The Evolution of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Prof. Dr. Olav Hohmeyer IPCC AR4 (2007) Results WG III Folie 1 A Short Overview of the IPCC Report on Climate Change Mitigation 2007 (WG III) Prof. Dr.
1 A B C
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Fill in missing numbers or operations
1
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Sequential Logic Design
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Embedded Computing.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
Introduction to Algorithms 6.046J/18.401J
Introduction to Algorithms 6.046J/18.401J
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
CALENDAR.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
Multiplication Facts Review. 6 x 4 = 24 5 x 5 = 25.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Welcome. © 2008 ADP, Inc. 2 Overview A Look at the Web Site Question and Answer Session Agenda.
The basics for simulations
Division- the bus stop method
Factoring Quadratics — ax² + bx + c Topic
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Employee & Manager Self Service Overview
DIVISIBILITY, FACTORS & MULTIPLES
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
April 30, A New Tool for Designer-Level Verification: From Concept to Reality April 30, 2014 Ziv Nevo IBM Haifa Research Lab.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Artificial Intelligence
Before Between After.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
12 October, 2014 St Joseph's College ADVANCED HIGHER REVISION 1 ADVANCED HIGHER MATHS REVISION AND FORMULAE UNIT 2.
Innovative Teaching Dr Carol Robinson Director Mathematics Education Centre.
Subtraction: Adding UP
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Week 1.
Chapter 10: The Traditional Approach to Design
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
FIGURE 12-1 Op-amp symbols and packages.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Employment Ontario Literacy and Basic Skills Performance Management Reports Training For Service Providers.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Using Lowest Common Denominator to add and subtract fractions
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Presentation transcript:

The Evolution of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century Ao Univ. Prof. Dr. Günther Ossimitz University of Klagenfurt, Austria The Evolution of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century 100th Birthday Anniversary of Ludwig von Bertalanffy Technical University of Vienna, 2. Nov. 2001

My Habilitation work: Development of Systems Thinking Main issues: - How can students learn Systems Thinking (ST)? - How can System Dynamics modelling help to develop ST - How can ST abilities be empirically measured? Ch 1: Approaches towards Systems Thinking in the Literature Ch 2: What is Systems Thinking? - a Definition Ch 3: Systems Thinking / System Dynamics in Math Education Ch 4: Empirical Studies about the Development of Systems Thinking Ch 5: The Study: „Development of Systems Thinking“ G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Some Systems Thinking Approaches Qualitative Approaches: Frederic Vester (Biocybernetics) Systemic Management: e.g. Peter Gomez/ Gilbert Probst Peter Senge: „The Fifth Discipline“ ST and Organizational Learning Cognitive Psychology - Dietrich Dörner: „The Logic of Failure“ System Dynamics-Approach (quantitative) Jay Forrester (MIT) introduces SD at about 1960 Barry Richmond sells SD Software STELLA under „systems thinking“ Each of these approaches is connected with Education! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Systems Thinking Approaches - Overview G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

What is Systems Thinking? Literature: ST is very fundamental and important e.g. George Klir: Facets of Systems Science (1991, p19): "Systems movement emerged from three principal roots: mathematics, computer technology and a host of ideas that are well captured by the general term systems thinking." This is the only appearance of the term "systems thinking" in Klir's great book! The same applies to a number of other important works of systems literature. Almost no serious definition of ST in systems literature! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

My Definition of “Systems Thinking“ Four interelated dimensions: Dynamical Dim. - Thinking in dynamical processes: beyond snapshot-thinking; understanding stocks vs. flows, delays, oscillations... Model Dim. - Thinking in Models /Awareness of Systems: modeling assumptions, model-reality; qualitative vs. quantitative models Feedback Dim. - Thinking in loops and networks: interrelated structures, indirect effects, feedback loops, networks of interrelations Pragmatical Dim. - Steering of Systems: finding the "leverage point", counterintuitive behavior, proper intensity and timing of actions. My Definition integrates different views of Systems Thinking! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Dynamical Thinking: Discerning stocks and flows Arrivals and Departures in a Hotel: Dec 18 - Jan 10 Arr Dep When was the number of Hotel guests a maximum? Give your answer just by a quick glimpse at the diagram without any tedious calculations! Intersection: Dec 27-Dec 28 Correct: < 20% G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Thinking in Models: Heroin Market 1 G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Price Elasticity of Heroin 10 kg Heroin available: 1000 ATS/kg: 10 Mio S Revenue 9 kg Heroin available: 2000 ATS/kg: 18 Mio S Revenue ! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Thinking in Models: Heroin Market 2 G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Lessons from the Heroin Models: Causal Loop Diagrams (CLD`s) are useful tools! CLD‘s help to discuss a situation. Different viewpoints can be clarified and checked more easily. The „same“ situation can be modeled in different ways. CLD‘s allow a reflection of model assumptions. Small differences in a model might have serious consequences. What appears to be the solution at first sight, might (via feedback) make the problem even more severe! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Feedback Thought: The Arms Race (Peter Senge: The Fifth Discipline) + Armation A + A feels endagered B feels endangered + Armation B + Escalating ("positive") feedback loop G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

The result of the Arms Race Total Amount of Armation in Arms race Time (years) G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

George Richardson: Two threads of Feedback Thought Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory (p. 93) George Richardson: Two threads of Feedback Thought - Servomechanisms Thread - Cybernetics Thread G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

George Richardson's Message: Feedback is a common fundamental idea in all systems approaches The feedback structure is often hidden in peculiar notations Explicit counsciousness of feedback in the 20th century Many roots of feedback thinking: Biology-math. Models (Verhulst, Lotka, Volterra) Econometrics (Tinbergen, Samuelson, Hicks) Engineering (Watt, Maxwell, Lyapunov) Social Sciences (Hume, Smith, Ricardo, Hegel, Marx, Bateson, Keynes, Lewin) Biology-Homeostasis (Hippocrates, Cannon, Rosenblueth) Logic (Epimenides, Boole, Cantor, Russell, Whitehead, Carnap, Goedel) Two main Feedback Threads in the 20th Century Cybernetics Thread (Ludwig von Bertalanffy et al) Servomechanisms Thread G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

The Cybernetics Thread Feedback was seen as an influence from output back to input. Feedback concept just for negative loops, no escalating loops Feedback is seen as homeostasis and control stability and instability of negative feedback systems Feedback analyses are usually verbal rather than mathematical or pictorial Feedback was associated with information transmittion, communication networks, information theory background idea: the ceration of intelligent machines G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

The Servomechanism Thread Formal dynamic feedback models employed Basic idea: Behavior depends upon feedback structure Feedback loops are seen as intrinsic part of real system positive and negative loops were present counterintuitive behavior of systems: well-intented policies lead to disaster Policy Analysis is an important aspect of practical systems analysis G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Ludwig von Bertalanffy on Systems Thinking LvB did great work in integrating different Systems approaches (Biology, Chemistry, Psychology, Cybernetics, Social Sciences) into a General Systems Theory (GST) GST was basically founded with mathematical concepts (differential equations, functions, stability) Feedback concept is only implicit in GST - lack of feedback notation Advances in Systems Thinking beyond GST are possible with new tools for diagramming/sketching feedback structures Systems Thinking needs systemic means of communcation (e.g. mind maps, CLD`s, stock-flow-diagrams)! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

My conclusions concerning Systems Thinking Systems thinking is like a tree: many roots and many branches Feedback is a core concept of systems thinking. Others are: thinking in processes, thinking in models, steering systems Systems thinking abilities are darely needed, yet, hardly developed, even among higly educated persons! Systemic diagrams are crucial for systems thinking / communication Causal Loop Diagrams are easy to learn and very flexible systems diagramming tools Systems thinking should be a guiding idea for any education at any age! G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

How to contact me: http://go.just.to/go Homepage G. Ossimitz http://go.just.to/pap Papers (incl. this lecture) http://go.just.to/sd System Dynamics / Systems Thinking Mega Link List alternativ: www.ossimitz.at mail: ossimitz@bigfoot.com G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Richmond: „Systems Thinking is System Dynamics with an Aura“ Systems Thinking und System Dynamics: Die Sichtweisen von Forrester und Richmond Richmond: „Systems Thinking is System Dynamics with an Aura“ G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Richmond (1991): What is Systems Thinking? Ossimitz (1991): Vier Stufen systemdynamischen Darstellens und Modellierens Systems Thinking Activities <=> systemische Darstellungsformen G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century

Testaufgabe "Staatsverschuldung vs. Budgetdefizit" In Fantasien nennt man den Betrag, um den die Staatsausgaben in einem Jahr höher sind als die Staatseinnahmen, "öffentliches Budgetdefizit". Im Jahr 1998 betrug das öffentliche Budgetdefizit in Fantasien 60 Mrd. Taler, Ein Jahr später lag es bei 40 Mrd. Taler. Kreuzen Sie an, welche der folgenden Aussagen richtig bzw. falsch bzw. nicht beantwortbar sind! Klgft: 63% Im Jahr 1999 wurden 20 Mrd. Taler Schulden zurückbezahlt Der Finanzminister konnte die Staatsschulden von 1998 auf 1999 um ein Drittel senken 30% Wenn es gelingt, das Budgetdefizit auf 0 zu senken (ausgeglichen zu budgetieren), dann hat Fantasien keine Schulden mehr. 62% Die Schulden sind sowohl 1998 als auch 1999 gewachsen. 42% Wenn es gelingt, das Budgetdefizit auf 0 zu senken, dann hat Fantasien seinen höchsten Schuldenstand erreicht. 56% Ein geringeres Budgetdefizit bedeutet eine geringere Staatsverschuldung. 41% Klagenfurt: n=104 (BWL) Graz: n=25 (USW) Wien: n= 25 (WU,TU, Uni) Diese Performance hätte man auch durch Münzwurf erreicht! Graz: µ=0,76 Wien: µ=0,8 Graz: µ=0,44 Wien: µ=0,52 Graz: µ=0,16 Wien: µ=0,28 Graz: µ=0,4 Wien: µ=0,56 Graz: µ=0,64 Wien: µ=0,72 Graz: µ=0,32 Wien: µ=0,68

Literatur Dietrich Dörner (1989): Die Logik des Misslingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen. Reinbek: Rowohlt Gomez/Probst (1987): Vernetztes Denken im Management. Die Orientierung 89. Bern: Schweizerische Volksbank Günther Ossimitz (2000): Entwicklung systemischen Denkens. München: Profil George Richardson (1991): Feedback thought. Reading: Pegasus Communications Peter Senge (1990): Die fünfte Disziplin. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta John Sterman (2000): Business Dynamics. Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: McGrawHill-Irwin Frederic Vester (1999): Die Kunst, vernetzt zu denken. Stuttgart: DVA G. Ossimitz: Development of Systems Thinking in the 20th Century