Framework For Teaching 2012. מסגרת לפיתוח מקצועי של מורים רקע מהי המסגרת ? הנחות על למידה והוראה מיטביים שימושים.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Integrating Theory into Practice
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Framework For Teaching 2012

מסגרת לפיתוח מקצועי של מורים רקע מהי המסגרת ? הנחות על למידה והוראה מיטביים שימושים

3 רקע פיתוח ב -1996: הכשרת מעריכים למתן רשיונות הוראה Praxis III (licensing of novice teachers). הכרה בחשיבות של מסגרת כזו ( לפי דניאלסון ) –לרפלקציה על מורכבות ההוראה –שפה משותפת לשיח מקצועי –מסגרת להערכה עצמית ורפלקציה על פרקטיקה הזדמנות להתפתחות מקצועית

4 מה כוללת המסגרת ? מערכת קטגוריות ומחוונים לרמות ביצוע מה כוללת המסגרת ? מערכת קטגוריות ומחוונים לרמות ביצוע הקטגוריות –ארבעה תחומים (domains) –בכל תחום 5-6 מרכיבים (components). סה " כ 22 מרכיבים –לכל מרכיב 3-6 תת קטגוריות נוספות (elements) הפיתוח המקצועי וההערכה מתבצעים ברמה של האלמנטים המחוונים – Unsatisfactory – Basic – Proficient – Distinguished

5 מה כוללת המסגרת ? ( המשך ) מה כוללת המסגרת ? ( המשך ) התחומים 1. תכנון והכנה Planning and Preparation 2. סביבת הכיתה The Classroom Environment 3. הוראה Instruction 4. תפקידים מקצועיים Professional Responsibilities 2 ו -3 בכיתה, 1 ו -4 מחוץ לכיתה משולבים

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation includes comprehensive understanding of the content to be taught, knowledge of the student's backgrounds, and designing instruction and assessment. מתוך : Teacher-Evaluation.aspx והכלי המעודכן ל -2012http:// Teacher-Evaluation.aspx 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy 1b. Demonstrating knowledge of students 1c. Setting instructional outcomes 1d. Demonstrating knowledge of resources 1e. Designing coherent instruction 1f. Designing student assessment

Domain 2: The Classroom Environment addresses the teacher's skill in establishing an environment conducive to learning, including both the physical and interpersonal aspects of the environment. מתוך : Teacher-Evaluation.aspx והכלי המעודכן ל -2012http:// Teacher-Evaluation.aspx 2a. Creating an environment of respect and rapport 2b. Establishing a culture for learning 2c. Managing classroom procedures 2d. Managing student behavior 2e. Organizing physical space

Domain 3: Instruction is concerned with the teacher's skill in engaging students in learning the content, and includes the wide range of instructional strategies that enable students to learn. מתוך : Teacher-Evaluation.aspx והכלי המעודכן ל -2012http:// Teacher-Evaluation.aspx 3a. Communicating with students 3b. Using questioning and discussion techniques 3c. Engaging students in learning 3d. Using assessment in instruction 3e. Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness

Domain 4: Professional responsibilities addresses a teacher's additional professional responsibilities, including self-assessment and reflection, communication with parents, participating in ongoing professional development, and contributing to the school and district environment. מתוך : Teacher-Evaluation.aspx והכלי המעודכן ל -2012http:// Teacher-Evaluation.aspx 4a. Reflecting on teaching 4b. Monitoring accurate records 4c. Communicating with families 4d. Participating in a professional community 4e. Growing and developing professionally 4f. Showing professionalism

10 פיתוח מקצועי : היכרות עם שימושים במחוונים ובאסטרטגיות הוראה פיתוח מקצועי : היכרות עם שימושים במחוונים ובאסטרטגיות הוראה דוגמאות ללמידה עצמית בשני מרכיבים של תחום 3 ( הוראה (.3b שימוש בשאלות וטכניקות לדיון.3d שימוש בהערכה בהוראה – 3a. Communicating with students – 3b. Using questioning and discussion techniques – 3c. Engaging students in learning – 3d. Using assessment in instruction – 3e. Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness

11 הנחות הנחות 1. תלמידים :  מעורבות בלמידה (engagement)  בניית ידע ( קונסטרוקטיביזם )  הבנת מושגים " חשובים " ופיתוח מיומנויות קוגניטיביות " חשובות " 2. מורים :  פעילויות מזמנות, כלים ומקורות  קבלת החלטות שיטתית ( מטרות, שיטות הוראה והערכה מותאמות )  הערכה מעצבת  מקצוענות : התפתחות ותרומה ( מעבר לכיתה )

12 שימושים שימושים 1. הכשרה 2. פיתוח מקצועי 3. הכוונה למתחילים 4. מתווה למנוסים 5. מבנה למיקוד שיפור

Example from Domain 1 - planning and preparation o Unsatisfactory o Teacher’s plans reflect little understanding of the content of students and available resources. Instructional outcomes are either lacking or inappropriate, assessment methodologies are inadequate o Proficient o Teacher’s plans reflect solid understanding of the content, the students and available resources. Instructional outcomes represent important learning suitable to most students. Most elements of instructional design including the assessments are aligned with the goals o Distinguished o Teacher’s plans based on extensive content knowledge and understanding of students are designed to engage students in significant learning. All aspects of the teacher’s plan –instructional outcomes, learning activities, materials, resources, and assessments-are in complete alignment and are adapted as needed for individual students.

Framework For Teaching Evaluation Instrument 2012

15 מטרות ההערכה מטרות ההערכה 1. פרקטיקה איכותית 2. למידת תלמידים 3. התפתחות מקצועית

Teachers Evaluation System What  Evaluative Criteria  Levels of Performance  Weighting  Score Combining  Standard Setting How  Procedures  Instruments  Personnel  Timelines  Due Process Process for Deciding Training for Evaluators Professional Development for Teachers

17 מעריכים מיומנים מעריכים מיומנים 1. מזהים דוגמאות של מרכיבי פרקטיקה שונים 2. מיחסים את התצפית לרמות ביצוע ספציפיות 3. מניעים שיח פרודוקטיבי על פרקטיקה 4. תוצאות ההערכה ( המדויקת ) תקפים בעיני המורים ומעוררות אמון ציבורי

An effective teacher evaluation system must contain three essential elements: מתוך : Teacher-Evaluation.aspx 1)A coherent definition of the domain of teaching (the “What?”), including decisions concerning the standard for acceptable performance (“How good is good enough?”). 2)Techniques and procedures for assessing all aspects of teaching (the “How?”). 3)Trained evaluators who can make consistent judgments about performance, based on evidence of the teaching as manifested in the procedures.

2)Techniques and procedures for assessing all aspects of teaching (the “How?”) UnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished General description Critical Atributes Possible Exemples Component #a:___________________ General description of the component Element of component Indicators Domain #: _________ תיאור של התבנית של הכלי

3)Skilled evaluators מתוך : Evaluations That Help Teachers Learn must be able to: o recognize classroom examples of the different components of practice, o interpret that evidence against specific levels of performance, o Engage teachers in productive conversations about their practice, o assess teachers accurately so teachers accept the judgments as valid and the public has confidence in the results.

מתוך : Enhancing Professional Practice. A Framework for Teaching Features of the framework o Comprehensive o Grounded in research o Public o Generic o Coherent in structure o Independent of any particular teaching methodology o What is required? That teachers have a repertoire of strategies from which they can select a suitable one for a given purpose. No single approach appropriate for each set of instructional purposes