RESULTS Spreadsheet for the WEB and printing if needed

Latin NCAP Sponsored cars KA CRS update

Ford KA Fly Viral - NO Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model Ford Ka Fly Viral 1.0, LHD Body type2 door hatchback Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1116Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant In the frontal impact the passengers head and chest hit the steering wheel, the rim was teared off the column. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees and the protection to the lower legs was poor. The body shell was not capable of withstanding further loading. Child occupant The installation instructions on both child seats were permanently attached to the seat and offered sufficient information. Child dummies were well protected. The vehicle did not give any warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag (in the car was no passenger airbag available, other versions offer this possibility without any warning label or airbag disabeling). Both Child dummies were protected Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Ford Romer Babysafe plus Protected/good 0+ Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Ford Romer Duo Plus Protected/ Fair 1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO

Chevrolet Celta - NO Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model Chevrolet Celta 1.4, LHD Body type2 door hatchback Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1119Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant The rating for the Chevrolet Celta was limited to 1 star due to the unacceptably high risk of life threatening injury to the driver's head. The protection offered to the driver's chest was weak and there were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees. Pedal intrusion and footwell rupture are high risk of severe injury to the driver lower leg and foot. The bodyshell was not capable of withstanding further loading.. Child occupant The dynamic performance of the child restraints was adequate. However, the installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The recommended child seats was found to be incompatible with the belt system on the vehicle. Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Britax First Class Protected/Fair 0/0+/1 Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Britax First Class Protected/ Fair 0/0+/1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO

Fiat Novo Uno Evo - NO Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model Fiat Novo Uno Evo, LHD Body type4 door hatchback Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1195Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant The rating for the Uno was limited to 1 star due to the unacceptably high risk of life threatening injury to the driver's head presented by the steering wheel. The protection offered to the driver's chest was weak and there were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The loading of the drivers knee and femur due to stiff structures in the dashboard were high. The intruding pedals and the severely deformed foot well area cause extreme risk on the drivers feet. The bodyshell was not capable of withstanding further loading and ruptures to the footwell threatened the driver's feet.. Child occupant The child seat for the 1,5 and 3 year old child was adequate to marginal. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The CRS of the P3 was incomatible with the seat belt geometry of the vehicle. Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Britax First Class Protected/good 0/0+/1 Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Britax First Class Protected/ Fair 0/0+/1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO

Chevrolet Corsa Classic - NO Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model Chevrolet Corsa Classic, LHD Body type4 door Sedan Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1151Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant The rating for the Classic was limited to 1 star due to the unacceptably high risk of life threatening injury to the driver's head presented by the steering wheel. The protection offered to the driver's chest was weak and there were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The bodyshell was not capable of withstanding further loading and ruptures to the footwell threatened the driver's feet. Child occupant The child seat for the 3 year old child was unable to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact, there was no head contact to front seat which is important. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The CRS of the P3 was incompatible with the seat belt geometry of the vehicle Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Britax First Class Protected/Fair 0/0+/1 Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Britax First Class Vulnerable/ Fair 0/0+/1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO

Nissan Tiida Hatchback + Driver Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model NISSAN Tiida Hatchback Full 1.8l, LHD Body type4 door hatchback Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1411Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant In the frontal impact the driver head was well protected by the restrain system. The adult passenger head protection was weak due to the high decelerations, and the neck and chest protection was marginal. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia on driver and passenger side, that could be impacted by any occupants knees. The bodyshell showed that it can withstand further loadings. Child occupant The Child Restraint System (CRS) initially recommended by Nissan failed during the frontal impact resulting in excessive forward movement of the 3 year old dummy. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The chest protection offered to children was poor due to high loads.. Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Britax First Class Protected/Fair 0/0+/1 Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Britax First Class Vulnerable/ Poor 0/0+/1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO YES NO

Manufacturers Sponsored cars

Chevrolet Cruze LT + 2 Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model Chevrolet Cruze LT, LHD Body type4 door Sedan Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1627Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were both well protected by the restrain system. The chest protection was adequate. There were no knee and tibia contact points visible for the driver on the dashboard which is desirable. But there were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an larger occupants knees.. Child occupant The child seat for the 1,5 and 3 year old child offered sufficient protection. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle did give warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag. Both CRS have ISOFIX anchorage systems and were installed with the isofix connectors.. Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Peg Perego Primo Protected/Good 0+ ISOFIX rearward facing Viaggio Tri-Fix 3 year old Child Peg Perego Viaggio1 Protected/Fair 1 ISOFIX forward facing Duo Fix ASIP Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO YES

Ford Focus Hatchback + 2 Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model Ford Focus Hatchback, LHD Body type4 door Hatchback Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1517Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant The body structure is stable and suffered minimal deformation. The single stage and tethered airbags and belt pretensiones with load limiters worked well and kept the loading of the passengers quite low. There are hazard structures in the area of the driver and passengers knees. All doors could be opened easily after the impact. Child occupant The child restraint for the 3 year old was the Ford branded Römer Duo Plus, belted with the 3 point seat belt. The head was well protected while the chest acceleration was quite high. The 1 1/2 year old child was placed in a rearward fitted Ford branded Römer Baby Safe plus, belted, and well protected. The neck loads were lightly above the higher performance limits. Both CRS had permanent labels attached to the seats. Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Ford Romer Babysafe plus Protected/good 0+ Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Ford Romer Duo Plus Protected/ Fair 1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO YES NO

Manufacturers Sponsored NEW cars

NISSAN MARCH + 2 Airbags DriverFront passenger ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT Good Adequate Marginal Weak Poor Tested model NISSAN March 1.0 FlexFuel, LHD Body type4 door hatchback Year of publication2011 Crash test weight1175Kg Adult Occupant Protection Child restraints Safety equipment Car details Comments Adult occupant The dummy readings indicated good protection to the head.The protection offered to the drivers legs was weak due to rearward pedal displacement. There were hazardous structures in the fascia that posed a risk to both the driver and passenger knees. The body shell was not capable of withstanding further loading. Child occupant The child seat for the 3 year old child was unable to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact, even with a large excursion the head of the dummy did not have contact with the rear of the backrest of the driver seat which is very important. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. Nissan recommends not to put children in the front passenger seat. The 18 months old dummy showed adequate to good protection. Child restraint Head / chest CRS type adjust position 18 month old Child Chicco Proxima Protected/Fair 0/0+/1 Belted rearward facing 3 year old Child Chicco Key1 X-Plus Vulnerable/ Poor 0/0+/1 Belted forward facing Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag NO YES NO

Summary of Results