National Weather Service Portland Near Shore Wave Forecasting William R. Schneider Science and Operations Officer Ron Beitel Information Technology Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

NCEP -- Where Americas climate and weather services begin. WHO ARE WE? WHAT DO WE DO? Ocean Prediction Center.
Modeling to Revise Coastal Inundation and Flooding Estimates in Georgia and Northeast Florida Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference May.
Part 5. Human Activities Chapter 13 Weather Forecasting and Analysis.
Operational modeling of waves and currents at beach and harbor scales The CariCOOS TEAM.
Navigating the Columbia River Bar
US Army Corps of EngineersCoastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC SWIMS Hawaii Hurricane Inundation Fast Forecast Tool Jane McKee Smith, Andrew B. Kennedy,
WORKING GROUP 1 MODELING OF WIND WAVES AND SURGE EVENTS IN THE CASPIAN, BLACK, AZOV AND BALTIC SEAS.
Coupled with the DART 4G system, PMEL is working on the next generation Tsunami Forecast System. New modeling capability will use NOAA supercomputers to.
Industry-IOOS Workshop March 2004 Marathon, Houston IOOS -COASTMAP Model and Management System Eric Anderson ASA Narragansett, RI.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Demonstration Project Ports of Los Angeles/Long Beach Julie Thomas Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing.
A Voyage of Discovery Physical oceanography Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung University.
Building Relationships with the Marine Community.
Review of the NCEP production Suite: Recent Changes and Plans
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Mouth of the Columbia River Buoy System Julie Thomas Program Manager, CDIP Executive Director, SCCOOS Ilwaco, WA June 18, 2009.
An Instrumented Coastal Process Modeling Test Bed US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jeff Hanson U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development.
National Weather Service – Newport/Morehead City NC NHC/WFO Tropical Products…and What’s New for 2012 WFO Newport Hurricane Awareness Seminar July 17,
NOAA’s National Weather Service Satellite Vector Winds Uses and Requirements in the Western Region NWS.
Introduction In the next few slides you will get an overview of the types of models that the Navy is using – analysis systems, tidal models and the primitive.
Extratropical Storm-Induced Coastal Inundation: Scituate, MA Robert C. Beardsley 1, Changsheng Chen 2, Qichun Xu 2, Jianhua Qi 2, Huichan Lin 2 2 School.
US IOOS Modeling Testbed Leadership Teleconference May 3, 2011 FVCOM Development Team Robert C. Beardsley and Changsheng Chen
Tsunami Methodology Validation Findings and Recommendations Dr. Jawhar Bouabid and Mourad Bouhafs April 09, 2015.
National Weather Service National Weather Service Central Computer System Backup System Brig. Gen. David L. Johnson, USAF (Ret.) National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Graphic courtesy NOAA / PMEL / Center for Tsunami Research Pacific Northwest Waters Gateway to Our Future Communication through the NANOOS Visualization.
Office of Coast Survey Improving NOAA’s Capacity to Address Coastal Inundation Events The Storm Surge Roadmap and the Way Forward Jesse C. Feyen Storm.
Office of Coast Survey NOAA’s Storm Surge Roadmap: a Pathway to Improved Products and Services Jesse C. Feyen Storm Surge Roadmap Portfolio Manager.
Use of QuikSCAT Winds at NWS Field Offices Andrew Haner Forecaster/Incident Meteorologist NWS Seattle, WA.
NCEP Vision: First Choice – First Alert – Preferred Partner 1 Ocean Prediction Center ( Ming Ji, Director “where NOAA’s ocean obs.,
Oceanic and Atmospheric Modeling of the Big Bend Region Steven L. Morey, Dmitry S. Dukhovksoy, Donald Van Dyke, and Eric P. Chassignet Center for Ocean.
Update on Storm Surge at NCEP Dr. Rick Knabb, Director, National Hurricane Center and representing numerous partners 21 January 2014.
The Utilization of the Graphic Forecast Generator (GFE) to Locally Apply CPC’s Week Two Forecast.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Summer WAS*IS 2006 National Weather Service Verification Program Overview Brenton MacAloney II National Weather Service Headquarters Silver Spring, MD.
