Susan Barrett Sheppard Pratt Health System Going to Scale: Essential Features of the Blueprint at the District Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan Barrett Outcomes Build Action Plan Using Self Assessment State, LEA, cluster??? 1. Introduce Topic 2. Discuss.
Advertisements

SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Reclaiming Futures as part of the OJJDP required Three-Year State Plan A Presentation to State SAGs Tom Begich.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Building Evaluation Capacity for States and Districts
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Building Effective Coaches to Expand & Sustain PBIS Implementation.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. University of Missouri - St. Louis Coaching for Capacity and Sustainability.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Securing Sustainable Funding, Political Support, & Visibility Barbara Sims & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 30, 2008.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
School-wide Facilitator Training September 15, 2010 School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett, Cyndi Boezio,
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
SW-PBS: Leadership & Sustainability George Sugai Center on PBIS University of Connecticut University of Oregon November 2, 2005
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
WELCOME PBIS Maryland Coaches & Administrators. Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Presented to the December 2008 State-Wide Coaches.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Sustaining and Scaling the Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: State Examples I Susan Barrett – Maryland Howard Muscott -
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Coaches Corner: Kathryn Schallmo MiBLSi Director.
Scaling and Sustaining PBIS: State, District, School Roles Rob Horner University of Oregon
Supporting District Structures & Teams through a State-Level Plan Susan Barrett, Implementer Partner Center on PBIS Brenda Melcher Central Region Coordinator.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Coaching Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org December 6, 2010.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
BoQ Critical Element: Faculty Commitment. Critical Element: Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus (regular data sharing)
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
SCTG COACHES WEBINAR November 3, 2015 December 1, 2015 January 5, 2016 February 2, 2016 March 1, 2016 April 5, 2016 May 3, 2016.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
State and District Role in
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

Susan Barrett Sheppard Pratt Health System Going to Scale: Essential Features of the Blueprint at the District Level

Outcomes Define the features and procedures for moving evidence-based educational practices from demonstrations to large- scale adoptions Provide State and District Examples Provide Lessons Learned Provide Next Steps Identify Key Resources

Problem Statement “We give schools strategies & systems for developing positive, effective, achieving, & caring school & classroom environments, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable. Schools need more than training.”

Sustainability + Scaling Organizational capacity for & documentation of accurate (90%) & expandable implementation of evidence-based practice across desired context (e.g., district, classroom, school-wide, nonclassroom) over time w/ local resources & systems for continuous regeneration.

Education 65 million kids 6 million teachers and staff 100,000 schools 3,143 counties 60 states & U.S. jurisdictions

Start with the end in mind… What will it take to have 100,000 replications that produce increasingly effective outcomes for 100 years? –Fixsen

Creating Implementation Capacity Start with too many overqualified people “Generation 1” practitioners become: –Generation 2 interviewers, trainers, coaches, evaluators –Generation 3 administrators, directors, and leaders –Generation 4 state and federal officials Fixsen 2008

You have knowledge about the Blueprint State/District will be successful if: –They start with sufficient resources and commitment –They focus on the smallest changes that will result in the biggest difference –They have a clear action plan –They use on-going self-assessment to determine if they are achieving their plan –They have access to an external agent/coach who is supportive, knowledgeable and persistent.

Implementers Blueprint Self Assessment More like guidelines Provides a common language

Leadership Team Funding VisibilityPolitical Support TrainingCoaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations SWPBS Implementers’ Blueprint Elements

Leadership Team SWPBS Implementers’ Blueprint Representation from key stakeholders Meet regularly with a regular process Complete regular self-assessment and long term action planning Led by Coordinator with FTE

Leadership Team –Language is important e.g. OISM, MISI- “Stayin Alive” –Integration Teams? Who are the players? Do you have folks who can assign dollars to a budget? change policy like job descriptions, code of conduct? Do you have Community Partners? –Management team- to do the day to day activities, planning, visiting schools, etc Roles and Responsibilities may change over time depending on implementation phaseRoles and Responsibilities –Establish a Partnership Agreement

Local Coordinator Identified –Implementation Phase should determine FTE –Access to Ongoing Training and Technical Assistance – Support –Meeting with other coordinators is critical!! –Local Management Team Creating protocols/standards (State v Local)Creating protocols/standards

Roles and Functions of Coordinator How many hats do you wear? –Systems Change Agent, –Trainer, Facilitator, Accountant, PR, Policy writer, Politician, Researcher, Computer Genius, Website Developer, Presenter…. Role changes over time-PROCESS –Can you build your skill to keep up? –Who will be your system of support?

Funding VisibilityPolitical Support SWPBS Implementers’ Blueprint Identify recurring funding sources 3 to 5 yrs. of support Disseminate results to multiple audiences Websites Newsletters Conferences Media (TV, etc.) Presentations to: school boards, state departments Write into policy Connect with key administrators LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES

Funding –Partnership Agreements Folks in charge have to understand 3-5 years, systems change –MD Example –Blending Initiatives –Social Marketing Economic Benefits, Serendipity( TN example) –Grants –Be careful what you wish for…

Where does your funding come from? examples Loudoun County Public Schools, VA –Department of Pupil Services –VDOE Training and Technical Assistance Center Charleston County School District, SC –General Operating Funds –Title Funds –IDEA –SS/HS Grant and additional grants –Business Partners

Local Political Support Superintendent Deputy Superintendent Assistant Superintendent for Instruction Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Services –Student Services –Special Education Assistant Superintendent for Support Services –Transportation –Food Services –Maintenance

TrainingCoaching Evaluation SWPBS Implementers’ Blueprint BUILD CAPACITY (training expertise) Support coaches Ensure coaches implement with fidelity Establish community of learning BUILD CAPACITY (implementation expertise) Support school teams Ensure teams implement with fidelity DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING Create data systems Fidelity Student outcomes Design process for evaluation Establish eval cycles COORDINATION ACTIVITIES

