New Opportunities in the Special Education Space NEKIA Business Development Institute November 17, 2005 Jane West, Ph.D. Washington Partners, LLC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Advertisements

State of Hawaii Department of Education April 2005 Title II A – Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Title II D – Enhancing.
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION.
February 2007IDEA Partnership1 Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention Fundamentals for Educators and their Partners.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner, National Center for Education Research.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences: Information for the Grants Administrator Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
MPRRC U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Special Education Technical Assistance Resources for Charter Schools.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Administrators’ Back to School INSTITUTE August 2013 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI ) Brownsville Independent School District Curriculum & Instruction Department.
Increasing Special Education Research Opportunities THE POLICY BEHIND EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.
1 Professional Development for Correctional Educators: EDJJ Professional Development Series Sarup R. Mathur Heather Baltodano Derrick Platt Pamela Harris.
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Innovation Configurations Daniel J. Reschly, Ph.D., and Susan.
Is Your School Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities: Guesswork or Science? Presented by The Elementary & Middle Schools Technical Assistance.
Eighth Street Elementary School September 25 th, 2014 Mr. John McCollum Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
EC Personnel: Status, Challenges, Preservice and Inservice Training, and Resources in Kansas David P. Lindeman, Ph.D. Presented at: Kansas Interagency.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
 Provide information that parents need to know when their child has an IEP  Provide ideas for helping your child reach their potential  Provide important.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Common Core State Standards: The Shifts and their Implications Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Alpha Charter of Excellence September 22, 2015 Isabel Navas, Principal.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
The IDEA Partnership at The National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) IDEA INFO Building Unified.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
Research Program Overview National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Robert J. Jaeger, Ph.D. Interagency and International Affairs Interagency.
WELCOME WELCOME PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OSEP PROJECT DIRECTORS’ VIRTUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 27, 2015.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Office of Special Education: Vision Statements Parent Advisory Council – Specialized Services November 05, 2012 Gina Ross - Elementary Megan McCullough.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Listening to Administrators: Learning about decisions and priorities National Center for Technology Innovation Tracy Gray, Ph.D., Director.
0 Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities PERFORMANCE MEASURES Craig Stanton Office of Planning, Evaluation,
The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in The Institute of Education Sciences (IES): An Introduction.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs The Legacy of IDEA 2004: Improving Results for all Students Dr. Alexa Posny.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Washington, DC July 21, 2008 Tools for Bridging the Research to Practice Gap Mary Wagner, Ph.D. SRI International.
Georgia’s Graduation/ Dropout Prevention Project Building Systems to Help Students with Disabilities Graduate.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Increasing Special Education Research Opportunities THE POLICY BEHIND EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education.
FY17 BUDGET BASICS Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Teaching and Learning Division National Center for Education Research.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
CEC Legislative Recommendations Education Appropriations Recommendations CEC urges Congress to: Provide $12.9 billion to fully fund IDEA’s Part.
Accommodations in testing: Law, policy and practice
SPDG Bidders’ Webinar TA&D Resources 6/01/2011
Office of Special Education
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
PLATFORM FOR ENGAGEMENT
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Research and Evaluation to Support Learners with Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

New Opportunities in the Special Education Space NEKIA Business Development Institute November 17, 2005 Jane West, Ph.D. Washington Partners, LLC

Key Developments in Special Education: Policy & Politics Three Fundamental Shifts 1. From Process to Results Civil Rights & access Accountability & outcomes

Key Developments in Special Education: Policy & Politics Special Education a mainstream interest Special Education a special interest 2. From the Sidelines to the Mainstream

Key Developments in Special Education: Policy & Politics Implementation Advocacy 3. From Disability Agenda to General Ed. Agenda

IDEA 2004 Reauthorization Issues NCLB Integration  Assessment  Highly qualified teachers Funding Paperwork Litigation Discipline Response to intervention Over identification of minority students

Trends in Special Education: The Next 5 Years Funding NCLB  Assessment  Accountability  Highly qualified teacher Response to Intervention Overrepresentation of minorities High school reform and adolescent literacy Decreasing paperwork

Effect on the Education Market place Teacher Training  Cross training of teachers in regular and special education In the school  The role of the special education teacher in the general education classroom.  Scientifically-based research guiding instructional methods and materials  Role of the principal Access to valid assessments for students with disabilities  Leveling the playing field with universal design principles  Guidelines and training for use of assistive technology and other accommodations for testing

Opportunities in the Current Climate Increased expectations and achievement for students in special education Increased access to the general education curriculum Highly trained teachers in all areas Less of a division between general and special education

Threats to Special Education Give up on assessment & accountability – too hard? Loopholes in NCLB continue to weaken assessment and accountability standards moving students in special education back to the basement Insufficient and diverted funding Property owners revolt against subsidizing special education General education parents and teachers revolt

Opportunities in Research, Technical Assistance, Development and Evaluation Monitor the priorities of the Institute of Education Sciences Consider how your work in general education can impact special education Check the Department of Education’s website for funding forecast forecast.html forecast.html  New forecasts expected sometime in November

Funding Sources in Special Education Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Technical Assistance & Model Demonstration Projects – now funded from the same budget line. Dissemination Funding allocation: FY : $49,397,000 National Center on Special Education Research (NCSER) Research Grants Funding allocation: FY : $90.9 Million

Changes in Funding Model demonstration projects are no longer funded under the research budget line Technical assistance projects and model demonstration projects share the same budget line  Funding fewer projects for shorter periods, but providing more money per project

Priorities of IES Special education research topics:  Language and vocabulary development  Assessment for accountability  Individualized Education Programs (IEP)  Early intervention and assessment for young children with disabilities  Serious behavioral disorders  K-12 Reading and writing (including reading and writing within disciplines), math and science  Secondary and post-secondary outcomes  Special education teacher quality: reading, writing, math and science

Advice NCLB implications for special education students Evaluation of desired IDEA outcomes:  Reduce paperwork  Reduce litigation  Reduce minorities in special education Link research to practice Technology and universal design