Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
Advertisements

Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department August 21, 2012.
Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility 1 January College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students ( ) 2.State-Developed Differentiated Recognition,
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting: October 16, 2003 Testing,
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
2009 ABCs/AYP Results Accountability Services August 11, 2009.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
The Many Meanings of “Multiple Measures” Susan Brookhart Volume 2009, Volume 67:3 ASCD, November 2009, pp
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
PRHS SAT REPORTS DISTRICT AYP REPORTS. WHAT IS THE SAT TEST? The SAT is a globally recognized college admissions exam. It tests your knowledge of reading,
Annual Student Performance Report September
Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
: ABCs and AMO Accountability Results WS/FCS Board of Education August 21, 2012.
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
New High School Exit Standards April 2005 By Andy Palmer and Chris Sardler Click HERE to return to the DocumentationHERE.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 School Improvement & Accountability Update for P.S. Jones Middle Presented by: Tracey Nixon Principal.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
1 AYP for 2007 Haywood County Schools George Chapman Superintendent.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Edenton-Chowan Schools
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
North Carolina’s NCLB Pilot Growth Model
Michigan School Report Card Update
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education

Testing & Accountability Services The Three Major Components ABCs Growth - (Growth and High Growth are determined differently since 2006) ABCs Performance Composite (additional courses counting in composite and revised tests will have major impact, will impact different grade level span differently) AYP Proficiency (five ways – Bar, Safe Harbor, Confidence Interval, Growth and Targeted Assistance

Testing & Accountability Services The New ABCs Formula and How growth will be determined Growth Scores for EOG Reading & Math and EOC subjects are determined by using the same formula EOG Reading and Math Growth Scores are determined by using two years of scores if available EOC Growth Scores are determined by using predictor subject(s) – examples (Algebra 1 predictor – 8 th Grade EOG Math) & (Physics – Chemistry & Geometry)

Testing & Accountability Services Expected Growth Each student will have a Growth Score for each subject (Read, Math, EOC Courses) if have predictor score(s) All scores are average to determine Expected Growth for a school (70 (EOC)/140 (EOG) days attendance requirement) If the average is 0.00 or greater, Expected Growth is met (HS have additional components in the model in addition to EOC scores)

Testing & Accountability Services Expected Growth The other components are changes in drop out rate, competency pass rate and percentages of students meeting the College University Prep/College Tech Prep standards. Subject to change for 2008

Testing & Accountability Services High Growth The school must make expected growth 60% of students must have positive growth (0 or above)

Testing & Accountability Services What impact did the New Formula have in 2006? Fewer schools met Expected Growth – 54% (3-8) and 57% (HS) Fewer schools must High Growth (especially HS) – 10% (3-8) and 18% (HS)

Testing & Accountability Services Growth

Testing & Accountability Services ABCs Proficiency Subjects Grades 3-8: EOG Reading & Math, 4 th & 7 th Writing, 8 th Grade Computer Skills and scores from alternate tests High Schools: EOC courses, 10 th grade Writing and scores from alternate tests All students who take test(s) count – no attendance requirement

Testing & Accountability Services ABCs Proficiency (Composite Score) Do not compare Composite Scores or Proficiency if new tests or less tests in composite Examples – EOG Math in 2006 was different test than previous year (scores were lower), Writing was not in previous Composites, EOC 2007 Math Subjects (Algebra 1, Algebra 2 & Geometry) & English 1 are new tests (scores are lower especially Algebra 1), EOC 2007 Science Subjects (Chemistry, Physical Science & Physics) are not in the Composite Do not compare Composite Scores of one school vs. another unless schools have same grade spans Writing Proficiency and Online Computer Skills has different impact at schools with different grade spans Examples - Writing – K-4 (approx. 1/5), K-5 (approx. 1/7), K-8 (approx. 2/15), 4-8 (1/12), 6-8 (approx. 1/8), 7-8 (approx. 1/6) Online Computer Skills – K-8 (approx. 1/15), 4-8 (approx. 1/12), 6-8 (approx 1/8), 7-8 (approx. 1/6)

Testing & Accountability Services

NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 10 Subgroups (School as a whole (All), Black, White, Hispanic, Asian, Native American Indian, Multiracial, Student with Disability (EC), Economically Disadvantaged Students (FRL), Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Attendance (Grades 3 – 8), Graduation (HS) Subgroups must have 40 or more students in order to count in either 95% testing requirement or proficiency (also must meet 140 days requirement for proficiency) How to count – Examples - School met 21/21, School met 10/10

Testing & Accountability Services NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Grades 3 – 8 (EOG Reading and Math - includes Regular and Alternate Assessments) HS – Students in Grade 10 (English 1/Grade 10 Writing & Algebra 1 or OCS English/Writing and Math)

Testing & Accountability Services Call or visit Donald C. Rhodes Pitt County Schools Director of Testing & Accountability