SLICE – Transitioning from Phase 1 into Phase 2 What I’d like to cover… Project management issues Project management issues Where we’re at with Phase.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gap Analysis >> Next Steps
Advertisements

Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Great Basin Restoration Initiative GBRI Field Office to On-the Ground Project.
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Managing the Nations Fish Habitat at Multiple Spatial Scales in a Rapidly Changing Climate Introduction and Overview.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Point-intercept aquatic plant sampling Ray Valley, Cindy Tomcko, Donna Dustin 19 November 2008.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment (SLICE) and its “so-called” sentinel lakes Ray Valley and Don Pereira.
Regional Critical Mass SLICE can wait no longer!.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.
MLC-2 New Hampshire October 12, Quality Improvement Activities for MLC-2 1.Articulate measures to monitor improvement for New Hampshire’s performance.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment (SLICE) Sentinel Lakes Program Ray Valley and Don Pereira.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Selecting a BR & E Model Ten Questions to Guide the Process 2004 RCCI INSTITUTE August 2004 Henry Cothran University of Florida (352) ext 409.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Proposed National SET Goals for 2009 National SET Mission Mandate Team and National 4-H Council.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.
Selecting a BR & E Model 10 Questions to Guide the process 2004 SCED Conference May 20 – 21, 2004 Hank Cothran Food and Resource Economics.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
SLICE Advisory Team Meeting January 26 th -27 th 2011.
Sentinel Lakes Program: MPCA Update – WQ Sampling, Data Analysis & Reporting Steve Heiskary Prepared in conjunction with: Jesse Anderson Pam Anderson Lee.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
Project: CAPACITY BUILDING FOR VIETNAMESE CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ON CLIMATE CHANGE Presented by: Ms. Pham Thi Bich Ngoc CC Project Coordinator, The.
Using the FRP to Enhance Georgia’s Leadership Program May 9, 2006 Stephanie Busch P 2 AD.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
EcoDistricts. What are EcoDistricts? An EcoDistrict is a highly integrated district or neighborhood that is resource efficient; captures, manages and.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
2016 Columbia River Basin Long-Term Water Supply and Demand Forecast Dan Haller, PE
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
Adaptive Integrated Framework (AIF): a new methodology for managing impacts of multiple stressors in coastal ecosystems A bit more on AIF, project components.
Establishing A Business Retention and Expansion Program Some Questions to Guide the Process.
10/12/20091 Agenda Introduction Meeting Purpose Sustainability History at NCSU CEST Mission & Organization Schedule Next Meetings Welcome to the Buildings.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
SW-PBIS Cohort 10 Spring Training & Celebration February and March 2016.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
ACCEL 1 ESL Providers Network (EPN) Adult English Language Acquisition Cohort March 13, 2015.
Planning Commission Meeting July 30, Presentation Outline  Project Purpose, Background and Schedule  Overview of Community Input  Overview of.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
Presentation transcript:

SLICE – Transitioning from Phase 1 into Phase 2

What I’d like to cover… Project management issues Project management issues Where we’re at with Phase 1 Where we’re at with Phase 1 1. Timeline 2. Deliverables Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 1. Debrief from Advisory Team Mtg in Jan “Stop-gap” measures in Revised purpose and goals Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines

What I’d like from you… Better clarity on Exec. Sponsor and Roles in transitioning SLICE Phase 1 into Phase 2. Better clarity on Exec. Sponsor and Roles in transitioning SLICE Phase 1 into Phase 2. Your thoughts about what SLICE looks like operationally Your thoughts about what SLICE looks like operationally Moving from “duct tape and bubble gum” to something sustainable Moving from “duct tape and bubble gum” to something sustainable Realigning staff resources to best carry-out a revised lake survey program Realigning staff resources to best carry-out a revised lake survey program Timeline target for implementing Phase 2 Timeline target for implementing Phase 2

Oversight DNR Fisheries 1 Project Coordination 2 Ray Valley Implementation DNR Fisheries Implementation 3 Recommendation of direction Information base Analysis and Evaluation Analysis Teams 10 Syntheses of trends Technical Advisory Team 12 Eco and Waters Implementation 4 PCA Implementation 5 Local Partners 7 Citizen Volunteers 8 Public Information and Outreach 9 MDH Implementation 6 DNR Area Staff Local trends Local Partners Local trends PCA Water Monitoring Unit Local trends Ancillary Investigations 11 Strategic Advisory Team 13 SLICE “Org chart” CO Managers Regional Managers

SLICE Phase 2

What I’d like to cover… Project management issues Project management issues Where we’re at with Phase 1 Where we’re at with Phase 1 1. Timeline 2. Deliverables Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 1. Debrief from Advisory Team Mtg in Jan “Stop-gap” assessments in Revised purpose and goals Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines

Where we’re at with Phase is last scheduled field season of 4-yr Phase-1 pilot 2011 is last scheduled field season of 4-yr Phase-1 pilot Several products will be rolled out in Several products will be rolled out in Forecast models of cold-water fish habitat given land use and climate changes in 3 sentinel lakes 2. Hist. reconstructions of WQ in 7 sentinel lakes 3. Cisco behavior and inland pop assessment tools 4. Zooplankton indicator development baseline comprehensive lake reports 6. DJ research project evaluating indicators

Where we’re at with Phase 1 We’re already finding useful indicators derived from our standard suite of lake survey assessments We’re already finding useful indicators derived from our standard suite of lake survey assessments Looking to gain efficiencies in effort Looking to gain efficiencies in effort If we build it, they will come If we build it, they will come

If you build it they will come… Lucinda Johnson Heinz Stefan Puni Jeyasingh - OSU Lee Engel – U of MN

Leveraging other intellectual and financial capital to explore lake issues Simulations of cisco fish habitat in Minnesota Lakes under future climate scenarios – Fang et al. (Auburn U & U of MN) Simulations of cisco fish habitat in Minnesota Lakes under future climate scenarios – Fang et al. (Auburn U & U of MN) Simulating the combined effects of future watershed land cover and climate change on cold-water fish habitat – Herb, Stefan, Johnson, Jacobson (U of MN and NRRI; USGS funded) Simulating the combined effects of future watershed land cover and climate change on cold-water fish habitat – Herb, Stefan, Johnson, Jacobson (U of MN and NRRI; USGS funded) Reconstruction of how a century of nutrient-enrichment of lakes has affected evolutionary changes in organisms, particular Daphnia pulex zooplankton – Punidan Jeyasingh Oklahoma State University (NSF funded) Reconstruction of how a century of nutrient-enrichment of lakes has affected evolutionary changes in organisms, particular Daphnia pulex zooplankton – Punidan Jeyasingh Oklahoma State University (NSF funded) Classification of Selected Minnesota Lakes Using Deuterium and δ 18 O to Characterize Hydrologic Residence Time – Lee Engel and Joe Magner (U of MN) Classification of Selected Minnesota Lakes Using Deuterium and δ 18 O to Characterize Hydrologic Residence Time – Lee Engel and Joe Magner (U of MN)

What I’d like to cover… Project management issues Project management issues Where we’re at with Phase 1 Where we’re at with Phase 1 1. Timeline 2. Deliverables Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 1. Debrief from Advisory Team Mtg in Jan “Stop-gap” assessments in Revised purpose and goals Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines

SLICE Advisory Team Meeting Debrief from Phase 1 Debrief from Phase 1 Review of progress on goals and objectives Review of progress on goals and objectives What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint Discussed program purpose and goals Discussed program purpose and goals ID’d core survey components of SLICE ID’d core survey components of SLICE Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios

What we accomplished… Debrief from Phase 1 Debrief from Phase 1 Review of progress on goals and objectives Review of progress on goals and objectives What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint Discussed program purpose and goals Discussed program purpose and goals ID’d core survey components of SLICE ID’d core survey components of SLICE Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scnarios Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scnarios

What worked… Just the commitment to build long-term monitoring infrastructure has attracted interdisciplinary partners. Just the commitment to build long-term monitoring infrastructure has attracted interdisciplinary partners. Having a dedicated coordinator Having a dedicated coordinator Bringing Research and Management closer – LTM bridges the gap. Bringing Research and Management closer – LTM bridges the gap.

“Areas for Improvement” Data quality issues Data quality issues 1. Many surveys weren’t done 2. Many surveys weren’t done right 3. “Span of control issues” with coordinating 18 Area offices and a dozen research staff to all be doing the same thing 4. Aging issues

“Areas for Improvement” Ownership Ownership 1. One staff with explicit ownership through PD (me) 1. No ownership means lack of understanding why the data is being collected 2. Lack of buy in and data quality suffers 3. Informative data are being put in a database and not being used

“Areas for Improvement” Disconnect in program relevance and staffing. Disconnect in program relevance and staffing. Area staff are shouldering workloads Area staff are shouldering workloads SLICE’s primary utility is for describing regional and statewide trends SLICE’s primary utility is for describing regional and statewide trends Scale issue Scale issue

SLICE’s “Power” is in the network: Example: statewide declines in Curly-leaf pondweed

Curly-leaf pondweed Widespread throughout S and central MN and moving north. Grows under ice and needs some winter light Can grow abundantly and form mats early in spring Dies off by early summer and algae blooms typically follow in eutrophic lakes Expected to benefit from shorter winters and earlier springs

