Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu CEF and ELP in developing pupils’ oral skills Kaarina Mäkinen Oct.30-Nov.3 2006 1.The CEF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linking CfE Outcomes to other languages frameworks
Advertisements

Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio Former les enseignants à lutilisation du Porfolio européen des langues.
ELP-TT Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio ECML-short term project ELP_TT2 Ülle Türk, Estonia.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 2 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
C HINESE 318 Introduction to Applied Chinese Linguistics.
European Language Portfolios & Common European Framework of Reference with Marnie Beaudoin Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta.
ELP-TT Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio Short-term project ELP_TT2 Project coordinator: Margarete Nezbeda, Austria.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 5 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 1 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
National Curriculum Key Stage 2
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST 2 CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 8 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST 1 CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 4 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
Curriculum Framework for Romani Seminar for decision makers and practitioners Council of Europe, 31 May and 1 June 2007 An introduction to the Curriculum.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
Education office, Evaz district, autumn 1393 Presenter: Rahmanpour CEF (Common European Framework): The basis of the new course book development in Iran.
JSP UNIT 4 THE COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE AND THE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE PORTFOLIO.
CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 11
(2) Using age-appropriate activities, students expand their ability to perform novice tasks and develop their ability to perform the tasks of the intermediate.
Portfolios – instruments for transferring & promoting a “learning philosophy” Good practices in History teaching Ileana Racoviceanu Belgrade, Serbia, Octombrie,
CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 7
The new languages GCSE: STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION.
CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 5
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 8 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 9 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 10 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
JSP UNIT 4 THE COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE AND THE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE PORTFOLIO.
Erasmus Plus Mejora de la Competencia en comunication linguistica en los centros europeos.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 11 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
Workshop: assessing writing Prepared by Olga Simonova, Maria Verbitskaya, Elena Solovova, Inna Chmykh Based on material by Anthony Green.
Mark COMMUNICATION Criteria 9-10 Very Good Information, ideas and points of view are presented and explained with confidence. Can narrate events when appropriate.
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Uses and users.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 7 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 1 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
THE NATURE OF TEXTS English Language Yo. Lets Refresh So we tend to get caught up in the themes on English Language that we need to remember our basic.
Oracy O 6.1 Understand the main points and simple opinions in a spoken story, song or passage listen attentively, re-tell and discuss the main ideas agree.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 6 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
HYMES (1964) He developed the concept that culture, language and social context are clearly interrelated and strongly rejected the idea of viewing language.
UNIT 7. DIDACTIC APPROACHES
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST 4 © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 4 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 9 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 2 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
As slippery as an eel? Assessing speaking and writing Part One Ülle Türk University of Tartu Estonian Defence Forces 23rd CSW, Tampere, March 2009.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 6 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public performance or display, including.
CEFR/CECR EVALUATION TEST © 2015 albert-learning.com CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 3 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
My Language Passport Name : Anton School : 22 Age: 16 My languages: Ukrainian, Russian, English At school I am learning: Ukrainian, English, German At.
LANGUAGE UNITES EUROPE IN-SERVICE TRAINING COURSE FOR LEARNING ENGLISH LANGUAGE promoted under the frame of Grundtvig learning partnership project no.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com CEFR EVALUATION TEST CECR ENGLISH EVALUATION TEST 3 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
Goal :Communicative Competence
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
Key Stage 2 Portfolio. Llafaredd / Oracy Darllen / Reading Ysgrifennu / Writing Welsh Second Language.
ELP-TT Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio Short-term project ELP_TT2 Project team member: Martine Tchang-George Switzerland.
ACCET 2014 Presented by: Brenda Nazari-Robati The Language Company Lynore M. Carnuccio The Language Company.
Learner’s Competences
REGISTRATION CODE: EET699
UNCERTAINTY CONSTANT CHANGE DYNAMISM IT FLOWS FLEXIBILITY ADAPTABILITY.
Liceo Scientifico Internazionale in collaboration with
Common European Framework of References (CEFR)
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 11/8/2018.
Different methods.
PORTUGUESE FOR FOREIGNERS
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 12/3/2018.
Intermediates Here is a simple profile for Intermediate proficiency speakers from ACTFL 2012.
Chapter 2 What speakers know.
IELTS: International English Language Testing System
Liceo Scientifico Internazionale in collaboration with
TEMPLATE ELEMENTS.
REGISTRATION CODE: EET699
Intermediates Here is a simple profile for Intermediate proficiency speakers from ACTFL 2012.
Yr7= teach present and ‘je vais’ future tense
Presentation transcript:

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu CEF and ELP in developing pupils’ oral skills Kaarina Mäkinen Oct.30-Nov The CEF visited 2.Practical ELP adaptations 3.Samples of oral tests

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu General aspects of using a foreign language in speaking world knowledge (CEF- declarative knowledge) understanding one’s own culture – understanding other cultures openness, warmth, trust (atmosphere) courage & encouragement risk taking politeness willingness to communicate ability to take the situation into account

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Awareness of intercultural competence (Lustig & Koester 1993) empathy respect tolerance (ambiguity) non-judgemental attitude group problem solving knowledge of the rules of interaction

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu CEF in planning a portfolio course in spoken interaction (CEF 2001, 26-27) A1 I can interact in a simple way provided the other person is prepared to repeat or rephrase things at a slower rate of speech and help me formulate what I’m trying to say. I can ask and answer simple questions in areas of immediate need or on very familiar topics.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken interaction/Common reference levels A2 I can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on familiar topics and activities. I can handle very short social exchanges, even though I can’t usually understand enough to keep the conversation going myself.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken interaction/Common reference levels B1 I can deal with most situations likely to arise whilst travelling in an area where the language is spoken. I can enter unprepared into conversation on topics that are familiar, of personal interest or pertinent to everyday life (e.g. family, hobbies, work, travel and current events).

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken interaction/Common reference levels B2 I can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible. I can take an active part in discussion in familiar contexts, accounting for and sustaining my views.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken interaction/Common reference levels C1 I can express myself fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions. I can use language flexibly and effectively for social and professional purposes. I can formulate ideas and opinions with precision and relate my contribution skilfully to those of other speakers.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken interaction/Common reference levels C2 I can take part effortlessly in any conversation or discussion and have a good familiarity with idiomatic expres- sions and colloquialisms. I can express myself fluently and convey finer shades of meaning precisely. If I do have a problem i can backtrack and restructure around the difficulty so smoothly that other people are hardly aware of it.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu CEF in planning a portfolio course in spoken production (CEF 2001:26-27) SPOKEN PRODUCTION A1 I can use simple phrases and sentences to describe where I live and people I know. A2 I can use a series phrases and sentences to describe in simple terms my family and other people, living conditions, my educational background, and my present or most recent job.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken production/Common reference levels B1 I can connect phrases in a simple way in order to describe experiences and events, my dreams, hopes and ambitions. I can briefly give reasons and explanations for opnions and plans. I can narrate a story or relate the plot of a book or film and describe my reactions.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken production/Common reference levels B2 I can present clear, detailed descriptions on a wide range of subjects related to my field of interest. I can explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options. C1 I can present clear, detailed descriptions of complex subjects integrating sub-themes, developing particular points and rounding off with an appropriate conclusion.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Spoken production/Common reference levels C2 I can present as clear, smoothly flowing description or argument in a style appropriate to the context and with an effective logical structure which helps the recipient to notice and remember significant points.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Texts, tasks and strategies Texts: samples of spoken or written language Tasks: action-oriented approach, i.e. tasks are related to texts in a way that allows the utilisation of the language user’s linguistic and general competences (Ellis 2003). Tasks may be non-linguistic, purely linguistic or a mixture of linguistic and other components. Strategies: if tasks are not automatic or routine, they necessitate the use of strategies.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Language activities (CEF 2001: 15-16) 1) Reception 2) Production 3) Interaction 4) Mediation 1-4 necessary in the processing of oral texts.

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu Comunicative language competences (CEF: ) The linguistic competence (lexical, grammatical, semantic, phonological, orthographic, orthoepic competences) The pragmatic competence (discourse competence, functional competence and design competence) The sociolinguistic competences (linguistic markers of social relations, politeness conventions, expressions of folk wisdom, register differences, dialect and accent)

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu The language user’s general competences (CEF 2001: ) Declarative knowledge (the knowledge of the world, sociocultural knowledge, intercultural awareness) Skills and know-how (practical skills and know-how, intercultural skills and know- how) Existential competence (abilities, motivations, values, beliefs, cognitive styles, personality factors) Ability to learn (language & communication awareness, phonetic awareness, study skills, heuristic skills)

Oct. 30th - Nov. 3rd 2006 Kaarina Mäkinen University of Oulu The language user’s general competences cont. Successful intercultural communication may lead to more understanding and more tolerance and less prejudice, xenophobia and racism. Intercultural awareness, knowledge of ´otherness´ and intercultural skills are teachable and learnable. The CEF – flexible and versatile enough! (H-M Järvinen 2004,150) Domains: personal, public, occupational and educational (CEF 2001: 45-50)