TIM-GSD 13 June GSD Weather Modeling Efforts in Support of RSA Christopher J. Anderson ESRL/GSD/FAB 10-km grid valid 09 UTC 12 Jun1.1-km grid valid.
Modelling 1: Basic Introduction. What constitutes a “model”? Why do we use models? Calibration and validation. The basic concept of numerical integration.
Carolinas Coast: A One-Stop Shop for Marine Observations in the Carolinas Funded by the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration Southeast Atlantic.
Storm Data and Verification Program Overview NOAA’s National Weather Service Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services Verification Unit Brenton MacAloney.
Office of Coast Survey Using Partnerships to Improve NOAA’s Storm Surge Products and Forecasts Jesse C. Feyen Storm Surge Roadmap Portfolio Manager National.
UMAC data callpage 1 of 16Nearshore Wave Prediction System (NWPS) EMC Operational Models Nearshore Wave Prediction System (NWPS) André van der Westhuysen.
Office of Coast Survey Improving NOAA’s Capacity to Address Coastal Inundation Events Jesse C. Feyen, Ph.D. Storm Surge Roadmap Portfolio Manager Acting.
Storm Based Warnings A New Direction in the Warning Process Add Name National Weather Service Add Office.
1 Extratropical Storm Surge Modeling Presented By: Jesse Feyen (NOS/OCS, Storm Surge Roadmap) Contributors:
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-18, Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
Contributing to the Prediction Coastal Flooding:
Predictability of High Impact Weather during the Cool Season over the Eastern U.S: CSTAR Operational Aspects Matthew Sardi and Jeffrey Tongue NOAA/NWS,
Evaluation of the Real-Time Ocean Forecast System in Florida Atlantic Coastal Waters June 3 to 8, 2007 Matthew D. Grossi Department of Marine & Environmental.
1 Vision for Marine and Coastal Services Digital Products Jamie Vavra Marine and Coastal Weather Services Branch Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services.
Observations to Operations: Why validation is important? Julie Thomas Scripps Institution of Oceanography Hydrographic Review Panel Los Angeles, CA April.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration WRF and the coastal marine environment Kate LaCasse SOO/SPoRT Workshop 11 July.
1 © CFI Group National Weather Service Marine/Tropical Survey Presentation of Customer Satisfaction Results March 16, 2004 Federal Consulting Group.
CFI GROUP WORLDWIDE ANN ARBOR ATLANTA BUENOS AIRES KUALA LUMPUR LONDON MADRID MELBOURNE MILAN PARIS PORTO ALEGRE SEOUL SHANGHAI STOCKHOLM National Weather.
Riding the IFPS/GFE into the Future of Forecasting Lynn Maximuk MIC WFO Pleasant Hill, MO.
GFE in RFCs Tom LeFebvre ESRL/Global Systems Division.
1 Toward Modeling of River-Estuary-Ocean Interactions to Enhance Operational River Forecasting in the NOAA National Weather Service Hassan Mashriqui Seann.
NWS MARINE PREDICTION CENTER America’s Weather Warning and Forecast Service for Mariners at Sea.
Marine Forecasts. Marine Products Special Marine Warning BULLETIN - IMMEDIATE BROADCAST REQUESTED SPECIAL MARINE WARNING NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DETROIT/PONTIAC.
C. Bruce Entwistle Science and Operations Officer Aviation Weather Center Kansas City, MO C. Bruce Entwistle Science and Operations.
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
Extra-Tropical Storm Surge (ETSS 2.0) Pre-Implementation Briefing College Park, MD May 14, 2015 Arthur Taylor, Huiqing Liu and Ryan Schuster MDL/NWS/NOAA.
HYSPLIT/ALOHA Demonstration Glenn Rolph OAR Air Resources Laboratory June 21, 2016.
What Happened? Three storms in quick succession First two were standard PNW winter storms Third fueled by remnants of Typhoons Hagibis and Mitag. Heavy.
Understanding Marine Customers Troy Nicolini National Weather Service Eureka, CA Presentation developed by Troy Nicolini with assistance from the COMET.
Ocean Prediction Center
Hypoxia Forecasts as a Tool for Chesapeake Bay Fisheries
Forecasting Marine Weather
Oil Spill in Mexican Gulf
An open-access service for on-demand coastal forecasts
Presentation transcript:

National Weather Service Portland Near Shore Wave Forecasting William R. Schneider Science and Operations Officer Ron Beitel Information Technology Officer National Weather Service Portland, Oregon March 2009

Overview  Motivation to Improve Wave Forecasts  History of Bar Forecasts  Portland Wave Modeling System  Changes to Wave Forecast Products

Motivation To Improve Near Shore Wave Forecasts  Most marine customers are in the Surf Zone or within 10 miles of coastline  Very Hazardous River Bars in Oregon and Washington  Columbia River has Significant Shipping, Commercial and Recreational Fishing  Tillamook Bar Especially Deadly in the past 5 years (15 Fatalities)  Waves are single greatest source of fatalities for weather phenomena in our forecast area

Recreational Boating

CDC Report - Commercial Fishing Fatalities  Oregon 21 [36%]  California 20 [34%]  Washington 17 [29%] Factors -  Weather - 34 deaths (79%)  Large Waves -17 deaths (40%)

Surf Zone Fatalities Source: Surf Zone Fatalities Source: Oregon Parks and Recreation   43 Fatalities (14 years)   41Fatalities in the 8 years prior to 2004   That’s ~ 5 deaths/year Average

The Columbia River Entrance

Outbound on Rough Columbia River Bar

Boat in Distress on Bar

Limitations of NWS Legacy Wave Model Guidance  Present day and Legacy WWIII not designed for shallow water waves  Grid Spacing Was Reduced to 7km in 2008 but - Input winds can from GFS can be Inaccurate near shore Input winds can from GFS can be Inaccurate near shore Trough of waves can be below the bottom! Trough of waves can be below the bottom! Doesn’t resolve surf Doesn’t resolve surf Doesn’t predict runup or setup for coastal flooding Doesn’t predict runup or setup for coastal flooding Doesn’t resolve complex opposing current and wave to wave interactions (Bar Conditions) Doesn’t resolve complex opposing current and wave to wave interactions (Bar Conditions)

Columbia River and Grays Harbor Bar Forecasts  Forecast of Waves at Columbia River Entrance Began 1977 Method used computer program or decay from outer buoys to forecast deepwater waves Method used computer program or decay from outer buoys to forecast deepwater waves Nomograms to forecast significant wave heights on the bar Nomograms to forecast significant wave heights on the bar  Current System used to forecast waves at the Columbia River Bar and Grays Harbor Bar began in 1984 Simple one-dimensional computer model run on a PC Simple one-dimensional computer model run on a PC Model based on work at NOAA PMEL Model based on work at NOAA PMEL “A Case Study of Wave-Current-Bathymetry Interactions at the Columbia River Entrance” F.I Gonzalez Journal of Physical Oceanography Vol 14, No. 6, June 1984 “A Case Study of Wave-Current-Bathymetry Interactions at the Columbia River Entrance” F.I Gonzalez Journal of Physical Oceanography Vol 14, No. 6, June 1984 Forecaster enters starting and ending values of swell and wind wave, height, period, direction Forecaster enters starting and ending values of swell and wind wave, height, period, direction Simple statistical model developed by Elson/Schneider (NWS Portland) has been show to be more accurate than the current system Simple statistical model developed by Elson/Schneider (NWS Portland) has been show to be more accurate than the current system

