Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.

Advertisements

RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists.

A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.

Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier Darrell L. Lee, easyCBM Senior Account Manager.

Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.

Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.

DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.

Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.

0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.

Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.

Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.

Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.

RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.

*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.

An Introduction to Response to Intervention

Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools

Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?

1 Good Morning! Christopher Kaufman, Ph.D. (207) web: kaufmanpsychological.org.

“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,

Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.

RTI Data-based Decisions Marilyn Bechtel Psychologist/Elliott Elementary School Lincoln Public Schools July 30, 2007.

Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.

Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format

Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.

Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.

Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.

 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.

Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf

Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.

0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.

 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.

MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.

Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.

Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.

Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.

Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.

Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.

From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings

RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.

June 5, 2014 Michelle Burks - Elementary ELA Coordinator.

Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.

Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.

RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.

Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.

DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.

Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.

Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.

Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.

UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.

1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.

Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,

Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA Assessment Driving Instruction David Lillenstein, Ed.D., NCSP Director of Psychological Services.

1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.

Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA Assessment Driving Instruction David Lillenstein, Ed.D., NCSP Director of Psychological Services Cindy Goldsworthy.

RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.

WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.

MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.

Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.

Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA Assessment Driving Instruction David Lillenstein, Ed.D., NCSP Director of Psychological Services (717)

Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA

Are students benefitting from core instruction + interventions?

The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model

3 Tier Leadership Team Implementation Training: Day 5 The Intervention Continuum Oakland Schools Early Childhood Special Education

Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities

Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Presented by: Megan Wolfinger & Julie Dignazio

Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.

Intensive Intervention – Tier 3

Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8, 2005

Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues I.History of using progress monitoring in Minneapolis Schools –To guide instruction –Early intervention and response to intervention –Keeping on track for adequate yearly progress Parts III & IV of this presentation are found in the accompanying power point presentation

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening and Eligibility for Special Education Referrals (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Monthly Norms For Sixth Grade

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening and Eligibility for Special Education Referrals (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

The Effectiveness of Special Education Marston, D. (1988). The effectiveness of special education: A time series analysis of reading performance in regular and special education. The Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 13–26. Multiple Baseline—AB design 3 elementary schools 272 students at risk—Below 25th Percentile CAT Measured weekly on CBM 11 students identified as LD with sufficient data

“Bob’s” Reading Progress Weeks Words Correct

“Terry’s” Reading Progress Weeks Words Correct

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Noncategorical Services Delivery Marston, D. (1987). Does categorical teacher certification benefit the mildly handicapped child? Exceptional Children, 63(5), EMR Teacher License LD EMR Student LD

Words Correct Reading Improvement of 4 Groups

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Ten Most Frequently Cited Barriers To Implementation of Formative Evaluation Systems 1.Teachers had a limited range of instructional strategies to use when data indicated a need for instructional changes. 2.Some teachers mechanically measure and chart without using data to make instructional decisions. 3.The use of CBM represents change and brings about resistance and anxiety. 4.Ongoing training system for special and regular education staff. 5.Implementing CBM in secondary schools. 6.The logistics of evaluation and modification. 7.Difficulty in getting staff to use CBM to adjust their instructional strategies. 8.Time needed to monitor teacher’s implementation of CBM. 9.Adequate district human resources to fully implement the program. 10.Concern that words read correctly is not a measure of comprehension.

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Class Chart Here

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

* Based on school psychology time studies by Dr. Andrea Canter Percentage of time spent testing by MPS school psychologists*

Problem Solving Model Student Needing Alternative Programming (SNAP) Individual Education Plan Student is Discrepant from Expectations Stage 2 Intervention Assistance Team Stage 1 Classroom Interventions Stage 3 Special Education Evaluation

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Monitoring Reading Progress Phase A Phase B  General Education Reading  Title I: 3X per week  General Education  Title I: 5X per week  Direct Instruction

Problem Solving Model (Marston et. al., 2003) FallSpring General Ed. Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

3rd Grade Data

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

CBM Growth for Lowest Quartile: 2001/2 Continuously Enrolled Students FallWinterSpring Median Words Read Correct Grade 7 White Am. Grade 7 African Am. Grade 2 White Am. Grade 2 African Am.

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Spring Kindergarten: Intercorrelations Early Literacy Measures: Validity Onset Phonemes Segments Letter Sounds Onset Phonemes

Spring Kindergarten with Fall 1 st Grade CBM Letter Sounds.62 Onset Phonemes.50 Segmentation.82 Spring Kindergarten Segments Predicting Fall 1 st Grade Report Card Teacher Ratings Understands what is read.66 Use phonics skills.66 Analyzes what is read.59 Reads fluently with expression.63 Early Literacy Measures: Validity

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Clicking on any green heading allows you to sort by that column

Intervention worksheets can also be entered online

CBM data can be viewed historically and graphed for the current year

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985) –Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986) –Non-categorical study (1987) Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)