Patterns of curly-leaf pondweed growth

St. James St. Olaf

Bottom Line: We won’t get this type of synthesis across lakes with the current individual lake approach of the lake survey program and associated standard reporting

“Areas for Improvement” Communication with staff Communication with staff 1. Relevance of SLICE to some Area staff not readily apparent 2. Communication to Area staff on progress or program direction is not timely or targeted. 3. The loss of training sessions hurts…

What we accomplished… Debrief from Phase 1 Debrief from Phase 1 Review of progress on goals and objectives Review of progress on goals and objectives What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint Discussed program purpose and goals Discussed program purpose and goals ID’d core survey components of SLICE ID’d core survey components of SLICE Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios

Adaptive Management Process Assess problem Evaluate Adjust Implement Design Monitor Phase 1: Oct – Jan 2006/2007 May-Jun 2007 Apr Today! Phase 2 Phase 1 Op plan

Collaborative process… Advisory team offered input on a short SLICE purpose statement Advisory team offered input on a short SLICE purpose statement Nine long-term goals were identified Nine long-term goals were identified More specific short-term Phase 2 objectives will follow with better clarity on budget More specific short-term Phase 2 objectives will follow with better clarity on budget Need an “endorsement” from Oversight team Need an “endorsement” from Oversight team

SLICE’s purpose… To monitor and model Minnesota lake ecosystems for the detection and better understanding of the effects of environmental stressors in order to guide management and policy actions that sustain lake resources.

What we accomplished… Debrief from Phase 1 Debrief from Phase 1 Review of progress on goals and objectives Review of progress on goals and objectives What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint Discussed program purpose and goals Discussed program purpose and goals ID’d core survey components of SLICE ID’d core survey components of SLICE Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios

Core components to continue monitoring in 2012 Water quality – PCA Water quality – PCA Zooplankton – PCA & EcoWat Zooplankton – PCA & EcoWat Lake Levels - EcoWat Lake Levels - EcoWat Year-round temperature loggers Year-round temperature loggers Nearshore fish sampling Nearshore fish sampling Point-intercept veg sampling Point-intercept veg sampling Large fish sampling (optional) Large fish sampling (optional)

What we accomplished… Debrief from Phase 1 Debrief from Phase 1 Review of progress on goals and objectives Review of progress on goals and objectives What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint Discussed program purpose and goals Discussed program purpose and goals ID’d core survey components of SLICE ID’d core survey components of SLICE Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios

Timelines 2011 is last field season 2011 is last field season Suggested “stop-gap” measures to get us through 2012 Suggested “stop-gap” measures to get us through 2012 Several final reports to be completed in 2012-spr Several final reports to be completed in 2012-spr Would like several things in place by 2013 Would like several things in place by 2013 Standard assessment and reporting protocols Standard assessment and reporting protocols Dedicated staff Dedicated staff New research projects (DJ, LCCMR???) New research projects (DJ, LCCMR???)

SLICE Phase 2

What we accomplished… Debrief from Phase 1 Debrief from Phase 1 Review of progress on goals and objectives Review of progress on goals and objectives What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint What worked, what didn’t from a programmatic standpoint Discussed program purpose and goals Discussed program purpose and goals ID’d core survey components of SLICE ID’d core survey components of SLICE Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Sketched out an analysis timeline of Phase 1 and implementation of Phase 2 Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios Started the discussion about alternative program designs based on funding scenarios

What I’d like to cover… Project management issues Project management issues Where we’re at with Phase 1 Where we’re at with Phase 1 1. Timeline 2. Deliverables Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 Transitioning out of Phase 1 and into Phase 2 1. Debrief from Advisory Team Mtg in Jan “Stop-gap” assessments in Revised purpose and goals Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines Vision of what SLICE looks like operationally and proposed timelines

Bottom line: Central Fisheries Command needs a small cavalry of specialists as our “eyes” on the landscape

The SLICE Cavalry Statewide Rough Rider R1 Rough Rider R2 Rough Rider R3 Rough Rider R4 Rough Rider

Sir! You should be aware that curly-leaf pondweed is declining across the State; the snowy winters of 2008 and 2009 may have something to do with it Report in from the field

R2 Rough Rider Sir! It appears that last winter was tough on bluegills and it appears we have had widespread year class failures

Note…these reports would come in regularly and not rely on periodic data mining projects to find declines that started years ago. Reports will be based on actual data (vs anecdotes)

Lake Fish Communities and Habitats Status and Trends Canadian Shield Landtype 2014 Annual Report

What I’d like from you…  Better clarity on Exec. Sponsor and Roles in transitioning SLICE Phase 1 into Phase 2.  Your thoughts about what SLICE looks like operationally Moving from “duct tape and bubble gum” to something sustainable Realigning staff resources to best carry-out a revised lake survey program Timeline target for implementing Phase 2