Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling. Outline –Safety Modeling »Safety Modeling Process –Set-up for Worked Example –Develop / Build Safety Model »Project.
Advertisements

Wisconsin DOT Facilities Development Manual (FDM)
HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT Spring 2015.
Road Design Basic Road Design
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Geometric Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Group Exercise - Session #8 8-1.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Geometric Design CEE 320 Steve Muench.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting June 10, 2004 NCHRP Project 3-69 Design of Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways Kevin M. Mahoney Penn State.
Slide 1 ENCE688F and Highway Safety Manual Dr. Mohamadreza Banihashemi Senior Transportation Research Engineer II GENEX Systems University of Maryland.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
At-Grade Intersection
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 7: Two-lane highway performance.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Horizontal Alignment.
1 Development of countermeasures Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 6 hrs.
SCOHTS Meeting Robert Pollack - FHWA April 28, 2010.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Local Government Section
Role of SPFs in the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Mike Dimaiuta LENDIS Corporation.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency The Ohio Department of Transportation District Clark Ave. Ashland, OH Julie Cichello, P.E. District.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Design Domain Elements Of Curves Radius & Superelevation
Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
Geometric Design (I). Learning Objectives To understand the considerations and quantifiable aspects of geometric design.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم AN-NAJAH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Evaluation, Design and Redesign Beit Wazan and.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Positive Guidance Principles. Positive guidance concept - Provide drivers sufficient information about roadway design, operations, and potential hazards.
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) By Josh Hinds.
NCHRP Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements UNC HSRC VHB Ryerson University (Bhagwant and Craig)
Engineering Study Griffin View Drive & Harbor Hills Blvd. Prepared for Lake County Public Works Engineering 437 Ardice Avenue Eustis, Florida Purchase.
CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Highway Design Criteria Overview April 24, 2006 David R. Dougherty, P.E.
GEOMETRIC DESIGN: HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT
Safety Audit Planned Project - Preliminary Design zGeneral Project Data yProject layout xRoad function Determine the road function. What kind of traffic.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering Fall 2013 Dr. Reg Souleyrette.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
How are Highway Designs Actually Represented in Surface Models for Automated Machine Guidance and How Should We Control Them? Alan Vonderohe Construction.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
us 30 and SR 603 – Ashland county September 7, PUBLIC meeting
Geometric Design (II).
Highway Alignment And Geometric Design
Rehabilitation Project
ViDA Software Overview
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling
School of Civil Engineering
Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
February 6, ADOT&PF Design Quarterly Meeting Randy Kinney, P.E., PTOE,
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) A product of the Federal Highway Administration’s Safety Research and Development program, the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) is a suite of software analysis tools for explicit, quantitative evaluation of safety and operational effects of geometric design decisions during the highway design process. This presentation provides an overview of IHSDM. The presentation has two main parts. The first part describes the purpose and scope of IHSDM. The second part highlights IHSDM’s evaluation capabilities.

Goal To marshal the best available knowledge about safety effects of geometrics into a more useful and usable form for highway project planners and designers. FHWA’s goal in developing IHSDM is to marshal the best available knowledge about the safety and operational impacts of highway geometry design alternatives into a more useful and usable form for highway project planners and designers, and traffic and safety reviewers.

What is the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)? A suite of software analysis tools used for evaluating the safety and operational impacts of highway geometric design.

Intended Usage Throughout the highway design process (preliminary planning and engineering through detailed design to final review) For existing and new alignments On two-lane rural highways (2003 release) The intent is that highway planners and designers can use IHSDM for input to decisions that impact safety throughout the project development process—from project scoping and preliminary design, through final design and design review. IHSDM can evaluate new alignments as well as improvement projects on existing roadways. The 2003 release of IHSDM applies only to rural two-lane highways. Research is underway to add capabilities for evaluating multilane rural highways.

Partnership Software Vendors (Import data from design packages) State DOTs (Arkansas, California, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina, Washington, and West Virginia) Software Vendors (Import data from design packages) GEOPAK CAiCE

Components Evaluation Modules Basic Services Policy Review Crash Prediction Design Consistency Intersection Review Traffic Analysis Basic Services IHSDM’s evaluation capabilities are structured in five modules: Policy Review Module Crash Prediction Module Design Consistency Module Intersection Diagnostic Review Module Traffic Analysis Module. Each module evaluates a design from a different vantage point and provides different indicators of safety. IHSDM Basic Services include importing highway geometry data from civil design packages and managing data within IHSDM, as well as HTML-based Help functions and User’s Manuals. The remainder of the presentation provides a brief description of each module.

Policy Review Module Scope Checks roadway segment geometry against relevant design policy and “flags” variations The Policy Review Module automates the process of checking designs against relevant design guidelines and “flags” (or highlights) elements that vary from values recommended in policy. This module could be used to evaluate the geometry of existing roadways in project scoping studies, to perform checks during the design process, and to automate portions of the final design review. IHSDM provides tables of policy values from the AASHTO Green Book (1990, 1994, and 2001 editions). It also provides the capability for individual States to edit those tables to reflect their own policy values that differ from AASHTO’s. Users may check any or all of 17 elements of cross section, horizontal alignment, vertical alignment, and sight distance.

Policy Review Module Cross-section checks: Traveled Way Width Auxiliary Lane Width Shoulder Width Shoulder Type Normal Cross-Slope Normal Shoulder slope Cross-Slope Rollover on Curves Bridge Width

Policy Review Module Horizontal Alignment checks: Radius of Curvature Length of Horizontal Curve Superelevation Compound Curve Ratio Vertical Alignment Checks: Tangent Grade Vertical Curvature

Policy Review Module Sight Distance Checks: Stopping Sight Distance Passing Sight Distance Decision Sight Distance

Crash Prediction Module Scope Estimates expected crash frequency based upon roadway geometry and traffic volumes The Crash Prediction Module estimates the expected crash frequency on an existing or proposed roadway segment as a function of the roadway’s horizontal and vertical alignment and cross section geometry, roadside environment and driveway density, and traffic volumes. The crash prediction algorithm breaks the roadway into intersections and homogeneous roadway segments of uniform geometry and traffic volume and estimates the expected crash frequency on each intersection and roadway segment. The algorithm applies a base (regression) model to account for the effect of traffic volume and crash modification factors to account for the effect of intersection/roadway geometry. The algorithm includes a calibration factor that States can develop and apply to reflect their own crash experience. Additionally, when the design alternative being evaluated is an existing roadway, the algorithm provides an Empirical Bayes procedure that use historical crash data for that roadway to refine its crash estimates. Publication No. FHWA-RD-99-207 “Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways,” posted on the Web at http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/pubs/99207/index.htm, documents the algorithm in detail. The remaining modules are diagnostic in nature. That is, they evaluate existing roadways or proposed design alternatives for common causes of safety problems on rural two-lane highways.

Crash Prediction Module Crash prediction algorithms for: Roadway segments Intersections: 3-way STOP-controlled 4-way STOP-controlled 4-way signalized

Crash Prediction Module Predicts the number of crashes for a design based on the cross-section and alignment (vertical and horizontal) Calibration procedure

Crash Prediction Module Roadway segment algorithm considers: AADT Lane and shoulder width Horizontal curve radius, length, spiral transition, superelevation Grade Driveway density Two-way left turn lanes, passing lanes, short four-lane segments Roadside hazard rating

Crash Prediction Module Intersection algorithm considers: AADT Skew angle Traffic control Exclusive left-turn and right-turn lanes Intersection sight distance

Design Consistency Module Scope Estimates 85th percentile speed profile along alignment to evaluate operating speed consistency Approximately 35 percent of all fatal crashes on two-lane rural highways occur on horizontal curves. Speed inconsistencies are a common contributor to crashes on curves, particularly on older, lower-design speed highways. The Design Consistency Module estimates the speeds of free-flowing vehicles along an alignment. Its output is an 85th percentile speed profile which can be used to check expected operating speeds against the roadway’s assumed design speed and to estimate changes in 85th percentile speeds between successive alignment elements. The speed reduction from an approach tangent to a curve is a primary indicator of an alignment’s consistency. The goal is a uniform speed profile. The larger the speed reduction entering a curve, the more likely it is that some drivers will not reduce their speed enough and the higher the probability of crashes at that curve. The Module’s speed prediction algorithm is documented in Publication No. FHWA-RD-99-171, “Speed Prediction for Two-Lane Rural Highways,” posted on the Web at http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/ihsdm/pdfs/99-171.pdf.

Design Consistency Module Scope Estimates 85th percentile speed profile along alignment to: Check design speed assumption Estimate speed reductions from an approach tangent to entering horizontal curves

Intersection Review Module Scope Policy Review Diagnostic Review Approximately 15 percent of all fatal crashes on two-lane rural highways occur at intersections. The Intersection Review Module includes both policy and diagnostic reviews of intersection geometry. The Policy Review component checks intersection design elements against design policy. The Diagnostic Review uses expert system technology in an attempt to reproduce how an experienced designer would review an intersection design, evaluate potential safety concerns, and identify possible treatments for addressing those concerns.

Intersection Review Module Scope Intersection Policy Review Corner radius Turn lane design Intersection angle Intersection sight distance triangles Intersection Diagnostic Review On average, approximately 15 percent of all fatal crashes on two-lane rural highways occur at intersections. The Intersection Diagnostic Review Module uses expert system technology in an attempt to reproduce how an experienced designer would review an intersection design and identify potential safety and operational issues. The Module can also lead users through an evaluation process for identifying alternative safety countermeasures.

Intersection Review Module Diagnostic Review Expert system that applies a systematic evaluation of an existing or proposed intersection geometric design to identify possible safety concerns and treatments 27 concerns (configuration and alignment) Treatments include design improvements & mitigation measures On average, approximately 15 percent of all fatal crashes on two-lane rural highways occur at intersections. The Intersection Diagnostic Review Module uses expert system technology in an attempt to reproduce how an experienced designer would review an intersection design and identify potential safety and operational issues. The Module can also lead users through an evaluation process for identifying alternative safety countermeasures.

Traffic Analysis Module Scope Uses TWOPAS to estimate traffic quality of service measures (average speed and % time following other vehicles) Evaluates the operational performance of alternatives to passing and climbing lanes, and short four-lane sections In the Traffic Analysis Module, IHSDM uses TWOPAS, a traffic simulation model for rural two-lane highways, to estimate traffic quality of service measures. TWOPAS is the model used to calibrate the two-lane rural highway capacity analysis procedures in the Highway Capacity Manual. In contrast to the Design Consistency Module that considers free-flowing vehicles, the Traffic Analysis Module evaluates traffic operations under current or future traffic flows. It can provide estimates including mean speed and percentage of time spent following, the two principle quality of service measures used for two-lane highways in the Highway Capacity Manual.

Driver/Vehicle Module Scope Driver performance model linked to a vehicle dynamics model that estimates driver speed and path, skidding and rollover potential Alpha version available Expected release in 2004 The Driver/Vehicle Module has two components: A human factors-based driver-performance model evaluates a roadway’s geometric design from an unimpeded driver’s perspective and estimates their likely choice of speed and path. These speed and path predictions are input to a vehicle dynamics model that estimates the vehicle’s friction demand and, for trucks, rollover potential along the roadway. These measures are additional indicators of the likely safety performance of a design.

2003 Release 1st public release of IHSDM May be downloaded free-of-charge from IHSDM Web site Technical support is available (see IHSDM Web site for details) The 2003 release of IHSDM is the first public release for testing and evaluation purposes. (There were limited releases during 2001 and 2002 to volunteer beta testers.) The 2003 release is available for downloading free of charge from the IHSDM Web site (see next slide for Web address). Although the 2003 release is fully functioning, FHWA qualifies the release “for testing and evaluation purposes” to emphasize that software development is ongoing. FHWA encourages feedback from users, which it will use in prioritizing enhancements for future planned releases.

IHSDM Web Site www.tfhrc.gov/safety/ihsdm/ihsdm.htm The IHSDM Web site is http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/ihsdm/ihsdm.htm. This site provides access to the software registration and download site. The site provides an overview of IHSDM, an electronic library of the research underlying IHSDM, and information on how to obtain technical support.

Training Course Pilot offerings of the IHSDM training course: July 15-17 hosted by Washington State DOT in Vancouver August 18-19 hosted by Central Federal Lands in Denver August 20-21 hosted by Montana DOT in Helena September 22-26 hosted by Wisconsin DOT in Madison September 29-October 1 hosted by Mississippi DOT in Jackson October 7-8 hosted by Maine DOT in Augusta Contact Ray Krammes: ray.krammes@fhwa.dot.gov or (202) 493-3312