APT & Classified Council.  Survey objectives and conception:  Solicit employee feedback to generate agendas  Use data to inform the governance process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

1 Response to the Employee Survey Recommendations.
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
2  Exempt/Non-Exempt  Non-exempt  Exempt Managerial/Policy Making  New Appointment  Probationary—24 months  Trainee--Once training progression is.
Human Resources Office of 1 Classification and Compensation Redesign Job Family Studies Project Overview.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey U of M: Overall Results umanitoba.ca.
KCTCS PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCESS RESULTS OF KCTCS EMPLOYEE PPE SURVEY (Overall 317 faculty and 614 staff responded, a total of 931) Only 6% of.
Pay For Performance: Managing Pay Systems Across Organizations
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
Does Your School Really Know What You Do?: Classification and Compensation of Campus NMC Staff David Herrington, Princeton University Andrew Bonamici,
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Executive Report to Council
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
Project Prioritization Process ASPCC Update December 14, 2005.
Where excellence and opportunity meet.™ From Classified Personnel to University Personnel: What it Means for UW-Oshkosh.
Human Resources Office of 1 Job Classification System Redesign Information Session Student Services July 2014 Sheila Reger, HR Consulting Manager Matt.
Phase II: Survey Findings January 2015 APSAC and CSSAC Presentation Purdue Quality of Work Environment Initiative 1.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
An Introduction to the HR Management Standards for Nonprofits Module 3 Managing People & Their Work Please open this link at the beginning of class.
Pilot – Professional Mentoring Program The American Association of Blacks in Energy.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
1 1 Copyright Universum 2008 Copyright Universum 2009 University Report Universum Student Survey 2009 Italian Edition Tor Vergata Business.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Virginia Tech Human Resources: Restructuring Information Session Brian Gittens, HR Restructuring Project Manager.
Linda B. Hendricks Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer April 14, 2009.
Faculty Senate Prioritization of Issues for Setting the Internal Faculty Senate Agenda.
April 23, 2015 Compensation Review Committee. Welcome & Introductions.
COMPREHENSIVE REFORM TRANSPARENCY, FAIRNESS AND OBJECTIVITY RESPONSIVENESS AND AGILITY BASIC PRINCIPLES.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Vice Provosts Meeting November 5, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
A Tale of Two Surveys Metropolitan State College of Denver Faculty Senate Marilyn Cullen-Reavill, Diane Davis, Christopher Jennings & Aaron S. Richmond.
NSW DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITIES – UNIT/DIRECTORATE NAME SASSPA Conference21 August 2015 Performance and Development NSW.
Diversity Commission Report November 16, 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey: Associate Professors Associate Professors Community Meeting October 30, 2013 Nancy Whelchel, Associate.
Who are we? And what is it that we do? LCC--Business Department Advisory Committee.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey All Campus Update January 21, 2015.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-1 Compensating Employees 7.
Great Colleges to Work For Survey: 2013 Results
Unit Business Managers Information Exchange Human Resources Items of Interest Sam Connally Vice President for Human Resources July 26, 2010.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Deans’ Council Meeting November 8, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
M ARK M ACIAS S HAWN B EARD SCC O FFICE OF I NSTITUTIONAL R ESEARCH 2007 SCC Employee Opinion Survey.
Bowling Green State University Ohio Staff Council of Higher Education 24th Annual Summer Conference (June 19-20, Ohio State University, Ohio)
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Human Resources Management. Roles of the Human Resources Department Human resources planning and analysis Equal employment opportunity practices Staffing.
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
UTC Work Culture Improvement Initative. Work Culture Improvement Team  Deborah Arfken, Chief Strategic Planning Officer  Richard Brown, Chief Business.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
1 NC State University 2008 Staff Well-Being Survey Highlights from Overall Results A Presentation to the Staff Senate Nancy Whelchel, Ph.D University Planning.
Connie Dennis, President, Classified Council Melodee Monson, President, APT Council November 27, 2012.
North of Market-Tenderloin Community Benefit District Human Resources Planning Built on Diversity and Inclusion PA December 18, 2012 Michelle Capobres.
Chapter 6 Some Human Aspects of Organizing. Advanced Organizer.
. 1.  EH&S Strategic Plan ◦ Review Mission, Vision, Values ◦ Strategic Objectives  Projects and Action Plans to support Objectives  Aligning Working.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Performance Evaluation Committees’ Report Combined Report from Committee for Professional and Administrative Staff and Committee for Classified Staff 2016.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Decreasing Turnover at Loyola. The Challenge Decreasing turnover Retaining valued employees.
Faculty Diversity Benchmarking Analysis- Southern Illinois University Brianna Addis Brian Skaggs Rachel Scheuneman Shanique Brown.
2011 Salary Administration Process Review TOM Presentation May 31, 2011.
Dubai Statistics Center practices in Human Resources Management - What is DSC? - Planning - Performing - Measuring and Evaluating - Supporting Factors.
Teacher Assessment in Lithuania Dalia Brazienė, The Senior specialist of Culture, Education and Sports Department of Kaunas Region, Lithuania 12 / 04 /
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Building A Successful Worksite Wellness Program from Scratch William McPeck, MSW, CWWPC, WLCP Consultive Coach St. Albans, Maine Nationally Certified Worksite.
Policies & Procedures 10/23/2012. Background:  To match with new strategic plan and based on the recommendations of the midterm evaluation.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
Office of Human Resources
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Pierce County Performance Audit Committee
Workforce Development Goal
Council of Chairs Meeting – Fall 2018
Presentation transcript:

APT & Classified Council

 Survey objectives and conception:  Solicit employee feedback to generate agendas  Use data to inform the governance process  Approvals:  Office of Research & Graduate Studies (exempt from IRB)  Executive leadership at UAA  Administration

 Criteria:  Brief  Qualitative and quantitative components  Assess satisfaction and ascertain priorities  13 items rated on a 1-5 Lickert Scale  Employees select top 3 priorities from the same list  Free responses

 July & August, 2012 administration  Invitation to participate sent out via dynamic listserv to all classified and exempt employees  Approximately 1300  353 responses  27% response rate

 Quantitative analysis:  Metrics of central tendency  T-test analyses  Qualitative analysis:  Categorical identification  Inform and give meaning to the quantitative findings

SATISFACTION RATING (LOW TO HIGH)  Healthcare  Parking  Governance & I. Decision- Making  Compensation  Communication  Professional Development  Facilities  Workplace Culture  Diversity  Retirement  Leave Benefits  Safety  Tuition Waiver PRIORITY RANKING (HIGH TO LOW)  Healthcare  Compensation  Workplace Culture  Communication  Governance & I. Decision- Making  Professional Development  Retirement  Leave Benefits  Tuition Waiver  Safety  Parking  Diversity  Facilities

 Healthcare  Satisfied with plan, dissatisfied with cost  Cost increases disproportionate to salary adjustments  Ongoing support for wellness programs  Compensation  Request for merit and step increases  Clear process to audit jobs to ensure appropriate grade assignments  Professional development  Mentoring  Increased opportunities  Inter-departmental communication and exchanges

 Communication  Better communication between MAUs and community campuses  Transparency from administration and governance  Direct communication from administration rather than “trickling down” through Deans & Directors  Ongoing opportunities to participate in surveys  Leave benefits  Request to combine annual and sick leave  Additional cash-in options  Parking  Cost  Space

 Unbiased /external grievance process  Supervisor evaluations  Changes to leave accrual and cash-out options  Workload & staffing

 Agenda development & planning  Ongoing communication  With staff  With administration  Between campuses & departments  Continued assessment