Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.

Advertisements

Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.

GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.

Begin with the End in Mind

LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.

Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.

DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.

Context of Decision Making

UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.

U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS.

Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.

Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.

Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.

Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,

PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.

Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.

Linking Data with Action Part 2: Understanding Data Discrepancies.

Regional Forum: Use of Gender Data in Sub-national Decision-making Kigali, Rwanda August 2012 Key Gender Terms and Concepts.

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.

WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.

Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.

Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.

Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.

Information Use Part II Informing Decisions Strengthening Programs through Improved Use of Data and Information.

STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Day 2 - Session 5 Interview guides and tips for effective strategies.

MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.

PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.

MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.

Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.

Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.

Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:

Data Quality Assurance Workshop

Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:

RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:

Data Quality Assurance

Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment

Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management

Session: 8 Disseminating Results

Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use

Right-sized Evaluation

Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation

Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.

Measuring Success Toolkit

MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero

Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:

Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Complementing Routine Data with Qualitative Data for Decision Making: Understanding the "Why" Behind Program Data Day 1 - Session 1 Note to Facilitator:

Training Content and Orientation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:

Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Introduction to the PRISM Framework

Information Systems for Health:

Information Systems for Health:

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output

Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,

Data and Interoperability:

Use of Information for Decision Making

Measuring Data Quality

Introduction to Health Informatics

Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Presentation transcript:

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement

How to Make Stakeholder Participation Happen Defining the purpose of M&E in the program  Participation in defining the purpose is important, as the whole design should flow from this. This will result in high empowerment of stakeholders Roles  Invite them to negotiations of purpose of M&E activities  Allow them to feed into the definition of purpose and/or critique what is already proposed

Cont. Focus the design on stakeholder needs  Where stakeholders are not involved in design, the M&E activity could be biased, missing important issues for the stakeholders  Perspectives of primary stakeholders can challenge other stakeholders’ more “established” analytical frameworks, bringing new perspectives on the interrelationship of different issues Roles  Invite them to negotiations of the program design  Allow them to feed into the program design and/or critique what is already proposed

Cont. Involve them in collecting evidence  For most M&E activities, greater participation of stakeholders in collecting data ensures accuracy, completeness, and fair results  Stakeholders (especially primary) may apply tools differently based on their translation of tools for local realities (e.g., perspectives on how family and household are defined)  Stakeholders may have different perspectives in interpreting responses or suggest different directions for further probing and data collection

Cont. Involve them in validating evidence  Participation of stakeholders in the stage of validating findings allows an opportunity to correct and clarify perspectives, as well as provide contextual analysis from their perspective  Involve them in discussing findings  Involve them in cross-checking findings

Cont. Involve them in analysis, conclusions, and recommendations  Participation in analysis, conclusions, and recommendations can be an extension of the validation process  Involvement of stakeholders becomes more important and necessary when they will have a role in actually implementing changes  The biggest challenge is how local-level validation, analysis, conclusions, and recommendations can be brought into a wider process with other stakeholders without losing the specificity of the local inputs

Cont. Using M&E results – dissemination process  Participation of stakeholders can be a further means of building ownership of results, particularly where these relate to locally visible follow-up, such as adjustments to existing programs  Roles:  In developing dissemination strategy  In designing messages  As a vehicle for dissemination messages

Cont. Using M&E results – translation into action plan  Participation in the use of M&E results can be the ultimate participation in M&E and typically requires some participation in early stages  Roles:  In developing action plans  In validating decisions

Exercise Stakeholder Analysis  Brainstorm list of stakeholders on flipchart (5 min)  Pick three stakeholders from your list and complete the analysis matrix (20 min)  Groups present one example of their entries in plenary  Discussion

10

MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International, ICF Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.