ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_0301111 2010-2011 Assessment Data Management System (ADMS) Review & Evaluation Conducted by the Assessment Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
Advertisements

PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
041 DnA Implementation Update1 DnA Implementation Update Prepared by the Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department October 4, 2011.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Report December 11,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
State Board of Education December 2013 Revision of Instructional Materials Adoption Process and Delay for Mathematics 1.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Core Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Task Force Literacy Task Force Staff Leads: Jeannie Johnson, Sarah Breed, Phil Tucher, Elizabeth Macias,
Long Range Plan Presented June 25, 2013 Adopted by the Board of Education: July 16, 2013.
1 Reading/Language Arts- English-Language Development Core Program, K-6 CA Treasures State-Approved List for Program Two.
Instructional Materials Process and Progress Update Chief Academic Officer Quarterly Meeting November 13, 2012.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
COMMON CORE GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Mike Royal Vice Chair, State Board of Education January 9, 2015.
1 ELEMENTARY INTERVENTIONS Board of Education Meeting February 21, 2012.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Espanola Public School Back to School Administrative Meeting July 28, 2015, 8:00-5:00 PM Presented by: Myra L. Martinez Associate Superintendent The mission.
World Language Textbook Adoption for French and Spanish
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Curriculum Frameworks & Instruction Resources Update Bilingual.
NORTH CAROLINA Textbook Publishers’ Meeting March 13,
Middle School Scheduling Community Feedback Presentation Revised 1.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports And Behavior Intervention Classrooms Board of Education Meeting September 15, 2015.
1 OGT Assessment Update (C-4) Ohio Department of Education Office of Assessment September
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Update on Student and Family Empowerment (SAFE) Program and Elementary Counseling Board of Education Report February 3,
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Scott Butson District Technology Manager. Provide professional to all district staff Professional development has been provided on a regular basis to.
Welcome Katherine Cox Print Download Help Exit View Notification from TA Choose Document : Proposal Report Proposal Approved Proposals/Reports.
EXPECTATIONS FOR MICHIGAN’S FOCUS SCHOOLS 11/12/20151 FOCUS SCHOOL WEBINAR Office of Education Improvement and Innovation School Support Unit August 27,
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
School Leadership Team
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
North Carolina High School Math Task Force Update Summer 2013.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee January 11, 2016.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Welcome Katherine Cox Print Download Help Exit View Notification from TA Choose Document : Proposal Report Proposal Approved Proposals/Reports.
1 Meeting the Socio-Emotional Needs of Students: Student and Family Empowerment (SAFE) Program and Elementary Counseling Board of Education Report April.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
6 Technology, Digital Media, and Curriculum Integration
Annual Strategic Planning Draft Timeline and Process
District of Innovation Update: International School Development
USBE: Tracy Gooley and Tanya Semerad
HCS Elementary Education Department
K-1 Literacy Pilot Update
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Educational Information System Replacement Plan Overview
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Welcome to <School Name> School
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
RBET - Review Board for Excellence in Teaching
CAASPP Results Board Report Executive Summary Academic Support
Presentation transcript:

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Assessment Data Management System (ADMS) Review & Evaluation Conducted by the Assessment Data Management System Committee in collaboration with the Assessment, Research and Evaluation Department and Curriculum Council 1

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_  After a thorough review of our current provider and four potential replacement vendors, the ADMS committee strongly recommends the adoption of Illuminate Education as the provider of our district’s ADMS. ADMS Committee Recommendation Illuminate EducationData Wise Performance Matters eSchool PLUS (Performance Plus) DataDirector New InterfaceTotal Weighted Points Received Percent of Weighted Points Received 68%24%3% 1% 100% Number of Ballots Ranked Number One Percent of Ballots Ranked Number One 82%9%5% 0% 100%

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Why Have an ADMS?  Facilitates teaching and learning by making student- centered information available to teachers and staff …. easily … and when it is needed.  Classroom Assessments  Demographic Lists  Online K-6 Report Cards  Placement and Intervention Eligibility Lists  English Proficiency Identification and Fluency Reports  California Standardized Test Reports  Program Evaluation Reports  District Assessments

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Our Journey  LUSD has been using DataDirector, our current ADMS provider since March  DataDirector is scheduled to undergo a significant user interface change in the late summer that would require significant training of our district’s users.  Under DataDirector’s new management, customer service and system reliability quality has declined significantly.  Frequent down times for the system’s servers, especially at the end of each quarter, and programming errors have become the norm. 4

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Our Journey  Our current contract for DataDirector expires on June 30,  In response to several wide-spread concerns regarding DataDirector, the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (ARE) Department facilitated a review and evaluation of the district’s ADMS needs in collaboration with teachers, site instructional leaders, and district leadership teams 5

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ ADMS Review Timeline / Process DateAction September 2010 Vendor customer service issues, site concerns discussed at Instructional Leadership Team October 2010DataDirector survey developed in collaboration with LEA November 2010District ADMS review process formulated at Cabinet District ADMS review process shared at Curriculum Council ADMS Committee members, including teachers, administrators, technology, and ARE staff, recruited to make a recommendation regarding the replacement or extension of the contract with our current provider (see ADMS Committee Membership in Appendix) Potential replacement vendor demonstration by PERFORMANCE MATTERS* December 2010Potential replacement vendor demonstration by DATA WISE* Potential replacement vendor demonstration by ILLUMINATE EDUCATION* Potential replacement vendor demonstration by SUNGARD (a.k.a. eSchoolPLUS)* January 2011 Riverside Publishing cancels January 27 demonstration of new interface for DataDirector; demonstration postponed until March 1 (at the earliest) ADMS Committee members electronically polled and unanimously agree to continue on without DataDirector new interface demonstration ADMS meeting to discuss and rank vendors; recommendation received* 6 *Each of these five meetings were scheduled for 2 hours from 3:30-5:30 PM.

