Cours d’aide à la décision multicritère Page web Travail de groupe (2 à 3 étudiants) –Pour le 10/11/2014,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS APPLICATIONS IN SELECTION OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
Advertisements

Propriété exclusive de The CoSMo Company – Ne pas diffuser / Exclusive property of The CoSMo Company – Do not distribute The Complexity Experience An introduction.
The SimForTree Frontends Relatie met en de werking van de begeleidingscommissies.
Chapter 10 Dealing with Uncertainty Introduction ---exacerbated by regulatory & environmental uncertainty Restructuring of the electric industry,
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
An Introductory Overview to Multi Criteria Evaluation GEOG 5161: Research Design Professor Kenneth E. Foote Petra Norlund 2010.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
MCDM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Multi Criteria Decision Modeling Preference Ranking The Analytical Hierarchy Process.
Multi-Criteria Decision Aide (MCDA) at the Watershed Scale Watershed HealthLand-Use Change and Social Context Biophysical Land Use Society Community Economy.
Evaluation of adaptation scenarios Follow-up committee meeting 6 October, Leuven.
E.G. please always turn off your cell phone or put it on vibrate mode for class A kind reminder on distractions such as phone use, noise (see syllabus).
What is Operations & Supply Chain Management? Mellie Pullman BA 339.
Midterm Notes Modeling and Best Decision SAILS & Manugistics Powerpoint Slides Presentations.
1 SWAZILAND ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORITY (SEA) WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE DANISH GOVERNMENT THROGH THE DANISH CO-OPERATION FOR ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (DANCED)
1 Enviromatics Decision support systems Decision support systems Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
SUSTAINABILITY DEFINITION
Operations and Supply Chain Strategies
MADM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Oil Spill Response Planning Coastal and Marine Environmental Sensitivity Mapping Simon Ross.
Institute for Resource Efficient and Sustainable Systems Graz University of Technology From Cleaner Production to Zero Emissions May 12, 2005 From Cleaner.
©2006 Pearson Prentice Hall — Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management — Bozarth & Handfield.
Prioritization of sub-watersheds for the application of environmental policies in the Basin of Lake Cuitzeo D. González. and M. Mendoza CIGA CENTRO DE.
Lecture 9GEOG GIS for Physical Geography1 Outline: – Introduction – Multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) – Multi-objective land allocation (MOLA) – Examples.
School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS and Environment Dr Steve Carver
DSS Modeling Current trends – Multidimensional analysis (modeling) A modeling method that involves data analysis in several dimensions – Influence diagram.
THE IMPACT OF THE AVIATION SECTOR ON CLIMATE CHANGE – A MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS OF POSSSIBLE POLICY MEASURES Annalia Bernardini, Cathy Macharis.
Illustration of the implementation of Wood-energy projects in Latvia Ilze Strēle State projects agency “Environmental projects” Vilnius 12/13 September,
MULTICRITERIAL REASONING of PRIORITIES1 THE PRINCIPLES OF MULTICRITERIAL REASONING OF THE DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Buracas & Zvirblis
National Reports An Example Roel Lanting (TNO). What was the question? National indicators and frameworks Indicators with national acceptance Other indicators.
INTRODUCTION TO LAND-USE ISSUES. Land-use planning Seveso II provisions (Art. 12) in case of: New establishments Modifications to existing ones Developments.
Vulnerability and Adaptation Methods and Tools. NATIONAL LOCAL INTEGRATED / DYNAMIC SECTORAL / STATIC GLOBAL GIS temporal Indicator analysis and ranking.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP FIVE: COMPARE ALTERNATIVE PLANS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Copyright ©2009, Oracle and/or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Value, Visibility, Agility and Accountability.
Decision Support System for the Long-Term City Metabolism Planning Problem Work Package 54 Mark Morley, Diogo Vitorino, Kourosh Behzadian, Rita Ugarelli,
OPTIMA Optimisation for Sustainable Water Management corridoio.zero Multidisciplinary Laboratory for Exchanges with the Balkans and the Mediterranean Region.
Decision map for spatial decision making Salem Chakhar in collaboration with Vincent Mousseau, Clara Pusceddu and Bernard Roy LAMSADE University of Paris.
Tanja Magoč, François Modave, Xiaojing Wang, and Martine Ceberio Computer Science Department The University of Texas at El Paso.
Decision Support in the Reuse of Sewage Sludge in Agriculture Aida Valls, Xavier Mercadé, Marta Schuhmacher, Ana Passuello Universitat Rovira i Virgili,
Analyzing the Problem (Outranking Methods) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
SIA in the Trade Negociation Process A Challenge for Research and Development Laurence Tubiana Sustra Network & IDDRI, Institut du développement durable.
Facility Location COB 300C – Fall Facility Location 4 Facility Location is the placement of facility with respect to customers, suppliers and other.
CHEVRON PIPE LINE COMPANY Risk Based Prioritization Process.
Working Proposals Working Proposals Rosário D. Laureano D2.03.
Process modelling and optimization aid FONTEIX Christian Professor of Chemical Engineering Polytechnical National Institute of Lorraine Chemical Engineering.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
“Social” Multicriteria Evaluation: Methodological Foundations and Operational Consequences Giuseppe Munda Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Dept. of Economics.
MCDM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Operations and Supply Chain Strategies. Chapter 2, Slide 2 ©2006 Pearson Prentice Hall — Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management — Bozarth.
Development of a community-based participatory network for integrated solid waste management By: Y.P. Cai, G.H. Huang, Q. Tan & G.C. Li EVSE, Faculty of.
Decision Making Matrix A Closer Look at Preliminary Ideas.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Effects-Based Operations as a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Problem Jouni Pousi, Kai.
May 1, 2012PIA Congress 2012 Roger Swinbourne - AECOM Integrating sustainable decision making into urban development.
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Engineering Economy Lecture 1 Week 1 2 nd Semester 20015/2016 Chapter 1.
Integration of Temperature Control into the Supply Chain
Analysis Manager Training Module
An integrated planning framework for the development of sustainable and resilient cities (the EU FP7 InSMART project) Rocco De Miglio
Prof. Maria Loizidou Nicosia, Hilton Park Hotel, 15th June, 2006
Fotis Kourmousis Environmental Scientist, PhD candidate
Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding with the Use of DECERNS WebSDSS
Resource Allocation in Health Care
Giuseppe Munda Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
ACG 3351 Innovative Education--snaptutorial.com
Panagiota DIGKOGLOU Jason PAPATHANASIOU
LOCATION THEORY Obaid Ali Fatima Aftab Andleeb Pervaiz Danish Mehr
Strategy and Management Control system
Implementing Marketing Analytics
Applying Nexus Thinking in Practice
Presentation transcript:

Cours d’aide à la décision multicritère Page web Travail de groupe (2 à 3 étudiants) –Pour le 10/11/2014, préciser par mail à La composition du groupe L’entreprise retenue Le cadre du problème à traiter (actions, critères) –Le 12/11/2014, courte présentation (5 min.) et discussion. ENSTA

Tableau multicritère Au moins 6 actions Au moins 5 critères Critères –Quantitatifs –Qualitatifs Problématique –Sélection d’une action –Sélection multiple sous contraintes –Evaluation Différents points de vue, scénarios ENSTA

Visual PROMETHEE 3-level simple hierarchical criteria structure. New visual tools: –PROMETHEE rankings and Diamond, –Visual Weight Stability Intervals, –Decision-maker’s Brain (PROMETHEE VI), –GAIA-3D, –GAIA-Webs and PROMap GIS integration, –Performance (input-output) analysis, … ENSTA

MCDA vs Optimisation ENSTA Social Environment Economic Equitable Sustainable Bearable Viable Optimisation MCDA Single criterion: Profit Single criterion: Profit Profit, Social, Environment, … Short-sightedness Crisis Sustainable Decisions

ENSTA Some Decision or Evaluation Problems Locating a new plant, a new shop,... Human resources management. Purchasing equipment. Assessing the quality of suppliers. Evaluating projects. Selecting an investment strategy.

ENSTA Some applications at ULB Financial evaluation of companies Quality assessment of suppliers Electricity production planning at Electrabel Regional planning Evaluation of urban waste management systems Environmental applications Health care: –EvaluationEvaluation –Therapeutical choice –Hospital managementHospital management...

ENSTA PROMETHEE Rank decisions from the best to the worst ones. Identify best compromise solutions.

ENSTA PROMETHEE I & II PROMETHEE I : partial ranking – PROMETHEE II : complete ranking –

ENSTA PROMETHEE Diamond 9

PROMETHEE Rainbow ENSTA

Sensitivity Analysis with PROMETHEE Criteria weights  PROMETHEE ranking. Interactive weight sensitivity analysis: « Walking Weights ». Robustness with respect to weight values? –Weight stability intervals. –Visual weight stability intervals. ENSTA

Walking Weights ENSTA

Visual Stability Intervals ENSTA VSI for « Precio » (level 6): [ 19.20%, 23.70% ] VSI for « Precio » (level 1): [ 0.00%, 50.68% ] VSI for « Potencia » (level 1): [ 0.00%, 48.65% ]

ENSTA GAIA Discover conflicts among criteria. Identify potential compromises. Help to fix priorities.

GAIA ENSTA Actions: points Criteria: axes  = 90%

ENSTA GAIA  = 90% Precio Economico: 15 k€ Turismo: 25,5-26 k€ Deportivo: 29 k€ Lujo: k€ Precio Economico: 15 k€ Turismo: 25,5-26 k€ Deportivo: 29 k€ Lujo: k€

ENSTA GAIA Potencia Deportivo: 110 kW Lujo: kW Turismo: kW Economico: 50 kW Potencia Deportivo: 110 kW Lujo: kW Turismo: kW Economico: 50 kW  = 90%

GAIA ENSTA Actions: points Criteria: axes Decision axis  = 90% PROMETHEE II ! Turismo B : 0,26 Lujo 1 : 0,06 Turismo A : 0,02 Lujo 2 : 0,00 Economico : -0,15 Deportivo : -0,17 PROMETHEE II ! Turismo B : 0,26 Lujo 1 : 0,06 Turismo A : 0,02 Lujo 2 : 0,00 Economico : -0,15 Deportivo : -0,17

GAIA-Brain ENSTA years old35 years old

ENSTA GAIA Actions: points Criteria: axes Decision axis  = 90% !! only  % information !!

GAIA Webs ENSTA Action profile – Turismo B GAIA Web – Turismo B Turismo A Turismo B Deportes Economico Lujo 1 Lujo 2

ENSTA Multi-scenarios model Scenarios: –Points of view, –Hypotheses, … Evaluations: –‘Objective’ criteria: common evaluations. –‘Subjective’ criteria: specific evaluations for each scenario. Specific preference structures : –Weights, preference thresholds.

ENSTA Multi-scenarios model Adaptation of PROMETHEE: –Individual rankings. –Global (group) rankings taking into account a possible weighing of the scenarios. Adaptation of GAIA: –Three distinct analyses.

ENSTA

PROMap Google Maps integration: ENSTA