THE AURORAL EMISSIONS AND THE ELECTRON PRECIPITATION UNDER DIFFERENT GEOMAGNETIC CONDITIONS DURING RECURRENT SOLAR WIND STREAM Guineva V. 1, Despirak I.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Abstract Using observations at 1-Hz sampling rate from the Greenland west coast magnetometer chain we study ULF waves over a wide frequency band and a.
Advertisements

The challenges and problems in measuring energetic electron precipitation into the atmosphere. Mark A. Clilverd British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United.
ASLAF: DETECTOR OF THE DIRECT SOLAR LYMAN- ALPHA RADIATION. FUTURE ALTERNATIVES V.Guineva(1), G.Witt(2), J.Gumbel(3), M.Khaplanov(3), R.Werner(1), J.Hedin(3),
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
NOAA data : >30keV electron We study upper atmosphere phenomena in South Atlantic Geomagnetic Anomaly (SAGA) since So far, we installed several instruments.
MURI,2008 Electric Field Variability and Impact on the Thermosphere Yue Deng 1,2, Astrid Maute 1, Arthur D. Richmond 1 and Ray G. Roble 1 1.HAO National.
Study of Pi2 pulsations observed from MAGDAS chain in Egypt E. Ghamry 1, 2, A. Mahrous 2, M.N. Yasin 3, A. Fathy 3 and K. Yumoto 4 1- National Research.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
Non-stationary solar wind structures and their influence on substorm bulge development I.V. Despirak 1, A.A. Lubchich 1, V. Guineva 2 1. Polar Geophysical.
CISM All-hands Meeting Boulder, CO Sept CMIT Simulations of the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms Wenbin Wang, Jiuhou Lei, Alan Burns, Stan.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Ionospheric responses to the particular solar events Zbyšek Mošna 1,2, Petra Šauli 1, K. Georgieva 3 1- Institute of Atmospheric Physics ASCR, Prague,
Further development of modeling of spatial distribution of energetic electron fluxes near Europa M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
CHAMP Observations of Multiple Field-Aligned Currents Dimitar Danov 1, Petko Nenovski 2 Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
Monitoring of auroral oval location and geomagnetic activity based on magnetic measurements from satellites in low Earth orbit. S. Vennerstrom Technical.
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
Expected Influence of Crustal Magnetic Fields on ASPERA-3 ELS Observations: Insight from MGS D.A. Brain, J.G. Luhmann, D.L. Mitchell, R.P. Lin UC Berkeley.
N.V. Semenova Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Russia.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
P. Brekke 1 Brugge 16 November Norwegian Space Weather Assets Pål Brekke Norwegian Space Centre.
Tracing Geomagnetic Conjugate Points by means of Extremely Similar Interhemispheric Auroras N. Sato (1), A. Kadokura (1), Y. Ebihara (1), H. Deguchi (1),
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Observation and Theory of Substorm Onset C. Z. (Frank) Cheng (1,2), T. F. Chang (2), Sorin Zaharia (3), N. N. Gorelenkov (4) (1)Plasma and Space Science.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
Importance of the Height Distribution of Joule Heating for Thermospheric Density Arthur D. Richmond and Astrid Maute NCAR High Altitude Observatory.
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science Representation of Middle Range Energy Electrons in the Chemistry-Climate Model SOCOL Pavle Arsenovic.
The Northern Lights. aurora borealis Natural light displays in the northern polar sky. The Northern Lights occur at the magnetic fields of the polar regions.
Study of the aurora emissions during substorms connected with different solar wind streams I.V. Despirak 1, Zh. V. Dashkevich 1, V. Guineva 2 1. Polar.
Solar wind-magnetosphere- atmosphere coupling: effects of magnetic storms and substorms in atmospheric electric field variations Kleimenova N., Kozyreva.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
20 September 2005Double Star -Cluster Noordwijk Sept WBD Studies of AKR: Coordinated Observations of Aurora and the SAKR – Ion Hole Connection R.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
Lancaster University Department of Communication Systems Skymap at 38.2 MHz as Measured by IRIS Steve Marple.
EoI#118 Auroral Optical Network International Network for Auroral Optical Studies of the Polar Ionosphere Ingrid Sandahl Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Localized Thermospheric Energy Deposition Observed by DMSP Spacecraft D. J. Knipp 1,2, 1 Unversity of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 2 High Altitude Observatory,
S. Frey et.al., THEMIS Ground-Based Observatory Analysis 1 San Francisco, Fall AGU, December 16, 2004 Analysis Used predicted THEMIS spacecraft positions.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.
THEMIS Workshop 1 UC Berkeley, 18 December 2004 Data Products and Access Tim Quinn UC Berkeley.
Interaction of solar and galactic cosmic rays with Earth’s atmosphere Contributors: Contributors: Rolf Bütikofer 1, Laurent Desorgher 1, Erwin Flückiger.
Intense Poynting flux at very high latitudes during magnetic storms: GITM simulation results Yue Deng 1 Cheng Sheng 1, Manqi Shi 1, Yanshi Huang 2, Cheryl.
THE REACTION OF MID-LATITUDE IONOSPHERE ON STRONG IONOSPHERIC STORMS ON THE BASE OF THE EAST- SIBERIAN GROUND-BASED RADIO INSTRUMENT NETWORK DATA B.G.
Dynamics and Photochemistry of N2+ Ion in the Polar Ionosphere Manabu Yamada, S. Watanabe ( Hokkaido Univ. ) N. Yoshida, Y. Takahashi ( Tohoku Univ. )
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Testing the Equipotential Magnetic Field Line Assumption Using SuperDARN Measurements and the Cluster Electron Drift Instrument (EDI) Joseph B. H. Baker.
The spatial and temporal distribution of solar and galactic cosmic rays S. V. Tasenko 1, P. V. Shatov 1, I. A. Skorokhodov 1, I. V. Getselev 1,2, M. Podzolko.
All-sky camera of the ALFA project: common points and interests with the Wide Field Astronomical Observations E. Séran & M. Godefroy CETP, St-Maur June.
EGU General Assembly 2006, 2-7 April, 2006, Wien ST6 Multi-point measurements of solar-terrestrial plasma: results and future perspectives Scientific objectives.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
XUV monochromatic imaging spectroscopy in the SPIRIT experiment on the CORONAS-F mission I. Diagnostics of solar corona plasma by means of EUV Spectroheliograph.
Ionospheric Assimilation Model for Space Weather Monitoring and Forecasting I. T. Lee 1 W. H. Chen 2, T. Matsuo 3,4, C. H. Chang 2,
Space Science MO&DA Programs - November Page 1 SS It is well known that intense auroral disturbances occur in association with substorms and are.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
1 New Instrumentation at NTNU Background Picture from D. Fritts P. J. Espy and R. E. Hibbins Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim,
Intermagnet (1 min data since 1991). Observations – 1 sec data Station Count: Total: 250 CPMN: 54 UCLA-built : 65 UM mags Ground Magnetometers THEMIS.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
The Structure of Current System for Polar Substorm
Ionospheric Science and Space Weather
Analysis of methods for estimating westward auroral electrojet current with meridian magnetometer chain data М.А. Evdokimova, А.А. Petrukovich Space Research.
Mid-latitude Electron Density Variations Under Magnetospheric Substorm Conditions As Determined From Istanbul Dynasonde Observations Aysegul Ceren MORAL,
The Physics of Space Plasmas
Subauroral heliosphere-geosphere coupling during November 2004 ionospheric storms: F2-region, North-East Asia Chelpanov M. A., Zolotukhina N.A. Institute.
High-Speed Plasma Flows Observed in the Magnetotail during Geomagemtically Quiet Times: Relationship between Magnetic Reconnection, Substorm and High-Speed.
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
SuperDARN and SCANDI data
Evidence for magnetic reconnection in the high corona
by using EISCAT/ESR Radars Enhanced TEC fluctuations
Presentation transcript:

THE AURORAL EMISSIONS AND THE ELECTRON PRECIPITATION UNDER DIFFERENT GEOMAGNETIC CONDITIONS DURING RECURRENT SOLAR WIND STREAM Guineva V. 1, Despirak I. 2, Werner R., Trondsen E. 3, Honary F. 4, Marple S. 4, Dahle K. 5, Stauning P. 6 1)Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Stara Zagora Department, 6000 Stara Zagora, P.O.Box 73, Bulgaria 2)Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Russia 3)University of Oslo, Department of Physics, Norway 4)Lancaster University, Department of Communications Systems, UK 5)Andøya Rocket Range, Andenes, Norway 6)Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark

Observation instruments All-Sky Imager (ASI): ARR, Andenes, Norway (69.3°N, 16.03°E); 5577 Å and 6300 Å emissions; 10 s time resolution; 180° field of view in a 512x512 matrix; All-Sky Imager (ASI): Auroral Observatory, Longyearbyen, Svalbard (78.20°N, 15.83°E); Andenes Imaging Riometer for Ionospheric Studies (AIRIS): absorption of cosmic noise at 38.2 MHz by 49 beams (7x7 area) every second (electrons with energies 10÷x100keV and deposition heights centered at about 90 km); Imaging Riometer for Ionospheric Studies (IRIS): Kilpisjärvi, Finland (69.05°N, 20.79°E); 64-beam Imaging Riometer and magnetometer at Longyearbyen, 38.2 MHz absorption; Andenes Magnetometer: registers the magnetic field components every second. Simultaneous observations from several instruments are used:

Projected fields of view of ASI and IRIS Instruments projected fields of view: Longyearbyen All-Sky Imager 6300Å (emission altitude 250 km) 5577Å (emission altitude 120 km) Andenes All-Sky Imager 6300Å (emission altitude 250 km) 5577Å (emission altitude 120 km) Andenes Imaging Riometer (AIRIS) (90 km reference altitude) Imaging Riometer at Kilpisjärvi (IRIS) (90 km altitude) Imaging Riometer at Longyearbyen (90 km altitude)

Examined periods during 2005/2006 season  – the most disturbed days in November (D1 and D2);  – quiet period;  – most disturbed day in the month (D1), all instruments had functioned

IMF, solar wind parameters

Temporal development ASI keograms along the 103.8°E geomagnetic meridian IRIS keograms along the 103.8°E geomagnetic meridian, 65.2°-66.8°MLAT IRIS absorption beam 25 at 38.2 MHz Total magnetic field and its H, Z and D components at Andenes 6300 Å 65°-74.2° MLAT 5577 Å 68.8°-72° MLAT :50-5:40 UT :30-5:50 UT

Spatial distributions of the emissions and particles UT UT UT 1 min. interval images 5577Å 6300Å Kilpisjärvi IRIS absorption images Andøya all-sky images

UTCorrelation between:Zone IZone IIZone III 18:00 – 21: I 5577 Å-I 6300 ÅCentral point Mean value I 5577 Å - Absorption I 6300 Å - Absorption :00 – 24: I 5577 Å-I 6300 ÅCentral point Mean value I 5577 Å - Absorption I 6300 Å - Absorption IIIIII I II III IIIIII III

UTMean ratios:Zone IZone IIZone III 18:00 – 21: I 6300 Å/I 5577 ÅCentral point Mean value Absorption/I 5577 Å Absorption/I 6300 Å :00 – 24: I 6300 Å/I 5577 ÅCentral point Mean value Absorption/I 5577 Å Absorption/I 6300 Å I I II III

UTCorrelation between I 5577 Å- I 6300 Å: 18:00 – 21: Central point0.8 Mean value :00 – 24: Central point0.749 Mean value0.752

UTMean ratios: 18:00 – 21: I 6300 Å/I 5577 ÅCentral point0.508 Mean value0.56 Absorption/I 5577 Å0.147 Absorption/I 6300 Å :00 – 24: I 6300 Å/I 5577 ÅCentral point0.365 Mean value0.41 Absorption/I 5577 Å0.343 Absorption/I 6300 Å0.063

Summary  The behaviour of the 5577 Å and 6300 Å intensities and the absorption at 38.2 MHz in some cases under different conditions – during substorms and under quiet conditions, during the passage of recurrent high energy solar wind stream is examined;  During substorms, the energy spectrum of the precipitating particles is enhanced in the part of the higher energies;  I 6300 /I 5577 becomes times smaller during substorms (~0.2) than in quiet conditions (~ );  I 6300 and I 5577 correlate very well regardless of the conditions.

Acknowledgments: The work was supported by the European Union’s 6th Framework Program within the ALOMAR eARI (22_VeGi and 40_VeGi) Projects. We are thankful for the data originated from the Imaging Riometer for ionospheric Studies (IRIS), operated by the Department of Communications Systems at Lancaster University (UK) in collaboration with the Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, and funded by the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (PPARC). The authors are grateful to Truls Lynne Hansen of the Tromsø Geophysical Observatory, University of Tromsø, Norway, for providing magnetometer data. We thank to Kjell Henriksen Observatory and Danish Meteorological Institute for giving us the data from the 64-beam imaging riometer and the magnetometer at Longyearbyen.

Thanks for the attention!