Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Monitoring Techniques
Advertisements

Grant Closeout Reconciling Grants at Closeout
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Presentation Title on MasterPage 1 Single Audit Changes – Recovery Act Compliance Supplement Appendix VII devoted to ARRA CFDA numbers Clarification of.
Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Omni Circular The CNCS Basics.
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
Fiscal Monitoring Fiscal Monitoring. Agenda I. Fiscal Monitoring I. Fiscal Monitoring II. Follow-up II. Follow-up III. Correction Action Plan III. Correction.
© 2003 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Florida Division of Emergency Management Domestic Security Unit Webinar-
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
Audits A-133 Compliance and Audit Readiness By: Tracy Jackson Senior Grants Management Specialist (Audits)
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Round Robin: Closing Out Your CNCS Grants
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Single Audit Compliance Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Jackie Reese, Audit Unit.
How to make changes to the grant award. Financial Management Seminar Grant Adjustments Notice  10% Deviation from Total Award $$ (does not apply to grants.
Monitoring & Enforcement By Alan Conway & Debbie Chen.
Andrew Nobleman & Halima Turner  Reporting Frequency: The Grants Officer, after coordination with the DOC operating unit, shall prescribe the frequency.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
Essentials of Grant Management Communication!. Keys to Award Management What documents make up your award package Reporting – taking responsibility for.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education Quarterly Special Education Meeting American Recovery and Reinvestment Act November.
Health Center Planning Grants: An Overview of Final Reporting Requirements & Grants Close Out Avni Shridharani, MHS Senior Advisor Bureau of Primary Health.
Solving the Mystery of Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs Office Technology and Economic Development November 4, 2009.
 10% Deviation from Total Award $$ (does not apply to grants $100K or less)  Change in Scope of Project  Change in Project Period (no cost extension)
Reimbursements, Reporting & Budget Modifications
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
January 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act January 2009.
Grant Award Management Bryan S. Clark, M.B.A. Chief Grants Management Officer Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
Homeland Security Grant Program Reimbursement Workshop May 28, 2009.
Close-Outs Presented by Stacy Tedder NOAA Grants Management Division January 31,
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
DHS Financial Reporting Requirements March SUBRECIPIENTS n Contractors classified as subrecipient and expending $300,000 or more in Federal Funds.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
The Lifecycle of Grants FISCAL MANAGEMENT Maddie Forrester Section Supervisor, Fiscal Grants Management.
Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators September 23, 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Pre Award Process for Federal Program Officers Competitive Grants Randi Neff Federal Program Officer.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
SF-425 Exercise Report actual expenditures not disbursements from Federal Government Report from the lowest level in Section 10 Report correct indirect.
Implementing TAACCCT Round 2 Consortium Grants Management September 27, 2013.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
NCJA’s National Forum Financial Management Training
Fiscal Monitoring in eGrants Management System (eGMS) July 26, 2018
Grants Management 101 Part A
Managing Federal grants
Managing Your Federal Grant Award
Presentation transcript:

Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due nine (9) months after end of FY  Submit online to Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC)  $10,000 or more in questioned costs must be included in the Single Audit report 166

167

Single Audit  Commercial Organizations and Individuals Submit one copy to the Office of Justice Programs, Office of the Chief Financial Officer. If audit report is delinquent, funds may be withheld.

Single Audit  The Federal Audit Clearinghouse requires all grant recipients to submit form SF SAC and the Single Audit Report package online utilizing the Internet Data Entry System (IDES).. If audit report is delinquent, funds may be withheld.

Single Audit  To use the online system: Questions about submission can be addressed to: Phone #: If audit report is delinquent, funds may be withheld.

Single Audit  A statement that the examination was made in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.  Report on the study and evaluation of internal accounting controls. 171

Resolution of Audit Reports Office of Audit, Assessment, and Management  Establish working file for the audit report.  Review and analyze the audit report.  If there are any findings, a letter must be generated to the audited recipient. This letter should include a request for a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). 172

Resolution of Audit Reports The corrective action plan (CAP) should include:  Description of each finding.  Specific steps to be taken to implement the recommendation.  Timetable for performance of each corrective action.  Description of monitoring to be performed to ensure implementation of CAP. 173

Resolution of Audit Reports  Recipient must generate response to the CAP letter within the specified time frame, usually within 30 calendar days from the letter.  Analyze response and follow up on action taken.  A special condition will be placed on new awards if report is delinquent. 174

Top Ten Audit Findings (FY 2012) 1.Procedures not documented or need improvement – Internal Controls. 2.Procedures not documented or need improvement – Accounting. 3.Procedures not documented or need improvement - Payroll. 4.Special conditions not met by grantee – unauthorized expenditures/drawdowns. 5.Federal Financial Report (FFR) not accurate (calculation and reporting errors). 175

Top Ten Audit Findings (FY 2012) 6.Procedures not documented or need improvement – Inventory. 7.Procedures not documented or need improvement – Subrecipient monitoring. 8.Suspension and Debarment – verification not performed or not properly documented. 9.Accounting system inadequate or not effectively utilized to account for grant funds. 10.Federal Financial Report not submitted timely. 176

Monitoring Discussion Grants Financial Management Division’s Mission  Ensure stewardship over Federal funds awarded by: On-Site financial reviews OCFO-Based financial reviews Technical assistance to grantees 177

Monitoring Discussion How are grants selected for on site-review?  Risk assessment  Dollar amount of award  New grant or grantee  Program Office Request  Grantee’s request for technical assistance  Problems identified through OCFO Based review  Random sample 178

Monitoring Discussion What will be reviewed during the on-site visit?  Internal Controls  Accounting System  Accounting procedures including cash management procedures  Federal Financial Reports (SF-425s)  Compliance with Recovery Act Reporting Requirements and Special Conditions (if applicable)  Test and Analyze expenditures  Provide technical assistance 179

Monitoring Discussion 180

Monitoring Discussion If there are deficiencies in your objectives and/or you have deviated from the budget without prior approval from the program office ….. DEVELOP CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN OCFO will help you get back on track 181

Monitoring Discussion What are the objectives of the OCFO based review?  Conduct an analysis of grant activity to date  Analyze Federal Financial Reports (SF-425s)  Determine compliance with audit report submission requirements  Determine compliance with Section 1512 reporting requirements (if applicable)  Evaluate payments -- determine excess cash  Identify grantees who need on-site financial review 182

Primary Grantee’s Responsibility  The primary grant recipient is responsible for monitoring the subrecipient and ascertaining that all fiscal and programmatic responsibilities are fulfilled, including compliance with Federal rules and regulations (e.g., OMB Circular A-133 compliance, EEO compliance). 183

Ten Top Monitoring Findings (FY 2012) 1.Unauthorized expenditures. 2.Unsupported costs. 3.Subgrantee monitoring procedures not documented or needed improvement. 4.Federal Financial Reports and ARRA 1512c Reports did not agree. 5.Expenditures not properly tracked by budget categories. 184

Ten Top Monitoring Findings (FY 2012) 6.Federal Financial Report (FFR) amounts did not reconcile to grantee’s accounting system. 7.Excess cash-on-hand identified. 8.Budget modifications exceeded the 10% limit and/or potential scope change. 9.Accounting procedures not documented or needed improvement. 10.Progress Reports not submitted timely. 185