HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Kay Fox Chair of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIP Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting August, 2007 FDLF.
Advertisements

Workshop on Inventories and Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste under WG 1 and 2 of the Climate Change Committee Presentation of UNFCCC.
Workshop on Inventories and Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste under WG 1 and 2 of the Climate Change Committee Overview of methods and.
GHG emissions from landfills for EPER reporting Ian Whitwell Pollution Inventory team Environment Agency of England & Wales.
Workshop on Inventories and Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste under WG 1 and 2 of the Climate Change Committee Summary of reporting on.
CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT. Agency Missions: Agency Missions: OSHA – Protection of employees from workplace injury and illness. OSHA – Protection of employees.
Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
Sewage and Effluent Treatment 2-4 November 2002 Seán Moran -The first few slides.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct Environmental Risk Assessment Progress and Lessons Learned Kay Fox Chair of the HERA Environmental.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
End of Waste: Supporting quality & sustainability? Roger Hoare Environment & Business Manager Environment Agency (England & Wales) 24 January 2013.
Implications of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Where Do We Stand on Regulations?
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
USES guia del USES EUSES (European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances) Multimedia.
And the Accuracy of the HERA Environmental Risk Assessment Kay Fox SEAC Environment, Unilever Chair - HERA Environment Task Force.
Wastewater generation
DANTES Akzo Nobel examples Johan Widheden
SETAC Fourth World Congress, Portland OR: USA November 2004 Governance and Law: Global Perspectives Human & Environmental Risk Assessment of Household.
OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Development 2-3 December, 2004, Paris Optimizing Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement: Japanese Experience in Water Pollution.
1 European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct 2001 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment HERA in the global chemical management scene Lothar Kistenbrügger.
HERA at CED XXXI C.Lally 1 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Christeine Lally Co-Chair.
Final core presentation, 05/01/2001 A European new joint initiative between: A.I.S.E (International Soap, Detergent and Maintenance Products Association)
Human Waste Disposal More than 500 pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites can travel from human or animal excrement through water. More than 500 pathogenic.
Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)
CoastalZone.com The Use of Ecological Risk Assessments in a Watershed Level Context Thorne E. Abbott CoastalZone.com.
Important informations
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
DEREL TEMPUS DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCES ENGINEERING LEARNING DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCES ENGINEERING LEARNING.
UN ECE CEP Working Group on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 7th Session Geneva 27 – 29 November 2006 Item 5(a) Guidelines for the Application of.
Dutch plan for finalising Hair software package Alterra – Wageningen University and Research Centre Roel Kruijne Working Group Meeting on Pesticide Statistics,
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct Human & Environmental Risk Assessment An A.I.S.E and CEFIC initiative on focused risk assessment.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct European Stakeholders Workshop ( October 11, 2001) Human Health Risk Assessment - Progress and.
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct HERA - General Approach An A.I.S.E and CEFIC initiative on focused risk assessment for ingredients.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
HERA - CED, 30th March 2001 Communication: Objectives, Status and Activities XXXI CED Annual meeting - 30 th March Charles Laroche HERA Communication.
HERA Second European Stakeholder Workshop July Human & Environmental Risk Assessment An A.I.S.E and CEFIC initiative on targeted risk assessment.
18/09/2006 Environmental Protection Agency Improvement of the Statistics on Industrial Water Use and Waste-Water Discharges Lithuania Project presentation.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
ECETOC Task Force, Cefic-LRI project ECO26 Adapting SimpleTreat for simulating behaviour of chemical substances during industrial sewage treatment With.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
Chemicals Policy and Health (CP&H) Introduction to Ecetoc TRA GPS Risk Assessment and REACH/GHS implementation in practice Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May.
Metal bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive Implementation in monitoring and assessment frameworks Implementation of Bioavailability 1.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Progress and challenges of a transboundary cooperation Dr. Adam Kovacs International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) Status of.
Regional aggregation of statistics on water abstraction and use Seminar on water statistics for countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia.
Voluntary Risk Assessment on Lead - background and environmental issues Dr Andy Bush Lead Development Association International.
- Proposed actions, targets and indicators to reach the objectives
Legislation Carl James.
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
WELCOME.
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
Microplastics - In prima vista
Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation
Large Combustion Plant Indicators
Pollution & Toxins Pollutant
4.8% 6.9 MILLION OLIVE OIL Evolution 2016 versus 2015 PRICE INCREASE
ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.
Assessing the value of measured data Day 1.
(Procter & Gamble, Brussels)
Changes to the methodology since the NEC report #2
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Some concepts for quantifying emissions of Priority Substances
Presentation transcript:

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Kay Fox Chair of the HERA Environmental Task Force

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox C. Poelloth, C. Arregui, J. Backmann - AISE I. Lopez Petresa C. Stevens Dow Corning G. Boeije P&G R. van Egmond Unilever H. Certa SASOL R. van Wijk Akzo Nobel R. Elsmore McBride T. Wind Henkel K. Fox Unilever A. Aarts Solutia P. Masscheleyn P&G A. Berends Solvay P. Richner CIBA D. Calcinai Condea Augusta W. Schul BASF E. Cerbelaud Rhodia J. Steber Henkel V. Koch Clariant R. Toy Shell Chemicals Environment Task Force

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Intended for application in EUROPE HERA Environmental Risk Assessment based on Technical Guidance Document for New and Existing substances EUSES

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Focus on chemical substances used primarily in Household detergent and cleaning products Primary Focus on the use and disposal of these substances Sewer Transport River Domestic Emission On-Site Treatment Sewage Treatment

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Detergent exposure scenario for EUSES Begin with EUSES –Environment Local Regional –Predators exposed via the environment –Man exposed via the environment TGD

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Detergent exposure scenario for EUSES Wide dispersive use, Detergents (5, 9) 100% of chemical to sewer (Local Use model) HERA Effectively in HERA

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Detergent exposure scenario for EUSES Production Formulation Use Contributions to Regional Environment from Local sources TGD Default HERA 0.3% 0.3%(1.003) % 0.8% 0 0 max max 99% 99% 100% 100% Bottom line - 100%, within volume determination error

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Detergent exposure scenario for EUSES To cover a “reasonable worst case”, TGD and EUSES assume that –the local wastewater treatment plant receives 4 times the average ingredient input –the Standard EU region receives 10% of the total European product consumption HERA replaces these default assumptions with HERA default values based on measured product consumption and environmental monitoring data - the HERA Detergent Scenario.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Detergent exposure scenario for EUSES Tiered Methodology –Begin with the HERA Detergent scenario –Accept all other EUSES Defaults –Replace selected defaults if necessary Removal values in STP Measured Kd values Biodegradation rates in rivers, soil, etc.  Often need Chronic ecotoxicity data

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Production Formulation Use Regional Environmental Concentration 20 million people 10% of EU Production Standard EU Region 200 km Release is based on Production Volume

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox STD. EU Region Local treatment plants Input to local treatment plant is based on the regional production volume.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Production Formulation Use Detergent Release scenario Release is based on population density HERA Region 200 km ~100% of release Kg/person/year

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox The standard EU region has 10% of the EU detergent consumption - for 5.4% of the EU population.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Detergent consumption per person in eighteen European countries

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox

The maximum regional release for detergent ingredients is found in the UK region containing London This is 5.5% of total usage, rather than 10%, as in the TGD Thus the HERA Detergent release scenario should have 5.5% of the total volume released to the region.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox STD. EU Region Local treatment plants Input to local treatment plant is based on the regional use volume. In EUSES,

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox HERA must give the correct local loading for sewage treatment plants in countries with highest detergent use. Italy and Spain have 1.25 times the average EU detergent consumption, per person. HERA ensures correct representation of the LOCAL treatment plant, which EUSES derives from the regional consumption, by raising the overall regional background to.055 X 1.25 = 0.07 times the European use volume Regional detergent Scenario HERA uses 7%, not 10%, for regional input EUSES

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Product use and substance use data are expected to be similar, for most widely used detergent ingredients. Each HERA Substance team will consider any areas of high regional usage for their substance, and will modify the HERA regional default if appropriate. Fragrance F

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox STD. EU Region Local treatment plants 4 TGD - Local plant Release from LOCAL Sewage Treatment facility A reasonable worst case treatment plant receives 4 times the average load

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox GREAT-ER GIS model which predicts chemical concentrations of household chemicals in rivers. Boron used as a conservative tracer, to validate the model. 6 STP influents and effluents Monthly river water and effluent samples UK data

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Measured effluent boron agreed with load calculated from consumer sales volumes (1996, 28 daily composite samples from 6 treatment plants) 0.22 g/person/day Boron in effluents: 50 treatment plants –NL 7 –Germany 6 –Italy 3 –UK 34 plants

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox UK Boron data from 804 grab samples from 34 plants. Measured to calculated boron : Mean = %ile < 1.5 Reasonable worst case (90%ile) is 1.5 times the regional average input, not 4 times as in the TGD default scenario.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Boron concentrations in Italy, Germany, and the Netherlands also agreed with the concentrations calculated for the country and year of emission, with the 90%ile of the measured to calculated boron distribution being less than 1.5. Thus data from 50 sewage plants, in 4 countries, show that for detergent ingredients in wide general use, such as perborate, a reasonable worst case (90%ile) is 1.5 times the regional average input. Paper on the 1.5 factor submitted to Chemosphere. ECETOC submission to TGD revision resulted in change to “up to a factor of 4” in the revised TGD.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Each HERA Substance team will consider any areas of high local usage for their substance, and will modify the HERA default for the reasonable worst case sewage treatment plant if appropriate.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox STD. EU Region Summary - HERA Defaults Detergent scenario Region - 7%, not 10% of ingredient used 1.5 Local sewage treatment is worst case, not %, not 99%, of ingredient used goes to the local treatment facility

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Modified Exposure Scenario - HERA TGD - Worst case (4) (Local STW) times worst case (~2) (10% production tonnage) gives almost 8 times the average ingredient loading to a local sewage treatment plant. HERA Detergent Scenario - Data backed “worst case” (1.5) for local STW times “worst case” (~1.7) regional release based upon product use shows two times the average ingredient loading to a local sewage treatment plant. HERA will check that the substance use patterns are suitable before using the HERA defaults.

HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Thanks! To HERA for providing the Challenges! To the HERA Environment task force for help with the Solutions To ERASM and the Environment Agency for England and Wales for funding the boron monitoring work To the EA and Yorkshire Water employees who collected the samples in all weathers! To you for listening!