Mig-29 A Flight Model data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Chapter 11.
Advertisements

Lecture X: Air Density Factor
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #10 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance There is considerable variations due to –pilot technique –ground conditions.
FP-2 T-44 Ops Limits Overview System Limitations Propeller Limitations Starting Limitations Engine Limitations Airspeed Limitations Miscellaneous Limitations.
Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Cpl. Martin Čuba. Basic information Name: B-2 Spirit Role: Stealth bomber Construction: Carbon-graphite composite material.
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
Aerodynamic Theory Review 2
Introduction to Propulsion
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
1 Q0 A skydiver jumps off a plane at 3000m. He falls with his belly “facing down” to 1000m altitude before opening up his parachute. Which is the qualitatively.
Lesson 28 Cruise Range and Endurance
JLFANG-LDS Light Dynamic Strikefighter Dr. James Lang, Project Advisor Aircraft Design by Team Bling-Bling Marcus Artates Connor McCarthy Ryan McDonnell.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Request for Proposal: Joint Strike Fighter for Australian Air Force JLFANG Black Knight 170 Aerospace Engineering Design I University of California, San.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 30 Turn Performance. “Turning” the tables…
Lesson 24 Performance— Thrust Required and Thrust Available
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Lesson 32 Energy Height and Specific Excess Power (Ps)
Lesson 31 Velocity vs. Load Factor (V-n) Diagrams
G.O.D.I.S Complex: “Gaurdian of Defense, Intelligence & Surveillance” Project Advisor: Dr. James Lang Team Leader: Dan Dalton Chief Engineer: Eugene Mahmoud.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Dynamics of a car/airplane and fuel economy. Energy in Transportation All transportation systems need energy to –accelerate up to speed. –Make up for.
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
AIRCRAFT HANDLING Part 3 Refuelling.
Aircraft Characteristics
The Boeing 777 can hold a max of 550 passengers on board and 2 crew members.
Aircraft Systems Operational Limits A-4N/TA-4. Aircraft Systems Operational Limits A-4N/TA-4 STARTER LIMITS ONE OF TWO AVAILABLE ENGINE STARTERS IS INSTALLED.
Structural Design Considerations and Airspeeds
October 19, 2015 Airbus A340 Family John Blizard February 3, 2009 Airbus A Airbus A Airbus A Airbus A
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
The Greenliner Environmentally Friendly Aircraft Tom Berger AA241B 3/14/06.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Human Resource Management. Presented To: Sir Ahmad Tisman Pasha.
Configuration Aerodynamics Mirage Mirage 2000 The Mirage 2000 Aircraft A Class Presentation By Anand Natarajan.
The Private Pilot.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Lecture Leading Cadet Training Principles of Flight 2 Lift and Thrust.
ME 440 Aerospace Engineering Fundamentals Hot Topic of the Week.
By: Ryan and Drew.  Armament (weapons): None  Engines: Two Pratt and Whitney J58’s (each weighing 6,000 lbs.)  Maximum Speed: Mach 3.2 (3.2 times the.
ME 440 Aerospace Engineering Fundamentals Hot Topic of the Week.
The Wright brothers are the two famous men who invented a type of aircraft that could fly. The Wright brothers started to made more and more different.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
Aerodynamic Design of a Light Aircraft
Be-200 — Basic multirole model; Be-200ChS or Be-200ES (Emergency Services); Be-200E — English cockpit version of the Be-200ES; Be-200RR —Designation.
Prabhath Dasanayake All rights reserved
Aircraft Design.
AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
F-18 Hornet and F-18 Super Hornet
FP-2 T-44 Ops Limits 5/6/15.
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
F-16 Fighting Falcon Ruolong Ma
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
FLIGHT MECHANICS BDA DR. ZAMRI BIN OMAR D
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Weight and Balance Private Pilot Ground School
Questions Laws and Forces, Lift and Drag, Loads and Load Factors
CONCORDE SST AN AVIATION ICON.
Dynamics of a car/airplane
Tables Toolbox.
Parachutes Changed Supersonic portion of descent
Embraer ERJ 135 VIP PHOTOS SPECIFICATIONS AIRCRAFT SPECIFICATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Mig-29 A Flight Model data

Section A : Mig-29 A (9.12) data

Dimensions Lenght: 17,32m Height: 4,73m Wingspan: 11,36m Wing area: 38,056m^2 Overall lift area: 60,890m^2 Wing incidence: 0deg. Anhedral: 3deg. Wing aspect ratio: 3,339:1 Tailplane span: 7,78m Tailplane area: N/A Tailplane aspect ratio: N/A Distance between fins: 3,38m Fin area: N/A

