Coming soon to a genetics lab near you! NBCEC Beef Genetic Workshop Clay Center, NE March 27, 2004 Marker adjusted EPDs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Testing and Marker Assisted Selection R. Mark Thallman U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE.
Advertisements

Introducing GeneSTAR ® MVP Molecular Value Predictions for Beef Quality and Production Traits.
Cameron Peace, Washington State University
SNP Applications statwww.epfl.ch/davison/teaching/Microarrays/snp.ppt.
Pooling DNA to Investigate Cattle Infertility Tara McDaneld USDA/ARS Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE, 68933, USA.
Matt Spangler University of Nebraska- Lincoln DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC EPD: EXPANDING TO MULTIPLE BREEDS IN MULTIPLE WAYS.
Detection of QTL in beef cattle Eduardo Casas U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska.
Understanding and Managing Variation in Meat Tenderness T. L. Wheeler, D. A. King, and S. D. Shackelford U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Assistant Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry
Fokkerij in genomics tijdperk Johan van Arendonk Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre Wageningen University.
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Abstract The goal of the Conifer Translational Genomics Network (CTGN) project is to provide tree breeders across the United States with new tools to enhance.
Use of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) in Dairy Sire Selection Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Genomic selection in animal breeding- A promising future for faster genetic improvement in livestock Dr Indrasen Chauhan Scientist, CSWRI, Avikanagar Tonk
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
Training, Validation, and Target Populations Training, Validation, and Target Populations Mark Thallman, Kristina Weber, Larry Kuehn, Warren Snelling,
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
DbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation S. T. Sherry, M.H. Ward, M. Kholodov, J. Baker, L. Phan, E. M. Smigielski and K. Sirotkin, Nucleic Acids.
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Dorrie Main, Jing Yu, Sook Jung, Chun-Huai Cheng, Stephen Ficklin, Ping Zheng, Taein Lee, Richard Percy and Don Jones.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
ARC Biotechnology Platform: Sequencing for Game Genomics Dr Jasper Rees
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES 1 Discovering Genes for Beef Production Mike Goddard University of Melbourne and Department of Primary Indusries, Victoria.
R.L.Quaas26 Mar Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE.
Wiggans, 2013Japanese Genomics Tour (1) Dr. George R. WiggansDr. H. Duane Norman Acting Research LeaderInterim Administrator Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansAg Discovery.
As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension.
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
What will mapping the genome mean to the industry? Clare A. Gill, Ph.D. Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University.
Applied Bovine Genomics – “Delivering on the Promise” Ronnie D. Green National Program Leader Food Animal Production USDA / ARS.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.. Next Four Seminars John Pollak – DNA Tests and genetic Evaluations and sorting on genotypes. John Pollak.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
Utilizing Genomics in genetic improvement Molecular genetics as a tool in wildlife breeding, management and conservation (An African Buffalo case study)
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
Quaas, Thallman & Van Eenennaam 20 April 2006 Choctaw, MS Beef Improvement Federation (NBCEC Validation Update) Commercial DNA Tests NBCEC Validations.
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansCDCB industry meeting – Sept. 29, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
The International Consortium. The International HapMap Project.
It’s A Six Star Steak Debbie McAllister Penn State University 2005.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Whole genome selection and the 2000 bull project at USMARC Larry Kuehn Research Geneticist.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
Jack Ward American Hereford Association October 31, 2012.
MASTITIS RESISTANCE New breeding tools for improving mastitis resistance in European dairy cattle QLK5-CT
What gains can we expect from Genetics?
Malting quality is not really a single trait, but a combination of traits, each of which is complex in nature. Most of the components of malting.
My vision for dairy genomics
ABIC 2014 – Red Deer, AB February 19-21
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.
Genome-wide Associations
Genomic Evaluations.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Wading through the confusion of EPDs and genomics
Presentation transcript:

Coming soon to a genetics lab near you! NBCEC Beef Genetic Workshop Clay Center, NE March 27, 2004 Marker adjusted EPDs

! !Thyroglobulin- marbling (Gene Star) ! !Calpastatin- tenderness (Gene Star) ! !Calpain- tenderness(MARC) ! !Leptin- fat deposition ! !DGAT- milk fat and protein Cattle genes affecting carcass traits

! !Single gene selection is worse than single trait selection ! ! Need to incorporate with EPDs ! !We need to rapidly identify sufficient number of genes that explain the majority of the genetic variation ! ! Need for additional laboratory tools Current limitations in genomic research

! !Large expensive projects - require international collaborations ! !Cattle physical (BAC) map ! !10 labs from US, Canada, UK, France, Brazil, New Zealand, Australia ! ! Complete in Summer 2004 Additional laboratory tools

Mapping a trait to a gene

! !Sequence the cow genome ! ! Funding from NHGRI; USDA; Texas; Genome Canada; New Zealand; Australia; National, Texas and South Dakota Beef Council; UK; and Norway - $54+ million (6X coverage, 10K full length genes, SNPs) ! ! Started Feb complete 2006? Ultimate physical map

! !BAC map and genome sequence will help fine map QTL ! !Need more QTL populations to identify more genes and for more traits ! ! SNP map will be used to develop low cost, high throughput genome scans ! ! Use industry populations? How do we identify more genes faster?

! !Develop haplotyped markers Implementation of Marker Adjusted EPDs AGGCTC TGGCTC TGCCTC TGCTTC TGGCAC TACTTC TGCTTGTGCTTGTGCTTGTGCTTG

! !Develop haplotyped markers Implementation of Marker Adjusted EPDs AGGCTC14% TGGCTC 25% TGCCTC 17% TGCTTC 1% TGGCAC 10% TACTTC 12% TGCTTG 21% Functional alleles 1)AGCTC, TGCAC, TGCTC 2)TGCTC, TGTTC, TGTTG, TATTC

! !Validate/replicate and estimate effect (different genetics and environment) ! !Evaluate interaction of different markers for the same trait ! !Evaluate effect upon additional traits ! !Selection pressure for each gene based upon effect of allele substitution, gene interaction, effects on different traits, and breeding objectives ! !Need some continual phenotyping to estimate effect Implementation of Marker Adjusted EPDs

! !Carcass traits- marbling, tenderness ! !Growth – bend growth curve ! !Milk production- composition ! !Feed efficiency – expensive to measure ! !Reproduction- dissect components ! ! Twinning population ! !Health traits - difficult to measure ! !Utilize genetic diversity- crossbreeding Genes affecting additional traits

! !Parentage ! !Verification system for animal identification ! ! Same markers used for parentage and animal ID ! ! Government subsidize genotyping ! ! Who maintains database and has access??? ! ! Added value with animal records Additional uses for DNA markers

! !BAC map, genome sequence, pedigree populations ! !Identify additional markers, QTLs (publicly available) ! ! Develop haplotype system ! !Provide GPE cycle 7 as a validating population ! ! Published or patent submitted ! ! Not for product development ! !Work with NBCEC to incorporate DNA markers with EPDs MARC’s role in advancing cattle genomics