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ ADMS Review Timeline / Process (continued) DateAction February 2011 Recommendation shared with Cabinet and Curriculum Council Illuminate Education demonstrations at selected LUSD sites March 2011Recommendation to LUSD Board of Education April 2011Implementation process meetings held with vendor Begin data conversion scheduling May 2011Data conversion and data import schedule finalized June 2011Illuminate Education available in Lodi USD July 2011 Teachers receive initial training 7

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Significant Features of Illuminate Education ADMS  Camera-based scanning resulting in cheaper printing costs, easier data entry, and increased student engagement.  Promotes student-centered assessments by allowing students to scan their own assessments and receive instant feedback  Provides more flexibility over the annual k-6 report card revision process  Facilitates nightly upload to ESP Grade book  Includes similar, but more user-friendly user interface over DataDirector 8

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Related Tasks  Based on ADMS Committee recommendation, ARE staff has been conducting the following tasks:  Facilitate resale of Fujitsu fi-6130 scanners in collaboration with Purchasing Department  Verify web / document camera scanning options for short (20 question), medium (40 question), and long (100 question) assessments.  Determine proposed budget impacts 9

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Related Tasks Sale of Existing Scanners  Conservative estimate provided by Purchasing is that LUSD could receive $500 per existing Fujitsu fi-6130 scanner  This amounts to $31,000 based on the 62 verified units at school sites  Scanners to be sold at end of or in early ; the projected amount will be deposited into the district’s General Fund 10

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Results of ARE Follow-Up Tasks Verify web / document camera scanning ability for assessments  Short, medium and long assessments could be scanned simply by placing them on a GradeCam camera.  This process has been successfully tested in classrooms at the following sites: 11 ElementaryMiddleHigh Clairmont (Grade 3) Heritage (Grade 6) Julia Morgan (Grade 6) Larson (Grade 3) Christa McAuliffe (Grade 8) Lodi High (Grade 11)

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Related Tasks Proposed Budget Impacts  Assumptions  Gr K-1 teachers continue to hand-enter assessment data; cameras not provided  Cameras provided for:  446 Gr 2-6 classroom teachers  179 Gr 7-12 ELA teachers  124 Gr 7-12 Math teachers  104 Gr 7-12 Science teachers  113 Gr 7-12 Social Science teachers 12

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Costs Related to DataDirector Costs Related to Illuminate Education Annual Contract $115,050 $111,203 Net One-Time $15,000 (Est. for Report Card revisions) $28,600 (Net costs after scanner sales and Camera purchases) Costs $130,050 $139, Costs $115,050 $111, Costs $115,050 $111,203 Related Tasks Proposed Budget Impacts Funding Source: District Program Improvement Funds

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ Appendix  ADMS Committee Membership

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ ADMS Committee: Classroom Teachers SiteName (First - Last)PositionGrade Level Bear Creek HighCindy MettlerClassroom9-12 Beckman ElementaryLisa FrommClassroom6 Christa McAuliffe MiddleCharles TaylorClassroom7-8 Christa McAuliffe MiddleMartha SniderClassroom7-8 Ellerth E. Larson ElementaryChris FungeClassroom3 Julia Morgan ElementaryShelley LiechtyClassroom3 Live Oak ElementaryNancy GonzalezClassroom1 Lodi HighGeorge KrukisClassroom9-12 Lois E. Borchardt ElementaryJoe VelasquezClassroom6 Manlio Silva ElementaryVanessa EddyClassroom2 Morada MiddleAdriano DobrescuClassroom7-8 Oakwood ElementaryNichelle BartlettClassroom5 Podesta Ranch ElementaryTammie RichClassroom3 Ronald E. McNair HighAmy LundebergClassroom9-12 Tokay HighJamie AnaforianClassroom9-12 Tokay HighMark HughesClassroom9-12

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ ADMS Committee: Coaches / Intervention / LEA President SiteName (First - Last)PositionGrade Level Beckman ElementaryChristina DunnCoachk-6 Creekside ElementaryJennifer PlasterInterventionk-6 OakwoodMatt HummelInterventionK-6 DistrictKathryn OdellCoachk-12 DistrictLuann CaseyCoachk-6 DistrictNanci Webber-JohnstonCoachk-6 DistrictJeff JohnstonLEA President7-12

ADMS Recommendation_Board of Education_ ADMS Committee: Site Administrators / ARE / Technology SiteName (First - Last)PositionGrade Level Christa McAuliffe MiddleRandy MalandroAdmin7-8 Clairmont ElementarySusan HitchcockAdmink-6 Erma B. Reese ElementaryMatthew RayAdmink-6 Lois E. Borchardt ElementaryJanis MoreheadAdmink-6 Millswood MiddleSheree FlemmerAdmin7-8 Tokay HighMartha DentAdmin9-12 DistrictDebra LadwigAREk-12 DistrictEd EldridgeAREk-12 DistrictJim SherblonAREk-12 DistrictSusan MartinTechnologyk-12