Weight and Engine Weight Motorization Empty weight equipped: 10 900kg Take-off clean: 14 000kg Normal take-off(2x R-27, 4x R-60 no drop tank): 15 600kg Maximum take-off: 18 480kg Maximum landing weight: 14 200kg Maximum internal fuel: 4 870L at 0,78kg/m^3 specific density = 3 700kg. Maximum external fuel: 1 centreline drop tank of 1 600L capacity for 1 250kg. In-flight refuelling: none Motorization Engine type: 2x Klimov/Sarkisov RD-33 low bypass ratio turbofans. Maximum dry thrust at S/L: 98,84kN or 10 086kgp. Maximum afterburning thrust at S/L: 162,80kN or 16 612kgp. Specific Fuel Consumption dry: 21,81g/kN Specific Fuel Consumption afterb.: 59,84g/kN

Performance Never exceed speed S/L: 1 480kph(M1,21) Never exceed speed 11 000m: 2 450kph(M2,00) Maximum operating mach number S/L: MMo 1,2(1 480kph) Maximum operating mach number 11 000m: MMo 2,3(2 815kph) Maximum climb rate (NTOW): 19 800m/min. Service ceiling: 14 500m Stalling speed 11 000m NTOW: 240kph Landing speed at NTOW: 250kph Landing speed at MLW: 270kph Unstick speed at NTOW: 260kph Unstick speed at MTOW: 290kph Landing run NTOW w/ chute: 660m Landing run NTOW: 900m Take-off run NTOW w/ AB: 250m Take-off run NTOW: 550m Max operating alpha: 26deg. Instantaneous turn rate: 26deg./s Sustained turn rate : 23deg./s Max operating g loading below M0,85: +9, -2,25 Max operating g loading above M0,85: +7, -2,25

Miscellenous Wing loading(W/S) clean: 368kg/m^2 W/S NTOW: 410kg/m^2 W/S MTOW: 483kg/m^2 W/S at end of combat radius(NTOW): 228kg/m^2 Overall loading clean: 230kg/m^2 Overall loading NTOW: 256kg/m^2 Overall loading MTOW: 303kg/m^2 Overall loading at end of combat radius(NTOW): 142kg/m^2 Ferry range(w/ drop tank): 2 100km Combat radius clean lo-lo-lo: 535km Combat radius clean hi-hi-hi: 1 250km Combat radius NTOW lo-lo-lo: 450km Combat radius NTOW hi-hi-hi: 900km Combat radius MTOW lo-lo-lo: 670km Combat radius MTOW hi-hi-hi: 1 380km Endurance clean 200m: 1h00min Endurance clean 11 000m: 1h20min Endurance NTOW 200m: 0h50min Endurance NTOW 11 000m: 1h10min Endurance MTOW 200m: 1h11min Endurance MTOW 11 000m: 1h40min

Section B : Free Falcon 3 Flight Model

FF3 Level Flight Envelope

FF3 Acceleration (1/2)

FF3 Acceleration (2/2)

FF3 Maximum G Load

FF3 Sustained G Load

FF3 Roll Rate

My 2cts comments FF3 Flight Envelope : pessimistic Reasonable under 30,000ft Maximum mach at 36,000 / 40,000 ft should be 2.35 instead of 2.15 Acceleration : accurate /pessimistic Very realistic, and if not, (between 20,000 and 35,000ft) rather pessimistic Maximum Available G : optimistic Between .5 and 1 G more than real life a low mach (< 0.45 at SL) Largely over estimated in supersonic and at high altitude Maximum Sustained G : optimistic between 1 and 2 G more than real life at sea level and low mach (< 0.45) Roll Rate: very optimistic Maximum value largely over-estimated (300 instead of 160) Negative impact of high dynamic pressure under estimated IN GENERAL In level flight configuration, FF3 MIG-29 Fulcrum does not have the advantage versus the Viper (F16-C Blk52) it should have, especially at high altitude In term of turn rate, the FF3 MIg-29 Fulcrum is closer to the Viper (F16-C Blk52) than it should be. Where the Viper should have a significant advantage

Section C : Proposal for Flight Model

Level Flight Envelope

Acceleration (1/2)

Acceleration (2/2)

Lift Coefficient

Maximum G Load

Sustained G Load

Roll Rate