Group Dynamics Joe Smetter, Brandon Vaca, and Kristin Wakin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team work & Team building team work and team building. u To understand the basic concepts and ideas of team work and team building. u To appreciate the.
Advertisements

GROUPTHINK in Archived Chapter, 3rd ed.
Chapter 12 Group Dynamics Groups and Social Groups and Social Exchanges Exchanges The Group Development The Group Development Process Process Roles and.
Communicating for Results 9e 9 Key Ideas Defining small group Characteristics of successful problem-solving teams Group formats Small-Group Communication.
Social Psychology David Myers 10e Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies1.
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
Motivation Theories. Maslow: Need for achievement Hierarchy of needs: Physiological, safety, love, esteem, self-actualization’ Must attain the lower order.
Human Resource Management Lecture-36. Summary of Lecture-35.
Social Scientists define a social group as a group of two or more people who have four characteristics: * They interact regularly and influence each other.
Welcome!. What is a Collaborative Team? A group of diverse members who work together to share their expertise to address issues, solve problems or give.
Themes in 12 Angry Men Groupthink Obedience to Authority Conformity
Ancestral Hierarchy and Conflict Christopher Boehm Presented by Josh Breiger.
Chapter 13 Teams and Teamwork
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: Oct. 22, Group Performance Process loss can reduce group perf. –How? –Brainstorming example –
Group and Social Influence on Behavior and Decision Making.
Chuck Millstead – Master Student University of Michigan, Flint
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter Fourteen Groups and Teams.
Chapter 15 Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Bipartisan Reports Cite Groupthink
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases) Prof. Morten Hansen MIIC, April
Prepared by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama © 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning All rights reserved. Group and Interpersonal Behavior.
Knowledge Objectives Define the term group.
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: March 28, Group Polarization Group discussion strengthens members’ initial attitudes  polarization Typical Group Study:
Social Psychology Alive, Breckler/Olson/Wiggins Chapter 10 Chapter Ten Group Dynamics and Intergroup Conflict.
NVSC LtCol J. D. Fleming 21 October 2014.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Theories of Motivation
“Patrice Zagame’s Team Leadership of Novartis Brazil” Case Study for Chapter 11 “Developing and Leading Teams” by Mohammad Khadim.
Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of.
Effective Groups and Teamwork
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Chapter 5: Groups and Organizations. Objectives (slide 1 of 2) 5.1 Types of Social Groups Define what a social group is and describe types of groups.
WITH THE NAME OF ALLAH THE MOST HELPFULL AND BENIFICAL.
Primate Behavior & Models for Human Evolution
How Teams Work. Task and Maintenance Needs  Task Activities – Any activity a team member does that contributes to the group’s performance purpose. 
GRADE 12 M.CARDINAL CHIMPANZEES: OUR CLOSEST RELATIVES.
TEAM PRESSURES AND CHALLENGES MEETING THE CHALLENGES.
PSYC 1000 Lecture 11. Evolution of Language Advent of language an evolutionary milestone Language is the basis for cultural evolution –Tendency of cultures.
GroupThink Embracing the Power of the Group Elaine Seat, PhD, PE.
Effective Groups and Teams
Leadership in Groups & Teams. “It is quite possible that the mark of a truly effective internal team leader is to be more of a coach and to empower the.
Groupthink What is it? Why should we care about it? What can we do about it?
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
MADE BY: Shalini Prakash….(018) Monisha Gautam..(026)
Defective Decision Making & Problem Solving Small Group Communication.
 Looking ahead - How do teams contribute to organizations? › What are the current trends in the use of teams? › How do teams work? › How do teams make.
Interpersonal & Group Perspectives Your Milgram Q’s are due today!!
Managing Conflict in Multidisciplinary Teams Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing.
Conformity and Groupthink MAR 3503 February 14, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8-1 Chapter 8 Participative Management and Leading Teams.
GROUP DECISION MAKING ADVANTAGES BROAD REPRESENTATION TAPS EXPERTISE MORE IDEAS GENERATED EVALUATION OF OPTIONS COORDINATION HIGH ACCEPTANCE DISADVANTAGES.
Leadership in Groups and Teams Chapter 7. “When building a team, I always search first for people who love to win. If I can’t find any of those, I look.
Groupthink Clip art.
Chapter 6 Primate Behavior. Chapter Outline Importance of Primate Study Evolution of Behavior Nonhuman Primate Social Behavior Reproduction and Reproductive.
Groups Dynamics and Teams Development. Groups, Teams and Organizational Effectiveness Group –Two or more people who interact with each other to accomplish.
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Foundations of International Foreign Policy.  Definition  Issues – Group versus individual genius  Issues – individual versus group acceptance  Issues.
Listening in Groups. Listening - HURIER Hearing Understanding Remembering Interpreting Evaluating Responding.
Chapter 15: Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Foundations of Interpersonal and Group Behavior
Processes that Occur in Group Decision Making
12 Group Dynamics Chapter Groups and Social Exchanges
Team Dynamics Eric M. Robinson.
Multidisciplinary Teams
Groupthink: The Desperate Drive for Consensus at Any Cost Irving L
Interpersonal & Group Perspectives
Why should we care about it?
Team Dynamics Chapter 16.
Social Facilitation The improved performance of tasks in the presence of others When is social facilitation most noticeable? When the tasks are simple.
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: Oct. 22, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

Group Dynamics Joe Smetter, Brandon Vaca, and Kristin Wakin

Our Closest Living Relatives Humans What traits do we share? Phylogenic Tree of Hominoids

What do we have in common? Genetic overlap Share 98.8% of the same genes Emotions Tool use Primitive yet effective spears Termite fishing Problem-solving abilities Ape Genius Ability to mimic behaviors Social learning Communication

Shared Traits Remarkable short-term memory

Cooperation Definition Working together to accomplish a shared goal Examples Hunting in bands for bush babies Sharing meat Grooming one another Defending territories Do chimpanzees have the capacity to cooperate?

Testing Intraspecies Cooperation Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311,

Chimpanzee Collaboration with Humans Soliciting Behavior Looking at the face Whimpering Taking the partner’s hand What if there is no benefit for the chimpanzee? Hirata, S., & Fuwa, K. (2007). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) learn to act with other individuals in a cooperative task. Primates, 48,

Evolutionary Implications Ability to cooperate in the wild and in captivity Rational and recruiting abilities Ability to mimic each other’s behavior Cooperation is not solely a human ability but must have existed in the common ancestor before the human and ape lineages divided.

Why isn’t this a Planet of the Apes? Chimps can imitate humans or other apes, but we routinely teach one another We have greater control over our emotions and impulses We have more complex forms of collaboration

Groupthink Groupthink- “ A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ striving for unanimity overrides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action.”

Antecedents of Groupthink High Group Cohesiveness A Stressful Situation Group Insulation Promotional Leadership Lack of Methodical Decision Making Processes Lack of Variety in Members’ Values and Perspectives

Symptoms of Groupthink Rationalization Stereotyping Self-Censorship Direct Pressure on Those Who Oppose Unanimity Existence of Mindguards Illusions of Invulnerability, Morality, and Unanimity

Groupthink and Political Disasters Groupthink is often used to explain political disasters throughout history. Why? The Holocaust, Bay of Pigs Invasion, Watergate Scandal, and explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger have all been cited as examples of events caused by groupthink.

Two-Process Groupthink Model Compliance vs. Reinforcement Compliance- A group member privately disagrees with the ideas of the group, but goes along with the group decision in order to secure unanimity Reinforcement- A group member initially agrees with the group’s ideas, and their position is further strengthened through group interaction

Leadership and Groupthink Promotional Leader- A leader who pushes his or her personal agenda upon a group rather than encouraging members to express all possible viewpoints. Promotional leadership has been correlated with the existence of more groupthink symptoms. Extreme example- Adolf Hitler

Evolution of Groupthink The behaviors of leaders and followers evolved in early humans. Leadership was necessary in order to organize groups for hunting and gathering. Organized groups with leaders were more fit. What evolutionary advantage could groupthink have?

Social Rank and IDS: The Evolution of Depression and Corresponding Relation to Oppression

Humans As Social Animals Competition for resources Mates Food Allies Done through… Formation of Alliances Agonistic Behavior (intraspecies fighting)

Often, confrontations can be aggressive and severely detrimental to the loser

Social Rank Theory Presented by John Price in 1967 Determined from observation that certain evolved psychobiological mechanisms exist that facilitate success or failure in conflict situations Dominant members perform ritual agonistic behavior (symbolic actions that portray dominance) to avoid prevent serious or fatal injury Lower ranking members of the group respond with submissive behavior These interactions result in the sustainment of social hierarchies that are beneficial for dominant members This process requires a submissive response from the lower-ranking group member

Involuntary Defeat Strategy (IDS) Price recognized that losers of intraspecies conflicts often exhibit behaviors closely resembling human depression, suggesting the presence of a psychobiological mechanism promoting (or at least allowing for) the acceptance of defeat This mechanism is now known as IDS These symptoms include: Withdrawal Decreased Motivation Helpless Hopelessness Inferiority Inadequacy Anhedoria (inability to experience pleasure) IDS can triggered when defeat is directly experienced or when defeat is though to be inevitable

IDS is and adaptive strategy Usually only lasts for a short time period Ends conflict with a superior member, escaping serious or fatal injury Give up on unattainable goals and focus on more realistic and profitable pursuits But can be maladaptive When the loser can not separate from the conflict When IDS is not “turned off” and becomes too intense or persistent clinical depression and anxiety can develop

Contemporary Human Experiences of IDS Competition strategies have evolved to emphasize social as opposed physical Social Comparison Compare attractiveness, rank, and membership to others Other animals make similar comparisons, but, they are used to prevent potentially dangerous conflict Humans make more sophisticated comparisons and judgments that can trigger IDS and result in depression and other mental disorders Entrapment Desire to escape negative conditions but either can not or believe that one can not Can be either internal, external, or both

Theory of Oppression Caused by a dominating enforcement of beliefs that designate a certain group as inferior Intropunitive response: internalization of beliefs about oneself that are transmitted by the dominating group Members of oppressed groups become their own oppressors by developing a sense of internal entrapment, often ignoring structural systems of oppression Depression has been observed to be one of the main impacts of oppression

Examples Slavery Mass Communication