Implementing Rosetta while integrating with a DAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Metadata Tools for JISC Digitisation Projects of still images and text Ed Fay BOPCRIS, Hartley Library University of Southampton.
Advertisements

Vital Implementation: BL-NLW-Tessella Ingest Meeting VITAL Implementation BL-NLW-Tessella Ingest Meeting 3 rd May 2007 Paul Bevan –
Vital Implementation Update Vital Implementation Update 11 th January 2006 Paul Bevan – Glen Robson –
OCLC Digital Archive Overview Judith Cobb LIPA Meeting July 2006.
The UM Libraries’ Frost Concert Archive Documenting the Performance History of the University of Miami Frost School of Music Amy Strickland University.
Mark J. Myers Electronic Records Archivist, KY Dept for Libraries and Archives (2001-May, 2014) Electronic Records Specialist, TX State Library and Archive.
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
Digital Preservation Practices and Strategies at Colorado State University Libraries.
Current Thinking on Digital Preservation: Role of Metadata Oya Y. Rieger Coordinator, Library Office of Distributed Learning Cornell University Library.
Michael Donovan, River Campus Libraries – 12/03 DocuShare Overview and Training.
Brief Overview of Major Enhancements to PAWN. Producer – Archive Workflow Network (PAWN) Distributed and secure ingestion of digital objects into the.
Robust Tools for Archiving and Preserving Digital Data Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Mike McGann Institute for Advanced Computer Studies Department of.
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation
CONTENT: A model for collaborative database building Trevor Bond Alan Cornish Washington State University Libraries.
Tools and Services for the Long Term Preservation and Access of Digital Archives Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Sangchul Song Institute for Advanced Computer.
1 of 5 This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. © 2006 Microsoft Corporation.
Incompatible or Interoperable? A METS bridge for a small gap between two digital preservation software packages Lucas Mak Metadata & CatalogLibrarian
Data-PASS Shared Catalog Micah Altman & Jonathan Crabtree 1 Micah Altman Harvard University Archival Director, Henry A. Murray Research Archive Associate.
Midwest Documentum User Group Harley-Davidson Documentum WCM 10/10/2006.
Putting it all together for Digital Assets Jon Morley Beck Locey.
Metadata standards, tools and processes for audio preservation at the British Library: An overview of new systems for audio description, preservation and.
DCC Conference, Glasgow November, Digital Archive Policies and Trusted Digital Repositories MacKenzie Smith, MIT Libraries Reagan Moore, San Diego.
Introducing New Services with DSpace Open Repositories Conference 2007 Susan Wells Parham Kent Woynowski Julie Griffin.
Columbia Digital Preservation Planning & Implementation Status Report, August 2010.
15 Maintaining a Web Site Section 15.1 Identify Webmastering tasks Identify Web server maintenance techniques Describe the importance of backups Section.
Section 15.1 Identify Webmastering tasks Identify Web server maintenance techniques Describe the importance of backups Section 15.2 Identify guidelines.
WORKFLOWS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR DIGITIZATION  Steve Bingo  Processing Archivist Washington State University Libraries  Alex Merrill  Assistant.
Working Group: Practical Policy Rainer Stotzka, Reagan Moore.
Johannes Spitzbart Phonogrammarchiv, Austrian Academy of Sciences Österreichische Tage der Digitalen Geisteswissenschaften save the data - workshop on.
CONTENTdm for Beginners September 25, 2012 by Kourtney Blackburn.
The DigiTool to FDA Program Lydia Motyka Florida Center for Library Automation.
Ms. Irene Onyancha ISTD/Library & Information Management Services United Nations Economic Commission for Africa The Second Session of the Committee on.
Virtual Ice Charting System Archive Browser Interface Distribution IngestProduction Ice Analyst Application Database Click on the boxes for more information.
11 October 2015 MAVIS v “Sneak Preview”. 11 October 2015 Enhancements in the Release  Reference Material  Brief Accessioning View  Template.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign A Unified Platform for Archival Description and Access Christopher J. Prom, Christopher A. Rishel, Scott W.
Farcry Not just a game anymore…. What is Farcry?  Farcry is a Content Management System (CMS)  It is designed to separate the jobs of site creation/design.
Data Management Console Synonym Editor
Digital preservation activities at the NLW Sally McInnes 18 September 2009.
Sea Ice Mapping Systems Archive Browser Interface Distribution IngestProduction Ice Analyst Application Database Henrik Steen AndersonDMI Paul SeymourNIC.
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.
ALA Institutional Repository Update ALA Archives at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Chris Prom Cara Bertram Denise Rayman.
VITAL at the National Library of Wales Glen Robson
The New DRS Introduction. What is DRS? Digital repository for preservation and access – Maintains integrity of deposited content – Preserves content for.
Funded by: © AHDS Preservation in Institutional Repositories Preliminary conclusions of the SHERPA DP project Gareth Knight Digital Preservation Officer.
Implementing PREMIS in DigiTool Michael Kaplan ALA 2007 Update.
DAITSS and the Florida Digital Archive Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation iPRES 2006.
Cooperative Print Archiving by Discipline Developing an Infrastructure to Sustain Scholarly Resources in Agriculture Amy Wood Center for Research Libraries.
Oman College of Management and Technology Course – MM Topic 7 Production and Distribution of Multimedia Titles CS/MIS Department.
Collection Management Systems
NLW. Object Classes Class 1  1 MARC Record  1 Image  No METS Class 2  1 MARC Record  Many images  No METS Class 3  1 MARC Record  Many.
Santi Thompson - Metadata Coordinator Annie Wu - Head, Metadata and Bibliographic Services 2013 TCDL Conference Austin, TX.
Where are my files? Discoveries in establishing a digital archive workflow Sally McDonald Archivist/Librarian Western History/Genealogy, Denver Public.
Integrating Laserfiche and SharePoint PO108 Alex Wilson and Jessica Huang.
Automating the Audit: Updates from the Metadata Upgrade Project at the University of Houston Libraries Andrew Weidner, Metadata Librarian Santi Thompson,
Here are some things you can do while you wait 1.Open your omeka.net site in your browser (e.g. 2.Open.
Meeting of the Member States Expert Group on Digitisation and Digital Preservation , Luxembourg European Archival Records and Knowledge Preservation.
Archivists' Toolkit - All Hands Meeting Scope Both multilevel and single-level description Accommodates description of collections, series, sub-series,
Fitting into an Appraisal, Accessioning, Processing, Discovery, and Delivery Workflow Chris Prom, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
SharePoint 101 – An Overview of SharePoint 2010, 2013 and Office 365
AEM Digital Asset Management - DAM Author : Nagavardhan
Internet Made Easy! Make sure all your information is always up to date and instantly available to all your clients.
Building A Repository for Digital Objects
DAITSS and the Florida Digital Archive
Trove Tufts Digital Image Library
Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Sangchul Song
Bentley Project Reel Digitization Bentley Historical Library t
SharePoint Foundation 2010
Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG
St. Louis Day of Dot Net 2011 Building Web Parts for an Office 365 SharePoint Site Becky Bertram Independent SharePoint Consultant SharePoint MVP, MCSD.NET,
RCSI institutional repository rcsi
Presentation transcript:

Implementing Rosetta while integrating with a DAM

A little background… Digitization began in 2000 No thought of preservation Now have 130 TB Adding 5 TB per month Digitize for internal and external clients

Leading up to Rosetta Files somewhat organized Moved to archival servers Policies created DPS softwares evaluated Rosetta recommended, end of 2012

Digitization CDM Pre-Rosetta workflow Primo Digital Archive – folders/files Project Client Archival images Coll. and m’data admin Web display NO LINK BETWEEN ARCHIVE AND CDM No preservation m’data Deriv. images Tech. m’data Some desc. m’data Most desc. m’data Clients’ Items

Initial implementation goals 1.Create semi-dark archive connected to DAM a.Master files in Rosetta b.Derivative files in DAM 2.Input descriptive metadata in DAM to be mirrored in Rosetta 3.Create new collections workflow 4.Create legacy collections workflow

How did scope creep start? Communication problems Sales reps vs developers/trainers Were we clear enough during needs assessment Lack of pre-implementation knowledge Digital Preservation and Digital Operations with different needs Which metadata where? Why? Rosetta as DAM? Every item in both systems or no?

Revised goals 1.Create Submission Information & Metadata (SIMP) ingest tool Ingest IEs into both Rosetta and DAM Ingest IEs into both Rosetta and DAM 2.Archival Resource Key (ARK) to keep items connected 3.Move descriptive metadata to SIMP, input only in DAM Title, ARK only metadata in Rosetta Title, ARK only metadata in Rosetta 4.Focus on new collections workflow

Digitization CDM Rosetta Workflow 1 Primo Rosetta Project Client Archival images ARK No desc. m’data Coll. and m’data admin Web display Deriv. images ARK Tech. m’data Some desc. m’data SIP/A RK ML App ARK Dual ingestions – but data not replicated CDM ingestion process remains as-is ARK is new m’data field ARK is THE link between Rosetta and CDM

Digital Operations* Metadata Services Digital Preservation SIMP Tool Staging Folders Digitized Content Workflow 1

Digital Operations* Metadata Services Digital Preservation Derivative s Gallery PACKAGING 1.Select Content (IEs) 2.Specify Package Title 3.Copy from Staging » Extract Technical Metadata » Create Derivatives 4.Mint ARK PACKAGING 1.Select Content (IEs) 2.Specify Package Title 3.Copy from Staging » Extract Technical Metadata » Create Derivatives 4.Mint ARK Staging Folders Digitized Content SIMP Tool Workflow 1

Staging Folders Digital Operations* Metadata Services Digital Preservation Digitized Content SIMP Tool METADATA EDITING 5.Set Metadata Template 6.Edit Metadata » Spreadsheet » Save Data 7.Approve METADATA EDITING 5.Set Metadata Template 6.Edit Metadata » Spreadsheet » Save Data 7.Approve PACKAGING 1.Select Content (IEs) 2.Specify Package Title 3.Copy from Staging » Extract Technical Metadata » Create Derivatives 4.Mint ARK PACKAGING 1.Select Content (IEs) 2.Specify Package Title 3.Copy from Staging » Extract Technical Metadata » Create Derivatives 4.Mint ARK Derivatives Gallery Descriptive Metadata Workflow 1

Staging Folders Digital Operations* Metadata Services Digital Preservation Digitized Content SIMP Tool SEND TO ROSETTA 9.Send to Rosetta » Checksums » METS Record » Copy to Digarch (UIT) SEND TO ROSETTA 9.Send to Rosetta » Checksums » METS Record » Copy to Digarch (UIT) METADATA EDITING 5.Set Metadata Template 6.Edit Metadata » Spreadsheet » Save Data 7.Approve METADATA EDITING 5.Set Metadata Template 6.Edit Metadata » Spreadsheet » Save Data 7.Approve PACKAGING 1.Select Content (IEs) 2.Specify Package Title 3.Copy from Staging » Extract Technical Metadata » Create Derivatives 4.Mint ARK PACKAGING 1.Select Content (IEs) 2.Specify Package Title 3.Copy from Staging » Extract Technical Metadata » Create Derivatives 4.Mint ARK DOWNLOAD.TSV 8.Download Metadata DOWNLOAD.TSV 8.Download Metadata Derivatives Gallery Descriptive Metadata Workflow 1

SIMP: Administration

SIMP: Browse Servers

SIMP: Navigate collections

SIMP: Create Packages

What’s in those packages?

Thumbnail images

SIMP: Send to Rosetta

Rosetta view

DAM view

Rosetta ingests so far…

Where are we now? Rolling out SIMP to Library depts for testing Gauging preservation needs/size by dept Coordinating workflows to ingest legacy files Planning Rosetta expansion beyond Library

Our biggest obstacles Building the SIMP tool to work with a DAM as well as Rosetta before going Live Changing the ways & order items are ingested into DAM Making sure Rosetta wasn’t forgotten due to DAM focus Coordination with Ex Libris implementation team

Scope creep: the bad Lengthened implementation period Strained communication Muddied Rosetta implementation with DAM concerns

Scope creep: the good Created a more robust ingest tool Multiple platforms served Library divisions came together, more cohesive

What did I learn? Communication is key! No one cares about long- term preservation as much as you (it’s not their job to). Internal education is important. If a project gets too stressful, take a couple months off!

Questions? Tawnya Keller Digital Preservation Archivist, J. Willard Marriott Library