1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
Advertisements

RIVERBEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT JANUARY 15, 2008 Environmental Consulting & Design, Inc.
Residential Development in Rural Lands Study STEERING COMMITTEE 7 February 15, 2006.
All parcels in Howard County Vacant parcels and infill parcels (improvement value of $5,000)
TA Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Current Features: 1.Floodways, 100 yr 2.Floodplain, outside floodway, 100 yr 3.Jurisdictional Wetlands 4.Stream.
Alachua County Plat Review – Southampton Traditional Neighborhood Development – Phase 1 February 24, 2009.
Land Subdivision and Zoning Unit: Owning Property Lesson: Land Subdivision and Zoning.
Springs Protection Options Septic System Evaluation Program Board of County Commissioners Meeting November 13 th 2012.
Draft Kane County 2040 Green Infrastructure Plan Energy and Environment Committee November 14, 2013.
Design Concept Development Districts William F. Ross ROSS+associates.
Cost Impact Analysis Proposed College Station Tree Ordinance.
Planned Unit Development
Wetland Planning Requirements, Tools & Processes.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
Site Scale Planning for Sustainable Forestland Development Lands for Tomorrow June 29, 2011.
Pre-Application Presentation To Village of Glendale Planning Commission February 2, 2015 Village Gate Subdivision.
Town of Round Hill Proposed Zoning Amendment R-2 Residential Single-Family District Conservation Cluster Option Planning Commission Public Hearing December.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Open Space Residential Development Bylaw Town of Rehoboth.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
UPDATE February 8, DRAFT PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES 1.Quick Overview a.Definition of Study Area b.Joint Land Use Study (JLUS - Dept. of Commerce-May.
Application LU-MIN Small-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Twenty Fingers Property May 2007 PLDRB.
Joint Council and Planning Commission Workshop November 4, 2013.
CPA-14-08: Transfer of Development Rights Large Scale Text Amendment Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 23, 2008.
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
GROWING COMMUNITIES ON KARST THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2007 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES: JEFFERSON COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Tony Redman
Case No. RZ APPLICATION TO REZONE ACRES FROM A-2 TO R1-AAA.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
BOOKER CREEK WATERSHED PLAN WATERSHED ASSESSMENT WETLAND ASSESSMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK.
University Storage and Office Orange County Board of County Commissioners Amendment S-5-1 and LUPA January 27, 2015.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Amendments to the Unified Land Development Code Section Multifamily Residential Requirements Section (d) – Planned Developments with Transfer.
TRANSFERRING DENSITY AND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OVERVIEW Creating an effective TDR Program Creating an effective TDR Program Steps.
South Meadows Open space # 16 Upgrades Open space # 16 Upgrades.
Presentation to the Water and Environmental Planning Committee September 22, 2006 Ad Hoc Committee on UGB/A Policy: Progress Report.
Steps to Complete Site Capacity Calculations 1. Base Site Area 2. Net Site Area 3. Density Residential = Dwelling Units Nonresidential = Impervious Surface.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010.
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Codes and Ordinances Workshop: Recommendations for Development and Site Layout Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Transportation Projects City Council Workshop May 14, 2013.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN & RZ-OTH
City of Dunnellon Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Future Land Use Element  Conservation Element  Concurrency Management System.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Butte County Board of Supervisors June 14, 2016 Garner Ranch Agricultural Conservation Easement RFI
G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Location Map. G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Aerial.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
J5 UDC Amendment Clustering January 20, 2015 Chance Sparks, Director of Planning.
Rethinking Acton’s By-right Method for Residential Development Partridgeberry Place, Ipswich, MA (Designed by Randall Arendt, Greener Prospects) 1.
How Closely We Live With Each Other
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
Drinking Water Source Protection Action Kit
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Presented by Kelsey Lang, Planning Associate June 27, 2016
Planning Commission November 4, 2010
Chapter 4 Osceola County Land Development Code (LDC)
Water Quality Protection Zones
Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan Planning Areas
Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design

2 Site Capacity Calculations Determines carrying capacity of the land to be developed – Residential and Nonresidential Density calculated based on “Net Site Area” Encourages natural resource and open space integration Facilitates the planning and design process

3 Steps to Complete Site Capacity 1. Base Site Area 2. Net Site Area 3. Calculate Density 4. Determine Resource Protected Land Area 5. Recreational Land (Residential Development) 6. Determine Total Open Space Area * Residential Developments

4 Step 1 - Base Site Area Calculation 1.Gross area of property 2.Subtract road, road easements and ultimate rights-of-way 3.Subtract land that is not contiguous a.Parcel separate from parent parcel by road or natural feature b.Parcel that may be developed on its own c.Parcel that is of a different zoning classification.

5 Development Site 33.7 Gross Acres.5 Acre/Unit Density Base Site Area = 33.7

6 Step 2 - Net Site Area Calculation 1.Base Site Area 2.Subtract floodplain, wetland, linear and nonlinear water bodies (natural channels, lakes and ponds)

7 Step 3 - Dwelling Unit Calculation 1.Net Site Area 2.Multiplied by residential density factor based on zoning classification. 3.Unit Yield = 38

8 SIGNIFICANT TREES TAG TYPE SIZE CONDITION 001 OAK 30” GOOD 002 OAK 30” GOOD 003 OAK 32” GOOD 004 OAK 32” GOOD 005 OAK 32” GOOD 006 OAK 34” GOOD 007 OAK 24” GOOD EXISTING EXISTING PROTECTION RESOURCE QTY/AREA REQUIREMENT GROVE 10,000 SF CANOPY 7,000 SF (70%) SIGNIFICANT TREES 7 TREES 5 TREES (70%) YOUNG WOODLAND 6.7 AC 50% (3.35 AC) MATURE WOODLAND 3.5 AC 70% (2.45 AC) FLOODPLAIN 3.5 AC 100% (3.5 AC) WETLAND 5.0 AC 100% of 4.9 AC WETLAND BUFFER 4.5 AC WETLAND 38,850 SF 80% 1.4 AC WETLAND 32,000 SF 80% NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY (Per UDO, Article 4)

9 Step 4 - Natural Resource Land Area Calculation 1.Calculate area contained within each protected resource group 2.Multiply resource area by resource protection ratio from zoning ordinance to determine minimum resource protection land area for each resource. 3.Sum the total for each resource to arrive at total protection land area for property.

10 NATURAL RESOURCE PLAN EXISTING EXISTING PROTECTION PROPOSED RESOURCE QTY/AREA REQUIREMENT PROTECTION GROVE 10,000 SF CANOPY 7,000 SF (70%) 7,200 SF (72%) SIGNIFICANT TREES 7 TREES 5 TREES (70%) 6 TREES (85%) YOUNG WOODLAND 6.7 AC 50% (3.35 AC) 50% (3.35 AC/145,929 SF) MATURE WOODLAND 3.5 AC 70% (2.45 AC) 70% (2.45 AC/106,722 SF) FLOODPLAIN 3.5 AC 100% (3.5 AC) 100% (3.5 AC) WETLAND 5.0 AC 100% of 4.9 AC 100% (4.9 AC) WETLAND BUFFER 4.5 AC WETLAND 38,850 SF 80% 95% (36,850 SF) 1.4 AC WETLAND 32,000 SF 80% 100% SIGNIFICANT TREES TAG TYPE SIZE CONDITION__IMPACT 001 OAK 30” GOOD REMOVE 002 OAK 30” GOOD SAVE 003 OAK 32” GOOD SAVE 004 OAK 32” GOOD SAVE 005 OAK 32” GOOD SAVE 006 OAK 34” GOOD SAVE 007 OAK 24” GOOD SAVE

11 Step 5 - Recreational Land Area Calculation 1.Take dwelling unit count proposed and multiply it against the recreational land area *multiplier. *Based on recreational land area needs from Framework Plan for average County household size

12 Step 6 - Total Open Space Calculation Conventional Option 1.Add the total resource protection land area and recreational land area required to be provided. Represents the minimum amount of open space for conventional subdivision designs.

13 REQUIRED RESOURCE PROTECTED AREA MINIMUM PROTECTION AREA REQUIREMENT – AC * Wetland buffer overlaps woodland area and is subtracted for total area requirement PROTECTION RESOURCE AREA REQUIREMENT GROVE 10,000 SF CANOPY 7,000 SF (70%) 0.16 AC YOUNG WOODLAND 6.7 AC 50% (3.35 AC) 2.35 AC * MATURE WOODLAND 3.5 AC 70% (2.45 AC) 1.45 AC * FLOODPLAIN 3.5 AC 100% (3.5 AC) 3.50 AC WETLAND 5.0 AC 100% of 4.9 AC 4.90 AC WETLAND BUFFER 4.5 AC WETLAND 38,850 SF 80% (31,080 SF) 0.71 AC 1.4 AC WETLAND 32,000 SF 80% (25,600 SF) 0.58 AC

14 Total Open Space Calculation Conservation Option 1.Take Base Site Area and multiply it times the minimum open space ratio for zoning classification. (Determines minimum amount of open space required to qualify for conservation option) 2.Compare conventional open space requirement with conservation requirement and provide additional open space to attain minimum requirement.

15

16 Open Space Designation Designation based on use of open space –Detention –Recreation –Greenway –Resource protection –Landscape –Sewage Disposal