COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION HEQF Implementation: An overview of preliminary data and the Way forward: Category B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

National Pupil Database: Current content & structure Anna Barker Data Services Group DfES.
HEQF Review - Comments Private Providers 25 September 2012.
New Directions: Online Courses & the University of Californias A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions.
A-G Updates and the New Piece of the Puzzle: Common Core Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California |
Fast Forward: University of Californias A-G Online Course Policy & the Growth of Online Learning Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate.
Update on HEQF Implementation 21 February HEQF ALIGNMENT: IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL PLAN ALL HIGHER EDUCATI ON PROGRA MMES AND QUALIFIC ATIONS.
Learning from ELIR: piloting a new approach Thelma Barron, Assistant Director, QAA Scotland.
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
Online Postgraduate Admissions Update for Postgraduate Forum – 22 January 2010 Kate Ward.
External Examiners Preview Demonstrations Academic Services & Student Systems Presented by Daniel Chandler, Project Officer, Academic Services & Matthew.
FIA Advisory Committee Charmaine Koch 15 November 2011.
Quality Assurance Forum February ‘Framework for Qualification Standards in Higher Education’ Short-term timelines December 2011: circulated for.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
HEQF Review Update & A New Accreditation Framework QA Forum Private Providers September 2011.
The situation with regard to SA public nursing colleges FUNDISA May 2012.
HEQC Accreditation Process & Role of Professional Bodies (PB) CHE & Professional Bodies Forum 12 September 2012.
FORUM FOR PROFESSIONAL NURSE LEADERS 7 March 2014 CHANGES IN EDUCATION AND PRACTICE. THE NEW QUALIFICATION FRAMEWORK.
RE-ACCREDITATION 2009 Procedures, Processes and Timeframes Tamara Bezuidenhout Project Manager: Accreditation 06 August 2008.
COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION QA Forum: PHEIs Data on PHEIs 6 March 2012 Tamara Bezuidenhout.
Template For Building Project Schedule Jazz Presentation.
Developments in Programme Accreditation QA Forum with Professional Bodies August 2011.
Data collection, extraction, and central collation Induction Event.
1 Please log-in to your Comprehensive Plan  Visit:  Under “I Would Like To”, select “Access My PDE Applications”
INNOVATION PROJECT PROGRESS Sept Innovation Management Project Status Project Name: Innovation Management Project Budget : Operational Budget 2010/11.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Possible changes to the Accreditation Process Quality Assurance Forum August 2011.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
Athletics Certification Orientation. Orientation Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits Committee Philosophy Second Cycle Issues Technology Athletics Certification.
 Overview  Online Report Process ◦ Report process for Grantees/Look-Alike Site Visits ◦ Report Process for Look-Alike Applicant Site Visits  Report.
Council on Higher Education: Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 10 October 2013.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Council on Higher Education: Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 12 October 2010.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION QA Forum: PHEIs HEQCIS: Update 25 September 2012 Tamara Bezuidenhout.
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
FY 2011 Budget Period Progress Report Cheri Daly
Briefing on the CHE’s Annual Report 2008/09 Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Higher Education & Training 28 October 2009.
HP Enterprise Services HomeTown Health Presentation July 7, 2010 Partnering for Success!
HEQC NATIONAL REVIEW OF ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMMES IN EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL PREPAREDNESS WORKSHOP 24 & 26 April 2006.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Wednesday, October 28 2:30 – 3:30 PM
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Business Plan and Budget for the Council on Higher Education (CHE) 2009/10 Presentation to a Joint Meeting of the Portfolio Committees on Basic Education.
SIF II Briefing Session 21 st September Briefing Session Content SIF Cycle I – overview Funding and arising issues SIF Cycle II – Process for evaluation.
CFCU PROGRESS AND MONITORING REPORTS (PMRs)
Research Colloquium on Post-School Education and Training 4 November 2014, Burgers Park Hotel Higher Education and Training Information System Jean Skene,
INSETA ASSESSOR- MODERATOR REGISTRATION PROCESSES.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
LCR Sexual Health Strategy Project Board 6 October 2016
Department of Higher Education and Training
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
THE SAIOH QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM & CPD AUDIT STATUS
Higher Education Quality Committee
Athletics Certification Orientation
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards
ITS Integrator User Certification Program
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Process, timeline and overview
New Jersey Department of Education
DSC Governance Sub Group Recommendations
Review plan of the nature reporting – update 6
DEPARTMENT OF ARTS AND CULTURE
Scene setter European Commission DG Environment
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION HEQF Implementation: An overview of preliminary data and the Way forward: Category B

HEQF IMPLEMENTATION HISTORY October 2007 HEQF Gazetted 2008 – Joint Communique 1 and 2 on the HEQF Implementation June 2009 – Joint Communique 3 on HEQF Implementation (Interim arrangements) April 2010 – HEQF Think Tank October 2010 – CHE-HEQF Communique 1 HEQF Implementation Plan January 2011 – HEQF Implementation Workshop August 2011 – HEQF-online goes live

HEQF ALIGNMENT: IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL PLAN ALL HIGHER EDUCATI ON PROGRA MMES AND QUALIFIC ATIONS SUBMITT ED VIA HEQC ONLINE FOR APPRAISA L AND CATEGORI SATION CATERGORY A MINIMAL CHANGES: EG NAMEOF QUALIFICATION CATEGORY B MINOR CHANGES: IE LESS THAN 50% CHANGE TO QUALIFICATION CATEGORY C MAJOR CHANGES: IE MORE 50% CHANGE TO QUALIFICATION UNIVERSITIES Blue Group UNIVERSITIES Purple Group UNIVERSITIES OF TECHNOLOGY COMPREHENS IVE UNIVERSITIES Red Group PRIVATE PROVIDERS EST. 60 – 70% OF APPLICATIONS LARGE SCALE EVALUATIONS OF APPLICATIONS IN AC-STYLE MODEL EST. 60 – 70% OF APPLICATIONS LARGE SCALE EVALUATIONS OF APPLICATIONS IN AC-STYLE MODEL OUTCOME: APPROVED AND ‘DEEMED’ ACCREDITED EST. 30 – 25% OF APPLICATIONS ‘ACCREDITATION-STYLE’ EVALUATION BY INSTITUTION TYPE, DISCIPLINE AND QUALIFICATION TYPE EST. 30 – 25% OF APPLICATIONS ‘ACCREDITATION-STYLE’ EVALUATION BY INSTITUTION TYPE, DISCIPLINE AND QUALIFICATION TYPE EST. 5% OF APPLICATIONS MAKE NEW APPLICATION FOR CANDIDACY-PHASE ACCREDITATION EST. 5% OF APPLICATIONS MAKE NEW APPLICATION FOR CANDIDACY-PHASE ACCREDITATION OUTCOME: APPROVED AND ‘DEEMED’ ACCREDITED OUTCOME: PROVISIONAL ACCREDITATION NOT APPROVED NOT ACCREDITED COMPREHENS IVE UNIVERSITIES Orange Group

HEQF IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Phased approach Phase 1 – to be completed June / July 2012 Categorise qualifications as Category A, B or C Complete offline HEQF Implementation 2-part template S1 – existing qualification information (A, B, C) S2 – amended qualification information (A, B – delayed)

HEQF-ONLINE DATA RESULTS Preliminary data extracted in May 2012 – will change as institutions continue to submit – should not be considered auditable data at this stage Data needs further analysis and disaggregation Summarises info received largely from S1 Provides broad overview of public sector and some PHEI data Provides indication of areas where dataset is incomplete and requires clarification, repopulation and ‘clean-up’ Specifically, PHEI data appears incomplete in some areas and will need further review and requests for clarification Existing qualifications categorisations (A, B, C) Overview provides an indication of future changes in the sector

QUALIFICATIONS RECEIVED

UNIVERSITIES

COMPREHENSIVES

UOT’S

PRIVATE PROVIDERS

PRIVATE – UG/PG SPLIT

PRIVATE - HIGHLIGHTS

CESMDISTRIBUTION CESM DISTRIBUTION

CATEGORY A SUBMISSIONS

CATEGORY A PROCESS EVALUATIONS Processed over 4100 Category A qualifications via HEQF-online Majority have been approved by the HEQC Doctorates, diplomas, MBAs parked until HEQF Review finalised Currently finalising details such as content of automated e- mails, report formats available to institutions via the HEQF- online, outcomes letters, etc Some data clean-up is required prior to the release of outcomes such as spelling and title corrections After initial clean-up is completed, institutions will be informed of approvals in principle After approval, additional clean-up may be required including info for CESMs, major fields of study etc

IMPLEMENTATION WAY FORWARD Analysis of data – determine CESM (disciplinary), institution type, qualification type differentiation Only Category B Phase 2 – begin in September 2012 HEQF-online submission of curriculum change information for evaluation (user-experience survey conducted to assist in improving the system) Accreditation-style evaluation HEQC approval Challenge – HEQF Review finalisation

PHASE 2 CATEGORY B TIMEFRAME January 2014 – June 2014 July 2013 – December 2013 September 2012 – June 2013 July 2014 – December 2014 Universities –submit Category B + S2 Applications (1089 qualifications) Private Providers submit Category B + S2 Applications (89 qualifications) Comprehensives – Orange Group submit Category B +S2 Applications (514 qualifications) Universities of Technology submit Category B + S2 Applications (246 qualifications) PHASETWOPHASETWO PHASETWOPHASETWO

CATEGORY B PROCESS September 2012 – release HEQF Category B questions – Word version ( and HEQF Implementation Handbook 2.0http:// November 2012 – Category B questions for submission on HEQF-online system, submitted in 2 parts  S1 submissions locked but ‘viewable’ and S2 available for submission or amendment  Category B questions in Q&A narrative format (similar to HEQC-online system) HEQF-online system will be open to all institutions once system goes live until indicated deadlines

CATEGORY B PROCESS 2 September 2012 – June 2013, CHE = train subject-matter experts as evaluators to evaluate the Category B submissions After each deadline, specific institution type will be evaluated per discipline and qualification type Submissions will be processed in an Accreditation-type evaluation and will tabled at HEQC for final approval Outcomes will be communicated to institutions once approved Anticipated all evaluations and outcomes will be released by end of 2015

HEQF-online USER-EXPERIENCE SURVEY Conducted an online user-experience survey irt using the HEQF-online system as an effective ICT tool to implement the HEQF – apply to moving future development for Category B 38% response rate Still analysing the data Broad issues:  Better communication, RSS feeds, automated s  Clarify processes and workflows, including checklists  Pilot future templates more rigorously, Finalise the template and stick to it  Needs to be user-friendly – online and offline??  New online systems are always intimidating

CATEGORY B QUESTIONS Purpose and characteristics of programme irt HEQF Curriculum and programme design changes Learning activities Professional body requirements Assessment Articulation and progression WIL RPL Widening access Category B Template circulated widely to members of public and private sector for comment. Comments will be collated and considered into final Category B Template (Word and HEQF-Online)

QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? Tamara Bezuidenhout Tel: URL: