Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services PERFORMANCE REPORTING 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th.
Performance Planning, Feedback and Merit Allocation TMG Open Meeting May 1, 2008.
1 Performance Assessment Process: The Reviewer’s Perspective May 2014.
Performance management guidance
Performance Management Process
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
Aligning Employee Performance with Agency Mission
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN THE SIERRA LEONE CIVIL SERVICE PRESENTER: DAVID WS BANYA DIRECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – HRMO.
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
+ NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS March 2010-April 2011 and January 2011-December 2011.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Reporting Church activities. Presentation outline Why do we report? When do we report? Who reports? What do we report? How do we report? Report process.
Contractor Business System Rule Revision #, Date (of revision) Presented By: Kendrick Dickerson, PA, DCMA Property Group May 3, 2013.
Performance Management
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
System Office Performance Management
INTERVIEWING SKILLS FOR EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services 1.
Performance Management
Performance Appraisal System Update
1 Presentation to officials of the Government of India by Titus M. Ndambuki Permanent Secretary Ministry of Public Service, Nairobi, Kenya.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Compensation Model Supervisor Training Presented by: Jennifer Larson
Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Internal models Gareth Truran Head of Department, London Markets.
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Key changes and transition process
1 Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats.
Student Learning targets
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
Engaging in Effective Performance Discussions June 6, 2013.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
Performance Planning & Evaluation Classified & Operational Form.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
REPORTING, MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROVISIONS ON NON-FINANCIALS – 2013/14 1 MIG Quarterly Workshop 3 – 4 September 2013.
The Performance Management And Appraisal System (PMAS) Principal Performance Appraisal.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SERVICE ACT 2 OF 2011 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE.
Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic.
Chicago Board of Trade  The World’s Leading Futures Exchange sm Chicago Board of Trade  The World’s Leading Futures Exchange sm FIA presentation November.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
All teachers are responsible for creating and managing their own PDP and gathering evidence – it’s a Professional Standard ALL elements of the PDP are.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Module 3: RECAP – Conversation A summary of Results and Behaviors RECAP Canadian Manager Enhanced FY15 CMP…A One Sysco Approach AGREE.ACHIEVE.RECAP.
Financial Reporting Overview & Attestation Users.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Review of CEPSIP2 and PSIP tools March 2016 PROJECT FOR CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR INVESTMENT PROGRAMMING PHASE II (CEPSIP2)
The CED’s & DED’s role in the Tenure & Promotion of Agents
Prof. dr. Giedrius Vanagas
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
System Office Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Performance Management System
2016 Year-End Performance Management
T.O.P.S
The Club Health Assessment
Performance Management System
Employee Performance Management System
Teacher SLTs
Performance Management Training
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services PERFORMANCE REPORTING 1

 I ndividuals should keep record of what they do on daily basis. The information can be useful in quarterly report preparation  A ll supervisors should keep record of assignments given out  I ndividuals must submit quarterly reports to their supervisors 2

Agreed Performance Targets ……………Quarter Cumulative Achievements (Total Achievements to – date) Targets for the quarter Achievement Performance Indicators Achievement Performance Indicators PAS FORM I A:QUARTELY INDIVIDUAL PERFORAMNCE REPORT Name ……………………………….Designation ……………………………… Personal No ……………..Department/Division/Unit/Section ……………….. Appraisee ’ s Signature …………………………… Date ……………………………………….. Supervisor ’ s Name ……………………………….Personal No …………………………….. Designation …………………………… Signature ……………… Date ……………………….. 3 The following reporting format shall be applied uniformly across the service

Note: Every officer shall be required to submit four quarterly reports, if performance covers a complete year, or reports which cover the period served on a pro-rata basis. The four (4) quarters and the dates for submission of reports are as indicated here below:  1 st quarter-1 st July to 30 th September of each year. Reports to be submitted to Supervisors by 3 rd October  2 nd quarter-1 st October to 31 st December of each year. Reports to be submitted to Supervisors by 3 rd January  3 rd quarter-1 st January to 31 st March of each year. Reports to be submitted to Supervisors by 3 rd April  4 th quarter-1 st April to 30 th June of each year. Reports to be Submitted to supervisors by 3 rd July 4

NOTE  Ad hoc assignments and any constraints encountered should also be recorded  Those who trained should give a report on what they learnt and the period  Period for leave taken should also be indicated for accountability  Any period of absence should form part of an appendix to the report 5

MID – YEAR STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Purpose  To monitor progress  Gives opportunity for adding or including changed targets where necessary/applicable  Take stock of achievements, any shortcomings in order to take remedial action early if required  It is mandatory and has to be conducted  PAS form 1A should be used for all performance reporting  Note:  Mid – year staff performance Appraisal must be discussed between officer and supervisor  The focus of discussion should be on targets as earlier set at the beginning of the appraisal year  Keeping record of activities/tasks done is critical for appraisal  For effective appraisal to take place, quarterly reports on achievements of targets/constraints by the mid year must have been prepared as scheduled and submitted to the supervisor  The mid-year performance appraisal using the above format must be signed by both parties 6

END OF THE YEAR APPRAISAL/EVALUATION The End of Year Appraisal takes place at the end of the reporting period. The following will constitute the end of year evaluation process:  The Supervisor and Appraisee are required to meet at the end of the year to discuss the overall performance over the whole appraisal period.  Prior to the meeting, the appraisee should prepare a preliminary report on the extent to which the set performance targets were achieved as agreed at the beginning of the Performance Year with clear performance indicators to support performance.  The Supervisor will assess the extent to which the appraisee has achieved the performance targets, taking into account any unforeseen developments that may have affected performance during the period.  The Supervisor is also required to assess the Appraisee’s core competences and values.  The Supervisor will use the following five (5) ratings:- 7

(i) Excellent Performance – All Performance Targets consistently exceeded (101 %+). This assessment describes performance that fully meets all the targets and exceeds them several areas. Besides eliciting a reward, performance at this level should trigger setting of higher and more challenging targets for the officer in the following performance year. (ii) Good Performance – All Performance Targets fully met (100%). This assessment describes performance that fully meets all the targets agreed upon in the work plan, and represents acceptable level of performance. However, an appraisee at this level should be encouraged and assisted in the following year to exceed set targets to qualify for excellent performance. (iii) Fair Performance – some Performance Targets fully met (80% - 99%). This assessment describes performance that fully meets some of the targets agreed upon in the work plan. Performance at this level may call for training and development intervention to address the Appraisee’s shortcomings. 8

(iv)Poor Performance – Targets partially met (70% - 79%). This assessment describes performance that partially meets some of the targets agreed upon in the work plan. Officers performing at this level should be informed in their cautionary and warning letters of the more serious consequences of continued poor performance. Causes of poor performance should be identified and appropriate action taken to address them. (v)Very Poor Performance – Targets not met (below 70%) This assessment means that the officer has not met the performance targets detailed in the work plan. The officer should be informed in the warning letter of the risk of separation should the very poor performance recur in the following year. The Supervisor will be required to identify the reasons for this type of performance and to communicate the same to the Ministerial Performance Management Committee for consideration. 9

N.B The following guidelines should always be observed- (i) Guide to Performance Appraisal System GP 247 A (Revised 2008) must be read and be used in the appraisal section (ii)The guide provides useful directions for values/staff competency appraisal (iii)Ministerial/departmental performance management committees shall be required to validate performance reports and make appropriate recommendations to the Authorized Officer 10

Departmental/ Divisional Evaluation Reporting Format 11

Departmental/Divisional Evaluation Reporting Format  Departmental Heads will compile Departmental Reports using PAS Form 1B.  This will cover all officers in their respective Departments, Divisions, Units or Sections.  The reports will then be forwarded to the respective heads of Human Resource Management Division together with a summary of the number of officers scoring in each of the above five(5)ratings. 12

PAS FORM IB Department/Division/Unit /Section ……………………………… SnoName of Officer P/NO.DesignationJob GroupName of Supervisor Designation of Supervisor Rating Score out of 100% Name of Head of Department Name………………………………….Signature………………………………Date………………

The End 14 Performance Management