Navigating the SPR&I Database Oregon Department of Education Fall 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSEG Project Project Update. Topics n Data Requirements and Recommendations n Assessment of Local Data Quality.
Advertisements

IDEA Final Report Process
Disproportionality in Special Education
Race-Ethnicity Proportionality Proportionality in the Special Education Population, by Race-Ethnicity, in Alaskan Public Schools Juenau, AK October 27.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students in Special Education SPR&I Regional Training.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Special Education Data In the Era of Accountability & District Improvement Steve Smith ODE IDEA Data Manager Fall 2007.
1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Special Education Data Collection and Reporting Data Collection, Verification, and Reporting Timelines Sara Berscheit / Steve W. Smith 2009 COSA Conference.
Improving Post-School Outcomes for Youth with Mental Health Issues.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
TELPAS, STAAR-ALT & Other Online Testing Presented by: Nancy Webster, Galena Park ISD & Tracy McDaniel, Spring ISD.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Oregon Department of Education October 2015 Fall Regional Training: Special Education Data Collections.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
B-1: Graduation Percent of youth with an IEP graduating from high school with a regular diploma Measurement – Michigan identified >80% as the target for.
Data Analysis & Disproportionality Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
Fall 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Updates.
ISES UPDATES April 16, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Navigating System Performance Review and Improvement (SPR&I) Oregon Department of Education Fall
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
YEAR #2 DETERMINATIONS ISD Special Education Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Oregon Department of Education April 2016 ECR Audits in Consolidated Special Education Spring Collection Data Conference.
ARC Chairperson Training
What is “Annual Determination?”
New SELPA Directors November 2016 Presented by Heather DiFede
Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Felton
Agenda 3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders
Guam Department of Education
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
ARC Chairperson Training
SPR&I Regional Training
in Correcting Noncompliance
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Disproportionality Prevention Support
Kinnelon School District Department of Special Services
Presentation transcript:

Navigating the SPR&I Database Oregon Department of Education Fall

Session Objectives By the end of this session, participants will be able to: Access the SPR&I system; Navigate the SPR&I system; Enter data into the SPR&I system; Access SPR&I system reports; and, Read SPR&I system reports. 2

Session Context ODE strategic plan and how it links to this work USDOE RDA IDEA General Supervision responsibilities 3

IDEA/General Supervision SPR&I Training MaterialsSPR&I Training Materials: Standards Indicators Consideration 4

General System Features Directory information fields available for agency contact information Findings and determinations posted on dashboard Due dates for each required activity posted on dashboard 5

General System Features EI/ECSE and School-age lock in screens have additional questions that help identify applicable standards. 6

Who Does ODE Monitor? District schools Charter schools Private schools Virtual schools YCEP, JDEP Long-term care and treatment programs 7

SPR&I Dashboard 8

Getting into the SPR&I Database 9

SPR&I Dashboard 10

PCR Review Progress 11

Another view… 12

Number of Student Files for Review 13

Individual Student File Review 1.System randomly selects student file. 2.Verify that student file meets file review criteria. 3.Lock student file. 4.Enter additional demographic information. 5.Review file for compliance & enter data into SPR&I database. 14

Additional File Review Evidence of Correction 1.If noncompliance is found, individual student file correction must be completed whenever possible. 2.Additional file reviews are required for any noncompliance found in the initial file review. 15

Systemic Issues 16

Systemic Issues One third or more of the Individual Student File reviews show noncompliance ANY noncompliance found in Additional File Reviews 17

Correction of Systemic Issues 1.Intervention(s) 2.Post-intervention special education actions 3.Corrective Action File Reviews of post-intervention actions 18

Corrections Student file corrections should be completed as soon as possible. All corrections must be done within 1 year. 19

Indicator B1/B2: Graduation & Dropout Rates Data Reports: 4 Year & 5 Year Cohort Graduation Rates 4 Year Cohort Graduation Growth Rate SPR&I Process if flagged: Improvement Plan 20

Indicator B3: Assessment Data Reports: AMO data (2 years) Participation IDEA Students -Math & ELA Performance IDEA students -Math & ELA SPR&I Process if flagged: Improvement Plan Required 21

Indicator B4: Discipline B4(a): Significant discrepancy (IDEA students vs general education students) B4(b): Significant discrepancy by race/ethnicity (IDEA students vs all LEA) SPR&I Process if flagged: Policy-to-Practice Review Corrective Action Plan 22

B4: Discipline Data Reports Significant Discrepancy: IDEA students vs General Education students Significant Discrepancy: IDEA students by Race/Ethnicity Detailed Data by Disability and Grade Level (reported by both the # of IDEA students and by Disciplinary Action types) Discipline Incident Details from SET Data Collection (Student Specific Information) 23

Indicator B5: Placement in the LRE Data Reports: 3 year placement distribution Placement Distribution by: Disability type, Grade level and Race/Ethnicity Weighted Risk Ratios by Race/Ethnicity SPR&I Process if flagged: Worksheet Improvement Plan 24

Indicator B9/B10 Disproportionate Representation Data Reports: IDEA by Race/Ethnicity (#, %, WRR) IDEA by Disability Type (#, %, WRR) Disability Type by Grade Level & Race/Ethnicity Eligibility Determination by Race/Ethnicity SPR&I Process if flagged: Worksheet Policy-to-Practice Review Corrective Action Plan 25

Indicator B11: Child Find Data Reports: Initial Referrals (# and %) Initial Referrals by Race/Ethnicity Students Found Eligible by Disability Type w/timeline data (# and %) Reasons for Exceeding 60 School-Day Timeline SPR&I Process if flagged: Corrective Action Plan 26

Significant Disproportionality Data Driven B4 Discipline B5 Placement B9 Disproportionate Representation in Special Education B10 Disproportionate Representation in Specific Eligibility Categories 27

Compliance Status by Standard Detail 28

Multi-Year Database Reports Comparison with similar size districts Comparison with local districts Trend Reports District & Building level analysis Data for planning & goal setting Planning for Regional Program services 29

Validation Validation allows ODE to designate certain student files for independent validation. 30

Confidence Scale Rate your own level of confidence: Accessing the SPR&I system; Navigating the SPR&I system; Entering data into the SPR&I system; Accessing SPR&I system reports; and, Reading SPR&I system reports. 31

Resources Check the SPR&I PCR User Guide. Call your ODE county contact. Call the ODE Info Specialist. Check the following web page for a list of useful resources: 32