School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.

Advertisements

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.

SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011 Orange Grove Elementary Accountability Report.

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.

Bureau of Indian Education

North Santiam School District State Report Cards

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.

1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.

Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.

Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.

RECOGNIZED 2009 Accountability Rating. Basic Indicators EXEMPLARY: for every subject, at least 90% of the tested students pass the test RECOGNIZED**:

San Antonio Independent School District Attendance Issues ALT Presentation November 2003.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.

Texas Public School Accountability Presented at Midwinter by the Texas Education Agency.

Ysleta Independent School District 2004 Accountability State and AYP.

Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2009 MILLSAP ISD Prepared by Lois Johnson in compliance with Texas Education Code

Sample ISD District Overview Name Position. What makes Sample ISD unique? Mission Statement Vision Statement Unique Programs.

SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.

Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)

District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.

Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.

Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.

Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 

Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

– 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups.

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.

Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

2012 Adequate Yearly Progress Preliminary Answers & other Important Information…

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Adequate Yearly Progress Report August 2009.

Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.

Explaining Sample ISD’s [Budget/Financial Position] As presented at: Region One Finance Advisory Council Meeting Friday, October 15,2010.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Texas State Accountability

A-F Accountability and Special Education

Presentation transcript:

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

Who are our Students? # of students –% white students –% African American students –% Hispanic students –% Economically disadvantaged students –% Students in Special Education –% Limited English Proficient students Number of campuses subject to ratings –High schools –Middle schools –Elementary schools

Two Rating Systems State Accountability System –Ratings: “Exemplary,” “Recognized,” “Academically Acceptable,” “Academically Unacceptable” and “Not Rated” –Indicators: TAKS tests, dropout rate (grades 7, 8), and completion rate (grades 9-12) –5 Subgroups: All students, White, African American, Hispanic, and Economically Disadvantaged Federal Accountability System (No Child Left Behind Act) –Rating Categories: “Meets Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)” or “Missed AYP” and “Not Rated” –Indicators: TAKS tests, TAKS participation rate, and graduation rate (for high schools) or attendance rate (for middle or elementary schools) –7 Subgroups: Same as state plus Limited English Proficient and Special Ed

District’s State Rating for Rating:________ Rating: ________ Areas of challenge:

Campus State Ratings for (#) campuses rated “Exemplary” (#) campuses rated “Recognized” (#) campuses rated “Academically Acceptable” Change from last year (if any) Areas of challenge

District’s Federal Rating for AYP status Change from last year (if any) Reason(s) district didn’t make AYP (if applicable)

Campus’ Federal Ratings for (#) of campuses rated “Meets AYP” (#) of campuses rated “Missed AYP” Change from last year (if any) Reason(s) why all campuses did not “Meet AYP” (if applicable)

Improvement Goals and Strategies for Improvement Goal #1: Program(s) to achieve the goal Improvement Goal #2: Program(s) to achieve the goal

How you can help…. Become a pen-pal to a student Read to our students during your lunch period Tutor a student after school or on weekends Participate in a “Financial Aid” workshop to help parents fill out financial aid forms Contact: