Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System The Wisconsin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.
The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
National Center on Response to Intervention
SIMS User Training SIMS State-Wide Training
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Heidi Erstad and Peg Mazeika, Technical Assistance Coordinators Wisconsin RtI Center Bridget Blask, Rachel Blum, and Leslie Connors Franklin Elementary.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Presented From the WI RtI Center Lori Cameron PBIS Technical Assistance Coordinator Sara Summ and Lynn Johnson Academic Technical Assistance Coordinators.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
A Preparation Presentation For: Administrators Team Members Classroom Management Trainers Coaches Start Here! The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
A Preparation Presentation For: Administrators Team Members Classroom Management Trainers Coaches Start Here! The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Welcome! As you are settling in and waiting for others to join, please take a few minutes to think about and jot down any questions you may have about.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
3 Tier Leadership Team Implementation Training: Day 5 The Intervention Continuum Oakland Schools Early Childhood Special Education
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Welcome to the NJTSS Early Reading Project!
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this document and for the continued support of this federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material. Reviewing Your Selected and Intensive Levels of Support

What is fidelity of implementation? Definition: Delivery of practices in the way in which they were designed and intended to be delivered, accurately and consistently Adapted from National Center on Response to Intervention, n.d., online.

ExposureAdherence Quality of Delivery Engagement Fidelity Sticking to the plan; Using “active ingredients” Frequency, dosage, duration Use of “best practices” Active participation Modified from O’Donnell, 2008

Fidelity of Implementation

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Differentiated Universal Reading Instruction Teachers differentiate content, process, and products based on student needs Teachers deliver instruction based on an established timeframe (e.g. 90 minutes a day, 5 days a week); students are in attendance All students engaged in content, working at next level of challenge Student grouping is flexible and fluid, based on data

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Selected Level Interventions Staff implement core components of interventions according to design Staff implement intervention based on duration & time frame defined by program developer or research; students attend sessions Students are actively engaged throughout interventions Staff deliver instruction with enthusiasm and fast pace

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Intensive Level Interventions Staff adhere to individualized student plan and collect data to determine effectiveness Staff follow predetermined duration and frequency based on team- developed individualized student plan to address student’s needs Student actively engaged throughout interventions working on individualized goals Staff adjust instruction based on student responsiveness to plan / according to student data

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Progress Monitoring Staff follow guidelines of the assessments Staff follows established progress monitoring timeline Students are engaged in goal-setting and track their own progress monitoring growth Staff do not provide additional context or assistance to students during the assessment

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Data-Based Decision-Making for Screening Predetermined measures used; Explicit written decision rules are followed to assess student, class, grade, or school-level progress Data analysis teams meet within one week of screening window Multiple staff roles are involved in problem-solving and data-based decision-making : Decisions are made in a timely way

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in School RtI Leadership Team Established agendas and protocols are used consistently in leadership team meetings The school leadership team meets monthly to oversee implementation of the school’s RtI Action Plan All team members are actively in discussions and decision-making The team adheres to norms established by the group

Where x = evidence-based practice and y = expected outcome Cordray, 2007 Evidence-based assumes that a practice is being implemented as intended Why is fidelity of implementation important?

Achievement of high implementation fidelity is one of the best ways of replicating the success achieved by original research. Carroll, 2007 Why is fidelity of implementation important?

National Research Center on Learning Disabilities, 2006 High fidelity Increased program credibility More consistent & better student outcomes Motivated staff Why is fidelity important?

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Accountability Support Quality control Quality assurance

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Be clear about and build deep understanding of “active ingredients” of instruction and intervention Over-estimate time, training, & support needed to develop fluency with new practices Know that change occurs at the individual level; one size won’t fit all! SUPPORT Don’t skimp on professional learning!

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Anticipate difficulties with implementation of new practices Provide and co-create staff manuals, checklists, “calibration checks,’ and guidelines Create feedback loops SUPPORT Don’t skimp on supportive structures!

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Continued monitoring is critical to success Create a plan to monitor implementation Analyze data to identify possible reasons for programs not performing as expected and action plan ACCOUNTABILITY

What resources are available to help? HANDOUT Resources to Support and Measure Fidelity of Instruction and Intervention

Closing Thoughts… The goal of a fidelity system is to ensure that both the school process of RTI and the practices at each level are implemented and delivered as intended so that we can create a system of success for ALL. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities, 2006

References Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., McInerney, M., Holland-Coviello, R., Masiello, T., Helsel, F., & Robyak, A. (2008). Measuring training and practice fidelity in capacity-building scaling-up initiatives. CELLpapers, 3(1), Available Forbus, D., Milbank C., & Hughes, J. (2011). Maximizing Student Outcomes – What does Instructional fidelity have To Do With It? EssentialEducator.org Johnson, E., Mellard, D., Fuchs, D. & McKnight, M. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Leonard-Barton, D. & Kraus, W. (1985). Implementing new technology. Harvard Business Review. 6, 102 – 110. Mellard, D., (2010). Fidelity of implementation within a Response to Intervention (RtI) framework: Tools for schools. National Center on Response to Intervention. National Center on RtI. (2009). Fidelity of implementation within an RtI framework. Available

References National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (August, 2006). RtI manual: Fidelity of implementation. Available North Dakota Department of Public Instruction. (n.d.). Fidelity of Implementation. Available Protheroe, N., (2008). The impact of fidelity of implementation in effective standards-based instruction. Principal, 38 – 42. SCRED. (2011). Implementation integrity within an RtI framework: Critical roles and tools for school psychologists. Available