Bar Forecast Model Output

Columbia River Bar Forecast

Near Shore Wave Modeling Project Background

Background  Effort Began around 2002 WFO EKA Using SWAN Model Better Wave Forecasts in the Thermal Trough Better Wave Forecasts in the Thermal Trough Detailed Forecast for the Humboldt Bar Detailed Forecast for the Humboldt Bar Troy Nicollni, Eve Devaliere, Dave Nordello Troy Nicollni, Eve Devaliere, Dave Nordello  NOAA Coastal Storms Initiative – 2004 Columbia River Study Area Columbia River Study Area Use Eureka’s Work and Extend to Columbia River Bar Use Eureka’s Work and Extend to Columbia River Bar

Background  NOAA NWS Contracted Navel Research Labs Eric Rogers Eric Rogers Develop Prototype Develop Prototype Implement Eureka Code in Portland Implement Eureka Code in Portland  Good Start But - NRL Prototype not designed for NWS systems and software NRL Prototype not designed for NWS systems and software Eureka Code Poorly Structured and Documented Eureka Code Poorly Structured and Documented Difficult to Set Up and Not Very Portable to Other NWS Offices or Configurations Difficult to Set Up and Not Very Portable to Other NWS Offices or Configurations Numerous Errors in Early Versions Numerous Errors in Early Versions Eureka Code Would Not Run In Portland Eureka Code Would Not Run In Portland Funding Ran Out Funding Ran Out

Work Done Since Eureka  Focus on Coastal Waters  Various Grants and Funding for Students  Improve and develop code  Implement Local Circulation Model for Humboldt Bar  Partition Wave Information  Implement at All WR Costal WFOs Portland  Focus on Bar Forecasts  Complete Redesign of Modeling System  Rewrite Input Scripts  Redesign Model Configuration Scripts  Make Modeling System Portable  Rewrite Output Scripts  Limited Resources

NWS Portland Wave Modeling System  Real Time Forecast System  Base Model is SWAN  Run 4 Times per day  Nearshore Waves  All of Washington and Oregon Coastal Waters  Concentrate on Bar Forecast 1. Columbia River – Very Complex 2. Tillamook 3. Gray’s Harbor 4. Others  Six Nests 1. Large Outer Nest 2. Coastal Waters Nest 3. Gray’s Harbor Bar Nest 4. Columbia River Bar Nest 5. Tillamook Intermediate Nest 6. Tillamook River Bar Nest  Bar Forecasts out 48 hours  Develop System Easy to Set up at any NWS Office

Wave Modeling System Inputs  NWS Graphical Forecast Editor winds Merged from Seattle, Portland and Medford NWS Offices Merged from Seattle, Portland and Medford NWS Offices  Bathymetery – currently 3 arc sec data (90m)  WWIII spectrum at the boundary  Water Level from SELFE (not yet implemented)  Tidal Current from SELFE (not yet implemented)  SELFE Input provided by Center for Coastal Margin Observation and Prediction (CMOP) OHSU  SELFE to be run at NCEP in the Future

Forecaster Wind Input

Short Term Goals  Obtain Tidal Current and Water Level Input from CMOP  Test Runs and Simple Validation  Web Interface to Display Output  Port System to Cluster

Long Term Goals  Tidal Current and Water Level Input from NOS/NCEP  Explore High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC) Grant  Coupled Model with SELFE at CMOP and/or NOS/NCEP  Bathymetery Update System  Valdiation Observations from USCG Observations from USCG Observations from Columbia River Bar Pilots Observations from Columbia River Bar Pilots

Challenges  No Current Funding from NWS or NOAA  All work being done (or not done) by Ron and Bill as time available

Output for Customers  New Graphical Web Based Products For Bars Significant Wave Height Significant Wave Height Mean Wave Direction Mean Wave Direction Steepness – Probability of Breakers Steepness – Probability of Breakers Wave Hazard Wave Hazard Tidal Current Tidal Current  Enhanced Text in Coastal Waters Forecast Bar Forecast