Evaluation What are your questions? Do you have the tools to answer? Can you get the answer quickly? Easy, Efficient, Relevant Economic Benefits Behavior Achievement Regular Feedback to all Stakeholders- MD example

Data Base pbs eval Local data base Decision Making Id gaps Build solutions Marketing and Dissemination Presentations Newsletters Progress Reports Evaluation Questions Template Tools Curriculum

Evaluation Cycle Start with the questions Build “Template”“Template” Id Tools Organize training materials- –Non negotiable info –Build from process tools

Evaluation Identify stakeholders –Assistant superintendents –Coordination team –Coaches –School principals Create & discuss implementation model Predict external factors that may influence expected results Input

Evaluation Activities Participation Short-term goals Outcomes Input

Evaluation Implementation with fidelity –Increased academic competence –Positive school climate –Increase time on task –Decrease in office referrals –Decrease in suspensions Outcomes Input Impact

Data Base Can you get access to the data quickly? Can others access easily? Id “others”? What reports will get generated? –Who, how often? What info will you use for decision making? –“move up triangle”- readiness? –Staff development Needs assessment- guide professional development What info will you use for dissemination and marketing?

Marketing and Visibility –Who are your stakeholders? –Do you have a spokesperson? –Using the data to create newsletters, presentations, fact sheets, elevator business cards- important you can get access to what you need to make your case on the fly!! –Newsletter, Annual Reports, Presentations – –Be Careful

30 Multiple levels of Visibility –State and Local Level: Presentations, Trainings, Stakeholder meetings, Interagency efforts, (Transformation; Mental Health Integration; Wraparound) –Multiple Media: Visual, Face to Face, Written, Website –Multiple Audiences: School Administrations and Instructional Leaders; University staff; Legislators, Potential alternative funders; State and Local Political appointees; Juvenile Justice; Vendors in the System of Care; Parent and other advocacy organizations; Community Members

What is Coaching Capacity? Does the district have sufficient capacity for: –District Training/Managing –School Coaching Do the coaches have capacity/skill to respond to schools as a: –Consultant –Coach (facilitator) –Intensive Coaching

Charleston PBIS Coach Rubric School Need Legend __ Rating Points = Intensive Support Unsatisfactory 3 = Coaching Support Below Avg. – Avg. 2 = Maintenance Support Good-Excel 1

Assigning Coaches by Need Example of Typical PBIS coaching load: 1 Red Zone School 3 points 2 Yellow Zone Schools 4 points 5 Green Zone Schools 5points 8 Schools12 Points Example of Red Zone School PBIS Specialist coaching load: 3 Red Zone Schools 9 points 1 Yellow Zone School 2 points 1 Green Zone School 1 point 5 Schools12 Points

Coach Competencies

Training Regular Training Cycle Curriculum- Illinois, MO, VA, OR Trainers- TOT Focus on outcomes Differentiated Instruction Readiness Follow Up- Returning Team Training

Type of Skill to be Trained Skinner (1974) distinguishes between two types of knowledge. –Knowing About: can describe variables that influence a phenomenon.Knowing About Example: Describe principles of reinforcement. –Knowing How: can perform effectivelyKnowing How Example: Shape the behavior of another. One form of knowing does not imply the other.

Returning Team Training Needs Assessment –Coaches –Principals –School teams Summer Training Day 1 –Key note speaker –Break-out sessions Day 2 –School team action planning

38 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Leadership Team Management Team Funding Marketing Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Active Coordination Braiding Initiatives 1.Phase One: Commitment to School Level Implementation 2.Phase Two: Commitment to Capacity Building 3.Phase Three: Commitment to Large Scale Implementation

Phase One Commitment to School Level Implementation Will this work here? –Establish Local Sites in Multiple Districts –Small and Large –Urban, Suburban and Rural – ES, MS, HS, Alt, JJ

Features Define Outcome DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES –State Team with 5 Year Implementation Plan Site Visits Coaching Information System Awareness Activities (Visibility, Marketing) –Coaching, Training –Local Point of Contact- pacing will be different –Funding,

Phase Two Commitment to Capacity Building –Demonstrated High Fidelity/High Impact –Demand Increases –State Team won’t be able to keep up with demand

Features Point of Contact and Coaches become Local Coordinators –Transfer role to local person –Use phase of implementation to guide decision points Meet with local team to build action plan- model after state team

Phase Three Commitment to Large Scale Implementation –Large number of schools in each district –Sustain and Build Integrated Systems Model- Braiding Initiatives Shelf Life –Increased roles and duties within District

Phase Four Innovation and Integration –Demonstrated impact throughout –Change/Adapt to fit culture every year –Renew Commitment –Easier, More Efficient, Cost Reduces –Organizational Framework allows for integration –Educators as better consumers

Expansion Maryland 494 schools North Carolina 548 schools Illinois 611 schoolsColorado 405 schools Florida 250 schoolsNew York 322 schools Michigan 181 schoolsOhio 221 schools New Mexico 130 schoolsWest Virginia 215 schools Virginia 210 schoolsLouisiana 285 schools Missouri 278 schoolsGeorgia 171 schools

Maryland

PBIS Maryland - Schools Trained and Implementing PBIS Maryland - Schools Trained and Implementing

Challenges Funding Mandates 3 Tiered Logic 2 nd Generation Coordinators –Death, Taxes and Attrition –Transfer of Skill Rapid Expansion (25% increase each year)

Successes/Serendipity State- Non Profit- University Partnership –Protected FTE Student Services and Special Education School Psych Conference Prior Relationship in each LSS Small, functional state team Successful Demo Sites Willing to talk to anyone who would listen