C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST 2011-2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Update
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
PRIDE Professional Rubrics Investing & Developing Educator Excellence
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Differentiated Supervision
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Differentiated Supervision
ADEPT Framework
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
A New Approach to Assessment Based on extensive research that has identified teaching and instructional practices that are most effective in impacting.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Process
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) Refresher Training Fall 2017.
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Introduction to Core Professionalism
The Unannounced observation
Presentation transcript:

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST

CHANGE IN ASSESSMENT WHY?  Senate bill 736 “Student Success Act”  Race to the Top WHAT?  New assessment instrument and new procedures WHEN?  Beginning school year

ELEMENTS OF THE SYSTEM Ratings, Metrics, Observations Multiple ratings Multiple ratings  Highly Effective, Effective, Developing/Needs Improvement, and Unsatisfactory  Descriptive language for each rating Multi-metric Multi-metric  50% principal input (school year )  50% student growth (3 year period of data beginning as the first year)  In a new metric will be added Multiple observations  New teachers, experienced teachers and struggling teachers

ELEMENTS OF THE SYSTEM The Rubric 4 Domains and Components 4 Domains and Components Domain I: Planning and Preparation Domain I: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Setting Instructional Outcomes Setting Instructional Outcomes Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources and Technology Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources and Technology Designing Student Assessments Designing Student Assessments Domain II: The Classroom Environment Domain II: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Student Behavior Managing Student Behavior Domain III: Instruction Domain III: Instruction Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Using Assessment in Instruction Domain IV: Professional Responsibilities Domain IV: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Communicating with Families Showing Professionalism Showing Professionalism

TEACHER CATEGORIES AND OBSERVATION SCHEDULE Category & Authorized Evaluator Criteria for Category Formal Observations (Announced) 30 minutes plus Informal Observations (Announced or Unannounced) minutes minimum Summative Evaluation Category I Principal / Asst. Principal 1-3 year teacher & new to district 2 1 first semester & 1 second semester 2 yearly 1 st Semester & 2 nd Semester Category II Principal / Asst. Principal 4 or more years teaching experience 11-2 yearly Annually Category III Principal / Asst. Principal Developing rating on a domain or on previous evaluation system received an NI or U on competency but not overall unsatisfactory 2 1 first semester & 1 second semester 2 yearly (plus 1 per domain that receives NI or U) Annually Category IV Principal Struggling teacher (overall unsatisfactory) 3 2 first semester 1 second semester 1 yearly for each domain that receives NI or U Annually

ELEMENTS OF THE SYSTEM Weights and Points Each domain is weighted to equal a total of 100 percent. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 20% Domain 2: The Classroom Environment20% Domain 3: Instruction 40% Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 20% Each component within a domain has four ratings with an assigned point value – Highly Effective:5 points – Effective:3 points – Developing/Needs Improvement1 point – Unsatisfactory0 Each component is weighted and carries a value.

Weights and Scoring Examples ComponentValues RatingWtd Rating 1a c d f wgt. 2a b d wgt. 3b c d wgt. 4a b c f wgt. Total Score 65 FORMULA: VALUE X RATING DIVIDED BY 5 = SCORE

ELEMENTS OF THE SYSTEM SCORING PART I:POINT RANGE SUMMATIVE EVALUATION: PART II STUDENT GROWTH: FINAL EVALUATION POINTS: TEACHER WILL KNOW SUMMATIVE EVALUATION SCORE IN APRIL. TEACHER WILL KNOW STUDENT GROWTH SCORE AND TOTAL EVALUATION SCORE IN THE LATE SUMMER/FALL. STUDENT SCORES MAY SERVE TO INCREASE OR LOWER THE TOTAL EVALUATION SCORE

Pre and Post Conferences Formal observations include a pre and post conference Informal observations include a post-conference Conferences are conversations about instruction and practice. Teachers must be ready to answer specific questions about the lesson and instruction (see pre and post observation conference forms) Teachers may need to supply artifacts if necessary. Principals and Assistant Principals must use the approved pre and post observation conference forms for each formal observation The administrator will conduct a post conference with written feedback to the teacher for each formal and informal observation

CAST Course and Information For an in-depth look at the rubric, an online course is available to you. The course includes a review of each domain and component. Frequently asked questions regarding CAST can be found on the district website. If you have questions regarding CAST, please