TNM staging and prognosis Alexandru Eniu, MD, PhD Medical Oncologist Department of Breast Tumors Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuţă Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Pharmacology breast cancer
Advertisements

UNDERWRITING CORRELATION FOR CANCER CASES. Are we going to accept a proposed insured with known cancer?
Personalized Medicine: Analytics for Cancer Survival Curves Ran Qi, Shujia Zhou, Yelena Yesha June 13, 2013 IAB Meeting Research Report.
Surveillance/ Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer
AVAST-M Protocol Title A randomised trial evaluating the VEGF inhibitor, Bevacizumab (Avastin®),as adjuvant therapy following resection of AJCC stage IIB.
PBL ORAL CANCER AND REHABILITATION TRIGGER 2. Ulcer – >1 month – Increasing in size – No pain – No history of trauma Habit – Smoking since 30 years, 20.
STAGING OF BRONCHOGENIC CA NSCLC STAGING TNM CLASSFICATION Adenocarcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Large cell carcinoma T – Primary tumor N – Regional.
SURGERY CASE 2 Rogelio, Graciella; Roque, Marianne; Ruanto, Teresa; Sabalvaro, Dyan Dr. Dakila Delos Angeles.
Ca lung Dr. D.P. Singh Professor, Surgery.. Primary lung cancer – risk factors Cigarette smoking Number of years Number of packs Passive smoking Atmospheric.
Pimp Session: Breast By James Lee, MD.
Malignant Breast Disease
Diagnosis and Staging JoAnne Zujewski, MD
A Slide Presentation for Oncology Nurses
Breast Cancer, A Common Problem in Sri Lanka
Module 6: Clinical Stage and Grade. Introduction Stage and grade determine prognosis Staging reflects the clinical extent of the tumor Grading a tumor.
STAGING MCR Staff Show Me Healthy Women March 27, 2008 Supported by a Cooperative Agreement between DHSS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Revised AJCC Classification of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Tumors.
Credit line: Breast. In: Greene, F.L., Compton, C.C., Fritz, A.G., et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas. New York: Springer, 2006: ©American.
What is TNM? TNM is a system for classifying malignant tumours ! It is a cancer staging system, which describes the extent of a person's cancer ! Most.
Histopathology and staging of breast cancer
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
Metastatic involvement (M) M0 - No metastases M1 - Metastases present.
Staging and Grading of cancers By Haleigh Nelson.
AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #3
Breast Cancer Nick Settecase, Payton Picone, & Mike Malone.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Lung Case #3 Contributors: Valerie W. Rusch, MD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New.
Clinical Division of Oncology Department of Medicine I Medical University of Vienna, Austria Breast Cancer.
BREAST CANCER PROF.NAZEM SHAMS. IS IT A SERIOUS PROBLEM ??
BREAST CANCER.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Melanoma Case #3 Contributors: Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, MD University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #2 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
BREAST CANCER GROUP 6 :  Nuraini Ikqtiarzune Haryono( )  Tri Wahyu Ningsih ( )  Rani Yuswandaru ( )  Anita Rheza Fitriana Putri( )
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #1 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
SYB Case 2 By: Amy. History 63 y/o female History of left breast infiltrating duct carcinoma s/p mastectomy in 1996 and chemotherapy ER negative, PR negative,
Breast Carcinoma. Anatomy Epidemiology: 10% 17.1/10 28/10 46/ m world wide 6% develop cancer of the breast in their lifetime. 50,000 to 70,000.
Slides last updated: March 2015 CRC: STAGING. How colorectal cancer (CRC) is staged 1 Stage describes the extent of cancer, and is one of the most important.
Cancer Staging.
Putting the Puzzle Together: Breast Collaborative Staging Melissa Riddle, RHIT, CTR October 6, 2012.
T1: Tumor 2.0 cm or less in greatest dimension
AJCC 6 TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA. AJCC NODE STAGING -16 CATEGORIES pNX – 1 option pN0 – 5 options; null,(i-),(i+),(mol-),(mol+) pN1 – 4.
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
Lisa Mifsud. Assessment and Management of Surgical Breast Disease.
Development of Lung Cancer Staging Steven M. Keller, M.D. Director Thoracic Surgery, Weiler Hospital Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery Albert Einstein.
Colon Cancer. Multihit Concept Clinical Information Clinical Information 1. Patient identification a. Name b. Identification number c. Age (birth date)
Melanoma of the Skin Regional lymph nodes for skin sites of the head and neck. Compton, C.C., Byrd, D.R., et al., Editors. AJCC CancerStaging Atlas, 2nd.
BRONCHOIAL TUMOURS.
TNM Staging: Prostate TONYA BRANDENBURG, MHA, CTR KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY.
TNM Staging: Breast TONYA BRANDENBURG, MHA, CTR KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY.
Pathology.
Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry
Breast Anatomic sites and subsites of the breast. Compton, C.C., Byrd, D.R., et al., Editors. AJCC CancerStaging Atlas, 2nd Edition. New York: Springer,
ajcc TNM Staging: chapter 1, and Summary stage
Treatment of thyroid nodules Depends on: –FNA cytological examination –Uptake of radioiodine –Size and patient preferences.
Breast Cancer 1. Leukemia & Lymphoma New diagnoses each year in the US: 112, 610 Adults 5,720 Children 43,340 died of leukemia or lymphoma in
PATHOLOGY OF NECK DISSECTION. VIEW FROM DEEP ASPECT OF NECK DISSECTION.
Carcinoma Vulva & Vagina
Cancer: Staging and Grading What is meant by the term “biopsy”? How do tumors behave differently from one another ? Examples of the stages of cancer and.
CLINICAL ASPECT OF GRADING AND STAGING Hanggoro Tri Rinonce, MD, PhD Department of Anatomical Pathology Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University.
What is Breast Cancer ? Abnormal cells develop from normal cells in the breast to form tumors Abnormal cells develop from normal cells in the breast to.
THE IMPORTANCE OF STAGING AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CANCER CARE
The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project The 8th Edition
CAMELYON17: Moving the challenge to patient level
Staging Cancer.
Proposed Changes to the 7th Edition
Cancer Staging.
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Lung cancer staging and TNM classification
Treatment Overview: The Multidisciplinary Team
Prognosis and survival after resection for bronchogenic carcinoma based on the 1997 TNM-staging classification: the Japanese experience  Tsuguo Naruke,
NSCLC: Staging and TNM classification
Presentation transcript:

