Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy State of the art Karin Sollart Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
0 Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the UNECE Strategy for ESD Expert group Indicators for ESD drs. R.M. van Raaij, ministry.
Implementation of Capacity Development for CDM Project in Viet Nam Nguyen Khac Hieu Climate Change Coordinator Vietnam National Office for Climate Change.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
UNECE Indicators for ESD successful implementation Prof. Michael Scoullos University of Athens Chairman, MIO-ECSDE, GWP-med, Coordinator, MEdIES Chairman,
March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.
ITUC Human and Trade Union Rights Report of the PERC HTUR Network Meeting PERC HTUR Network PERC Summer School, Bratislava September
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency National Capacity Self Assessment (GEF/UNDP) The Third GEF Assembly Side Event – 30 th August,2006 Cape town Integrating.
1 February 2005 Briefing Sessions Draft Regulations Using Water for Recreational Purposes.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
The Mediterranean Strategy on Education for Sustainable Development (MSESD) Prof Michael Scoullos, H2020 CB/MEP Team Leader, UNESCO Chair & Network on.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
0 Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the UNECE Strategy for ESD Expert group Indicators for ESD: Our methods, discussions.
Electronic information tools in support of public participation under the Aarhus Convention Michael Stanley-Jones Environmental Information Management.
THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated planning and Assessment of National Development Plan of the Czech Republic.
Peer Learning Event on national Lifelong Guidance Policy Forums 4th-5th of June 2008, Thessaloniki With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The implementation programme for the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics UNECE special session on National Accounts for economies in transition Geneva,
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL OFFICE FOR EUROPE SUSTAINABLE AND HEALTHY URBAN TRANSPORT AND PLANNING.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
 The East African Communications Organization (EACO) is an inter- governmental organization established by ICT regulators and operators from the East.
Issues from the CDM Institutional Reviews CDM Dialogue, Barbados March 2006 Ian C King Project Manager, UNDP CRMI.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Women and girls in sport in Ireland Let’s level the playing field 28th October Dublin Isabel Romão Member of the CoE Gender Equality Commission Member.
National Agencies’ contribution to the evaluation of Grundtvig Action and to the National Evaluation Report on Socrates Programme Socrates - Grundtvig.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
Regional Action Plan for Sustainable Transport of Dangerous Goods along the Mekong River Final Regional Workshop, October 2014 Bangkok, Thailand.
September 2005 DEA: First National Workshop 1 Development and Energy in Africa First National Workshop: Tanzania 12 September 2005 Introduction Gordon.
1 Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February Brussels.
Towards a European Qualifications Framework Relevance beyond Europe? Moscow 18 April 2006 Jens Bjornavold European centre for development of vocational.
Background The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which the UN Members States jointly committed to in September 2015, provide an ambitious and long-term.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
IPCC Key challenges facing communities, and approaches to solutions that enhance resilience: through NAPs Climate and Health Summit 2014 Investing.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
FROM GOODWILL TO PRACTICAL SOLUTION: UNECE Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development.
UNECE Indicators for ESD successful implementation Prof. Michael Scoullos University of Athens Chairman, MIO-ECSDE, GWP-med, Coordinator, MEdIES Chairman,
Albanian Qualifications Framework Ejvis Gishti, NAVETQ Kiev, March
Mitigation, Enhancement and Monitoring Session 9 Health in SEA.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Progress Report 20 November 2012
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Gerald Farthing PhD Chair, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Steering Committee on Education for Sustainable Development.
Development and Energy in Africa
Audit Guideline on Delivering the 2030 Agenda through Environmental Audit WGEA’s Work Plan Goal 1 - Developing guidance materials available.
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
05 April 2016 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APP - Department of Arts and Culture.
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
National Mechanisms for Reporting and Follow-up
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Information on projects
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
4th Meeting of the Expert Group on the Integration of Statistical and Geospatial Information (UN EG-ISGI) – Nov 2017 Summary of progress Martin Brady,
Presentation transcript:

Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy State of the art Karin Sollart Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Background Strategy (Vilnius March 2005) : to facilitate the introduction and promotion of education for sustainable development (ESD) in the UNECE region and thereby contribute to the realisation of our common vision. The aim of the Strategy: to encourage UNECE member States to develop and incorporate ESD into their formal education systems, in all relevant subjects, and in non-formal and informal education.

Objectives 1. Ensure that policy, regulatory and operational frameworks support ESD; 2.Promote SD through formal, non-formal and informal learning; 3.Equip educators with the competence to include SD in their teaching; 4. Ensure that adequate tools and materials for ESD are accessible; 5.Promote research on and development of ESD; 6. Strengthen cooperation on ESD at all levels within the UNECE region.

The process of developing indicators Establishment of Expert Group following Vilnius. Mandate is 'to develop indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy’. 1.Four meetings scheduled 2.Setting up a ‘framework’: using an evaluation model 3. Translating objectives into indicators: state of the art

1. Four meetings of the Expert Group : Representatives from different countries Meetings held: Ede (26-28 Sep) Geneva (31 Oct – 2 Nov) Meetings to come: Vienna (Mar 2006) The Hague (May 2006)?

2.An evaluation model that covers : a. The process of implementation b. The effectiveness of the implementation, as a qualitative feature of both the process and long- term effects of ESD and that helps to: c. Distinguish between different types of indicators in relation to different phases of the process of implementation

Evaluation model used Check list ……… y/n TYPE 1 Policy framework Direct/ Indirect Effects, Impact TYPE 0 Current situation Baseline TYPE 3 Output Outcome TYPE 4 Outcome Throughput Activities T=0 T= TYPE 2 Input

On indicators…. - Baseline data shows the existing situation in relation to an issue at a certain point in time -‘Checklist indicators’ provide information on initial policy, legislation, regulatory and governance measures taken by a government in order to implement the Strategy - ‘Input indicators’ provide information on a broader spectrum of activities taking place in terms of the implementation of the Strategy - ‘Output indicators’ provide information on the result of these activities - ‘Outcome indicators’ provide information on the possible impact due to the implementation of the Strategy, in particular its qualitative aspect in terms of values, attitudes and choices in favour of SD

3. Translating objectives into indicators: state of the art First draft of indicators prepared and submitted for comments to Steering Committee (December 2005) For each objective a group of indicators and underlying questions was determined. With regard to the issue of ‘indigenous people’ (not a separate objective), it was proposed that a description on how their knowledge is conserved, used and promoted, be considered as an indicator.

Draft list of indicators: see hand-out Subject for evaluation: objectives of the Strategy Indicators Objective 1 Ensure that policy, regulatory and operational frameworks support the promotion of ESD 1.1 Organisation of the institutional arrangements - Not started (0 yes) - In progress (1-2 Yes) - Developing (3-5 Yes) - Completed (6 Yes)

IndicatorsUnderlying questions 1.1 Organisation of the institutional arrangements - Not started (0 yes) - In progress (1-2 Yes) - Developing (3-5 Yes) - Completed (6 Yes) (a)Is the Strategy available in your national[1] language(s)[2] Yes/No[1][2] (b) Do you have a coordinating body for implementation of the Strategy? Yes/No Pls. describe its mandate and coordinating mechanism. (c) Do stakeholders participate in the coordinating structure? Yes/No Etc.

Underlying questions Indicator type Means & Source of Verification Status of indicator Time-frame for completion (a) Is the Strategy available in your national [1] language(s) [2] Yes/No [1][2] Qualitative ‘Checklist’ Government reports RequiredPhase I (b) Do you have a coordinating body for implementation of the Strategy? Yes/No Qualitative ‘Checklist’ Government reports Required Phase I Etc.

Subject for evaluation: objectives of the Strategy Indicators Objective 1 Ensure that policy, regulatory and operational frameworks support the promotion of ESD 1.2 Implementation of the policy, regulatory and operational frameworks support the Strategy.

IndicatorsUnderlying questions 1.2 Implementation of the policy, regulatory and operational frameworks support the Strategy. (a)Do you have a national Strategy on SD? Yes/No (b) If yes, is ESD a part of this Strategy? Yes/No Pls. describe its mandate and coordinating mechanism. (c) If not, is ESD addressed in any other national policy document? Yes/No Explain how it is included. Etc.

Underlying questions Indicator type Means & Source of Verification Status of indicator Time- frame for completion (a) Do you have a national Strategy on SD? Yes/No Qualitative ‘Checklist’ Government reports RequiredPhase I

At the next meetings the experts… …w ill focus on consistency and validation and deletion of duplications in the draft. …will work further on the grouping of underlying questions in order to develop aggregated indicators.

Discussion……………………………..