Ventricular Assist Devices Topics in Bioengineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cost-Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) as Permanent Implants for End-Stage Heart Failure David Samson Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
Advertisements

Community Preparation for Caring for Mechanical Circulatory Device Patients University of Wisconsin Hospital And Clinics Ventricular Assist Device Program.
BACKGROUND Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are a proven therapy as bridge-to-cardiac transplantation in Class IIIB and Class IV heart failure patients.
Perioperative Management of Heart Failure Gamal Fouad S Zaki, MD Professor of Anesthesiology Ain Shams University
Hemolysis in Patients Supported with Durable, Long-Term Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy Jason N. Katz, MD,MHS; Brian C. Jensen, MD; Patricia P.
Equipoise Does Not Exist for REVIVE IT Andrew Boyle, MD Heart and Vascular Center Director, Florida Chairman of Cardiology Medical Director of Heart Failure,
Community Preparation for Caring for Mechanical Circulatory Device Patients University of Wisconsin Hospital And Clinics Ventricular Assist Device Program.
Dean Handimulya UIEU 2005 Congestive Heart Failure Dean Handimulya, M.D.
Advances In LVAD Patient Management
Introduction to Ventricular Assist Device (VAD)
Biventricular Failure – Total Artificial Heart Francisco A. Arabía, MD Director, CHSI Center for Surgical Device Management Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute.
Predicting Major Outcomes after MCSD Implant 1 Risk Factors for Death, Transplant, and Recovery James Kirklin, MD David Naftel, PhD.
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Assessment.
HeartWare HVAD: Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes Mark S. Slaughter, MD Professor and Chair Department Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery University of.
Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thrombroenbolism Group /06/11.
Community Preparation for Caring for Mechanical Circulatory Device Patients University of Wisconsin Hospital And Clinics Ventricular Assist Device Program.
Risk Factors for Adverse Outcome after HeartMate II Jennifer Cowger, MD, MS St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana Advanced Heart Failure, Transplant, & Mechanical.
Management of Heart Disease in Pregnancy.  It is estimated that 1% to 3% of women either have cardiac disease entering pregnancy or are diagnosed with.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
Clinical Review AbioCor® Implantable Replacement Heart H Julie Swain M.D. Cardiovascular Surgeon Ileana Piña M.D. Heart Failure Cardiologist DRAFT.
A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
Natural History of Heart Failure
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of.
Identifying patients for advanced heart failure therapy by screening patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator:
James K. Kirklin, MD, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD, Robert L
Can the Seattle Heart Failure Model Be Used to Risk-stratify Heart Failure Patients for Potential Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy?  Wayne C. Levy,
Figure 1 Patients outside of target international normalized ratio range by time point and management strategy. All values are expressed as percentages.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
All-cause mortality by treatment group
Mechanical circulatory support
Axial and centrifugal continuous-flow rotary pumps: A translation from pump mechanics to clinical practice  Nader Moazami, MD, Kiyotaka Fukamachi, MD,
Table 2 Laboratory and echocardiographic values before LVAD implantation in the two groups. From: Reversibility of fixed pulmonary hypertension in left.
Pre-operative mortality risk assessment in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: Application of the HeartMate II risk score 
Fifth INTERMACS annual report: Risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients  James K. Kirklin, MD, David C. Naftel,
University of Wisconsin Hospital And Clinics
A, Breakdown of frailty into its underlying causes, manifestations, and clinical outcomes separated by LVAD-responsive and LVAD-independent causes of frailty.
Effects of High Density Lipoprotein Raising Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with or without Renal Impairment:
Age-related cumulative incidence for (A) serious adverse events (including death, heart failure admission, ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac transplant)
Survival on the Heart Transplant Waiting List: Impact of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge to Transplant  Jaimin R. Trivedi, MD,
Shinichi Fukuhara, MD, Koji Takeda, MD, PhD, Paul A
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices HOSEIN PASANDI.
Effects on pre- and posttransplant pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices  Ranjit John, MD, Kenneth Liao,
Primary end point in normotensive and hypertensive patients at baseline (events per 100 patient-years of follow-up) Primary end point Nifedipine Placebo.
Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): On track to compete with heart transplantation?  James K. Kirklin, MD, David C. Naftel,
In vitro hemodynamic characterization of HeartMate II at 6000 rpm: Implications for weaning and recovery  Gengo Sunagawa, MD, Nicole Byram, BS, Jamshid.
Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes 
Homocysteine and risk in end-stage renal disease: a matter of context
Mechanical circulatory assist device development at the Texas Heart Institute: A personal perspective  O.H. Frazier, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Figure 1 Ventricular end-diastolic pressure–volume relationship curves
Risk for BMI outcome (%)
Figure 11-1.
Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi- institutional comparison shows significant differences  John M.
Connie W. Tsao et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Neal A. Chatterjee et al. JCHF 2014;2:
Figure Overview.
Flow of Patients Through Trial
Jerry D. Estep et al. JCHF 2013;1:
Figure Overview.
Patient Disposition James A. de Lemos et al. JAMA 2004; 292:
Baseline Demographic Characteristics of Adults With Diagnosed Heart Failure and Eligible to Receive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Alan S. Go, et al.
Entry, Randomization, and Follow-up of Patients in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial Of the 461 patients who did not meet the protocol criteria,
Baseline Characteristics of Elderly Participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study,According to Quintiles of Cystatin C Michael G.Shlipak et al N Engl.
The ACCORD Study Group. NEJM 2010; Epub March 14
Trends in LVAD implantation rates among the Medicare population from 2004 to Trends in LVAD implantation rates among the Medicare population from.
Early Outcomes With Marginal Donor Hearts Compared With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure  Erin M. Schumer,
Improved Survival and Decreasing Incidence of Adverse Events With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge-to-Transplant Therapy  Ranjit.
Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation after ventricular assist device implantation  James S Gammie, MD, Leah B Edwards, PhD, Bartley P Griffith, MD,
Current Status of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
Optimal timing for heart transplantation in patients bridged with left ventricular assist devices: Is timing of the essence?  Chase R. Brown, MD, Fabliha.
Presentation transcript:

Ventricular Assist Devices Topics in Bioengineering

Increasing use of VADs as bridge to transplantation Klotz et al. (2008) Prog Biophys Mol Biol

Overview of VAD types Klotz et al. (2008) Prog Biophys Mol Biol;

The HeartMate II VAD Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Figure 1 Griffith et al. (2001) Ann Thorac Surg. Figure 2

Flow visualization around inlet stator and rotor Griffith et al. (2001) Ann Thorac Surg. Figure 3

Tethered and untethered configurations Griffith et al. (2001) Ann Thorac Surg. Figures 4 and 5

Pressure-flow relationships for HeartMate II Griffith et al. (2001) Ann Thorac Surg. Figure 6

Baseline characteristics of the patients (1) Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 1 Normal: 55-70%

Baseline characteristics of the patients (2) Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 1 N N N N N H - renal H - liver N H – tissue breakdown, various

Baseline characteristics of the patients (3) Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 1 Increase contraction Edema Hypertension Hypertension, HF Arrhythmia Arrhythmia, HF Hypertension Arrhythmia (ventricular) Anticoagulant

Blood clotting cascade

NYHA Heart Failure Class

Functional status and quality of life Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 2

Functional status and quality of life Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 2 Plot on graph?

Outcomes of the patients Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 3

Outcomes of the patients Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Figure 2

Adverse events in the study Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 4

Adverse events in the study Miller et al. (2007) NEJM. Table 4

Testimony from a patient ouz093Us&feature=endscreen

Questions for discussion Is it worth the risk? What major issues still need to be addressed? What can BMEs do to improve VAD design? What about for other patient populations (eg, women and children)? Other thoughts, ideas, critiques? tricular_assist_device.html