Status of the XFEL.EU Undulator Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIEMAT technological contributions to linear colliders Fernando ToralGandía, 3/12/2005.
Advertisements

Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning November 12, Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
SCU Measurements at LBNL
XFEL Undulator Efforts at DESY and Thoughts on LCLS-II H.-D. Nuhn June 30, 2010.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
1 Zachary Wolf 1 Undulator Tuning Status June 9, 2009 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Alignment.
Robert Ruland Installation Alignment -Magnetic Measurements – Fiducialization April 7-8, 2005 FAC Meeting 1 Installation Alignment,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Robert Ruland MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget Robert Ruland.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
XFD – XF Engineering Group November 15-th, 2004LCLS Undulator Final Design Review1 Undulator for the LCLS project – from the prototype to the full scale.
Zachary Wolf LCLS Undulator October 30, LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim.
J. Pflüger / DESY - Radiation Damage Workshop Stanford June 19, 2008 Radiation Damage Study at FLASH using the Diagnostic Undulator J. Pflüger, J. Skupin,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
Alain FRANCE for the ESS RFQ Team at CEA Saclay
SuperConducting Undulator (SCU) R&D Motivation and Status P. Emma For the SCU R&D collaboration: ANL, LBNL, SLAC June 27, 2014.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
ASTeC Report for CLIC-UK Jim Clarke on behalf of all ASTeC & Technology Department staff contributing to CLIC-UK STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK CERN-UK.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
F Booster Long Straight Corrector Upgrade Technical Status and Schedule for Installation Craig Drennan DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 27, 2007.
FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility Michael Bieler FLASH Operation at DESY WAO2012, SLAC, Aug. 8, 2012.
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
XFEL X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Bernward Krause MEA WP-12: Warm Magnets WPL: B. Krause.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
PETRA III, A New High Brilliant Light Source At DESY
TBL experimental program Status and Results  Introduction  Status  Experimental program for 2010 and beyond  Outlook ACE, Steffen Döbert.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 12th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment September 10-14, 2012 Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, U.S.A NSLS-II Girder.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for USR, Huairou, Beijing, China, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 2012 Zhou Qiaogen Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, C.A.S. IDs for SSRF.
1 0.1-nm Hard X-ray XFEL  Project Period: 2011 ~ 2015  Total Budget: 400 M$  10-GeV Electron Linac (Normal Conducting S-band, 60 Hz)  Total Length:
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Two-beam module layout
CLIC Parameter Working Group Two Beam Module Design
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
Power coupler at DESY & for XFEL
Magnetic Measurements For The LCLS Undulator System
LLRF Controls Outline Requirements External Interfaces Schedule Design
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Communication and Documentation Needs exemplified on WP 71
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
XFEL Beam Collimation and Switchyard Review Beam Switchyard
Phase Adjustments: K vs
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Linac (WBS 1.2.2) Vinod Bharadwaj April 23, 2002
Undulator Line Design Liz Moog, Advanced Photon Source April 24, 2002
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Undulator Cost & Schedule Patric Den Hartog, ANL April 24, 2002
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Undulator Tuning Status
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader May 14, 2009
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Undulator Alignment Plan
Specifications for the XFEL Beam Switchyard Kickers
LCLS Undulator Magnetic Measurements
Presentation transcript:

Status of the XFEL.EU Undulator Systems J. Pflüger, European XFEL How to edit the title slide Upper area: Title of your talk, max. 2 rows of the defined size (55 pt) Lower area (subtitle): Conference/meeting/workshop, location, date, your name and affiliation, max. 4 rows of the defined size (32 pt)

XFEL.EU Undulator Systems & Controls Undulator Segments Overview XFEL.EU Undulator Systems & Controls Undulator Segments Serial Production of Undulator Segments: Representative Results Intersections Summary

Undulator Systems

European XFEL Overview Aerial View SC Accelerator Dogleg Switchyard SASE 1 SASE 2 SASE 3 Dumps Injector Accelerator Layout SASE 1- 3 : Undulator Systems W. Decking

Tunnel Installation of SASE2 Undulator System – Final WP71 Deliverables Local Control Systems SASE2 SASE1/3 Downstream View e - Intersection 1.1 m Undulator Segment 5m Undulator Cell 6.1m   SASE1/2 SASE3 0 [mm] 40 68 Operational Gap Range [mm] 10-20 10-25 K-Range 3.9–1.65 9.0-4 Radiation Wavelength Range [nm] @ 17.5 GeV 0.147-0.040 1.22-0.27 @ 14.0 GeV 0.230-0.063 1.90-0.42 @ 8.5 GeV 0.625-0.171 5.17-1.15 # of Segments 35 21 System Length [m] 213.5 128.1 W.Tscheu

Undulator Control System Up to 35 Local Control Systems in Tunnel Global Control in Computer Service Room External Access for DOOCS and Experiments 1…. up to 35 Developed at XFEL.EU XFEL.EU guidelines & standards Based exclusively on industrial Automation Technology Using the fast EtherCAT protocol Hardware from Beckhoff GmbH Running the TwinCAT software The Topology reflects Hardware S. Karabekyan, A Beckmann, M. Yakopov

Undulator Segments

Standard Undulator Segment Support Structure Gap Measurement Accuracy ±1µm Special Attention: 1. Shear deformation and compressive deformation 2. Material pairing / Bimetallic bending 3. Four point support of girders 4. Four Motors, electronic gears 5. Forced girder guiding 6. Precision measurement of gap / Motor feedback to ±1µm, avoiding Abbé errors

Magnetics I: Design Standard Support System with Standard Interface Different Magnet Structures may be adopted Same Material for girder and Magnet support structure: AlMg Structure is segmented into~ 0.9m long modules + End sections Structure is clamped onto the interface

Production of Undulator Segments The Focus is on Serial Production. R&D is long ago!! Industrial Part Mechanical Support System including Local Motion Control System: 2 Suppliers Magnetic Structure Documentation in EDMS XFEL.EU Part Integration: Mechanics & Magnetics @ XFEL.EU Commissioning @XFEL.EU Magnetic Measurement & Tuning Preparation for Installation

Production Cycle: Industrial Production July 2012 Dec 2012 Mechanical Support Systems Magnetic Structuress Nov 2012 Local Control Systems July 2012 Nov 2012 Dec 2012

Production @ XFEL.EU in Building 36 New Undulator Segments 3 climatized Magnetic Labs Steps @ XFEL.EU: Mounting of magnetic structures 1st Commissioning Magnetic Measurements & Tuning Preparation for Installation Schedule: Total Time  2 Years (starting Oct/12) 3 Weeks/Segment !  3 Magnetic Labs needed running in parallel Scheduled End: Oct / End 2014 Assembly Area for Magnetic Structures Segments waiting for Magnetic Measurements Measured and tuned Segments Incoming Magnetic Structures from VAC 2nd Hall with 700m2 for storage December 2012

Magnetic Measurements Results Magnetic Measurements U. Englisch, Y. Li, S.Utermann, F. Wolff-Fabris

Pole Tuning at XFEL Undulator Segments Tuning Screws  300m  4mrad Locking Screws 5m U40: 246 pairs of poles U68: 144 pairs of poles BY and BZ tuning is combined No Shims are used All errors are tuned by moving Poles Bipolar Field Corrections

BY Field: Pole Height Tuning I 𝐾 𝑗 = 𝑒 𝑚𝑐 𝑧 𝑗 − 𝜆 0 4 𝑧 𝑗 + 𝜆 0 4 𝐵 𝑦 𝑧 𝑑𝑧 Δ𝐾 𝑗 = 𝐾 𝑗 − 𝐾 = 𝑒 𝑚𝑐 𝜆 0 2 𝑆 𝑗 𝑆 𝑗 = 𝑚𝑐 𝑒 2 𝜆 0 Δ𝐾 𝑗 Local K-Tuning  300m Limit to 3 next neighbors 𝑆 𝑗 = 𝑖=−3 3 𝑎 𝑖 𝑝 𝑗+𝑖 Local gap change Local Field Change Influence of neighbors FLASH Determination of ai p

BY Field: Pole Height Tuning II Tuned Poles: U40: N =246 U68: N= 144 The Characteristic Coefficients ai were measured for U40/U68: For the 3 poles next to the end ‘End Poles’ For all other poles ‘Bulk Poles’ Tuning done at the ‘Tuning Gap’: U40: 14mm U68: 16 mm Most Poles need to be tuned  One Tuning Step is (usually) sufficient Bulk poles

BZ Field: Pole Tilt BZ is due to errors only. Ideal BZ trajectory 2nd Field Integral is a Null line Correction by Tilting Poles  4mrad 0 [mm] Tuning Gap Tilt Kick Signature [Tmm/mrad] U40 40 14 0.0127 U68 68 16 0.0325

Pole Tuning: U68-X003-N001 @ Gap=16mm Before you start editing the slides of your talk change to the Master Slide view: Menu button “View”, Master, Slide Master: Edit the following 2 items in the 1st slide: 1) 1st row in the violet header: Delete the existent text and write the title of your talk into this text field 2) The 2 rows in the footer area: Delete the text and write the information regarding your talk (same as on the Title Slide) into this text field. If you want to use more partner logos position them left beside the DESY logo in the footer area Close Master View

