NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

NETS-TF Standards Take this quiz to test your understanding of the NETS- TF standards! Start quiz!
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
1 UW-Whitewater & CESA 2 Licensure Renewal & Support Center.
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What it means for New Teachers
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Staff & Student Feedback The Role of Feedback in Educator Evaluation January 2015.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Teacher Quality In New Mexico Information Session on New Mexico’s 3-Tiered Teacher Licensure System James Ball, SDE Larry Martinez, SDE Kersti Tyson, SDE.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Strand A In Depth Context and Introduction. Strand A: Instruction Demonstrates your competency in instruction based on your documentation of NM Teacher.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
School-Family-Community Partnerships Increasing Volunteerism
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
April 10, A year of mentoring required to move from the initial to the professional license: Initial teaching Initial school specialist Initial.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
What it means for New Teachers
Partnership for Practice
Dissemination Training
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
EdTPA, Pro-Cert, National Boards
Colorado Department of Education
Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST
Presentation transcript:

NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005

TEACHER DATA 21, 516 teachers (FTEs) 21, 516 teachers (FTEs) – 734 Pre-Level I – 3,026 Level I –11, 417 Level II – 6,339 Level III Advanced from Level I to Level II in spring, 2005: 835 Advanced from Level I to Level II in spring, 2005: 835 Retirees annually: Approximately 800 Retirees annually: Approximately 800

New Mexico’s 3-Tiered Teacher Licensure System EVERYTHING PROVEN BY EXPERIENCE ELSEWHERE FAILS IN NEW MEXICO. - Gov. Lew Wallace

Student Teacher’s content test scores knowledge Defining Teacher Quality…Finding a Balance Teacher performance and student learning NM Teacher Evaluation System

HIGH OBJECTIVE UNIFORM STATEWIDE STANDARD OF EVALUATION (HOUSSE) EVIDENCE BASED SYSTEM ANNUAL EVALUATION PROCESS (LOCAL) LICENSURE ADVANCEMENT PROCESS (LOCAL & STATE) Based on New Mexico’s Nine Teacher Competencies with Differentiated Indicators for Each Licensure Level

ANNUAL EVALUATION: 4 Processes PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP): Establish annually by 40 th day of school on district form Based on 9 state teaching competencies at indicators for licensure level Includes evaluation issues from previous year (if applicable) Assure teacher is “highly qualified” under NCLB (if applicable) REFLECTION ON PDP: End of year activity for every teacher on a statewide form Teacher reflects on his/her progress in implementing the PDP SUMMATIVE EVALUATION: Statewide form to document a teacher’s performance on the PDP. Completed annually for Level I teachers Completed every 3 years for Level II and Level III-A teachers. PROGRESSIVE DOCUMENTATION OF TEACHER PERFORMANCE: Statewide form to document a teacher’s continuous professional growth over a 3-year period. Completed annually for Level II and III-A teacher only.

THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DOSSIER FOR LICENSURE ADVANCEMENT Level I teachers MUST submit Professional Development Dossier in order to advance to Level II, within five year period at Level I. Advancement is possible after three years. If a Level II teacher wishes to advance to Level III the teacher must submit a Dossier after earning an MA and successfully completing a minimum of 3 years at Level II. (Advancement is optional.) Dossier includes 5 strands; 3 strands (A,B, &C) are evaluated by independent reviewers (state level); 2 strands (D&E) are completed at the district level.

Evidence of Competence STRAND A INSTRUCTION Independent reviewer NM Teacher Competency I Knowledge of Content & Curriculum NM Teacher Competency II Teaching Methods & Resources NM Teacher Competency V Assessment Techniques & Procedures STRAND B STUDENT LEARNING Independent reviewer NM Teacher Competency III Student Communication & Feedback NM Teacher Competency IV Knowledge of Student Growth & Development NM Teacher Competency VI Classroom Management & Environment NM Teacher Competency VII Student Diversity STRAND C PROFESSIONAL LEARNING Independent reviewer NM Teacher Competency VIII Change Agentry NM Teacher Competency IX Collaboration with Colleagues, Parents, & Community STRAND D VERIFICATION School districts Advancement from Level I to II: Verification of Mentorship Advancement from Level II to III-A: Verification of Leadership Role(s) Advancement from Level II or III-A: Verification of PDD authenticity STRAND E EVALUATIONS School districts Annual Evaluations (Principal) Superintendent’s Recommendation for Licensure Advancement or Renewal Teacher’s Professional Development Dossier (PDD) Must include evidence from all five strands

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DOSSIER (PDD) Strand A I. Context Describe your students & classroom context:  Provide class information.  Write brief description of range and growth in achievement levels for all students.  List NM Student Performance Standards & Benchmarks.  Provide any additional necessary information. II. Introduction Write brief Introduction of a 3-5 Consecutive hours of Instruction with one group of students:  Knowledge & skills this instruction helped students learn  How segment fit with previous and continuing instruction  Integration of skills and content  Organization of educational setting  Differentiation of instruction III. Instructional Record Provide detailed description of your ongoing instruction. Two-column description:  Left column – narrative description of events  Right column – explanation of reasoning and how activity was adapted IV. Resources Present the resources & materials you used:  Collect examples of resources from Sections II & III of Instruction Strand.  Label resources and arrange.  Provide special instructions. V. Student Work VI. Analysis of Student Show example of Achievement high achievement Explain the student work. ways the class demonstrated Show example of achievement. mid-range achievement. Criteria for determining Show example of different levels low achievement of achievement. student work. How three students differed in achievement. How achievement was communicated to parents. How you took data into account for next segment of instruction.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DOSSIER (PDD) Strand B I. Student X: Examples of Work and Explanation Complete Student X's cover sheet. Complete Student X's cover sheet. Prepare examples of Student X's work. Prepare examples of Student X's work. Explain student selection & work. Explain student selection & work. II. Student Y: Examples of Work and Explanation Complete Student Y's cover sheet. Complete Student Y's cover sheet. Prepare examples of Student Y's work. Prepare examples of Student Y's work. Explain student selection & Explain student selection & work. work.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DOSSIER (PDD) Strand C I. Examining and Implementing Change in Teaching Change in Teaching  Explain area you investigated & what prompted you to do it. & what prompted you to do it.  Explain resources you consulted, what you learned, consulted, what you learned, & what you tried as result. & what you tried as result.  Explain how your practice changed, your plans for future changed, your plans for future growth. growth.  Select up to 4 pieces of evidence of changes. evidence of changes.  Provide list of resources. II. Collaboration  Explain how you worked with colleagues, parents, & colleagues, parents, & community members. community members.  Illustrate your explanation.

INDEPENDENT REVIEWERS Professional Development Dossiers are assessed by trained reviewers Professional Development Dossiers are assessed by trained reviewers –Teachers –Administrators –University Educators in Elementary/Secondary –Retired Educators –Any qualified educator with a background in elementary and secondary education. All PDDs are submitted through an on-line system developed by Vision Link of Denver, CO All PDDs are submitted through an on-line system developed by Vision Link of Denver, CO

WHERE ARE WE NOW ? Three-tiered teacher licensure structure and evaluation system are designed and in place as of July 1, Three-tiered teacher licensure structure and evaluation system are designed and in place as of July 1, PDPs are in place statewide for teachers by 40 th day of school annually PDPs are in place statewide for teachers by 40 th day of school annually Electronic PDD submission system has been implemented – two submission periods have taken place Electronic PDD submission system has been implemented – two submission periods have taken place

VISIT OUR WEBSITE: for the latest information on Local Annual Teacher Evaluations and the Professional Development Dossier as well as other resources for teaching in New Mexico. Also contact me at: