Section 330-12.3 Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R U M B L E S T R I P S By Gary Dirlam, Mn/DOT District 3 Traffic Engineer.
Advertisements

2014 Chip Seal Training Contract Administration Issues.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
Wisconsin DOT Facilities Development Manual (FDM)
Chapter 3: Elements of Design Transition Design Controls (p
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
2013 C&MS Section 500- Structures Changes from 2010 to 2013 Construction and Materials Specifications in Structures Items.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 Contractor Asphalt Training Rich Hewitt, PE District Bituminous Engineer District Five Materials & Research.
1 Final Estimates and Asphalt Reports. 2 Setting Spread Rate For Asphalt Base.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
ECGD4107 Pavement Engineering Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K004
VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Spring 2015.
Things to look for and remember while preparing FD05 Estimates.
Example #4: Designing Superelevation
1 Automated Machine Guidance: Electronic Files and Design Data AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Meeting August 18, 2010 – Burlington, VT Mark Taylor.
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
 Embankment Construction – LOTs  What is the maximum length of a LOT? Mainline pavement lanes, turn lanes, ramps, parking lots, concrete box.
1 Overview CQC Asphalt Specifications.  Payment based on Contractor’s Quality Control tests.  FDOT runs verification tests at a lesser frequency. 
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
EARTHWORK RECORD SYSTEM
Quality Control Testing
2002 FDOT/FTBA Construction Conference
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Introduction Installation variables have a real-world effect on the fixture’s Light Beam or the Field Photometrics. Disruption to the Photometric Beam.
Geometric design.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 6 Specifications and Special Provisions Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Welcome Please set all cell phones to vibrate..
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Design Exceptions 101 Ed Fischer, State Traffic-Roadway Engineer Mike Morrow, FHWA Field Operations Engineer Kent R. Belleque, Senior Interchange Engineer.
Temporary Traffic Control Standards Update. Why? Came into this position soon after TC details became TTC standards about 1.5 years ago (2/13/2013) As.
AIR QUANTITY REQUIRED TO TRANSFER HEAT IN A FORCED AIR SYSTEM In all four mechanical systems considered, the transfer of heat, either by taking it out.
Florida Department of Transportation 1 Overview of CQC Asphalt Specifications.
Overview of the New Hot Mix Specifications Dale A. Rand, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division Flexible Pavements Branch TRB AFK10 Committee Meeting April 20-21,
Design of Highway Horizontal Alignment Chapter 16
Allen Hughes State Materials Office
1 Chapter 3: Elements of Design Sight Distances (p.3-1 to 3-18 ) Be able to define and use the stopping sight distance equation Be able to explain the.
Things to look for and remember while preparing FD05 Estimates.
THIS IS With Host... Your GDLAlcohol Drugs Rules & Regulations Driver, Safety, & Rules Other Road Users Emergency Situations.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Geometric Design (I). Learning Objectives To understand the considerations and quantifiable aspects of geometric design.
REVISED May 2009STATE MATERIALS OFFICE Goals in this Session To understand:  The Sampling & Testing process  The Project Certification process  The.
Addressing Localized Roughness at the Project Level by Gary Higgins.
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
Problem Management Scenario # 2 September 17,2005.
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
An Introduction to Contracts and Design Guides Presented by: David Lake, P.E. Roadway Designer Nevada Department of Transportation.
Trenton M. Clark, P.E. Director of Engineering Virginia Asphalt Association.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
Table Discussions 2015 SE Meeting. Scenario #1-Project Completion A $1 million bridge replacement project has a completion date of August 1 th. This date.
NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
June 3, 2016 BANNER HR FORUM.  To receive credit on your LMS transcript, please be sure you have indicated your attendance.  As a courtesy to others,
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
Quantity Calculations Module 3. Quantity Calculations  Specifications  Post Bid Quantity Calculations  Production Quantity Calculations –Checking Yield.
Geometric Design (II).
Highway Alignment And Geometric Design
Site Grading Site Grading Civil Engineering and Architecture
ALDOT Specification Updates
Appearance Approval Report (AAR)
Vertical alignment controls how the road follows the existing terrain.
Longitudinal Joint Construction – Why Straightness Matters
Highway Design CE 424 Cenk OZAN, PhD Assist. Prof.
Prime Contractor Performance
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Note: Need to update based on revisions to Ch 7 of HDM (freeway and non-freeway now covered in.
Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments
Presentation transcript:

Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here

Cross Slope Control Your logo here  Cross slope can play a major role in safety and ride quality of a roadway.  Not enough slope can contribute to poor drainage resulting in hydroplaning or lateral drift of passing vehicles.  To much slope can result in sway of large body vehicles and driver discomfort.  Inconsistent or sudden changes in cross slope can have a negative impact on the ride quality and driver comfort.

 Goal of the revised spec.  QC role and requirements  CEI & Verification role and requirements  Measurements and tolerances.  What’s acceptable and what’s not  Corrective actions What We’ll Cover Today Your logo here

 Clarify QC and VT processes for Tangent Section and Super-elevated Section  Realistic and meaning full requirements for accuracy  Specify process of Calibration and comparisons  Finalize the criteria of cross slope acceptance and removal and replacement of the defect area Goal of Revised Your logo here

 Measuring device › Level › Digital read out › Minimum length 4 feet › Accuracy to 0.1 degrees › Calibrate a minimum of once per day › Record all measurements on an approved form Requirements of Your logo here

Tangent Sections  Minimum Frequency: One measurement every 100 feet.  Calculate the deviation cross slope at each  measurement Deviation = ׀ Measured cross slope –Design cross slope ׀.  Average the deviation of ten consecutive measurements  Compare Average deviation to table  If acceptable reduce frequency to 200’ if approved by Engineer QC Requirements Your logo here

QC Your logo here Super-Elevated Sections  One measurement every 100 feet in the full super elevation.  For transitions one measurement at every control point as specified in the plans.  If no control points are specified or transition is less than 250’ take a minimum of three measurements: start of transition, 0% point, and end of transition, (same for full super)  Average the deviation separately for the transition and the full super.  Compare Average deviation to table

Transitions Your logo here End transition Start transition Location of 0%

 Minimum Frequency: Tangent sections, Randomly select ten cross slope measurements per lane mile, (one every 500 feet) Super-elevated sections, Verify all control points in transitions, and a minimum of three points on the full-super. Verification Your logo here

Summary Tangent QC: Start every 100’, Every 200’ if approved by the engineer. VT: Minimum 10 per mile Transition QC: measure each design control point. If no control points given measure beginning, 0%, and end. VT: Same Full Super QC: measure every 100’ a minimum of 3 points. VT: Minimum of 3 points.

Acceptance Tolerance Your logo here

 For intersections, tapers, crossovers, transitions at the beginning and end of the project, bridge approaches and similar areas; unless specified in the plans adjust the cross slope to match the actual site conditions, or as directed by the Engineer. Exceptions Your logo here

Example Tangent Your logo here >.02% Area Fails both the absolute average and individual measurement.

Example Super-elevation Your logo here Design Control Point

What’s Acceptable Your logo here  Transition Example

 Example Full Super What’s Acceptable Your logo here

 Notify the Engineer immediately if any measured sections do not meet criteria of table  Engineer will determine if the deficiency poses an impact to the overall traffic safety, surface drainage, or ride quality. If the deficiencies are sufficiently separated and do not pose an impact, Engineer may waive corrections at no reduction in pay. If not request to have it corrected per  Engineer reserves the right to check the cross slope measurements at any time or location. Corrective Action Your logo here

 For those instances corrective action may unnecessarily mar the appearance of the finished pavement the contractor request to leave deficient cross slope (Friction Course only) in place & the Engineer approves said requests, it should be handled as a pay reduction in accordance with & The reduction form ( ). Corrective Action Your logo here

Questions ? Your logo here