Ethics Theory and Business Practice 4.1 Social Contract Theory – Part One Some Key Themes

aims to outline social contract theory in its classical format to explain the importance of voluntarism, tacit agreements and hypothetical constructions in a business context

social contract theory a political philosophy, aimed at identifying rights and obligations of citizens and the state can also be used to identify rights and obligations associated with relationships between companies and their stakeholders and to help us think about the broader relationship between business and society

classical social contract theory 1.why do we move from the state of nature to society? 2.what do we sacrifice in so doing? the state of naturesociety

1. why do we move from the state of nature to society? Hobbes: to avoid a constant war of all against all Locke: to ensure respect for property and thus to encourage productive endeavour Rousseau: to enable information to be shared and knowledge to be captured, which facilitates human progress

2. what do we sacrifice in so doing? we give up our freedom to do whatever we want to do we agree, instead, to do what is needed to ensure the smooth running of society

three features of social contract theory social contact theory emphasises the importance of: 1.voluntarism 2.tacit agreements 3.hypothetical constructions

1. voluntarism the ethical legitimacy of social arrangements derives from the fact that those who are involved in those arrangements have voluntarily agreed to their involvement they have agreed to be involved while fully aware of the advantages and disadvantages that this presents

2. tacit agreements an explicit agreement is an agreement that has been stated clearly and precisely a tacit agreement is an agreement that is understood or implied without being clearly and precisely stated tacit agreements may be just as compelling as explicit agreements for example …

theory in practice The psychological contract: a tacit agreement between employers and employees

3. hypothetical constructions the obligations arising from the social contract are not based on an actual agreement they should be thought of as if some form of agreement had been made, even though such an agreement has never actually been made by remaining in society, and by enjoying its benefits, we act as if we have agreed to a social contract

in a business context by participating in, and by enjoying the benefits of a particular business relationship we act as if we had agreed to make the associated sacrifices

social contract theory and the relationship between business and society society offers benefits to business in enjoying those benefits, business takes on an obligation to make certain sacrifices such obligations are a matter of voluntary, tacit, hypothetical agreement between business and society

theory in practice Starbucks wakes up and smells the coffee

key points voluntary agreement to participate in a business relationship gives ethical force to the obligations associated with that relationship a comprehensive understanding of business obligations should take into account tacit agreements as well as explicit ones by participating in a business relationship, we could be thought of as agreeing to honour certain obligations