Welcome Iowa Core Leadership Teams Peer Review Process Spring 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Overview for Parents and Guardians Fall 2010
Purpose of Instruction
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Leadership #1 February 1, 2012 Presenters: Judy Johnston Vonnie Kunkel 1.
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Formative Assessment A Maryland Race to the Top Initiative Denise Hunt NCSA June 2013.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
External Review Exit Report Midvale School District #433> December 3-4, 2014.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Customer Focus Module Preview
California Coalition of Early & Middle Colleges A coalition dedicated to strengthen and promote Early & Middle Colleges Fall Meeting September 27, 2013.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Session 7: Using the Tuning Protocol to Adapt Modules
Collaborative Data Teams
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Participants are expected to purchase the book Results Now Instructional Leadership.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Superintendent’s Zone Mission District Instructional Leadership Team Network Session #1 Karling Aguilera-Fort Regina Piper November 12, 2014.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
Nancy Steele Kelly Vanderbosch The Power of Teams in RtI as a Multi-Tiered System of Support.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
CFN 201 High School Principals’ Meeting Thursday, September 27, :00 – 3:45 p.m.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HEAEnet-public Password: education0309.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Administrator Support for PBIS Wayne RESA Chris McEvoy
Washington Unified School District Educational Services Division Curriculum and Instruction Department Aspiring Leaders Academy February 10, 2016.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Welcome Special Education Liaisons May 15, Overview of the Day Welcome Question/Answer Dr. Julia – (May 3) Debrief Learning Support Team Feedback.
Agile Education Teacher Presentation
February 8, 2017.
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT [SECOND]/[THIRD] QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
PBC Mary dowling.
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Welcome Iowa Core Leadership Teams Peer Review Process Spring 2011

Within the Iowa Core… what is your “Big Hairy Deal?”

Question #3: Next Steps..

Question #4: What help do you need from AEA and DE? Question #5: Was the Peer Review Process helpful? 94% said “YES”

Celebration!!!!

Today at a glance… Overview of the Process Peer Review Process (1 Round) Team Time/ Closure/ Feedback

Consider the following statements: Individuals or groups working together can usually produce better work than individuals or groups working in isolation. There is no piece of work that with more time, thought and effort couldn’t be improved.

Individuals or groups working together can usually produce better work than individuals or groups working in isolation. There is no piece of work that with more time, thought and effort couldn’t be improved. Individually, think about the past school year… With a partner, share your story

Peer Review Process The emphasis is on improving the work. The atmosphere is one of “we’re in this together.” Our single purpose is… “to make a good thing even better.”

Peer Review Process Rationale:  The Iowa Core… major priority for teaching & learning in Iowa  Implementation intended as a working plan of action… adjusted on a regular basis  Strength & success of implementation enhanced through collaboration within & among schools  Best opportunity to positively impact student learning in each & every classroom across Iowa

 to provide and receive feedback on the Iowa Core Implementation Plan… a collaborative, on-going process for strengthening the plan and its implementation Peer Review Process Purpose

To be effective, there are two beliefs that participants need to consider… 1. Individuals or groups working together can usually produce better work than individuals or groups working in isolation. 2. There is no piece of work that with more time, thought and effort couldn’t be improved. Peer Review Process (synergy) (continuous improvement)

Teachers Administration Community Leadership for Iowa Core

The Process: 20 minutes/20 minutes Progress Update & Next Steps (Team Presentations) 20 minutes Document Review (Teams work separately) Feedback (Teams together) (BREAK) (for PAIRS) 20 minutes/20 minutes Team time (Teams apart) 30 minutes

Guide for Feedback Conversations (20 minutes/ 20 minutes) EXAMPLE: You established a focus area for the year, and you stuck with it! You kept your Iowa Core priorities at the top of your agenda, and didn’t let other issues detour you from your plan. EXAMPLE: …creating a visual of some sort that represents the content of your implementation plan- and that “at a glance” can serve as a reminder of where you are in the larger process? (perhaps a GANTT chart) Or… additional ways to involve parents and your community in the good work that is happening in your school? EXAMPLE: …how will you maintain the momentum you’ve generated around this outcome, while moving on to others? In other words, how will the actions you’ve taken be established as a new way of doing business”?

Peer Review Process: Iowa Core Implementation Plan (for PAIRS) Progress Update & Next Steps (20 minutes each) (Teams Together) Document Review Imp. Plan Activities (20 minutes) (Teams Apart) Pull on-line stopwatch into this space

Take a break… Return by: 00:00

Peer Review Process: Iowa Core Implementation Plan (for PAIRS) Feedback (20 minutes each) (Teams Together) Team Time (30 minutes) (Teams Apart) Pull on-line stopwatch into this space

Please provide us with feedback on the peer review process. (one per TEAM) Google document preferable

Thank You!

The Process: 20 min/20 min/20 min Progress Update & Next Steps (Team Presentations) 20 minutes Document Review (Teams work separately) Feedback (Teams together) (BREAK) (for TRIADS) 20 min/20 min/20 min Team time (Teams apart) 30 minutes