frameworks are anthropocentric. Humans are the creatures deserving of moral consideration. Challenges: issues of distribution and justice the individual vs. the social responsibilities to future generations

Climate Change Distributional equity and Global justice Must all countries adopt the same restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions? Obligations to future generations How can we have obligations to persons that do not exist? Uncertainty + risk How do we handle uncertainty in our empirical knowledge and in the likely outcomes of our actions?

Moral Considerability Who counts? Why? Traditional ethical frameworks are anthropocentric. But if we ask “why?”… Possible grounding: high cognitive function/rational capacities sentience (experiential) having interests being alive

Moral Considerability Who (or what) counts? Why? When we look for the dividing line, it is not at all clear that only humans will be worthy of moral consideration. non-anthropocentricism

Moral Considerability Who (or what) counts? Why? When we look for the dividing line, it is not at all clear that only humans will be worthy of moral consideration. non-anthropocentricism Are species morally considerable? Are mountains? ecosystems?

Moral Considerability Who (or what) counts? Why? When we look for the dividing line, it is not at all clear that only humans will be worthy of moral consideration. non-anthropocentricism Are species morally considerable? Are mountains? ecosystems? Individualism vs. Holism

Peter Singer’s Position utilitarian non-anthropocentric individualist Grounding: sentience (pain and pleasure as the measure of utility) BUT this excludes non-sentient living things, and thus, presumably, any “holistic” entities. Sticky issues: gradations of intrinsic value “interests” versus “sentience”

Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic The Moral Principle: "A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise". Built upon a newly acquired, ecological understanding of the biological world… The Land Pyramid

"All ethics so far evolved rest upon a single premise: that the individual is a member of a community of interdependent parts... The land ethic simply enlarges the boundary of the community...” "It is inconceivable to me that an ethical relation to land can exist without… a high regard for its value. By value, I of course mean something far broader than mere economic value; I mean value in the philosophical sense.”

Deep Ecology Two Basic Norms: 1) Self-Realization: identification self-in-Self 2) Biocentric Equality: All living things have equal right to live and flourish. All livings things are equal in intrinsic value. (careful: "living" is used very broadly here)

Summary of central concepts Values: intrinsic, instrumental Claims: empirical, normative Moral considerability Anthropocentrism vs. non-anthropocentrism Individualism vs. Holism Ethical frameworks: Rights theory, Utilitarianism, Land Ethic, Deep Ecology