What is a Program? An intentional effort to fulfill predetermined and important needs of people Single events or activities do not result in the types.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
GETTING DOWN TO BUSINESS Program Goals and SLOs For Instuctional Learning Outcomes Council (I-LOC) Created by Michael Gos.
A Guide to Implementation
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
INDEPENDENT LEARNER.
Building Team Facilitation Skills Presented by: Mary Jo Meyers M.S.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Contrast the actions of managers according to the omnipotent and symbolic views
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Getting on the same page… Creating a common language to use today.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Competency Assessment Public Health Professional (2012)-
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Organizational Culture and the Environment: The Constraints
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Section III Major & Annual Objectives Program Logic in Program Development Black Box Program Delivery just assembles inputs, delivers, measures outputs.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Human Learning Lisa Holmes. Learning Theory A learning theory is a concept that describes how learning occurs. It takes into consideration how the information.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Program Fidelity Influencing Training Program Functioning and Effectiveness Cheryl J. Woods, CSW.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
The Method to My Madness Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Retreat August 9, 2010.
Program Planning. Cycle of Planning Determine mission of organization Assess community Prioritize problems within resources Set goals and objectives Determine.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Evaluation Overview: Rochelle Schultz Spinarski, Rural Health Solutions Community Care Learning Collaborative October 29, 2014.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Selecting Criteria and Setting Standards. Useful Criteria and Standards Criteria need to reflect intent of the program Select criteria that can be influenced.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Chapter 2: Constraints and Challenges for the Global Manager
Contrast the actions of managers according to the omnipotent and symbolic views
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Chapter 2: Constraints and Challenges for the Global Manager
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic?
Strategic Planning Setting Direction Retreat
FRAMEWORK OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Using Logic Models in Project Proposals
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

What is a Program? An intentional effort to fulfill predetermined and important needs of people Single events or activities do not result in the types of behavior change necessary to accomplish this mission

Programs Must: Provide Multiple Contacts With the Same Audience Include a minimum 6 hours of Educational Instruction (GPRA) Preferably use a Variety of Instructional Techniques Strive for Behavior Change

Needs-Based Programming Problem-Based Programming Issues-Based Programming Three Kinds of Programs

Needs-Based Programs often subject matter based identified by clientele as a “felt need” often motivated learners goal of enhancing knowledge or skills

Problem-Based Programs often focused on a specific audience often subject-matter based not necessarily identified by clientele as a “felt need” but rather an “ascribed need” not necessarily motivated goal of changing practices or behaviors

Issues-Based Programs often focused on widespread issue of public concern complex, multi-disciplinary not necessarily identified by clientele as a “felt need” but rather an “ascribed need” not necessarily motivated information must be tailored for the audience goal of changing practices or behaviors

Program Logic in Program Development Bennett’s Hierarchy Program Logic Model Social,Economic, Environmental Conditions Practices Knowledge, Opinions, Skills, Aspirations Activities Resources PlanningPerformance

FROM:JACOBS’ 1998 Five Tier Model for Evaluation BUREAUCRATIC PARADIGM SERVICE-ORIENTED RULES DRIVE ACTIONS TOP DOWN RIGIDITY / STANDARDIZED PUNISHES RISK TAKING REPORTS INPUTS ACTIVITIES OBJECTIVES-BASED PARADIGM OUTCOMES- ORIENTED NEEDS DRIVEN COLLABORATIVE FLEXIBILITY MONITOR OUTCOMES RISK TAKING DIVERSE MODELS

FROM: JACOBS 1998 EXEMPLIFY A COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACH PROMOTE PARTNERSHIP WITH ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN EVALUAITON SOLICIT AND VALUE DIVERSITY INSTILL COLLABORATION AND COMMUNICATION BE ACCESIBLE AND RESPECTFUL FOSTER SUSTAINABILITY

Tier One : PROGRAM DEFINITION PURPOSE: DOCUMENT NEED FOR A PARTICULAR PROGRAM USE LITERATURE TO JUSTIFY PLANNED PROGRAM RELATIVE TO NEEDS AND ASSETS DEFINE PLANNED PROGRAM

Tier One : PROGRAM DEFINITION TASKS: WORK WITH STAKEHOLDERS TO ASSESS COMMUNITY NEEDS AND ASSETS REVIEW PERTINENT LITERATURE BASE DESCRIBE PROGRAM VISION, MISSION, GOALS, OBJECTIVES, CHARACTERISTICS

Tier Two: ACCOUNTABILITY PURPOSE: EXAMINE IF PROGRAM SERVES THOSE IT WAS INTENDED TO IN THE MANNER PROPOSED

Tier Two: ACCOUNTABILITY TASKS: IDENTIFY STAKEHOLDERS DOCUMENT PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS, ACTIVITIES, AND HOW SERVICES ARE DELIVERED (BUREACRATIC PARADIGM STOPS HERE!)

Tier Three:UNDERSTANDING AND REFINING PURPOSE: IMPROVE PROGRAM BY PROVIDING INFORMATION TO VOLUNTEERS, PARTICIPANTS, AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

Tier Three: UNDERSTANDING & REFINING TASKS: GATHER PROGRAM SATISFACTION DATA EXAMINE THE FIT BETWEEN TIER 1 AND TIER 2 DATA EXAMINE PROCESS DATA AND IDENTIFY LESSONS LEARNED IDENTIFY PROGRAM STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES REVISIT LITERATURE

Tier Four: PROGRESS TOWARDS OBJECTIVES ObjectivesOutcomesMeasures Collect Measures Report Findings PURPOSE: DOCUMENT PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS AND OUTCOMES

Tier Four: PROGRESS TOWARDS OBJECTIVES ObjectivesOutcomesMeasures TASKS: WRITE OUTCOMES FOR OBJECTIVES CREATE MEASURES FOR OUTCOMES DECIDE ON DESIGN ISSUES AND DATA ANALYSIS REPORT FINDING TO ALL STAKEHOLDERS

Tier Five: Program Impact Purpose: DEMONSTRATE LONG TERM IMPROVEMENTS IN QUALITY OF LIFE DEMONSTRATE PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY SUGGEST MODELS WORTHY OF DUPLICATION CONTRIBUTE TO THE LITERATURE

Tier Five: Program Impact TASKS: PLAN TO DOCUMENT LONG-TERM IMPACT PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF SUSTAINABILITY IDENTIFY COMPONENTS THAT SHOULD BE REPLICATED DISTRIBUTE FINDINGS OF IMPACT