Another U68: U68-X048

U68-X003 / X004: Comparison of Gap dependent Results Transverse Overlap K-Parameter Longitudinal Overlap / Phase Jitter Specs Result Operational Gap Range [mm] 10-25 --- B0 @ 10mm Gap [T] 1.69 1.66 K @ 10mm Gap 10.5 9.3 RMS I2Y [Tmm2] < 210 < 90 RMS I2Z [Tmm2] < 100 < 70 Phase Jitter [°] < 8

Pole Tuning : U40-X044-K004 @ Gap=14mm Before you start editing the slides of your talk change to the Master Slide view: Menu button “View”, Master, Slide Master: Edit the following 2 items in the 1st slide: 1) 1st row in the violet header: Delete the existent text and write the title of your talk into this text field 2) The 2 rows in the footer area: Delete the text and write the information regarding your talk (same as on the Title Slide) into this text field. If you want to use more partner logos position them left beside the DESY logo in the footer area Close Master View

U40-X044 / X004: Comparison of Gap dependent Results Transverse Overlap K-Parameter Longitudinal Overlap / Phase Jitter Specs Result Operational Gap Range [mm] 10-20 --- B0 @ 10mm Gap [T] 1.14 1.13 K @ 10mm Gap 4 3.9 RMS I2Y [Tmm2] < 100 < 50 RMS I2Z [Tmm2] < 40 Phase Jitter [°] < 8 < 7 Before you start editing the slides of your talk change to the Master Slide view: Menu button “View”, Master, Slide Master: Edit the following 2 items in the 1st slide: 1) 1st row in the violet header: Delete the existent text and write the title of your talk into this text field 2) The 2 rows in the footer area: Delete the text and write the information regarding your talk (same as on the Title Slide) into this text field. If you want to use more partner logos position them left beside the DESY logo in the footer area Close Master View

Comparison of Magnetic Results Measurement Results be independent of the Bench Comparison of Measurements done at all labs Influence of low temperature exposition ≈2°C Further Plans: Influence of Transport Conditions to Osdorfer Born

Present Status of Production Status of Undulator Production August 22, 2013 Delivery Status: 64 Support Systems 54 Magnet structures Prepared for Measurements: 48 Waiting for magnetic measurements: 10 Segments Measured, tuned, ready for Installation: 38  Magnetic Length: 190m Scheduled End of Production: 12 / 2014

Intersections

SASE2 Type Intersection Beam Loss Monitors WP17 Re-entrant Cavity BPMs+ Electronics WP17 WP71 Phase Shifters WP19 Vacuum System Status 1/2013: Delivered: Quadrupoles, WP12 In Production 91 Intersections: Phase Shifters (Nov 12), WP71 BPMS, WP17 BLMs, WP17 Vacuum systems, WP19 Air Coil Correctors, WP71 Base Plates, WP71 Adjustors, WP71 Concrete Pillars , WP71 Quadrupole Movers, Ciemat Released for production: Control Cabinets Ciemat (Oct 13) Start of Assembly @ XFEL: June 2014 WP12 Quadrupoles WP71 Air Coil Correctors WP71 Quadrupole Movers WP71 Support Bases Adjustors Concrete Pillars

Phase Shifter Prototypes by IHEP Beijing Period length: 55mm Gap range: 10.5 to >100mm Max. Phase Integral @ gap 10.5mm : 23400 T2mm3 1st Hor/Ver Field Integral Tolerance: ±0.004 Tmm Dynamic Operation without retuning! 2nd Hor/Ver Field Integral Tolerance: ±67 Tmm2 Phase adjustment accuracy: ± 10° (5°) Min. Gap precision for 5/10° at SASE1/2 ±15/30 µm Tolerance Band & Operational Range H. Lu, S. Sun, C. Wan, IHEP, Beijing H. Lu, Y. Li, J. Pflueger, NIM A605 (2009),399

Summary Production of Undulator Segments in full Swing Industrial Production is well in Schedule Magnetic measurements & Tuning @XFEL.EU being ramped up Magnetic Measurements & Tuning: Methods and techniques work fine 38 Segments tuned to Specs  “Ready for Installation” Intersections: Phase Shifter Prototypes in Specs All Components are in production Production of Undulator Systems in schedule!

XFEL.EU Undulator Systems Group, WP71 WP71 Status March 3, 2013, left to right: Yufang Yang, Suren Karabekyan, Xiaoyu Li, Georg Deron, Yuhui Li, Bora Ketenoglu, Uwe Englisch, Joachim Pflüger, Andreas Beckmann, Sonia Utermann, Martin Knoll, Majid Bagha-Shanjani, Fredrik Wolff-Fabris, Hongxian Lin, Karl-Heinz Berndgen, not shown: Mikhail Yakopov

The End