Using Assessment Program Resources to Shape Effective ELA Instruction Amy F. Radikas, Literacy Specialist Renee A. Savoie, NAEP State Coordinator Connecticut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bloom's Taxonomy.
Advertisements

Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
What Does Rigor Look Like?
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Writing a Usable and Working Curriculum Background with Step-by- Step Guidance.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Differentiating the Curriculum Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain (Benjamin Bloom) Elements of Depth and Complexity (Sandra Hall Kaplan)
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Clear Standards/Curriculum Framework Licia Lentz Woodland Hills High School February 12, 2010.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
THE C OMMON C ORE, & C OGNITIVE R IGOR Language Arts Council Meetings Fall 2012 Portions adapted from Karin K. Hess materials.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Teachers Helping Teachers Align Units with the Common Core/ Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy September 24, 2012 Presented by Elin Reuben Karma.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Benjamin Bloom (et al.) created this taxonomy for categorizing levels of abstraction of questions.
Higher Order Thinking Skills
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
CTA Spirals Progressions for English Language Arts and Literacy
D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING Unit 5 Seminar. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
THE C OMMON C ORE, & C OGNITIVE R IGOR Language Arts Council Meetings Fall 2012 Adapted from Karin K. Hess materials.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
And PARCC
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Are your students thinking more deeply or just working harder
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
A classification of learning objectives within education
A guide to reading, writing, thinking and understanding
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Writing Learning Outcomes
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Using Assessment Program Resources to Shape Effective ELA Instruction Amy F. Radikas, Literacy Specialist Renee A. Savoie, NAEP State Coordinator Connecticut Assessment Forum III Crowne Plaza, Cromwell August 13, 2012

Session Overview Key shifts in ELA/Literacy NAEP and PISA basics Evidence of the shifts illustrated through NAEP & PISA Discussion

CCSS Requires Three Shifts in ELA/Literacy #1Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction #2Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational #3Regular practice with complex texts and its academic language achievethecore.org

ACT Report In 2006, ACT released a report called Reading Between the Lines. The findings suggested that the ability to read complex texts is the “clearest differentiator between those ready for college-level reading and those not.”

ACT: Reading Between the Lines The most important implication of this study: “What students could read, in terms of its complexity, was at least as important as what they could do with what they read.” CCSS Appendix A. p. 2

What is NAEP? NAEP National Assessment of Educational Progress Nation’s Report Card Established by Congress in 1969 to answer questions about student academic performance The Nation’s ONLY monitor of what students know and can do ◦ “common yardstick” “Survey” design ◦ National, regional and state-level results

Overall NAEP Reading Results for Connecticut GRADE 4GRADE 8 YEAR AVG. SCALE SCORE % OF STUDENTS AT/ABOVE PROFICIENT AVG. SCALE SCORE % OF STUDENTS AT/ABOVE PROFICIENT *37* *34* *37* * 43X X 45X * indicates a statistically significant difference when compared to performance in 2011.

Grade 4 Reading in 2011: Average Scale Score Comparisons Grade 4 Reading in 2011: Average Scale Score Comparisons Higher avg. ss. than CT Avg. ss. not significantly different from CT Lower avg. ss. than CT

Grade 8 Reading in 2011: Average Scale Score Comparisons Higher avg. ss. than CT Avg. ss. not significantly different from CT Lower avg. ss. than CT Grade 8 Reading in 2011: Average Scale Score Comparisons Grade 8 Reading in 2011: Average Scale Score Comparisons

Program for International Student Assessment ( sponsored by the OECD) Program for International Student AssessmentOECD Administered every 3 years since 2000 Assesses 15-year-old students Measures application of knowledge and skills to problems in a real-life context What is PISA? Click to view YouTube video about PISA

PISA aims to answer… Are students well prepared to meet the challenges of the future? Are they able to analyze, reason, and communicate their ideas effectively? Do they have the capacity to continue learning throughout life?

Who Participates in PISA? OECD countries (34) Non-OECD education systems (33)

PISA 2009 Reading Literacy Results Data for 65 education systems (34 OECD and 31 non-OECD) U.S. not measurably different from OECD average U.S. scored below 9 education systems U.S. scored above 39 education systems 13

PISA Reading Literacy Trends

PISA and NAEP: Key Differences PISA includes a considerable amount of noncontinuous text. NAEP measures “meaning vocabulary.” NAEP Grade 8 and 12 passages are notably longer than PISA passages. In terms of readability and grade level, PISA is closer to Grade 12 NAEP.

The Origins of CCSS International Assessments NAEP CCSS

CCSS Requires Three Shifts in ELA/Literacy #1—Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction #2—Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational #3—Regular practice with complex texts and its academic language achievethecore.org

Informational Text Students are required to read very little informational text in elementary and middle school. Informational text is more difficult for students to comprehend than narrative text. Informational text makes up the vast majority of required reading in college/workplace.

NAEP Reading: Passage Types by Grade GradeLiteraryInformational 450% 845%55% 1230%70% CCSS ELA p.5

In the Early Years Children must:  Develop strong foundational cognitive skills (literacy/communication).

Grade Two  Informational texts use clear and consistent formats, use of simple headings to organize information into categories, illustrations extend the meaning, and simple graphics support understanding of content Elfrieda H. Hiebert, Fundamentals of Literacy Instruction and Assessment, Pre-K–6 Edited by Martha C. Hougen, Ph.D., & Susan M. Smart

An Example from NAEP NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Informational Passage: Marian’s Revolution by Sudipta Bardhan-Quallen Available through the NAEP Questions Tool

One of 10 Released Items Why is "A Voice for Civil Rights" a good heading for the section that follows it on page 3? Use information from the article to support your answer.

Student Responses: Full Comprehension

Student Responses: Partial Comprehension

Student Responses: Little or No Comprehension

Item-Level Performance Data Little/NoPartialFullOmitted Avg. SS% Avg. SS% Avg. SS% Avg. SS% NP CT ‡5 NP= National Public ‡ Reporting standards not met.

CCSS Requires Three Shifts in ELA/Literacy #1—Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction #2—Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational #3—Regular practice with complex texts and its academic language achievethecore.org

Evidence to Support Text Dependent Questions Can be literal (checking for understanding) but must also involve analysis, synthesis, evaluation. Focus on word, sentence, and paragraph, as well as larger ideas, themes, or events. Focus on difficult portions of text in order to enhance reading proficiency. Can also include prompts for writing (DOK) and discussion questions. achievethecore.org

Bloom’s Taxonomy [1956 ] & Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions [2005] Knowledge -- Define, duplicate, label, list, name, order, recognize, relate, recall Remember Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify Comprehension -- Classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize, report, review, select, translate Understand -- Construct meaning, clarify, paraphrase, represent, translate, illustrate, give examples, classify, categorize, summarize, generalize, predict… Application -- Apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, practice, write Apply -- Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation; carry out or use /apply to an unfamiliar task Analysis -- Analyze, appraise, explain calculate, categorize, compare, criticize, discriminate, examine Analyze -- Break into constituent parts, determine how parts relate Synthesis -- Rearrange, assemble, collect, compose, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, write Evaluate -- Make judgments based on criteria, check, detect inconsistencies/fallacies, critique Evaluation -- Appraise, argue, assess, choose, compare, defend, estimate, explain, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value Create -- Put elements together to form a coherent whole, reorganize elements into new patterns/ structures Karin Hess

Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels DOK-1 – Recall & Reproduction - Recall of a fact, term, principle, concept, or perform a routine procedure DOK-2 - Basic Application of Skills/Concepts - Use of information, conceptual knowledge, select appropriate procedures for a task, two or more steps with decision points along the way, routine problems, organize/display data, interpret/use simple graphs DOK-3 - Strategic Thinking - Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps to approach problem; requires some decision making and justification; abstract, complex, or non-routine; often more than one possible answer DOK-4 - Extended Thinking - An investigation or application to real world; requires time to research, problem solve, and process multiple conditions of the problem or task; non-routine manipulations, across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources Karin Hess

The Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix integrates Bloom + Webb Different models used to describe cognitive rigor:  Bloom – What type of thinking (verbs) is needed to complete a task?  Webb – How deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? How complex is the content? Karin Hess

Depth + Thinking Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember - Recall, locate basic facts, details, events Understand - Select appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident - Specify, explain relationships - summarize – identify main ideas - Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence (quote, example…) - Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts Apply - Use language structure (pre/suffix) or word relationships (synonym/antonym) to determine meaning – Use context to identify meaning of word - Obtain and interpret information using text features - Use concepts to solve non-routine problems - Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem Analyze - Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, text feature, etc. – Compare literary elements, terms, facts, events – analyze format, organization, & text structures - Analyze or interpret author’s craft (literary devices, viewpoint, or potential bias) to critique a text – Analyze multiple sources - Analyze complex/abstract themes Evaluate – Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures - Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information Create - Brainstorm ideas about a topic - Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge - Synthesize information within one source or text - Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts The Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix Applies Webb’s DOK to Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions

DOK is about complexity—not difficulty! The intended student learning outcome determines the DOK level. What mental processing must occur? While verbs may appear to point to a DOK level, it is what comes after the verb that is the best indicator of the rigor/DOK level. ◦ Describe the process of photosynthesis. ◦ Describe how the two political parties are alike and different. ◦ Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe. Karin Hess

Let’s practice Your class has just read some version of Little Red Riding Hood. What is a basic comprehension question you might ask? What is a more rigorous question you might ask? Karin Hess

Depth + Thinking Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember What color was Red’s cape? Who is this story about? Understand Apply Identify words/phrases that helped you to know the sequence of events in the story. Analyze Is this a realistic or fantasy story? Is this a realistic or fantasy story? Justify your interpretation using text evidence. Evaluate Create Write a telephone conversation between Red and her mother to explain the wolf incident.

How can we apply these ideas back in our schools AND CLASSROOMS?

Guiding Questions What skills & concepts are most important? Is the intended rigor of skills/concepts reflected in materials used (e.g., texts, tasks) Is there a range of DOK (rigor) within the learning activities/lesson?

Bands 11- CCR K-1 Increased Ability to Use Text Evidence Standards Two through Nine Bands 11- CCR K-1 Standard One Standard Ten 39 Increasing Range and Complexity achievethecore.org

PISA Reading Unit 3: Graffiti See Page 13

Question 4: Graffiti (p. 17) Full Credit Guidelines: Explain opinion with reference to style or form of one or both letters. Refers to criteria such as structure of argument, cogency of argument, strategies for persuading readers, etc. Example: “Helga’s. She gave you lots of different points to consider and she mentioned the environmental damage that graffiti artists do which I think is very important.”

Question 4: International Performance Data Overall Percent Correct Japan75> Canada63> United Kingdom62> New Zealand58> Finland58> Australia54= OECD Average53 Korea, Republic of52= Ireland51= Poland50= Norway48= United States46< Mexico45< Country average vs. OECD average Higher> Not Different= Lower<

CCSS Requires Three Shifts in ELA/Literacy #1—Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction #2—Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational #3—Regular practice with complex texts and its academic language achievethecore.org

Academic Vocabulary Words that add to students’ language ability (e.g., maintain, fortunate, required, tend, contrast/compare, insisted, summarize) Words that are needed in a content area (e.g., isotope, peninsula, photosynthesis, cubism, isosceles triangle)

More Examples from NAEP NAEP 2009 Grade 12 Literary Passage: The Open Window by Saki Available through the NAEP Questions Tool

NAEP’s “Meaning Vocabulary” ABCD* Avg. SS% Avg. SS% Avg. SS% Avg. SS% NP CT‡928923‡ On page 3, the narrator says Framton has the delusion that total strangers are interested in his nervous condition. This means Framton A.has a common illness related to his nerves. B.is worried about what people think of him. C.dreams that he is constantly being watched. D.has a mistaken idea about how others view him.

Grade 8 Example On page 2, when the author of the biographical sketch says that E. B. White's essays "appealed to an urbane crowd," he is describing the audience for White's writing as A.having sophisticated tastes. B.leading busy lives. C.being politically conservative. D.having a good sense of humor. A*BCD Avg. SS% Avg. SS% Avg. SS% Avg. SS% NP CT ‡

The Origins of CCSS International Assessments NAEP CCSS

Discussion What are the opportunities and challenges related to the shifts? How can districts support teachers in making these important shifts? Revisit your definition of rigor – has it changed? In what ways? What existing curriculum, assessment materials, or activities will you examine for a range of cognitive rigor? What types of supports and resources can CSDE provide?

Related Resources Many papers and presentations available at or contact Karin Hess Hess, K. (2004). “Applying Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge (DOK) Levels in social studies and science” [online]: Little Red Riding Hood handout g%20Hood-CRM_KH11.pdf g%20Hood-CRM_KH11.pdf Achievethecore.org—Student Achievement Partners provides modules for professional development and other valuable CCSS resources. Achievethecore.org

NAEP Questions Tool Online access to released NAEP items in a variety of subjects over many years Teachers use the NQT … ◦ to see models of well-designed items measuring the same content taught in their classrooms; ◦ as a starting point when building common assessments; and ◦ to reflect on the performance of the students in their classrooms in comparison to students statewide and across the nation.

PISA Resources PISA Released Items from 2000, 2003 and 2006 PISA in FocusPISA in Focus: monthly policy-oriented notes PISA Assessment Framework

Please contact us to request further information. Renee Savoie phone: Amy Radikas phone: