Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Discourse and Mathematical Argumentation in the Classroom Wednesday, June 6, 2012.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
With great power comes great responsibility.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK) What are students being asked to do? How complex is the student thinking?
What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Enrichment…It is not just for gifted anymore.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
March 22, 2017 Bringing Reading Anchor Standard One to Life in Your School: Text-Dependent Questions 1.
Assessment Information
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Practical Tips for Increasing Student Thinking & Learning
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Norman L Webb.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September 10, 2013 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Today’s Learning Targets By the end of the session, participants will: Understand the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels within the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and SBAC assessment items by explaining the characteristics that distinguish the levels.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Cognitive Rigor Matrix – Developed by Karin Hess A framework for increasing the rigor of student tasks. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment (NCIEA), 2009

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee How are Bloom’s Taxonomy and DOK related? Read and highlight the article What exactly do “fewer, clearer, and higher standards” really look like in the classroom? Using a cognitive rigor matrix to analyze curriculum, plan lessons, and implement assessments by Karin K. Hess, Dennis Carlock, Ben Jones, and John R. Walkup

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee How are Bloom’s Taxonomy and DOK related? What exactly do “fewer, clearer, and higher standards” really look like in the classroom? Using a cognitive rigor matrix to analyze curriculum, plan lessons, and implement assessments by Karin K. Hess, Dennis Carlock, Ben Jones, and John R. Walkup 1.What do you now understand about the CRM and DOK? (on a yellow Post-it) 2.What questions do you still have? (on a pink Post-it)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DOK is About Complexity The DOK level is determined by type of thinking and application of the intended student learning outcome. Instruction and classroom assessments must reflect the DOK level of the objective or intended learning outcome.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Clarifying what each DOK level means Use the CRM(Cognitive Rigor Matrix) and the handout of sample release items to decide on three important characteristics for each DOK level. Be prepared to share your answers for your assigned DOK with the whole group.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or performance of a simple process or procedure Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a simple, well-known procedure or formula DOK Level 1: Recall and Reproduction

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DOK Level 2: Basic Skills and Concepts Includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem Actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DOK Level 3 Strategic Thinking Requires deep understanding exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning. The cognitive demands are complex and abstract. An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response would most likely be a Level 3.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DOK Level 4 Extended Reasoning Requires high cognitive demand and is very complex. Students are expected to make connections, relate ideas within the content or among content areas, and select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved. Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 often requires an extended period of time..

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reflection: What? So What? Now What? Understand the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels within the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and SBAC assessment items by explaining the characteristics that distinguish the levels. What have you learned? What actions will you take based on what we have talked about so far in regards to aligning tasks, DOK, and higher level thinking?