Essentializing the AK Standards & Essential Elements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Advertisements

o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Is it Mathematics? Linking to Content Standards. Some questions to ask when looking at student performance Is it academic? – Content referenced: reading,
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Teaching to the Standards: Math A Literacy-Based Approach for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities by Katherine Trela, PhD, Bree Jimenez, MS.
Understanding the IEP Lori Freeman, Director of Special Education PreK-12 Maria Albano, Coordinator of Special Education, Hommocks Middle School Alexis.
Dillard Research Associates and Alaska Education & Early Development
Common Core State Standards Wolcott Elementary School West Hartford Public Schools.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Overview of the Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment System
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education,
EngageNY.org Common Core: What can Parents Do? Presented by: Ms. Augello Ms. Careccia.
4 th Grade State Tests. ELA- April 14 th, 15 th and 16th Day 1Day 2Day 3Total Book 1Book 2Book 3 ReadingWriting Passages Multiple- Choice Questions.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
ELA and Mathematics 3 rd Grade New York State Exam Workshop.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
Math Foundational Services SHIFT 1: Focus October 9, 2014 Cindy Dollman & Joe Delinski The PROE Center.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
* The purpose of the Snoqualmie Valley School District Summer Learning Program is to prepare and remediate students with the purposes of demonstrating.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Alternate Assessment Changes. 9/14/20152 Important Information that You Need to Know The new Alternate Assessment will be a test given to students.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Unit Portfolio Presentation Linda Hill & Jonna Wallis
A transitional approach. REPORT CARDS PHONE CALLS TO PARENTS S PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES STUDENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES EVALUATED STUDENT WORK STANDARDIZED.
Common Core State Standards
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Next Generation Standards April 27, 2012.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
DECEMBER 2013 Dynamic Learning Maps: Claims and Conceptual Areas and Common Core Essential Elements Update The present publication was developed under.
Unpacking Standards and Using Student-Friendly Language Facilitated by: Catherine Garrison Professional Development Specialist.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Module 1 What is Common Core?. Goals Develop an understanding of Common Core Standards and the PA commitment  English Language Arts  Mathematics Explore.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Common Core Standards Implementation ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Understand the Change Be the Change How to Change.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Welcome to Curriculum Night I am so glad you are here. Feel free to ask questions. Remember our time is short. Welcome to Curriculum Night for Ms. Figurelli’s.
Quick Write Reflection How will you implement the Engineering Design Process with your students in your classes?
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
Thornton Elementary Third Quarter Data rd Grade ELA Which standard did the students perform the best on in reading? Which standard did students.
 Remember: › Standards are………… › Standards are not………… › Use Assessment to drive Instruction.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
ELA - 3 Common Core Vs Kansas Standards. DOMAIN Standards For Literature (RL)
3 rd, 4 th and 5 th Grade. Agenda Preparation looks like… General Information for Exams Overview of ELA Exam Overview of Math Exam Ways to Help At Home.
Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning October 2011.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Common Assessment Data Review and Action Plan for Students not Mastering the Common Core Standards.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Standards-based Grading and Reporting Information for Parents.
Bridgehampton November 16 th. Introductions Name Tent: –Print your first name in the center in large letters. –Identify your educational role (e.g., grade.
Jessica Bowman, USBE. Share one thing about your special education program that you are proud of. Share one thing you are excited to do this summer. Get.
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
Welcome Teachers! Jessica Bowman, USOE.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium
Florida Standards Assessments
Florida Standards Assessments
Progress in Curriculum Alignment with the NH College and Career Ready Standards (NH CCRS) October 8, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Essentializing the AK Standards & Essential Elements Dillard Research Associates and Alaska Education & Early Development January 22, 2015

Objectives of Training To understand the reasons for linking IEPs with Alaska Standards in English language arts and Math To practice essentializing standards that are linked to the AK Standards

Why Link IEPs to AK Standards? IDEA 2004 – IEPs must include “academic and functional goals, designed to meet the child’s needs that result from the child’s disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum.” Subsequent federal legislation requires all students to be provided access to the general education curriculum

Why Link IEPs to AK Standards? cont’d. Access to the general education curriculum is supported Instruction is focused on more challenging content and skills Collaboration between general and special educators is promoted All students in Alaska must have full access to the Alaska Statewide Assessment System. Alaska students with an IEP can be assessed with either the general assessment or Alaska’s alternate assessment, the AKAA.

Standards-Based Reform Change the way we think about instruction for special education students (social conception of disability that is strength-based) Raise expectations for student learning Provide access to grade-level content standards Plan, teach, and assess students so that they can participate and make progress in the general education curriculum Ensure that parents continue to be part of this discussion and understand the rationale for change

Tips for looking at the Standards Look for the essential content (nouns) Look for the essential intellectual operations (verbs) Look for vocabulary that limits the scope of the content and intellectual operations (delimiters) Consider prerequisite skills (access skills, including sensory/motor needs as well as use of supports) Consider the cognitive/linguistic process required to access the standard Add whole numbers (1-100). Noun = numbers, verb = Add, the delimiter is whole, scope, or delimiter, is (1-100).

What level of cognition is required in order to access the standard? Anderson’s Taxonomy Anderson et. al. 2001

Levels of Communication Students functioning at the Attention level are able to attend to content oriented stimuli and materials. At the Joint Attention level, they are able to attend to stimuli and materials jointly, along with a peer or teacher. Students who are communicating at the Pre-Symbolic level can explore patterns that exist among objects and graphic representations, which are pictures and picture symbols. They do not yet understand that numerals and letters have significance at these three levels. A student functioning at the Early Symbolic level is beginning to realize that numerals and letters contain meaning and significance. They can use abstract symbols, numerals, and letters to a very limited degree for meaningful purposes. Students functioning at the Symbolic level or higher understand that symbols, numerals, and letters have meaning and are communicating using symbols, numerals, and letters to a limited degree. Students functioning at the Conventional Symbolic level are using some language and social conventions in their communication patterns. Students functioning at the Extended Symbolic level are using language and social conventions more consistently and across contexts in their communication patterns. Students functioning at the Symbolic Skills for Transition level are demonstrating extended communication skills that are still below grade level expectations, but at a level of complexity that denotes that they could be assessed and instructed at a higher level. *Framework derived from multiple sources, including Browder, Downing, Reichle, Wetherby, & colleagues. Please see References.

Apple Example The Big Apple – has nothing to do with NY, but we all understand the reference.

Essentializing Standards

Essentializing Coding System (a) Essential content (nouns) is (b) Essential intellectual operations (verbs) are underlined, with complex verbs also bolded. (c) Delimiters of content or intellectual operations are italicized. boxed Note: This is the process you will see in our examples, which are done electronically. When you do this by hand for practice, you will circle complex verbs and put delimiters in (parentheses)

Essentialization Process Select standard Code using essentialization system Reduce depth, breadth, and complexity by: transforming complex verbs limiting scope of content/verbs eliminating extra text Generate the essentialized standard

Example 1: How to Essentialize an AK Reading Foundation Standard 4.RF4 - Read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension. Read text with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension. Essentialized standard: Read appropriate text with accuracy. Alaska Reading Reading Standards: Foundational Skills (Page 16) Can also essentialize further, such as match icons, match objects, understand text that is read to them.

Example 2: How to Essentialize an AK Number and Operations in Base Ten Standard 4.NBT.4 - Fluently add and subtract multi-digit whole numbers using any algorithm. Verify the reasonableness of the results. Fluently add and subtract multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm. Verify the reasonableness of the results. Essentialized standard: Add two-digit whole numbers with fluency. Fourth grade Number and Operations in Base Ten standard

Example 3: How to Essentialize an AK Writing Standard 9-10.W.4 Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, style, and features are appropriate to task, genre, purpose, and audience. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, style, and features are appropriate to task, genre, purpose, and audience. Essentialized standard: Write relevant text with accuracy.

Example 4: How to Essentialize a Standard 9-10.L1 - Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. Essentialized standard: Accurately identify icons when using expressive language.

Quick Review of Essentializing Select standard Code using essentialization system Reduce depth, breadth, and complexity by: transforming complex verbs limiting scope of content/verbs eliminating extra text Generate the essentialized standard

Your Turn to Practice Essentializing Standards

Practice Essentialization of Standard #1 3.RL1 - Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text (e.g., making basic inferences and predictions), referring explicitly to details from the text as the basis for the answers. Identify the essential content: _____________________________ Identify the essential intellectual operation(s):________________ Identify the delimiter(s):__________________________________ See Activity #1 of “2_DRA_IEP_Essentialize_Standards_Worksheet_VF.docx”

Practice Essentialization of Standard #1 3.RL1 - Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text (e.g., making basic inferences and predictions), referring explicitly to details from the text as the basis for the answers. Essential content: questions , understanding Essential intellectual operation(s): ask, answer, demonstrate Delimiter(s): and, to, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers, and, (e.g., making basic inferences and predictions)

Practice Essentialization of Standard #1 Reduce depth, breadth, and complexity Eliminate unnecessary content, intellectual operations, and delimiters Generate the essentialized standard Answer questions about a text. One way to answer the Essentialized Elements for Activity 1.

Practice Essentialization of Standard #2 Activity 1 7.NS.3. Solve real-world and mathematical problems involving the four operations with rational numbers. (Computations with rational numbers extend the rules for manipulating fractions to complex fractions.) For example, use models, explanations, number lines, real life situations, describing or illustrating the effect of arithmetic operations on rational numbers (fractions, decimals). Identify the essential content: ______________________________________________ Identify the essential intellectual operation(s):_________________________________ Identify the delimiter(s):___________________________________________________ See Activity #2 of “2_DRA_IEP_Essentialize_Standards_Worksheet_VF.docx”

Practice Essentialization of Standard #2 Activity 2 7.NS.3. Solve real-world and mathematical problems involving the four operations with rational numbers. (Computations with rational numbers extend the rules for manipulating fractions to complex fractions.) For example, use models, explanations, number lines, real life situations, describing or illustrating the effect of arithmetic operations on rational numbers (fractions, decimals). Essential content: problems Essential intellectual operation(s): Solve Delimiter(s): real-world and mathematical, involving the four operations with rational numbers, (Computations with rational numbers extend the rules for manipulating fractions to complex fractions.), and For example, use models, explanations, number lines, real life situations, describing or illustrating the effect of arithmetic operations on rational numbers (fractions, decimals).

Practice Essentialization of Standard #2 Reduce depth, breadth, and complexity Eliminate unnecessary content, intellectual operations, and delimiters Generate the essentialized standard: Solve addition and subtraction word problems. One way to answer the Essentialized Elements for Activity 2.

Practice Essentialization of Standard #3 Activity 3 8.RI2 – Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to the characters, setting, and plot; restate and summarize main ideas or events, in correct sequence, after reading a text. Identify the essential content: ______________________________________ Identify the essential intellectual operation(s):_________________________ Identify the delimiter(s):___________________________________________ See Activity #3 of “2_DRA_IEP_Essentialize_Standards_Worksheet_VF.docx”

Practice Essentialization of Standard #3 8.RI2 – Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to the characters, setting, and plot; restate and summarize main ideas or events, in correct sequence, after reading a text. Essential content: central idea , text , summary Essential intellectual operation(s): Determine, analyze, restate or summarize Delimiter(s): a, of a text, and, its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to characters, setting, plot, main ideas or events, correct sequence, after reading the text

Practice Essentialization of Standard #3 Reduce depth, breadth, and complexity Eliminate unnecessary content, intellectual operations, and delimiters Generate the essentialized standard: Identify the central idea and main ideas of a text. One way to answer the Essentialized Elements for Activity 3.

Quick Review of Essentializing Select standard Code using essentialization system Reduce depth, breadth, and complexity by: transforming complex verbs limiting scope of content/verbs eliminating extra text Generate the essentialized standard

Developing Nodes Initial Precursor (IP) Distal Precursor (DP) Proximal Precursor (PP) Target (T) Successor (S)

Internet Resources Alaska State Standards in ELA and Math – state.ak.us/akstandards/ Alaska State Standards in other content areas– http://education.alaska.gov/AKStandards/standards/standards.pdf DLM Claims & Conceptual Areas in Math – http://dynamiclearningmaps.org/sites/default/files/math_ye_blueprint.pdf DLM Claims & Conceptual Areas in ELA – http://dynamiclearningmaps.org/sites/default/files/ela_ye_blueprint_0.pdf

Resources Used Carol Kosnitsky – Writing IEPs that Align with Common Core Standards IEPs and Arizona Common Core Standards Ginevra Courtade, Ph.D. University of Louisville & Diane Browder, Ph.D. University of North Carolina, Charlotte – Aligning IEPs to Common Core State Standards for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities

References Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Addison, Wesley, Longman Inc. New York. Browder, D., Wakeman, S., & Jimenez, B. (2006). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade level content for students with Significant cognitive disabilities. Downing, J. E. (2005). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities. (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Reichle, J., Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2002). Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Wendell, Wendell (1996). The social construction of disability (p. 60). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Wetherby, A. M., Warren, S. F., & Reichle, J. (Eds.). (1998). Transitions in prelinguistic communication (pp. 233-259). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Contacts Please submit any additional questions or comments to one of us at the following email addresses. Thank you for your attention today! Kim Sherman, Dillard Research Associates kim.dra.eed@gmail.com Dan Farley, Dillard Research Associates alignassess@gmail.com Sevrina Tindal, Dillard Research Associates HelpDesk sevrina@dillardresearchassociates.com