SIG Year Two Application Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Using Data to Improve Schools One child at a time……….. The Educator’s Role Pamela M. Kastner National Board Certified Teacher.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Planning Part II: Goal Setting
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Performance Monitoring COURTNEY MILLS SCPCSD DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Office of Service Quality
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Arizona State Systemic Improvement Plan Update State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report  All indicators are still significant and will be.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
NC State Improvement Project
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Presentation transcript:

SIG Year Two Application Process Where are we now? Where do we want to go? How are we going to get there?

Renewing of the Grant LEAs must set and track progress against benchmarks that demonstrate student achievement “The SEA’s decision to renew a grant is, in part, determined by progress towards these student achievement goals.” School Turnaround Group – Mass Insight Education http://www.massinsight.org/stg/research/additi onalresearch/evaluation-toolkit/

SIG Grant Year 2 Your plan needs to answer the following questions: Where are we now? Where do we want to go? How will we get there? How will we know we are there? How can we keep it going?

Implementation Status Identify the strategies/action steps you have completed from your Transformation or Turnaround goal of your CIP. Evaluate the effectiveness of the completion of the identified strategies/action steps. See planning sheet… What data do you have to confirm?

Stages of implementation Exploration –actively considering a change Installation –preparing for use of the innovation Initial Implementation –actively engaged in learning how to do and support the doing of the innovation Full Implementation –actively working to make full use of the innovation as part of the organizations typical functioning Innovation –Being able to make adjustments to implementation Sustainability –what’s working/best practices become part of the culture of doing the work Fixen, Blasé, Horner & Sugai(February)

Measuring Programs and Processes What was put into place in Yr1? To what degree was the program implemented? Who was it intended to serve? What was the intended, desired result? Did it do what it was supposed to? What data do we have to support this conclusion?

What’s working…what’s not… What in the Yr 1 SIG plan accomplished what it was supposed to accomplish? How will the LEA/school ensure the continued success? What’s needed to continue the success? What in the Yr 1 SIG plan didn’t accomplish what it was supposed to accomplish? Why? What are you going to do about it? What’s needed to correct this?

Time issues? Is there something in the Yr 1 plan that wasn’t implemented due to lack of time? Why did time run out? How will that be addressed in Yr 2?

Activity #1 “Table Talk” Assign a recorder for your discussion Accomplishments Evaluate progress on the mandatory components of the model chosen, using the LEA & School CIP strategies, action steps, and Budget Components Strengths What is working? What has been accomplished? Evidence? Needs Where do we need to continue our efforts? What adjustments need to be made? Data?

Student Achievement (Page 5 of application) Using the data from diagnostic testing (other than AIMS scores) down to the teacher and student level, describe the progress you are making regarding student achievement. (Attach any documents that show student level data.)

The Data Remember that data can be organized by: Levels: District, School, Grade, Classroom and Student level Content Areas: Reading, Writing, Math Standard Strand, Concept, Performance Objective Aggregated and Disaggregated: All students and subgroups

Analyzing student achievement data (including AIMS) (Section A of application) What is the trend in mathematics/reading for each grade level? Each subgroup? Which grade levels/subgroups are not moving in the right direction? Did percent proficient go up or down? What is the difference in achievement from last year and this year? What growth can be seen from the beginning of the year to the end of the year?

Analyzing Student data (including AIMS) What are the gaps between the sub- groups and “All Students”? Which grade level has the smallest/largest gap? What might contribute to these gaps?

Analyzing Student data (including AIMS) Has the performance of different subgroups of students improved over time(last three or four years)? What might be some of the reasons for the gaps between groups?

Specific to AIMS data How are students performing on AIMS? What percentage of students fell into each proficiency level (exceeds, meets, approaches, FFB)? What contributed to the student achievement scores? Is there a correlation between the benchmark scores and the AIMS results? If not, why?

Examples of other types of data Attendance records (teacher and student) Enrollment records All assessment data Teacher, student, and parent surveys Report cards Teacher evaluations Principal evaluations Progress charts or checklists Others?

Activity #2 As a group, discuss what types of data are available (academic as well as other). In what ways do we need this data be disaggregated? In what ways can this data show the growth of the school/LEA?

Interpreting the data Interpreting data gives staff an opportunity to explore the meaning of the results. Knowing what contributed to improvements is as important as knowing the results. The interpretation process digs deeper into knowing the reason for the results. (Why did we get what we got?) Example: How did the students with disabilities improve so dramatically in such a short time? What changes in teaching, resources, staff, or professional development occurred in this time that might have influenced the results?

Interpreting the data: the 5 whys… The 5 Whys is a questions-asking method used to explore the cause/effect relationships underlying a particular problem. Ultimately, the goal of applying the 5 Whys method is to determine a root cause of a problem. By repeatedly asking the question "Why" (five is a good rule of thumb), you can peel away the layers of symptoms which can lead to the root cause of a problem. Although this technique is called "5 Whys," you may find that you will need to ask the question fewer or more times than five before you find the issue related to a problem. Benefits Of The 5 Whys Help identify the root cause of a problem. Determine the relationship between different root causes of a problem. One of the simplest tools When Is 5 Whys Most Useful? When problems involve human factors or interactions.

Activity #3 How will the school/LEA ensure there is time to analyze and interpret the data? Who will be involved in this process? How will this interpretation be explained to stakeholders? (board, parents, community, teachers, students, new staff, etc.)

Now we know why…but what are we going to do about it? (Section C of the application) What in your plan specifically addresses the issues? Also important and not to be forgotten: What in your plan supports the strengths and gains that have been achieved?

Identify priorities and setting Yr 2 goals Specific & Strategic (what and why) Measurable (if you can measure it, you can manage it) Attainable (it will stretch you, but it is within reach) Results-based (must have an outcome) Time-bound (a clear beginning and a clear end point)

How will we achieve these goals? An action plan Action plans need to clarify how decisions are made, identify professional development required to learn new skills and gain new knowledge, and clarify the use of partners to achieve the vision.

Action planning

Things to remember… Make sure the action steps are realistic. Make sure the actions steps address the goal. Make sure the goal is based on a “need” that has data analysis to back it up. Make sure your goals will accomplish closing the achievement gap/ increase graduation rates.

Activity #4 When will the team convene to create action steps for next year? Who will be involved? For each person involved, what is their role? How will these action steps be communicated to stakeholders?

Addressing implementation within the action plan How will the use of what is adopted/implemented be monitored for fidelity? How will we monitor fidelity over a period of time? How will we know if the action is making a difference?

Remember…

Stages of implementation Exploration –actively considering a change Installation –preparing for use of the innovation Initial Implementation –actively engaged in learning how to do and support the doing of the innovation Full Implementation –actively working to make full use of the innovation as part of the organizations typical functioning Innovation –Being able to make adjustments to implementation Sustainability –what’s working/best practices become part of the culture of doing the work Fixen, Blasé, Horner & Sugai(February)

Activity #5 What is in place/ will be put in place to ensure fidelity? What parties will be responsible for seeing this happen?

The District/Charter Holder Role… is this in the plan? Ensure the school plan is aligned to the district/charter plan Review district and school data on a regular basis Provide recognition and support for schools making progress Create a district-wide “data culture”

The District/Charter Holder Role Develop an assessment plan used for every grade and every school Use/create a database to collect and provide immediate access to school achievement data Assist principals in scheduling enough time for literacy instruction Do walk-throughs to monitor the use of programs (we are not talking about coach or principal walk-throughs, but LEA walk- throughs)

The District/Charter Holder Role Ensure a scientifically-based core program and a menu of supplemental programs for struggling learners that are aligned with the core are in place Ensure on-going, job-embedded PD is in place and focuses on student achievement

Activity #6 What is currently in place at the district/charter holder level to support the SIG? What is currently not in place at the district/ charter holder level? How will this be addressed?

Questions?

Applications Annual Report/Year 2 Application due on July 8, 2012