IMAGE QUALITY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION.
Advertisements

IMAGE GENERATION IN CT.
CT Scanning: Dosimetry and Artefacts
Computers and Computed Tomography
Image Reconstruction.
Image Quality Bushong Chapter 7.
Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging
Chapter 18 Radiographic Exposure
Digital Radiography.
Resident Physics Lectures
RAD 354 Chapt. 28 The Digital Image Spatial resolution Contrast resolution Contrast-detail curve Pt. dose considerations.
RAD 350 Chapter 17Digital Rad Tech. Spatial Resolution – ability to distinguish small items in close proximity with near the same atomic mass density Spatial.
MAMMO QC – covered in week 8
Computed Tomography II
NC HPS Meeting 10/18-19/2001 Boone, NC Recent Advances in CT Technology and Issues of CT Dosimetry T. Yoshizumi 1,2, M. Sarder 1, R. Reiman 1,2, E. Paulson.
MULTISLICE CT.
1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 3.0 (Now based on ACRIN 6678) QIBA Group 1C.
Advanced Biomedical Imaging
Technical Factors or Prime Factors
IMAGE QUALITY NOISE LINEARITY CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY IMAGE ARTIFACTS.
Computed Tomography III
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods X-ray Imaging Part 1.
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
 QC testing of screen speed should occur on acceptance and then yearly.  Evaluate first whether similar cassettes marked with the same relative speed.
Conventional and Computed Tomography
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
Basic principles Geometry and historical development
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY - I RAD 365 CT - Scan
Quality Control Rad T 110.
CT Quality Control for CT Scanners. Quality Control in CT A good idea? Yes Required for accreditation? Sometimes Improves image quality? Sometimes Depends.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) May 6, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
Control of Scatter Radiation
Quality Control.
SPECIAL IMAGING/ADVANCED IMAGING INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY
Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.
Module B Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging.
Image Quality Radiographic Resolution.
Geometric Factors Focal Spot Object Film Object b a h c Film B A H C
George David Associate Professor of Radiology Medical College of Georgia.
Computed Tomography Q & A
Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging
PRINCIPLES OF CT Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD. Intended learning outcome The student should learn at the end of this lecture principles of CT.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No Image Quality and Patient Dose
Factors affecting CT image RAD
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Optimization of Protection in Computed Tomography (CT)-What can radiographers do? IAEA Regional Training Course.
▪ History ▪ Equipment ▪ Image Production/Manipulation.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) March 18, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
Nuclear Medicine: Tomographic Imaging – SPECT, SPECT-CT and PET-CT Katrina Cockburn Nuclear Medicine Physicist.
Image Quality The capacity to define, measure, and assess image quality is a primarily responsibility of a CT Technologist.
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY - I RAD 365 CT - Scan
CT QUALITY MANAGEMENT. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
RAD 254 Chapter 27 Digital Fluoroscopy
Quality Assurance.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 2.1 QIBA Group 1C.
Computed Tomography Computed Tomography is the most significant development in radiology in the past 40 years. MRI and Ultrasound are also significant.
ACR CT Accreditation Dose Pass/Fail Criteria and Reference Levels ExaminationPass/Fail Criteria CTDIvol (mGy) Reference Levels CTDIvol (mGy) Adult Head8075.
Exposure Factors or Prime Factors
Computed tomography. Formation of a CT image Data acquisitionImage reconstruction Image display, manipulation Storage, communication And recording.
IMAGE QUALITY. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
CT Scanner Detection system. 2 CT Scanner n Generator s High frequency, kW n X-ray tube s Rotating anode, high thermal capacity: 3-7 MHU s Dual.
CT Multi-Slice CT.
* Our Goal Obtain the best possible image * Best Possible Image? What is our goal?
Physics Testing for ACRIN 6678 Protocol version 3.0 QIBA Group 1C
Single Photon Emission Tomography
Basic principles Geometry and historical development
Resident Physics Lectures
Presentation transcript:

IMAGE QUALITY

SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION RADIATION DOSE NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS

Resolution in CT Spatial Resolution Contrast Resolution

SPATIAL RESOLUTION DEGREE OF BLURRING IN THE IMAGE MEASURE OF THE ABILITY TO DISCRIMINATE OBJECTS OF VARYING DENSITY A SMALL DISTANCE APART AGAINST A UNIFORM BACKGROUND

MTF MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION MOST COMMONLY USED TO DESCRIBE SPATIAL RESOLUTION IN CT

MTF MTF OF 1 – 100% TRANSFER OF OBJECT TO IMAGE

HIGH CONTRAST PHANTOM

FACTORS AFFECTING SPATIAL RESOLUTION SLICE THICKNESS FOCAL SPOT SIZE DETECTOR WIDTH TYPE OF CONVOLUTION FILTER (KERNEL) MATRIX SIZE FOV

SLICE THICKNESS S. RESOLUTION 5 MM 1 MM

FOCAL SPOT SIZE FOCAL SPOT SIZE S. RESOLUTION LARGE FOCAL SPOT = LARGE PENUMBRA (BLURR)

DETECTOR WIDTH S. RESOLUTION

TYPE OF CONVOLUTION FILTER SHARP KERNEL S. RESOLUTION SMOOTH SHARP

MATRIX SIZE S. RESOLUTION

DFOV SIZE DFOV S. RESOLUTION 20CM 10CM

CONTRAST RESOLUTION SENSITIVITY OF THE SYSTEM LOW CONTRAST RESOLUTION LOW CONTRAST DETECTIBILITY

LOW CONTRAST RESOLUTION ( TISSUE RESOLUTION) THE ABILITY OF AN IMAGING SYSTEM TO DEMONSTRATE SMALL CHANGES IN TISSUE CONTRAST

CONTRAST RESOLUTION SENSITIVITY OF THE SYSTEM LOW CONTRAST RESOLUTION LOW CONTRAST DETECTIBILITY

CONTRAST RESOLUTION PHANTOM

FACTORS AFFECTING LOW CONTRAST RESOLUTION PHOTON FLUX SLICE THICKNESS PATIENT SIZE DETECTOR SENSITIVITY RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM IMAGE DISPLAY QUANTUM NOISE

PHOTON FLUX (INTENSITY) PHOTON FLUX C. RESOLUTION mAs P. FLUX kVp P. FLUX

LOW TECHNIQUE ADEQUATE TECHNIQUE

SLICE THICKNESS C. RESOLUTION 8 mm 5 mm

10 mm – 100 PHOTONS 5 mm – 50 PHOTONS

PATIENT SIZE C. RESOLUTION NORMAL LARGE

DETECTOR SENSITIVITY C. RESOLUTION

TYPE OF CONVOLUTION FILTER SMOOTH KERNEL C. RESOLUTION SMOOTH SHARP

MONITOR RESOLUTION C. RESOLUTION IMAGE DISPLAY MONITOR RESOLUTION C. RESOLUTION

QUANTUM NOISE C. RESOLUTION HIGH NOISE LOW NOISE

NOISE IN CT FLUCTUATION OF CT# BETWEEN POINTS IN THE IMAGE FOR A SCAN OF UNIFORM MATERIAL SUCH WATER.

NOISE SOURCES IN CT QUANTUM NOISE – X-RAY INTENSITY AT THE DETECTORS MATRIX SIZE DFOV SLICE THICKNESS CONVOLUTION FILTER TYPE PITCH

QUANTUM NOISE – CONTROLLED BY THE TECHNOLOGIST mA Time kVp NOISE

NOISE QUANTUM (STATISTICAL) –CONTROLLED BY THE TECHNOLOGIST ELECTRONIC – INHERENT IN THE EQUIPMENT

QUANTUM NOISE – CONTROLLED BY THE TECHNOLOGIST DFOV MATRIX COLLIMATION FILTER SPATIAL FREQUENCY PITCH NOISE

DOSE vs IMAGE QUALITY RADIATION DOSE IMAGE QUALITY