TNM staging and prognosis Alexandru Eniu, MD, PhD Medical Oncologist Department of Breast Tumors Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuţă Cluj-Napoca, Romania

The Basics of TNM Staging l Premises: –Cancers of the same anatomic site and histology share similar patterns of growth and similar outcomes. –As the size of the primary tumor (T) increases, regional lymph node involvement (N) and/or distant metastases (M) become more likely.

DiagnosisDiagnosis l THE ONLY CERTITUDE = PATHOLOGY l Always necessary l Insufficient for planning treatment l We need –prognostic factors –predictive factors –targeted diagnosis

The Basics of TNM Staging l TNM records the 3 significant events in the life history of a cancer: –Local Tumor Growth (T) l TX, Tis, T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 –Spread to Regional Lymph Nodes (N) l NX, N0, N1, N2, N3 –Distant Metastasis (M) l MX, M0, M1

The Basics of TNM Staging l Stage Grouping –After assignment of TNM categories –Stage 0, I, II, III or IV l Multiple Simultaneous Tumors –The tumor with the highest T category is the one selected for classification and staging –Simultaneous bilateral cancers in paired organs are staged separately l Staging of primary unknown tumors can be based on clinical suspicion of the primary origin

Why Use TNM? l Allows the health professional to determine appropriate treatment ( primary, adjuvant) l Allows assessment of prognosis and outcomes l Enables the reliable evaluation of treatment results l Results in quality cancer care l Enables comparison of results

Primary Tumor (T) l Same definitions for clinical and pathologic T l If the measurement is made by physical examination, the examiner will use the major headings (T1, T2, or T3). l If mammographic or pathologic measurements are used, the subsets of T1 can be used. Tumors should be measured to the nearest 0.1 cm increment. l TXPrimary tumor cannot be assessed l T0No evidence of primary tumor l TisCarcinoma in situ (DCIS, LCIS, Paget’s) Note: Paget’s disease associated with a tumor is classified according to the size of the tumor.

T1 Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dimension

Primary Tumor (T) Subdivisions of T1 l T1Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dim. l T1mic Microinvasion 0.1 cm or less in greatest dimension l T1aTumor more than 0.1 cm but not more than 0.5 cm in greatest dimension l T1bTumor more than 0.5 cm but not more than 1 cm in greatest dimension l T1cTumor more than 1 cm but not more than 2 cm in greatest dimension

T2 Tumor more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

T3 Tumor more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

T4 Tumor of any size with direct extension to (a) chest wall or (b) skin T4a Extension to chest wall, not including pectoralis muscle T4b Edema (including peau d’orange) or ulceration of the skin of the breast, or satellite skin nodules confined to the same breast T4cBoth T4a and T4b T4dInflammatory carcinoma

Inflammatory carcinoma vs neglected T4b T4d T4b

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Clinical l NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed (e.g., previously removed) l N0 No regional lymph node metastasis l N1Metastasis to movable ipsilateral axillary lymph node(s) l N2 Metastases in ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes fixed or matted, or in clinically apparent* ipsilateral internal mammary nodes in the absence of clinically evident axillary lymph node metastasis –N2a Metastasis in ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes fixed to one another (matted) or to other structures –N2b Metastasis only in clinically apparent* ipsilateral internal mammary nodes and in the absence of clinically evident axillary lymph node metastasis Clinically apparent is defined as detected by imaging studies (excluding lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical examination or grossly visible pathologically.

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Clinical l N3 Metastasis in ipsilateral infraclavicular lymph node(s) with or without axillary lymph node involvement, or in clinically apparent* ipsilateral internal mammary lymph node(s) and in the presence of clinically evident axillary lymph node metastasis; or metastasis in ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node(s) with or without axillary or internal mammary lymph node involvement l N3a Metastasis in ipsilateral infraclavicular lymph node(s) l N3b Metastasis in ipsilateral internal mammary lymph node(s) and axillary lymph node(s) l N3c Metastasis in ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node(s) *Clinically apparent is defined as detected by imaging studies (excluding lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical examination or grossly visible pathologically.

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Pathologic (pN) l pNX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed (e.g., previously removed, or not removed for pathologic study) l pN0 No regional lymph node metastasis histologically, no additional examination for isolated tumor cells (ITC) l pN1 Metastasis in 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes, and/or in internal mammary nodes with microscopic disease etected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent** l pN2 Metastasis in 4 to 9 axillary lymph nodes, or in clinically apparent* internal mammary lymph nodes in the absence of axillary lymph node metastasis l pN3 Metastasis in 10 or more axillary lymph nodes, or in infraclavicular lymph nodes, or in clinically apparent* ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes; or in ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes

Distant Metastasis (M) l MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed l M0 No distant metastasis l M1 Distant metastasis

Breast Cancer Staging Stage I Stage 1 T1 N0

Breast Cancer Staging Stage IIA Stage IIA T1 N1 T2 N0 N1 Stage IIa may also describe cancer in the axillary lymph nodes with no evidence of a tumor in the breast

Breast Cancer Staging Stage IIB Stage IIB T2 N1 T3 N0 N1

Breast Cancer Staging Stage IIIA N1 T3 N1 Stage IIIA T1-3 N2 T1-3

Breast Cancer Staging Stage IIIB, IIIC Stage IIIB T4 N1 T4 N2 N3 N0 Stage IIIC

Stage IV Breast Cancer l Stage IV breast cancer can be any size and has spread to distant sites in the body, usually the bones, lungs or liver, or chest wall

AJCC Staging System (anatomic) T N M Stage 100I IIa IIb IIIa 4 or IIIb Any30IIIc any 1IV

Survival in relation to presence and extent of regional LNs

Breast Cancer Survival Rates Stage 2yr 5yr% 10yr% %BC I II III IV (MBC) <1 10 The overall median survival for MBC is <2ys. 50% of women with MBC stage IV will live <2ys.

How to Implement AJCC TNM Staging l Development of policy and procedure l Staging form part of the medical record l Development of a process by which the staging form is placed in the medical record –Size of facility and number of analytic cases –Pathology, medical records, cancer registry… l Development of Quality Control Methods to assure compliance

The TNM is imperfect! l Prognostic factors –Lymph Node Involvement –Tumor Size –Tumor Grade –Lymphatic/Vascular/Perineural Invasion –Age of the patient –Tumor biology Profile * ER, PR *Her2neu expression *Ki 67/ proliferation fraction

Future of Oncology l Diagnostic: Organ  Molecular Etiology l Classification: Histology  Molecular Function l Focus: Therapy  Prevention l Therapy: Toxic, Complex  Non-Toxic, Targeted l Outcome prediction: Suboptimal  Precise l Patients follow-up : Anatomic  Systemic

Backup slides

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Pathologic (pN) a l pN0(i–)No regional lymph node metastasis histologically, negative IHC l pN0(i+) No regional lymph node metastasis histologically, positive IHC, no IHC cluster greater than 0.2 mm l pN0(mol–) No regional lymph node metastasis histologically, negative molecular findings (RT­PCR) b l pN0(mol+) No regional lymph node metastasis histologically, positive molecular findings (RT­PCR) b

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) l a Classification is based on axillary lymph node dissection with or without sentinel lymph node dissection. Classification based solely on sentinel lymph node dissection without subsequent axillary lymph node dissection is designated (sn) for “sentinel node,” e.g., pN0(i+) (sn). l b RT-PCR: reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction.

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) l pN1 Metastasis in 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes, and/or in internal mammary nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent** l pN1miMicrometastasis (greater than 0.2 mm, none greater than 2.0 mm) l pN1aMetastasis in 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes l pN1b Metastasis in internal mammary nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent** l pN1c Metastasis in 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes and in internal mammary lymph nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent.** (If associated with greater than 3 positive axillary lymph nodes, the internal mammary nodes are classified as pN3b to reflect increased tumor burden)

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Pathologic (pN) a l pN2 Metastasis in 4 to 9 axillary lymph nodes, or in clinically apparent* internal mammary lymph nodes in the absence of axillary lymph node metastasis l pN2a Metastasis in 4 to 9 axillary lymph nodes (at least one tumor deposit greater than 2.0 mm) l pN2b Metastasis in clinically apparent* internal mammary lymph nodes in the absence of axillary lymph node metastasis l pN3 Metastasis in 10 or more axillary lymph nodes, or in infraclavicular lymph nodes, or in clinically apparent* ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes in the presence of 1 or more positive axillary lymph nodes; or in more than 3 axillary lymph nodes with clinically negative microscopic metastasis in internal mammary lymph nodes; or in ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Pathologic (pN) a l pN3a Metastasis in 10 or more axillary lymph nodes (at least one tumor deposit greater than 2.0 mm), or metastasis to the infraclavicular lymph nodes l pN3b Metastasis in clinically apparent* ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes in the presence of 1 or more positive axillary lymph nodes; or in more than 3 axillary lymph nodes and in internal mammary lymph nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent** l pN3cMetastasis in ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes –*Clinically apparent is defined as detected by imaging studies (excluding lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical examination. –**Not clinically apparent is defined as not detected by imaging studies (excluding lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical examination.

Stage Grouping l Stage 0 TisN0M0 l Stage IT1*N0M0 l Stage IIA T0N1M0 l T1*N1M0 l T2N0M0 l Stage IIB T2N1M0 l T3N0M0 l Stage IIIA T0N2M0 l T1*N2M0 l T2N2M0 l T3N1M0 l T3N2M0 l Stage IIIB T4N0M0 l T4N1M0 l T4N2M0 l Stage IIIC Any TN3M0 l Stage IV Any T Any N M1 –*T1 includes T1mic  Note: Stage designation may be changed if post-surgical imaging studies reveal the presence of distant metastases, provided that the studies are carried out within 4 months of diagnosis in the absence of disease progression and provided that the patient has not received neoadjuvant therapy.

Schematic Diagram of Breast and Regional Lymph Nodes AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas